• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Trump - Make America Great Again!

Status
Not open for further replies.
deljzc said:
I said six months ago our country needs to stand up in the world and say we are against Sharia law.

If people want to construe that as being anti-Muslim, oh well.

Sharia and our constitution and what we stand for as a nation are incompatible. We used to be this way against Nazism and Communism and saved millions of peoples lives around the world fighting for democracy and self-determination (people today seem to forget that).

Now we "respect" countries' right to govern how they want or worship how they want, even when they are blatantly against civil liberties and any moral value system a reasonably, educated person would have.

Sharia has no place in our country. Period. End of discussion.

To me, "vetting" a Muslim before entering the country means having them denounce Sharia law and agree to follow laws of our country even when in conflict with the Quran. If they don't agree, you don't let them in.

I am that against Sharia and think it's the next worldwide political epidemic that our government leaders have continued to ignore and put their head in the sand about.
Click to expand...

Dr. Carson approves of this message.

madinsomniac said:
I forget... what is the punishment under sharia for Homosexuality, or for women being promiscuous, or women's rights in general...or for changing religions?

It seems like a great thing for the liberal side of the country to defend... When a type of government rails against basic human rights as being against what they want based on religious principles, its probably time to explicitly denounce that particular train of thought as wrong... I mean Christians get eaten alive for saying they don't support gay marriage, and here is something that advocates the death penalty, and more than in an old testament unenforced kind of way... like they really stone them... and women who are raped too... and people who decide they don't believe in it anymore...
Click to expand...

Yep. The "secular humanists" are in for the rudest of rude awakenings.
 
A "no" vote for the GOP candidate, even if it is Trump, is a vote for the Dem candidate. Turnout is crucial for a GOP win. The Dems use so many tricks/fraud to get votes (dead people, cats, dogs, illegals, multiple votes, etc.), all GOP votes count. So, if you don't vote or put in a write in, do not complain even a single time if a Dem wins because you, effectively, voted for them. You can sit there and shut up for the 4 or 8 years the Dem is in the White House further killing our great country.
 
TDX27 said:
A "no" vote for the GOP candidate, even if it is Trump, is a vote for the Dem candidate. Turnout is crucial for a GOP win. The Dems use so many tricks/fraud to get votes (dead people, cats, dogs, illegals, multiple votes, etc.), all GOP votes count. So, if you don't vote or put in a write in, do not complain even a single time if a Dem wins because you, effectively, voted for them. You can sit there and shut up for the 4 or 8 years the Dem is in the White House further killing our great country.
Click to expand...

Exactly. You don't see the Dems do that. They're about voting party all the way in November.
 
You can't not vote.

The real impact is not just Trump vs. Clinton, but the potential for Clinton to win AND the Senate swings back to the democrats (which is why I'm against the Senate blocking ANY Obama Supreme Court appointment - if you get a moderate, take it).

The Republicans have 54 current Senate seats.

There are SIX Senate races that are complete toss-ups right now:

Florida (Rubio's spot)
Illinois (leaning Democrat)
New Hampshire
Nevada (Harry Reid's spot)
Wisconsin (leaning Democrat)
Pennsylvania (leaning Republican)

Mostly, whoever wins the Presidential election gets these "toss-up" senate spots. Which is why Democrats have recently won back congressional seats in presidential election years and then lose them in off-cycle elections (because Democrats are stupid and don't vote in off-cycle elections).

The fear in not voting is getting Clinton + Democratic Senate for two years, which is a very real possibility. Even if you don't like Trump, please get out and vote to prevent that.
 
Great article from Buchanan:

AMERICA FIRST
NATIONALISM AND POPULISM PROPEL TRUMP
Pat Buchanan to establishment: Donald's message is here to stay, even if he is not

As the returns came in from South Carolina Saturday night, showing Donald Trump winning a decisive victory, a note of nervous desperation crept into the commentary.

Political analysts pointed out repeatedly that if all of the votes for Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, John Kasich, Jeb Bush and Ben Carson were added up, they far exceeded the Trump vote.



Why this sudden interest in arithmetic?

If the field can be winnowed, we were told, if Carson and Kasich can be persuaded to follow Bush and get out, if Cruz can be sidelined, if we can get a one-on-one Rubio-Trump race, Trump can be stopped.

Behind the thought is the wish. Behind the wish is the hope, the prayer that all the non-Trump voters are anti-Trump voters.

But is this true? Or are the media deluding themselves?

Watching these anchors, commentators, consultants and pundits called to mind the Cleveland Governors Conference of 1964.

Sen. Goldwater had just won the winner-take-all California primary, defeating Gov. Nelson Rockefeller, assuring himself of enough delegates to go over the top on the first ballot at the Cow Palace in San Francisco.

But with polls showing Barry losing massively to LBJ, the panicked governors at Cleveland conspired to block his nomination.

Michigan Gov. George Romney and Pennsylvania Gov. Bill Scranton were prodded to enter the race. Scranton would declare his availability in San Francisco with a letter accusing Goldwater of hostility toward civil rights – Barry had voted against the 1964 bill – and of excessive tolerance toward right-wing extremists such as the John Birch Society.

And what became of them all?

Goldwater won his nomination and went down in a historic defeat, but became a beloved figure and the father of modern conservatism.

Of those who turned their backs on Goldwater that fall, none ever won a presidential nomination. Of those who stood by Barry that fall, Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan, both would win the GOP nomination twice, and the presidency twice.

And the conservative movement would hold veto power over party nominees and become the dominant philosophy of the GOP.

Folks forget. Not only were there “liberal Republicans” and “moderate Republicans” back then, they dominated the landscape. Yet rare is the Republican today who would describe himself in such terms.

Which brings us back to the anti-Trump cabal.

Like the reporting you see here? Sign up for free news alerts from WND.com, America’s independent news network.

While their immediate goal is to deny him the nomination, do they really think that if the party nominates Rubio, things can be again as they were before Trump? Do they not see that America and the West are undergoing a series of crises that will change our world forever?

Bernie Sanders is not all wrong. There is a revolution going on.

Late in the last century, when Robert Bartley was editorial editor, the Wall Street Journal championed a constitutional amendment of five words – “There shall be open borders.”

Bartley, who told colleague Peter Brimelow, “I think the nation-state is finished,” wanted U.S. borders thrown open to people and goods from all over the world. To Bartley and his acolytes, what made America one nation and one people was simply an ideology.

But what was silly then is suicidal today.

Whatever one may think of Trump’s talk of building a wall, does anyone think the United States is not going to have to build a security fence to defend our bleeding 2,000-mile border?

Given the huge trade deficits with China, Japan, Mexico and the EU, the hemorrhaging of manufacturing, the stagnation of wages and the decline of the middle class, does anyone think that if Trump is turned back, the GOP can continue on being a free-trade party financed by the Beltway agents of transnational corporations?

Absent some major attack on the homeland, do our foreign-policy elites believe the American people would support new U.S. interventions to defeat, occupy and tutor Third World nations in liberal democracy?

Trump is winning because on immigration, amnesty, securing our border and staying out of any new crusades for democracy, he has tapped into the most powerful currents in politics: economic populism and “America First” nationalism.

Look at the crowds Trump draws. Look at the record turnouts in Republican caucuses and primaries.

If Beltway Republicans think they can stop Trump and turn back the movement behind him, and continue on with today’s policies on trade, immigration and intervention, they will be swept into the same dustbin of history as the Rockefeller Republicans.

America is saying, “Goodbye to all that.”

For Trump is not only a candidate. He is a messenger from Middle America. And the message he is delivering to the establishment is: We want an end to your policies and we want an end to you.

If the elites think they can not only deny Trump the nomination, but turn back this revolution and re-establish themselves in the esteem of the people, they delude themselves.

This is hubris of a high order.


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/02/nationalism-and-populism-propel-trump/#RUmZxYoEwClqjwB2.99
 
Ron Burgundy said:
Exactly. You don't see the Dems do that. They're about voting party all the way in November.
Click to expand...

Why do you suppose Trump is running as a Republican instead of an Independent?

He needs to run as a Republican as much as the Republicans need him not to run as an Independent.
 
So much for that theory from the bourgeois mainstream media pundits that Jeb's voters will go to Rubio and Cruz


Trump's Lead Grows with Jeb Out of the Race

With Jeb Bush out, Donald Trump has widened his lead in the race for the Republican presidential nomination.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of Likely Republican Voters finds Trump with 36% support, giving him a 15-point lead over Senator Marco Rubio who earns 21% of the vote. Senator Ted Cruz is in third place with 17%.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=DailyNewsletter
 
Ron Burgundy said:
Exactly. You don't see the Dems do that. They're about voting party all the way in November.
Click to expand...

I'm seeing some Bern supporters saying they won't vote for Hitlery. I think they, eventually, will see the light (or their vote gets cast for them)...
 
Cruz crumbles

Donald J. Trump ✔ ‎@realDonaldTrump
Wow was Ted Cruz disloyal to his very capable director of communication. He used him as a scape goat - fired like a dog! Ted panicked


Trump Rocks Vegas




ha ha

Trump: As president, I would prosecute Clinton

Donald Trump said Monday night that he believes Hillary Clinton will likely get away with her use of a private email server while she was secretary of state. But the GOP front-runner quickly revived the visibly disappointed Las Vegas audience by promising that as president, he would be sure to prosecute Clinton.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trump-as-president-i-would-prosecute-clinton/article/2583925
 
Last edited:
So how do all the Trump supporters feel about his support of the Obamacare mandate?
 
Last edited:
How many Blue Dog Dems and Independents will vote for Trump over Hillary?

alot
 
ark steel said:
I'm seeing some Bern supporters saying they won't vote for Hitlery. I think they, eventually, will see the light (or their vote gets cast for them)...
Click to expand...

Democrats are far more likely to stick with their party's candidate than we are when our guy doesn't win the primary. That's how Bomma got reelected.
 
Spike said:
trump-electric-chair.jpg
Click to expand...

"When I'm president, I'll build a chair, a really beautiful chair that works amazing, you'll really love it. And I'll make China pay for it."
 
Troglodyte said:
Just last week Trump said he support the Obamacare mandate and unlike his republican counterparts, wants to protect the entitlement programs.
Click to expand...
You keep saying that but Trump said he would immediately repeal Obamacare.
 
Troglodyte said:
Just last week Trump said he support the Obamacare mandate and unlike his republican counterparts, wants to protect the entitlement programs.
Click to expand...

link?
..........
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Steeltime
The Kurt Schlichter Update
Replies
1
Views
125
wig
W
Tibs
Christian Right even more dangerous in decline?
2
Replies
35
Views
513
Booted
Booted
Steeltime
Fact checking the fact checkers
Replies
4
Views
185
Stewey
Stewey
Djfan
Letter from Oathkeeper to Trump
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
SteelChip
SteelChip
SteelChip
Trump's great wall becomes trump's great stall
Replies
21
Views
2K
SteelChip
SteelChip
Top