• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Trump - Make America Great Again!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Now we just need to have the fossil, err Bernie, to declare himself as an Independent. That'll throw a monkey wrench in on the democratic side. Just hope the same doesn't end up ringing true if the GOP doesn't name Trump as their nominee. Trump running as an Independent would hand the presidency over the Hitlery. The GOP better not **** this up.
 
if Bern and Trump both go independent, then it would be a real **** up for both the Dems and Republicans
 
if Bern and Trump both go independent, then it would be a real **** up for both the Dems and Republicans

That would be interesting.

Or maybe someone else entirely could get in the race. Let's face it, most people aren't thrilled with Hillary or Trump. Have we ever had an election between two candidates whose approval ratings were this low?
 
Now we just need to have the fossil, err Bernie, to declare himself as an Independent. That'll throw a monkey wrench in on the democratic side. Just hope the same doesn't end up ringing true if the GOP doesn't name Trump as their nominee. Trump running as an Independent would hand the presidency over the Hitlery. The GOP better not **** this up.

Heck, I'd donate to his campaign personally if Bernie declared as an independent.
 
Bernie reminds me of ark
 
Trump could throw a wig on, slap on a little lip stick and run as a transgender woman. He would get a TON of votes and be able to use the bathroom with hot women and little girls.
 
Trump could throw a wig on, slap on a little lip stick and run as a transgender woman. He would get a TON of votes and be able to use the bathroom with hot women and little girls.

Oh c'mon... just throw a dress on him and he's covered. Already got the wig and the spray on tan.
 
We are in the general election


Trump vows to improve relations with Russia, China if elected U.S. president

Republican front-runner Donald Trump vowed on Wednesday to seek better relations with Russia and China if elected president in November and said he would make U.S. allies bear more of the financial burden for their defense.

In a major speech, Trump delivered a withering critique of Barack Obama's foreign policy, saying the Democratic president has let China take advantage of the United States and has failed to defeat Islamic State militants. He pledged to "shake the rust off America's foreign policy."

With U.S.-Russian relations strained over numerous issues including Moscow's support for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, Trump said "an easing of tensions with Russia from a position of strength" is possible.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-idUSKCN0XO10R
 
So how do you ease tensions with Russia, tell them we Love Assad too.

And how do you get better relations with China, when you first want to start a trade war with them and
place tariffs on their products.

Most of Trumps positions are contradictory and don't make much sense.

Our issues with China and Russia revolve around having conflicting interests. You either stand up for our interests
and have conflict or give in to Russia and China, making them happy and have better relations.
 
So how do you ease tensions with Russia, tell them we Love Assad too.

And how do you get better relations with China, when you first want to start a trade war with them and
place tariffs on their products.

Most of Trumps positions are contradictory and don't make much sense.

Our issues with China and Russia revolve around having conflicting interests. You either stand up for our interests
and have conflict or give in to Russia and China, making them happy and have better relations.

21Steelers,

Obama was wrong to try and oust Assad. ISIS is far worse. Keep a small dictator in check is the best option for now. Boot him out in the Middle East and the vultures and ISIS take part of the country's resources using some of them for terrorism against us and our allies.

Who says start a trade war? Just let China know in a quiet meeting that they must trade fairly, and do not attempt to manipulate currencies or there will be adverse changes. The days of them renting out the white house Lincoln Bedroom and using their money to buy USA politics are over.

The USA has most of the cards, but we play them like a 2 4 hand in Texas hold them with a 7, Jack, King Flop. Trump is 100% correct here.

These " politicians " get their pockets stuffed from foreign nations, some of which hate us. Hillary Clinton takes this money in shameless fashion. Very anti-American if you ask me,

Seriously the rest of the world who's not on our side will have an oh crap moment if Trump is elected President and our respect level in terms of Geopolitics, Terrorism, and International business will go way up.

Far above any level since Ronald Reagan, who the Russians's correctly feared.

Trump is a war guy. In fact, he didn't want the war in Iraq. Hillary Clinton voted for it.
 
The days of them renting out the white house Lincoln Bedroom and using their money to buy USA politics are over.

Oh yeah, those days are over lol...

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...ced-by-rich-chinese-who-invest-cash-for-visas

Throughout his presidential campaign, Donald Trump has attacked China and warned about the dangers of deficient immigrant screening.
"They’ve taken our jobs, they’ve taken our money, they’ve taken everything," he said of China in a speech late last month. He has called for a revamping, even a freezing, of the immigration system, but says he would make an exception for the highly skilled.
Yet no skills are required of the wealthy Chinese being courted by a Chinese-subtitled video to help finance a huge Trump-branded tower in New Jersey. The video leads viewers behind the wheel of a car into Jersey City with scenes of the tower, all to the tune of the theme song from The Sopranos, "Woke Up This Morning."
The video was produced to help raise tens of millions of dollars through a controversial government program that offers expedited visas to foreign investors overwhelmingly from China. While the program has many supporters who argue it attracts foreign capital and creates jobs at no U.S. taxpayer cost, congressional overseers and Homeland Security have raised sharp concerns. Applicants are sometimes cleared in less than a month and the critics say the government is essentially selling visas to wealthy foreigners with no proven skills, paving the way for money laundering and compromising national security.
 
So how do you ease tensions with Russia, tell them we Love Assad too.

And how do you get better relations with China, when you first want to start a trade war with them and
place tariffs on their products.

Most of Trumps positions are contradictory and don't make much sense.

Our issues with China and Russia revolve around having conflicting interests. You either stand up for our interests
and have conflict or give in to Russia and China, making them happy and have better relations.


Sure beats bending over and taking it in the backside like Obama has for 8 years.
 
Pennsylvania is Trump Country


Donald Trump Secures Vast Majority of Unbound Delegates in Pennsylvania

Donald Trump has won a vast majority of the unbound delegate count in the state of Pennsylvania, according to an ABC News analysis.

Of the 54 available free-agent delegates in the state, 39 of them told ABC News they will support Trump on the first ballot of the Republican convention.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/dona...ound-delegates-pennsylvania/story?id=38695683
 
Trump just gave his foreign policy speech and killed it. It was perfect.
No wonder you loved it.

ap_16118114842811.jpg


Here Are the Many Ways Trump's Big Foreign Policy Speech Made No Damn Sense
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/04/trumps-foreign-policy-speech

The real estate mogul's explanation of his foreign policy was completely incoherent.

Is the Donald Trump who supports torture and wants the United States to "bomb the **** out of ISIS" a thing of the past? The Republican front-runner certainly wants us to think so.

Trump gave a sedate but completely incoherent speech on foreign policy in Washington, DC, on Wednesday, hoping to burnish his image as the GOP's self-declared "presumptive nominee" and to put his inflammatory foreign policy statements behind him. As he did during his last major foreign policy speech before the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, Trump read from a teleprompter and seemingly tried to give off a calm, statesmanlike appearance.

At the start of the speech, Trump promised he would lay out a foreign policy "that replaces randomness with purpose, ideology with strategy, and chaos with peace." But there is simply no point in trying to pick out a Trump Doctrine or any sort of policy vision from Wednesday's speech. The address was a baffling combination of establishment GOP foreign policy talking points, attacks pulled from Trump's rallies and media appearances, red-meat jabs at President Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, and even an "America First" slogan once used by 1940s Nazi sympathizers to try and keep the United States out of World War II.

So, instead of trying to pick through the mess, here's a list, in no way comprehensive, of the many times Trump contradicted himself while laying out his alleged foreign policy:

We have to be both stable and completely unpredictable: Trump repeatedly said the United States had "no coherent foreign policy" and needed to again become a stable and dependable ally. How to do that? "We must, as a nation, be more unpredictable."

China is destroying the United States economically, but we have huge economic leverage over China: Trump loves to attack China, and he once again complained about the United States' large (but shrinking) trade deficit with China that's "letting them take advantage of us economically." But he also claimed that the Obama administration has huge, unspecified financial leverage over China, which isn't being used to make China take a tougher line against North Korea.

We'll be an incredible ally again. Also, our allies are freeloaders: Trump once again criticized other countries for not spending enough on their own defense. "Our allies are not paying their fair share," he complained, promising to somehow make them boost their defense budgets. He then pledged that America would again be a powerful and respected ally to the same countries he had insulted.

We can't waste money, but we have to spend a lot more on weapons: "Not one dollar can be wasted," Trump said of the federal budget, blaming much of America's supposed decline on government overspending and debt. He also called for the United States to pump cash into building new weapons to rebuild the American military, demanding hugely expensive and wasteful systems such as new fighter aircraft and warships.

Weapons are a scourge, but we have to spend a lot more on weapons: "The power of weaponry is the single biggest problem we have today in the world," he said, seemingly forgetting his demand that the United States spend billions of dollars more adding to that very problem.

We have to work with Muslim allies, but none of them are allowed to come here:
Trump promised he would work "very closely with our allies in the Muslim world" to help defeat ISIS and radical Islam. Seconds later, he once again demanded the United States temporarily halt Muslims from entering the United States. "A pause for reassessment will help us prevent the next San Bernardino," he said.

The foreign policy establishment has already reacted with almost universal horror to Trump's rise. A group of more than 75 Republican foreign policy experts blasted Trump in an open letter last month, saying he was "fundamentally dishonest" and "utterly unfitted" to be president. CIA Director John Brennan said he would refuse any orders to resume waterboarding or other acts of torture, which Trump has said he would bring back. Marine Gen. Joe Dunford, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, attacked torture as "inconsistent with the values of our nation" in response to Trump's comments. The Huffington Post this week described panic among current and former military officers at the prospect of a Trump presidency. Wednesday's speech likely won't do anything to change minds.
 
Last edited:
Hillary didn't run against 17 candidates. And the total primary votes so far favor the GOP by 3 million. That's just with Trump, Cruz, Kasich and Rubio. If you throw in all of the others it's even higher.

You just have to love how the liberals lie about everything. If she ran against even one more legit candidate, she would not have the votes or be winning at all. Trump was up against a lot of competition and that's the only reason he doesn't already have the delegates needed. He will kick the piss out of Hilldog in November. I have no doubts about it.
 
Here is Trumps Foreign Policy: "when I am President, our foreign policy will be Hugeeeeee, Humongous, Truly Awesome, Bestest Foreign Policy
Ever, Truly Hugeeeeee, I'm totally against war and would only use force as a complete last resort, but we will be so feared, feared Hugeeeely,
we will build so many big weapons, Hugeeee weapons, and so many of them, billions and billions of them, might have to evacuate Texas
to store them all, bombs and hand grenades for every man, woman and child, many many many Hugeeee weapons. But I'm totally against war
and we will never ever ever ever use any of them. The world will be so peaceful and the World will Love Me and Love us and birds will sing
and flowers will blossom and we will have the most awesome Peace ever, truly remarkable, Hugeeely Splendid.
 
Damn, when you get your *** handed to you by Lindsey Graham, it's probably time to throw in the towel.

Graham tears into Trump’s ‘pathetic’ foreign policy speech
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...rs-into-trumps-pathetic-foreign-policy-speech

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) tore into Donald Trump’s foreign policy address Wednesday in a series of tweets, saying, “Ronald Reagan must be rolling over in his grave.”

The outspoken senator called Trump’s speech at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington pathetic and incoherent.

“Trump speech is pathetic in terms of understanding the role America plays in the world, how to win War on Terror, and threats we face,” Graham wrote.

“Trump’s FP speech not conservative. It’s isolationism surrounded by disconnected thought, demonstrates lack of understanding threats we face.”

Graham also mocked Trump for using a Teleprompter to deliver the speech.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Not sure who is advising Trump on foreign policy but I can understand why he’s not revealing their names.</p>— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) <a href="https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/725368153988055042">April 27, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Question #1 for Trump: Are we sure the guy running the teleprompter has the pages in the right order? <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/notmakinganysense?src=hash">#notmakinganysense</a></p>— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) <a href="https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/725370408241876992">April 27, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Question #2 -- Did teleprompter guy actually write the speech? <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/notmakinganysense?src=hash">#notmakinganysense</a></p>— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) <a href="https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/725371534215401472">April 27, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Trump speech is pathetic in terms of understanding the role America plays in the world, how to win War on Terror, and threats we face.</p>— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) <a href="https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/725372336317288448">April 27, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Trump’s FP speech not conservative. It’s isolationism surrounded by disconnected thought, demonstrates lack of understanding threats we face</p>— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) <a href="https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/725375744709369857">April 27, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Final thought on Trump's foreign policy speech -- Ronald Reagan must be rolling over in his grave.</p>— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) <a href="https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/725376841268224000">April 27, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Last edited:
TMC hangs his head ins shame over Lindsey Graham
 
I'll take The Atlantic over Bob Corker, thank you.

Trump’s Incoherent Foreign-Policy Plans
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics...rine-is-america-first/480204/?utm_source=SFFB

The Republican front-runner delivered a formal address on his “America first” doctrine on Wednesday, TelePrompter and all.

A day after declaring himself the GOP’s presumptive nominee, Trump wanted to show the club of political insiders who have long snubbed him that, yes, he could give a sober, considered address on his vision for the world. Yet by design or not, the awkwardness of Trump’s presentation made clear that this was not the freewheeling anti-politician who has won the votes of more than 10 million Republicans over the last four months. There was no rapturous crowd of thousands to hear him at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, just a couple hundred people who responded to a few of his punchier declarations with meek applause. And while the address neatly summarized the various foreign-policy positions Trump has taken in interviews and at campaign rallies, it did not eliminate their inherent contradictions.

For Trump, the speech appeared to be an altogether uncomfortable experience, the kind of forced attempt at looking “presidential” that he has frequently scoffed at while campaigning. At times, he ad-libbed a “Not good!” or “Bad!” or “A mess!”—as if to signal to his fans that it was really him speaking, not some low-energy impostor with a battery missing. Trump concluded with a few extra platitudes, vowing to make America “strong” and “reliable” and, yes, “great again.” When he was done, the crowd applauded politely and Trump walked slowly off stage, finally done with a formal speech he seemed painfully unaccustomed to delivering.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top