Off topic on elfies alt accounts... I miss a few of them... didn't one show up right after the last banning? Lol
And the mythology grows....only Trumptards.
Off topic on elfies alt accounts... I miss a few of them... didn't one show up right after the last banning? Lol
Off topic on elfies alt accounts... I miss a few of them... didn't one show up right after the last banning? Lol
And the mythology grows....only Trumptards.
Yep, Polamalu43. That was obviously one of Elfie's alternative identities, which is why I frequently called her, "elfiePoloLiar." She lied and said Polo43 was not her, even after I cited the evidence showing otherwise (pattern of writing, political views, timing where elfiePoloLiar and Pola43 were never simultaneously active). I noted that the crazy *****, Pola43, shared the exact same political disease as elfiePoloLiar, and she responded, "See? Others share my views."
Seriously, I am not making this up. After I called her out and showed that she was posing as Pola43, she tried to claim that Pola43 - simply elfiePolo under a different user name - showed how reasonable her views were.
elfiePoloLiar - a bloated, clown-car, dimwit, snot-licking, fat-***, mumu-wearing liar.
And the mythology grows....only Trumptards.
It's called echo as he changes direction of fire, sniping window, or it's police returning fire.
See Wig this is textbook confirmation bias. You're not alone.
Oh really. How much shooting have you done?You're a dumb ****. Yeah the police just shot up at the building blindly returning fire. ******* moron.
Oh really. How much shooting have you done?You're a dumb ****. Yeah the police just shot up at the building blindly returning fire. ******* moron.
Sure...because a patrol officer armed with an M-16, but not armed with proper SWAT procedures couldn't have seen muzzle flash and decided to return fire.
And I guess Kent State never happened according to your thinking either.....dumb ****.
you're now slipping back into your state of lunacy. you honestly think LV police "patrol" the city with M16s?
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-la...release-body-camera-1507083588-htmlstory.html
Sure...because a patrol officer armed with an M-16, but not armed with proper SWAT procedures couldn't have seen muzzle flash and decided to return fire.
k.
No, you stupid ********. There isnt a single officer, SWAT or Patrol, that would return fire towards a populated hotel. EVER.
So stop talking about **** you have no idea about.
No, you stupid ********. There isnt a single officer, SWAT or Patrol, that would return fire towards a populated hotel. EVER.
So stop talking about **** you have no idea about.
you are correct. EVER. There's no way they would do that. Way too many variables.
Yes because the decision to surpress fire that is wounding /killing multitudes of people is not worth the risk of maybe hitting someone in an adjacent room.
Let me guess; you and Badcat reached the rank of General in the military?
Yes because the decision to surpress fire that is wounding /killing multitudes of people is not worth the risk of maybe hitting someone in an adjacent room.
Let me guess; you and Badcat reached the rank of General in the military?
Like sands through the hourglass, so are the days of our lives.
Sent from my iPhone using Steeler Nation mobile app
In the trunk idiot.....Jesus Christ it's staggering.
ah, so in the trunks of police cars is a small arsenal of weapons.
as you say ... you can't make this **** up.
No, actually, I slept at a Holiday Inn last night.
Think of what you are suggesting, standing outside a hotel, shooting up at the 32nd floor, in the dark among the chaos and civilians around. It's not smart. You don't have to be military or LEO to think that is a really bad decision.
ah, so in the trunks of police cars is a small arsenal of weapons.
as you say ... you can't make this **** up.
of course elfie is right. ze is never wrong.
and, for those of you paying attention, ze has now claimed to be a firearms expert.
update your scorecards. there will be a test at the end of class.