Dude, you're wrong, period. America HAS gone soft, it has. And if Hillary or Sanders said American was soft, hell, they might get a golf clap or two out me too. You expect that I should somehow be offended by those comments? It's dead accurate! And it needs to be addressed. Going "soft" is now killing people (i.e., being PC prevented neighbors from reporting the San Bernadino killers). He isn't saying that I am specifically soft, but if he wants to, that is fine too, because I'm an American citizen and if he wants to lump us all together and say we've all gone soft, I have no problem with that, because as a country, WE HAVE.
You clearly don't get the point about the rebuttal I was making about Trump and him being waited on. You tried, miserably, to combat Trump's soft comments, by saying there is nothing hard about being waited on hand and foot. Now, let me try to make this really simple for ya, ok, eh? I didn't say that Trump didn't have staff that waits on him. Instead, I said (again making it simple simple simple) - "what's the big deal? Those he is competing with - Hillary, and Sanders, and Obama - all have a staff too and are also waited on hand and foot." Hillary doesn't make her own sammiches. So why is Trump bad for being take care of, but they are not? Do we comprendo? If you want to attack Trump for being waited on, go ahead. But don't ignore the fact that each of those on the other side of the aisle are as well. This "condition" is not unique to one Donald Trump.
Dumbing this down on the secondary point...You try to say that Trumps life isn't hard, because he is rich (like Hillary and the rest). My point was he wasn't always rich. He may not live a hard life now, but I'm sure he hasn't forgotten what "hard" was like. He didn't grow up like Chelsea Clinton. Do you understand that rebuttal?
SMH man, wake up. Now you have me chuckling.