• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Trump - Make America Great Again!

Status
Not open for further replies.
In the latest Iowa poll Trump trails Hitler by only 3 points, and he hasn't even taken her on yet. She's going to be destroyed.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/donald-trump/

That's one state. You are dreaming.

Hilarious to me that some of the same types of people who hated McCain and Romney for supposedly being RINOs are fans of Trump. Just because he yells and screams and says the government is stupid. I feel like I'm in bizarro world.

http://journal.ijreview.com/2015/08/246266-dont-fall-for-a-fake-conservative/

I ran for office because I was tired of being misled by Republicans who promised conservative government and gave us bank bailouts and more debt. The Wall Street bankers got richer and the American taxpayer got poorer.

The Tea Party erupted over dissatisfaction with false conservatives. It amazes me that anyone in the Tea Party movement could possibly consider Clinton/Reid/Pelosi supporter Donald Trump for President.

I honestly have no idea what Mr. Trump’s real philosophy is. He was liberal before he was conservative, and has openly professed for decades that his views are those of a Democrat.

In 1990, he said if he ever ran for office, he’d do better as a Democrat. He became an independent briefly in 1999 before he switched back to registering as a Democrat. In 2004, he identified more of his beliefs as those of a Democrat, especially on economic policy, stating on CNN that“it just seems that the economy does better under the Democrats than the Republicans.” He only registered as a Republican in 2009 before dropping the party again in 2011, only to re-register in 2012.

This is a guy who said in 1999 that he was a strong supporter of the United Nations. He was for partial birth abortion before he was against it. He lavished praise on the bank bailouts. He was for Obamacare before he was against it and has said he’s “liberal on health care.”

In the debate, I reminded Trump that conservatives in the GOP have spent decades opposing a single-payer system like the socialized medicine of Canada and England. He responded that I hadn’t heard his answer. The problem is, I had heard his answer and, like many of his answers, it made absolutely no sense. What I heard was that he was once for a single-payer system—today, he’s against Obamacare but still kind of likes the concept of single-payer and isn’t sure it works.

No conservative in America supports a single-payer government-run healthcare system, and yet around 25 percent of Republicans seem to favor Trump. How can this be possible? How can a quarter of the GOP support a guy who was a Republican, then an Independent, then a Democrat, and then a Republican again?

Are conservatives really willing to gamble about what Donald Trump really believes in?

It is refreshing to hear someone speak truth to power, to transcend Washington-speak, and cut through the staidness of our politically correct world but not when it is all blather, non-sequitur, and self-aggrandizing bombast.

Donald Trump is showing he isn’t suited to lead the country, and I think we all need to discuss why.

Frankly, it sounds too much like he is someone used to bullying to get his way. What do you do to a bully? You stand up to him. That’s what I did on the debate stage, and I was the only one.

The only one to tell Donald Trump that if he is willing to possibly give the election to Hillary, he shouldn’t be on the stage. That should be our first and uniting principle.

We don’t need a bully, and we don’t need another President who thinks he is King. We certainly don’t need someone who has driven his companies into bankruptcy four times yet smugly tells us he uses our nation’s Chapter 11 laws to his own personal advantage. All well and good for him – but what of the creditors and vendors he defaulted on?

Voters are hungry for a plain-spoken critique of Washington. But I’m unsure how credible that voice is when it comes from the consummate insider, a man who buys and sells politicians like he does Lamborghinis.

Trump has paid over 1.5 million dollars to politicians from both sides of the aisle, from Harry Reid to Rahm Emanuel to Jeb Bush. The majority of his donations were to Democrats until a few years ago when he began thinking more seriously of making a play for the Republican nomination.

(For the record, Donald Trump has NEVER donated to any of my political campaigns, perhaps because he knows I can’t be bought. He has donated to an eye institute that sponsored the medical mission I took to Guatemala where the funding was directly spent on our surgical work restoring sight to over 200 men and women.)

He has, however, put a significant down payment on Hillary Clinton—at least a $100,000 investment in the Clinton “Foundation” in addition to repeated donations to her campaigns—and acknowledges he spoke to Bill Clinton before he decided to pursue the Republican nomination. What kind of access was he purchasing?

I asked him in the debate why he’s hedging his bets. If he doesn’t win the GOP nomination will he support Clinton? Will he run as a third party candidate? Ross Perot gave us Bill Clinton. Will Trump give us Hillary Clinton?

Why give so much money to both sides?

That’s the problem with the system. Big Government and Big Business get in bed together, and the ordinary taxpayer ends up with the short end of the stick while our country is driven deeper into debt.

I for one don’t think you should run for President if you believe what Trump says about money in politics: “When you give, they do whatever the hell you want them to do.”

Isn’t this buying and selling what’s wrong with Washington?

Bill Clinton is under fire for accepting donations and high speaking fees from foreign governments while Hillary served as Secretary of State. I think it’s despicable that politicians like Hillary sell access. But isn’t it equally despicable for people like Trump to buy access?

It makes me sad to think that Tea Party awakening could be hijacked or hoodwinked by a guy who supported the bank bailouts, supported Obamacare, and continues to support the Clintons.

I was there at the first Tea Party in 2007 and I’ll be damned if I’m going to stand passively by and watch the movement destroyed by a fake conservative.

I will stand up to anyone, Republican or Democrat, who tries to use government as their own personal piggy bank and I won’t be bought or sold.

I will run this race on issues important to the American people. Unlike Trump, I have serious, specific proposals for the largest tax cut in American history and a five-year balanced budget. I offer real solutions to defeat the Washington Machine like ending corporate welfare, term limits and forcing Congress to read the bills.

We owe the American people substantive answers like that, not bluster and bombast. I plan to stand up to anyone who doesn’t have the temperament or ideas to be President. Maybe it’s time for the GOP voters to tell Mr. Trump he’s fired so we can find a serious candidate who will bring real change.
 
Part of the reason Trump is resonating with voters is the fact he isn't just a template "Republican" or template "Democrat". Maybe he does flip flop? Who cares? Everyone knows those elected flip flop all the time to the highest bidder. Everyone knows that once you get elected you can't possibly pass all those strong left or right legislation anyhow.

There was a great op-ed piece today on USA Today about how BOTH sides of the isle have become surprisingly monolithic. That both parties have become elitists that are more worried about keeping the broken system in place to benefit themselves than do anything for the people they represent. They look at average Americans as a thorn in their side toward governing. Just another pawn to manipulate each election cycle before they can get back to their glass houses and laws that keep them in power.

Americans are realizing we don't have a Democracy, we have a Plutocracy or a Oligarchy. They manipulate the 2-party system into making us think we have a say, but in reality we don't. Both sides over the last 20 years have basically governed the same way. Hell, it might go all the way back to Reagan and the 1980's.

All the left/right rhetoric is just a vehicle to distract us from what is really happening. The rich and powerful are governing the United States to best benefit themselves and maintain their power structure.
 
Donald Trump, rebelling against the 'rich and powerful oligarchy"? Standing up for the average citizen? LOL. Once again, bizarro world that anyone thinks this way.
 
Hillary explains why she went to Trump wedding

"I happened to be planning to be in Florida and I thought it would be fun to go to his wedding because it is always entertaining," Clinton said. "Now that he is running for president it is a little more troubling." Clinton tried to distance herself from Trump, saying, "I didn't know him that well."

trump_clinton.jpg


http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/10/politics/clinton-trump-wedding/index.html
 
Donald Trump, rebelling against the 'rich and powerful oligarchy"? Standing up for the average citizen? LOL. Once again, bizarro world that anyone thinks this way.

Against the media and foreign nations who don't trade fairly, HECK YES HE IS.
 
That's one state. You are dreaming.

Hilarious to me that some of the same types of people who hated McCain and Romney for supposedly being RINOs are fans of Trump. Just because he yells and screams and says the government is stupid. I feel like I'm in bizarro world.

http://journal.ijreview.com/2015/08/246266-dont-fall-for-a-fake-conservative/

I ran for office because I was tired of being misled by Republicans who promised conservative government and gave us bank bailouts and more debt. The Wall Street bankers got richer and the American taxpayer got poorer.

The Tea Party erupted over dissatisfaction with false conservatives. It amazes me that anyone in the Tea Party movement could possibly consider Clinton/Reid/Pelosi supporter Donald Trump for President.

I honestly have no idea what Mr. Trump’s real philosophy is. He was liberal before he was conservative, and has openly professed for decades that his views are those of a Democrat.

In 1990, he said if he ever ran for office, he’d do better as a Democrat. He became an independent briefly in 1999 before he switched back to registering as a Democrat. In 2004, he identified more of his beliefs as those of a Democrat, especially on economic policy, stating on CNN that“it just seems that the economy does better under the Democrats than the Republicans.” He only registered as a Republican in 2009 before dropping the party again in 2011, only to re-register in 2012.

This is a guy who said in 1999 that he was a strong supporter of the United Nations. He was for partial birth abortion before he was against it. He lavished praise on the bank bailouts. He was for Obamacare before he was against it and has said he’s “liberal on health care.”

In the debate, I reminded Trump that conservatives in the GOP have spent decades opposing a single-payer system like the socialized medicine of Canada and England. He responded that I hadn’t heard his answer. The problem is, I had heard his answer and, like many of his answers, it made absolutely no sense. What I heard was that he was once for a single-payer system—today, he’s against Obamacare but still kind of likes the concept of single-payer and isn’t sure it works.

No conservative in America supports a single-payer government-run healthcare system, and yet around 25 percent of Republicans seem to favor Trump. How can this be possible? How can a quarter of the GOP support a guy who was a Republican, then an Independent, then a Democrat, and then a Republican again?

Are conservatives really willing to gamble about what Donald Trump really believes in?

It is refreshing to hear someone speak truth to power, to transcend Washington-speak, and cut through the staidness of our politically correct world but not when it is all blather, non-sequitur, and self-aggrandizing bombast.

Donald Trump is showing he isn’t suited to lead the country, and I think we all need to discuss why.

Frankly, it sounds too much like he is someone used to bullying to get his way. What do you do to a bully? You stand up to him. That’s what I did on the debate stage, and I was the only one.

The only one to tell Donald Trump that if he is willing to possibly give the election to Hillary, he shouldn’t be on the stage. That should be our first and uniting principle.

We don’t need a bully, and we don’t need another President who thinks he is King. We certainly don’t need someone who has driven his companies into bankruptcy four times yet smugly tells us he uses our nation’s Chapter 11 laws to his own personal advantage. All well and good for him – but what of the creditors and vendors he defaulted on?

Voters are hungry for a plain-spoken critique of Washington. But I’m unsure how credible that voice is when it comes from the consummate insider, a man who buys and sells politicians like he does Lamborghinis.

Trump has paid over 1.5 million dollars to politicians from both sides of the aisle, from Harry Reid to Rahm Emanuel to Jeb Bush. The majority of his donations were to Democrats until a few years ago when he began thinking more seriously of making a play for the Republican nomination.

(For the record, Donald Trump has NEVER donated to any of my political campaigns, perhaps because he knows I can’t be bought. He has donated to an eye institute that sponsored the medical mission I took to Guatemala where the funding was directly spent on our surgical work restoring sight to over 200 men and women.)

He has, however, put a significant down payment on Hillary Clinton—at least a $100,000 investment in the Clinton “Foundation” in addition to repeated donations to her campaigns—and acknowledges he spoke to Bill Clinton before he decided to pursue the Republican nomination. What kind of access was he purchasing?

I asked him in the debate why he’s hedging his bets. If he doesn’t win the GOP nomination will he support Clinton? Will he run as a third party candidate? Ross Perot gave us Bill Clinton. Will Trump give us Hillary Clinton?

Why give so much money to both sides?

That’s the problem with the system. Big Government and Big Business get in bed together, and the ordinary taxpayer ends up with the short end of the stick while our country is driven deeper into debt.

I for one don’t think you should run for President if you believe what Trump says about money in politics: “When you give, they do whatever the hell you want them to do.”

Isn’t this buying and selling what’s wrong with Washington?

Bill Clinton is under fire for accepting donations and high speaking fees from foreign governments while Hillary served as Secretary of State. I think it’s despicable that politicians like Hillary sell access. But isn’t it equally despicable for people like Trump to buy access?

It makes me sad to think that Tea Party awakening could be hijacked or hoodwinked by a guy who supported the bank bailouts, supported Obamacare, and continues to support the Clintons.

I was there at the first Tea Party in 2007 and I’ll be damned if I’m going to stand passively by and watch the movement destroyed by a fake conservative.

I will stand up to anyone, Republican or Democrat, who tries to use government as their own personal piggy bank and I won’t be bought or sold.

I will run this race on issues important to the American people. Unlike Trump, I have serious, specific proposals for the largest tax cut in American history and a five-year balanced budget. I offer real solutions to defeat the Washington Machine like ending corporate welfare, term limits and forcing Congress to read the bills.

We owe the American people substantive answers like that, not bluster and bombast. I plan to stand up to anyone who doesn’t have the temperament or ideas to be President. Maybe it’s time for the GOP voters to tell Mr. Trump he’s fired so we can find a serious candidate who will bring real change.

I like Paul but don't see him as electable right now. Still a Cruzer.

Part of the reason Trump is resonating with voters is the fact he isn't just a template "Republican" or template "Democrat". Maybe he does flip flop? Who cares? Everyone knows those elected flip flop all the time to the highest bidder. Everyone knows that once you get elected you can't possibly pass all those strong left or right legislation anyhow.

There was a great op-ed piece today on USA Today about how BOTH sides of the isle have become surprisingly monolithic. That both parties have become elitists that are more worried about keeping the broken system in place to benefit themselves than do anything for the people they represent. They look at average Americans as a thorn in their side toward governing. Just another pawn to manipulate each election cycle before they can get back to their glass houses and laws that keep them in power.

Americans are realizing we don't have a Democracy, we have a Plutocracy or a Oligarchy. They manipulate the 2-party system into making us think we have a say, but in reality we don't. Both sides over the last 20 years have basically governed the same way. Hell, it might go all the way back to Reagan and the 1980's.

All the left/right rhetoric is just a vehicle to distract us from what is really happening. The rich and powerful are governing the United States to best benefit themselves and maintain their power structure.

No ****?
 
[video]https://video-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hvideo-xfp1/v/t42.1790-2/11845527_10155969599885725_557728957_n.mp4?efg=eyJ ybHIiOjU4NSwicmxhIjo1MTJ9&rl=585&vabr=325&oh=0661e3d3946276e4f102822e8f2f7420&oe=55CE7497[/video]
 
He called the establishment stupid and incompetent again. Love it.


The Pitbull won't let go of that red meat!

He smells more blood.


ha ha!


Trump: 'If they're honorable, they have no choice but to indict Hillary Clinton'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qaMeO0HoRr0

"She will have to drop out at some point."

"You can't have someone running who's under massive investigation, and at the highest level - potentially 20 years, in prison. I mean this is serious stuff."

"I mean how can you have somebody running and then all of a sudden they're indicted."

"If they're honorable, they have no choice but to indict her."

"I don't know how she can escape this. It's such a big problem."




The Don knows entertainment
 
sorry, Megyn is on vacation

article-0-0C355A06000005DC-427_468x698.jpg




Fox News poll: Donald Trump still leads GOP field

A new Fox News poll finds Donald Trump leading the GOP presidential field nationally with 25%, followed by Ben Carson at 12%, Ted Cruz at 10%, Jeb Bush at 9%, Mike Huckabee at 6%, Scott Walker at 6%, Carly Fiorina at 5%, John Kasich at 4%, Marco Rubio at 4%, Chris Christie at 3% and Rand Paul at 3%.

http://tampa.metrobugle.com/2015/08/...ads-gop-field/
 
Trump's immigration plan

Donald Trump unveiled his immigration policy paper on Sunday, pledging to “[put] the needs of working people first — not wealthy, globetrotting owners” and vowing to deport millions of undocumented immigrants.

Trump’s three principles of the plan include:

1. A nation without borders is not a nation. There must be a wall across the southern border.
2. A nation without laws is not a nation. Laws passed in accordance with our Constitutional system of government must be enforced.
3. A nation that does not serve its own citizens is not a nation. Any immigration plan must improve jobs, wages and security for all Americans.

Until Mexico pays for the wall, the United States would, “among other things,” “impound all remittance payments derived from illegal wages; increase fees on all temporary visas issued to Mexican CEOs and diplomats (and if necessary cancel them); increase fees on all border crossing cards – of which we issue about 1 million to Mexican nationals each year (a major source of visa overstays); increase fees on all NAFTA worker visas from Mexico (another major source of overstays); and increase fees at ports of entry to the United States from Mexico [Tariffs and foreign aid cuts are also options]”

The plan calls for the number of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers to triple, along with nationwide e-verify, the “mandatory return of all criminal aliens,” “detention-not catch-and-release,” defunding sanctuary cities, enhancing penalties for staying past temporary visas, cooperating with local task forces taking on gangs and ending birthright citizenship.

“The influx of foreign workers holds down salaries, keeps unemployment high, and makes it difficult for poor and working class Americans – including immigrants themselves and their children – to earn a middle class wage.

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), an immigration hard-liner with whom Trump consulted on the issue, praised it as “exactly the plan American needs.” Sessions, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s immigration subcommittee, said in a statement that “[p]olling shows this plan will appeal broadly to all segments of the electorate: prioritizing the just demands of loyal, everyday Americans who have been shunned by a governing elite.”

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/08/donald-trump-immigration-plan-121420.html#ixzz3j52v9aSe
 
Love the plan.......but he left out " force able bodied citizens collecting public assistance to "do the jobs Americans won't do." Gonna have to replace those bean pickers somehow.
 
Love the plan.......but he left out " force able bodied citizens collecting public assistance to "do the jobs Americans won't do." Gonna have to replace those bean pickers somehow.

Exactly...I'm waiting to see his plan for all that are sucking the government tit as a career.
 
The genius of Trump is he can package his political message in less than a minute. While fine details are needed, politician's seldom go into those type of details.

I think Trump's got a winning issue on illegal immigration. I worry a bit on his message on taxes. If he's getting the revenue from tariffs, or curbing foreign aid, that's fine. Just be sure to take in as much as we are currently, then the Dem's can't play the ohhhh he's going to cut XYZ because his taxing system won't have enough funds to social security.
 
If the rest of the candidates had sacked up and not been afraid of the media, Trump might not have a huge lead. Cruz and Fiorina are about halfway there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top