Of course
2022 Midterms Thread
- Thread starter Tim Steelersfan
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 18,588
- Reaction score
- 29,948
- Points
- 113
- Location
- The nearest Steelers bar.
Remember when both sides - (D) and (R) - were so pissed at Rand Paul when he asked where all those billions we gave to Ukraine were going?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2014
- Messages
- 3,320
- Reaction score
- 3,237
- Points
- 113
This whole FTX issue has Dem fingerprints all over it. The CEO was basically taking every dollar even from his own employees buying FSS coins, backing loans while sending tons of dollars to the Democrats. All the money is gone....billions. Word is the CEO jumped on a private plane to escape extradition to the US. Guy was worth 16 billion just last week and zero today.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 20,529
- Reaction score
- 22,335
- Points
- 113
Congrats to people who keep voting for ******* criminals who could give two ***** about you,your family or this country . Brav ****** O.
Floggy: This isn't corruption, you're stupid. Alex Berenson - New York Times former reporter who I used to lick his nut sac - is a tin foil hat conspiracy theorist!! JFC!
Notice how throughout this election cycle the MSM's position was to question every R candidate - "will you continue to support sending money to Ukraine to support the war?"
Weird.
Not that there is a Cabal or anything.
I hear you.It gets caught all the time, the issue is that neither party is interested in fixing anything because the current system makes money hand over fist for both of em… my gosh a democrat once sued his opponent in open court claiming that his opponent offered to pay more per vote than they had verbally agreed on prior to election day
The whole thing is too corrupt to fix at this point… i vote third party in hopes that one day it will win something and all the uniparty scum will panic and finally drop their false pretenses and unite under one overbearing totalitarian party like it really is… then at least people will really know where we stand…
Did you really think Mitch McConnell and the majority of those Republican politicians stand for anything? They weren’t going to let populists win that might upset their power applecart… I find it funny yet sad.
Career politicians are all theater. Not for us
Wait til the ukraine decides to start attacking us. All those weapons we send are going to backfire(no pun intended)
Affiliates still follow a national major corporation. Whether the wording is by national corporation or not it does raise some questions
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2014
- Messages
- 3,320
- Reaction score
- 3,237
- Points
- 113
Add three more in the last 6 hours....204 Dems to 211. Plus 23 in the last 48 hours. Republicans at 211....static for the last two plus days.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,435
- Reaction score
- 5,504
- Points
- 113
Clearly, I didn’t have to watch the video. For it to be mathematically impossible for a candidate to win an election, first they must be losing the election. Prove me wrong.
This should be good…
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,435
- Reaction score
- 5,504
- Points
- 113
Judge: Trump signed court document that knowingly included false voter fraud stats
Former President Donald Trump signed legal documents describing evidence of election fraud that he knew were false, a federal judge indicated Wednesday.
www.politico.com
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,435
- Reaction score
- 5,504
- Points
- 113
JFC, the source doesn’t run the election, the state does.
So, if Lake wins, it’s corrupt?
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2014
- Messages
- 6,982
- Reaction score
- 6,963
- Points
- 113
Kari Lake is not going to win. They are going to manufacture enough "mail in ballots" to put Hobbs in office.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,435
- Reaction score
- 5,504
- Points
- 113
Simple yes or no question.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,435
- Reaction score
- 5,504
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 18,588
- Reaction score
- 29,948
- Points
- 113
- Location
- The nearest Steelers bar.
Yep.
Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.
Shame on me for actually believing these elections would be different than 2020 and the "plumbing leak" and the counting stops and the 81 million "votes" and this:
These scumbag liars actually did THIS right in front of our eyes and we did nothing. NOTHING.
When Biden gets 99.46% of the vote next election, I won't be surprised and won't care. Run all the phony "elections" you want. I'm not playing and I'm not paying.
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2014
- Messages
- 6,982
- Reaction score
- 6,963
- Points
- 113
She was not winning a few days ago...
Watch the video, then back up your claim.
It's a discussion about where the ballots are from, but more importantly known missing ballets. As in, we can validate 50,000 (Rs) voted and those specific votes have not been counted. And when you look at the number of ballots remaining to be counted, the math is pretty evident.
The election process in my state needs to be completely overhauled. It should not take a week to determine the winner of any election.
Hobbs is an extremely weak candidate, refused to debate and would only answer questions from people she knew.
She's even in charge of the election, and never recused herself. While not a big believer in polls, Lake was up by 5-7 points on election day.
Add to this, polling place irregularities in predominately R areas, and any rational person would question this, regardless of which way they lean politically.
Did I mention that my vote still hasn't been counted?
So, unlike you when asked many yes or no questions over the years, I will answer.
Lake should win easily, it's the process that's corrupt.
Well it's pretty simple. You're Hobbs and you're overseeing the state's election. No conflict of interest there either.
You know there are 100,000 votes remaining. You're up by 12K. You know the votes remaining - election day drop offs from Maricopa and Pima - favor Repubs 4 to 1.
You have a choice. Open them, concede.
Or...manufacture mail ins to account for the difference.
At this point, no one has any confidence that Hobbs (who's running for Governor AND running the election) and the corrupt AZ elections haven't already counted all of the ballots. They know the outcome already. How do you cure and get enough mail ins now is the game while still claiming the election was legit. Even when legit states finished counting days ago.
Maricopa gets cheeky with constituents. Lake's War Room responds.
This is daming.
www.uncoverdc.com
No matter what the results of the midterm elections are in Arizona, Maricopa County is yet again at the center of controversy, and for a good reason.
Election judge Michele Swinick has come forward to report what she experienced in Maricopa County on Election Day. She worked Election Day as a judge at the Islamic Voting Center in Scottsdale, AZ. She reports that the center is heavily Republican, with “no party” designated voters as the second most populous demographic, followed by very few democrat voters, evidenced by the fact that she checked in very few of them on Election Day. She reports she spent the entire day checking in voters.
Swinick says that the tabulators all worked “perfectly” during the test the night before the election. The problem with scanning began immediately with the first ballots. Voters scanned their ballots between 4 and 12 times with very minimal success. Poll workers estimated about 1 in 10 ballots were being read for the first three hours of voting.
Voters were given options to either spoil their ballots and try again or drop them into a different section called “Door 3.” As per Swinick, their inspector had to empty the ballots from “Door 3” three times throughout the early afternoon because of the volume of ballots. Typically, ballots aren’t supposed to be removed from that box until polls close, but they made an exception because the box was jamming and became too full.
Swinick reports that the technician came to the center between 3:30 pm and 4:00 pm MT and rebooted the machines. After this, there were no further issues with ballots being run through tabulators. She reported that one of the poll workers told her, “Everything is now going smoothly with the tabulators.”
Per Swinick’s inspector, an offsite supervisor had advised “Because of the situation” to put all “door 3” ballots that had not been scanned through a tabulator into a separate black bag and to label them “misreads.” As a judge, Michele told UncoverDC that she personally signed the sticker placed over the bag’s zipper, and then these bags were sent to the tabulation center to be counted. Michele informed us that the normal process for a ballot that is “unread” is for poll workers to run the ballots through the tabulators one more time before sending them to the center. As per Swinick, this was not done.
The County had set up a website to give voters the ability to check that their vote was counted. The problem is Michele has proven that the website isn’t correct and seems to be using a voter’s “check in” as evidence their vote was tabulated rather than the actual tabulation of the vote. Michele offered her first-hand proof of this.
“My roommate ran his ballot through the tabulators 15 times as one of the 1st voters at the Islamic Center. It did not read the ballot. He was forced to drop it in door #3.
About an hour after I arrived home at 9 pm MT, my roommate checked the website to see if his vote had been counted. The website reported it was. It is mathematically impossible for his vote to have been counted by then since only an hour before, I left the center, and the ballots had not been taken from the center to the meeting point where the ballots are hand exchanged to another transport team, which takes them to the tabulation center. For his ballot to have been counted, it would have also needed to be sorted and hand-counted by a team at that center and reported into the website —all within that hour.
In the case of In Person/Day of Voting, this proves the reporting of his ballot being received & counted is actually based on his being checked into the Voting Center and him receiving a ballot to be cast—NOT his ballot being scanned and read through the tabulator or hand counted at the tabulation center.”
Michele has also been threatened by her supervisor (first name Timothy) for speaking out about what she has witnessed. He called her and said they “have been scouring social media and saw posts (that Michele) would be going on several podcasts to report information about the election.” Michele told UncoverDC that she was questioned about her podcast, what it’s about, and that they accused her of already appearing on other podcasts earlier in the day, even though, at the time, that was untrue. As per Swinick, her supervisor told her, “if I find out you have gone on any podcasts, I will terminate you.”
UncoverDC asked Michele for her opinion of what was going on, given her experience. She said:
“In my opinion, the machines were programmed to do this, and it was all planned. The process and narrative, both machines and people. It was brilliantly done. They isolated the ballots to replace or not count them in 223 bags. The hard part for them in 2020 and during the primary was getting the ballots to match their manufactured machine count. This way, they have everything isolated in the bags.”
Michele will be appearing today at 5 pm ET on the Zelenko Report. You can watch it by clicking this link.
Maricopa County Election Judge Speaks Out - UncoverDC
No matter what the results of the midterm elections are in Arizona, Maricopa County is yet again at the center of controversy, and for a good reason.
www.uncoverdc.com
No matter what the results of the midterm elections are in Arizona, Maricopa County is yet again at the center of controversy, and for a good reason.
Election judge Michele Swinick has come forward to report what she experienced in Maricopa County on Election Day. She worked Election Day as a judge at the Islamic Voting Center in Scottsdale, AZ. She reports that the center is heavily Republican, with “no party” designated voters as the second most populous demographic, followed by very few democrat voters, evidenced by the fact that she checked in very few of them on Election Day. She reports she spent the entire day checking in voters.
Swinick says that the tabulators all worked “perfectly” during the test the night before the election. The problem with scanning began immediately with the first ballots. Voters scanned their ballots between 4 and 12 times with very minimal success. Poll workers estimated about 1 in 10 ballots were being read for the first three hours of voting.
Voters were given options to either spoil their ballots and try again or drop them into a different section called “Door 3.” As per Swinick, their inspector had to empty the ballots from “Door 3” three times throughout the early afternoon because of the volume of ballots. Typically, ballots aren’t supposed to be removed from that box until polls close, but they made an exception because the box was jamming and became too full.
Swinick reports that the technician came to the center between 3:30 pm and 4:00 pm MT and rebooted the machines. After this, there were no further issues with ballots being run through tabulators. She reported that one of the poll workers told her, “Everything is now going smoothly with the tabulators.”
Per Swinick’s inspector, an offsite supervisor had advised “Because of the situation” to put all “door 3” ballots that had not been scanned through a tabulator into a separate black bag and to label them “misreads.” As a judge, Michele told UncoverDC that she personally signed the sticker placed over the bag’s zipper, and then these bags were sent to the tabulation center to be counted. Michele informed us that the normal process for a ballot that is “unread” is for poll workers to run the ballots through the tabulators one more time before sending them to the center. As per Swinick, this was not done.
The County had set up a website to give voters the ability to check that their vote was counted. The problem is Michele has proven that the website isn’t correct and seems to be using a voter’s “check in” as evidence their vote was tabulated rather than the actual tabulation of the vote. Michele offered her first-hand proof of this.
“My roommate ran his ballot through the tabulators 15 times as one of the 1st voters at the Islamic Center. It did not read the ballot. He was forced to drop it in door #3.
About an hour after I arrived home at 9 pm MT, my roommate checked the website to see if his vote had been counted. The website reported it was. It is mathematically impossible for his vote to have been counted by then since only an hour before, I left the center, and the ballots had not been taken from the center to the meeting point where the ballots are hand exchanged to another transport team, which takes them to the tabulation center. For his ballot to have been counted, it would have also needed to be sorted and hand-counted by a team at that center and reported into the website —all within that hour.
In the case of In Person/Day of Voting, this proves the reporting of his ballot being received & counted is actually based on his being checked into the Voting Center and him receiving a ballot to be cast—NOT his ballot being scanned and read through the tabulator or hand counted at the tabulation center.”
Michele has also been threatened by her supervisor (first name Timothy) for speaking out about what she has witnessed. He called her and said they “have been scouring social media and saw posts (that Michele) would be going on several podcasts to report information about the election.” Michele told UncoverDC that she was questioned about her podcast, what it’s about, and that they accused her of already appearing on other podcasts earlier in the day, even though, at the time, that was untrue. As per Swinick, her supervisor told her, “if I find out you have gone on any podcasts, I will terminate you.”
UncoverDC asked Michele for her opinion of what was going on, given her experience. She said:
“In my opinion, the machines were programmed to do this, and it was all planned. The process and narrative, both machines and people. It was brilliantly done. They isolated the ballots to replace or not count them in 223 bags. The hard part for them in 2020 and during the primary was getting the ballots to match their manufactured machine count. This way, they have everything isolated in the bags.”
Michele will be appearing today at 5 pm ET on the Zelenko Report. You can watch it by clicking this link.
Similar threads
