• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

2022 Midterms Thread

Do I like Katie Hobbs? No. But the election aligned very closely with polls.
While I will certainly agree with your first statement, I will respectfully disagree with the second. Most polls had Lake up by 5 point approaching election day, add to that the nearly 1/3 of the polling locations in the county having issues, gives people a legitimate reason for concern about the entire process. I voted on election day, placed the ballot in the tabulator and it gave an immediate confirmation of my vote. So why did it take a week before the county acknowledged it? Hobbs may have won, but the current process is a joke.
 
Hobbs may have won, but the current process is a joke.

And that's the problem, isn't it? "Hobbs may have won" is absolutely a correct statement and the "may have" part is the reason for concern.

(D)imbos simply dismiss the legitimate reasons why "may have" is the best we can say. As long as their candidates win, "may have" is good enough for them.

Again, time to hand out ballots by the tens of thousands - millions - at rallies and have attendees turn them in. "Oh my God, what if they are not valid???" Too ******* bad - (D)imbos made this mess and have no interest in cleaning it up.
 
And that's the problem, isn't it? "Hobbs may have won" is absolutely a correct statement and the "may have" part is the reason for concern.

(D)imbos simply dismiss the legitimate reasons why "may have" is the best we can say. As long as their candidates win, "may have" is good enough for them.

Again, time to hand out ballots by the tens of thousands - millions - at rallies and have attendees turn them in. "Oh my God, what if they are not valid???" Too ******* bad - (D)imbos made this mess and have no interest in cleaning it up.
And this was the point I was trying to make. Hobbs may have well won, but with this system, who the hell knows.
 
Secretary of State Hobbs, not to be confused with Governor elect Hobbs is suing Cochise and Mohave Counties for delaying their certification of the election, threatening them with 2 year prison terms.

But, nothing to see here, everything is just fine.
 
Nothing to see here either

 
Americans want valley girls representing them in government. Everybody knows that!
 
Secretary of State Hobbs, not to be confused with Governor elect Hobbs is suing Cochise and Mohave Counties for delaying their certification of the election, threatening them with 2 year prison terms.

But, nothing to see here, everything is just fine.

No conflict of interest here. What a cool set them have going on. She's the judge,jury and executioner.
 
My favorite part of the article.

Kelly won the race by 51.4 percent to Masters’ 46.5 percent, a difference of about 125,000 votes.

The RealClearPolitics polling average had the race pretty much at a dead heat going into Election Day. Kelly ended up winning the match-up 51.4 percent to Masters’ 46.5 percent, a difference of about 125,000 votes.


Hard hitting **** right there.
 
This **** is just considered normal now. They coined the phrase "election deniers" to protect the methods they employ.


Lawsuit filed in Maricopa County reveals “steroid-like injection” of 225,171 “inactive” voters just before Nov. 8

1669993553612.png

This allowed for:

An inflated turnout rate

Headaches for those deemed “inactive” at the polls

Possibility of throwing out votes if the arcane Election Procedures Manual, written by Katie Hobbs, was not followed by poll workers who were not trained on inactive voters

1669993595249.png
1669993614472.png
1669993645979.png

Who was put on the “inactive” list?

Might they have been inclined to vote Republican 🤔
Lawsuit also shows how Arizona’s Election law was broken regarding malfunctioning machines:

“There is no option in the statute which allows the machines to continue in use when they are obviously failing to read ballots. But that didn’t happen at many of the 223 locations...”

1669993680742.png

Josh Barnett discusses his lawsuit here

 

Attachments

  • 1669993628812.png
    1669993628812.png
    289.5 KB · Views: 0
  • 1669993634354.png
    1669993634354.png
    289.5 KB · Views: 0
Truly a beautiful article. If you read only one today, let this be it.


This is a “brief history” because the complete history of Democrat electoral malfeasance reaching back to Tammany Hall and Tweed would require four volumes or more. (I’m running into the same problem with a new book I’m outlining analyzing the Democrats as a criminal organization, much like the Mafia or the Camorra.)

So a brief history it is, limited to the past thirty years or so. Believe you me, there’s no lack of cases even in that short span.

The Dinkins Magic Voting Machines

Just days before voting in the 1993 David Dinkins/Rudolf Giuliani election, the New York Times reported that a number of voting machines had been found in a closed Manhattan school. All the machines were loaded with votes for Democrat incumbent David Dinkins.

Voting proceeded without the help of those machines, and of course Rudy was elected. But that was the end of it. As far as I’ve been able to learn, there was no investigation, no inquiries, or, for that matter, any further reportage on it. A Democrat attempt to steal the NYC mayoral election was flushed down the memory hole.

An Inconvenient Decision

We all know the absurdist story of the 2000 presidential election. But it’s often overlooked that Al Gore was attempting an outright steal of a presidential election, a bold move not to be repeated until 2020 – and he attempted it with the open assistance of the judiciary.

The leftist version is well known, since it’s all we ever hear – George W. Bush was only ahead by 900 votes in Florida when Gore, in the pure interest of fairness, requested a simple recount, at which point the right-wing extremist Supreme Court leapt in and handed the victory to Bush by fiat. (This, by the way, has served as an excuse for all electoral cheating since that point – “the GOP started it in 2000… We have to cheat, to protect democracy.” As to what excuses the myriad cases of cheating that occurred beforehand… well, don’t ask me. I dunno.)

What actually happened is that Gore’s crowd created a strategy in which every possible vote-counting method would be utilized, with recounts repeated as many times as necessary until one was finally discovered that would overturn the results. These included attempts to carry out recounts only in Democrat strongholds such as Dade County while shutting down any such efforts on the Panhandle, home to many military retirees.

The Bush campaign took Gore to court to prevent such schemes, until finally, given the opportunity at last, the Florida State Supreme Court – almost exclusively Democrat-appointed -- found in favor of Gore’s demand that ‘undervotes” – ballots showing no presidential vote at all – be counted, while at the same time “awarding” him nearly 500 votes, a novel concept unheard of in American jurisprudence up to that date.

It was here, facing the prospect of a presidential election thrown by a corrupt Democrat court in full public view and in defiance of established precedent, that the U.S. Supreme Court finally stepped in, overturning the Florida court’s decision and ending the recount circus. Bush won with 537 votes. (A later media recount showed that Bush’s lead would have held in any reasonable recount process.)

Votes from the 8th Dimension

The 2004 Washington state gubernatorial contest between Republican Dino Rossi and Democrat Christine Gregoire ended with Rossi up by 261 votes. A machine recount left him still ahead by 42 votes. The state Democrats paid over $700,000 for a hand recount, and whaddaya know… Votes started appearing from any and all conceivable sources. A bag containing votes here… an electoral official’s car there… it’s surprising they didn’t start falling out of the sky like the frogs in Magnolia.

By the end of the year Gregoire was ahead by 130 votes and was inaugurated on January 12. Rossi, God love him, continued fighting, taking Gregoire to court over the blatantly illegitimate votes. A Pierce County judge tossed the votes out, only to be overruled by the Washington State Supreme Court. A final decision didn’t come for six months, when Judge John Bridges, a Democrat appointee, tossed aside the concept of “chain of custody” to find in favor of Gregoire. Rossi should have continued on to the U.S. Supreme Court – after all, a critical legal concept was being overthrown – but he does get an E for Effort, since he did more than any other Republican in recent memory.

The Washington case enshrined the concept that all Democratic votes, whether they emerged from a portal into hyperspace or were discovered in a 2000 B.C. Sumerian temple, had to be counted no matter what the circumstances. GOP votes… not so much.

Goshdarnit, People Liked Him

A similar chain of events occurred in the election of Al Franken in Minnesota in 2008. Incumbent Norm Coleman originally prevailed with over 700 votes, which were mysteriously whittled down to 200 in short order. Franken called for a recount, and begorrah, the votes suddenly started appearing. Some, anyway -- an envelope of votes from one county simply disappeared, but were counted regardless, the totals evidently being read out from tea leaves. By the time it all ended, Franken was ahead by 312 votes. Coleman, a Republican gentleman of the old school, made perfunctory efforts at protest, but was undercut by the GOP itself, led by former governor Arne Carlson, a RINO to rule them all, who had refused to endorse Coleman during the campaign.

Shortly after the election, it was discovered that at least 1,099 illegal votes had been cast by felons, and this had been known during the vote count, but had been ignored. Franken exchanged his diapers for a suit and spent the better part of two terms voting the way he was told and embarrassing his party before being forced out during the “MeToo” craze.

Trump Agonistes

At this point anyone who needs convincing about cheating during the 2020 election needs their own personal TED Talk covering it. While media keeps telling us it has been “debunked,” they never quite get around to details such as when, where, by whom, and on what grounds.

What’s often overlooked is that 2020 was layered operation, with efforts taking place from the most exalted corridors of power down to the lowest one-legged precinct worker. Consider the Hunter scandal(s). Following the NY Post’s blockbuster report, 52 members of the “Intelligence Community” published a letter in Politico asserting that it was a Russian dezinformatsiya exercise. Intelligence operatives also approached social media outlets such as Twitter and Facebook with the same yarn, with Dorsey and Zuckerberg eagerly censoring the story. The entire saga, featuring hookers, crack, stifled investigations, payoffs from China and Ukraine, and 10% for the "Big Guy," was buried until well after the election. This, playmates, goes by the term “election interference.”

Following the vote, polls revealed that up to 17% of voters would not have voted for Biden if they’d known about Hunter’s escapades. That’s the election right there. So how has this been debunked? It hasn’t -- there’s no way it could be; it’s right out there in the open, stinking like a dead skunk. It has simply been ignored.

As for cheating at the voting level, everything that needs to be said was said in 2000 Mules, which summarized True the Vote’s investigation into the “irregularities” surrounding the election. The mechanism was simple: left-wing operatives dumping armfuls of votes into isolated drop-boxes at three in the morning. Literally thousands of hours of footage of this activity exists, and is featured in the film. (My favorite bit of evidence here involves the single bust of voter fraud that occurred – in Louisiana, of all places -- A critical piece of evidence involved fingerprints on the fake ballots. Within hours, vote dumpers across the nation appeared suddenly accoutered with vinyl gloves.)

It seems to me that it would be easy enough to “debunk” this if you really wanted to – simply track down those lefty operatives (we know who they are) and find out what they were actually doing in the middle of the night dropping boxloads of ballots while wearing gloves. If they’ve got a reasonable answer, fine. But they don’t… that’s why such “debunking” has never and will never occur.

True the Vote’s Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips were arrested on trumped-up contempt charges just a week before the 2022 election. What a coincidence!

To be continued...
 
Continued....


2022

Which brings us to the latest reports, in which the Democratic Party astonished the world by abandoning 170 years of duplicity to allow the first completely clean national election in nearly two centuries.

Actually, no… having gotten away with 2020 -- so far -- the Dems saw no reason to hold back. While something on the order of 400 laws reforming electoral procedures have hit the books since 2020, it wasn’t enough. None of these were in blue states, and few if any in purple ones.

So Fetterman was not elected in Pennsylvania, and Kelly and Hobbs were not elected in Arizona, and Cortez Masto was not elected in Nevada. These are the results of cheating, blatant cheating in Arizona and Pennsylvania (250,000 bogus votes were intercepted in PA before the election, and sequestered by order of both the state and federal Supreme Courts, decisions which acting Secretary of State Leigh M. Chapman ordered election officials to ignore. Does anyone want to bet those were the only ones?)

Arizona is a unique situation, with the contest overseen by… Katie Hobbs, acting as secretary of state. This is unbelievable, the equivalent of putting Hunter Biden in charge of the DEA. Kari Lake is admirable in many ways, but how she allowed this one to get by her I cannot surmise. This should have been a major issue from day one and fought relentlessly all the way through. It’s a simple fact of nature: give a Democrat an opportunity to cheat, and cheating will happen, as the sparks fly upward. There is no excuse for overlooking this by anyone, anywhere, anytime.

Once again, we need to call on Goldfinger’s dictum: once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action. We are way past “three times” at this point.

Three points follow. First, Democrat electoral cheating is not a Trump fantasy. The Dems have been cheating since they first emerged from the roiling chaos of Andrew Jackson’s id. Tammany, the Locofocos, the Jim Crow South, Frank Hague, Tom Pendergast, Harry Hopkins, the Cook County machine, Joe Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson… It’s one long saga of corruption from beginning to end. The suggestion that the Dems are totally corrupt in their approach to elections is not a novelty, nor is it a slander. It is a simple statement of fact. Claims to the contrary are nonsense, as are the media assist-me-to-my-fainting-couch fits every time the topic comes up.

The Dems have taken a system of fraud developed over a century’s time and steadily weaponized it over the past three decades. It is a science at this point. Its most glaring weakness is that, like any con, it requires near-open cooperation from its victims to work.

Which the GOPe has been happy to supply. Republicans have made next to no effort at any point to put a stop to it. Not even Rudy, the GOP’s attack dog, made an effort to shine a spotlight on Dinkins and his little games. And if the man who took down the New York mob wouldn’t touch it, what can we expect from the flock of capons currently running the Republican Party?

Years ago, when I was in real estate in New Jersey, there was an immigrant from a Slavic country living in downtown Passaic. He had been mugged over sixty times. Local thugs would wait until he left to shop for groceries, then follow him to the store and simply relieve him of the bag when he emerged. The city cops offered him a radio (this was well before the cellphone era) so that he could summon them when it happened again. “No, no,” he wailed. “It would only be taken from me.”

The emotions aroused by this story include pity, sympathy, and heavy admixture of glee and contempt. This may seem mean, but it’s also healthy.

The Republican response to Dem electoral cheating arises from the same source, a gutlessness indistinguishable from sheer cowardice.

Things may at last be changing. Trump blew the whistle on the whole scam – one of the major reasons they hate him. Now Kari Lake is redeeming herself by promising to hammer Kathy Hobbs and the Arizona Dems for as long as it takes. This is a good start -- but it’s only a start.

There are dozens – perhaps as many as a hundred – populist conservatives joining Congress at the beginning of next year. Investigating voter fraud (particularly involving Hobbs, and her snipers on the rooftop) represents their opportunity to make their mark.

This is the second election in a row marked by impossible results. Not “extraordinary,” not “unusual,” but impossible. Joe Biden did not get 81 million votes. Fetterman could not have been elected by a sane electorate. Catherine Cortez Masto was not saved by magic votes arising from spontaneous generation. All these outcomes are outside the realm of the possible. All were produced by a sophisticated, highly developed system of cheating. Eventually, we’ll have to put a stop to it, one way or another.
 
shoild be done already
iu

What time can the corpses vote?
 
People say there is no way Biden got 81 million votes, but Trump got almost 75 million. That is almost 13 million more than 2016. Biden got about 15 million more than Clinton who was not likeable. The numbers skewed about the same. Was there voter fraud? Maybe, but people were tired of Trump and considered Biden a return to normal. Oz and Walker were pretty bad candidates so not surprising either one lost. The fact Walker was able to keep it close is pretty impressive. Fettermen is not fit for office, but some probably didn't know anything about him, but will not vote republican. Oz did not really have that strong of support based on the republican primary. There certainly could have been fraud, but the republicans need to put up better candidates and work on reaching younger voters and getting a better turn out for early voting
 
People say there is no way Biden got 81 million votes, but Trump got almost 75 million. That is almost 13 million more than 2016. Biden got about 15 million more than Clinton who was not likeable. The numbers skewed about the same. Was there voter fraud? Maybe, but people were tired of Trump and considered Biden a return to normal. Oz and Walker were pretty bad candidates so not surprising either one lost. The fact Walker was able to keep it close is pretty impressive. Fettermen is not fit for office, but some probably didn't know anything about him, but will not vote republican. Oz did not really have that strong of support based on the republican primary. There certainly could have been fraud, but the republicans need to put up better candidates and work on reaching younger voters and getting a better turn out for early vote
I agree with alot of what you say. But you have to remember how well the candidate was like before they decided to run for office.
It is hard to remember this but Oz was not hated. Before announcing his run. He was still well liked. Then months and months of the news media beating him down has a negative reaction on what we remember about him.
 
I agree with alot of what you say. But you have to remember how well the candidate was like before they decided to run for office.
It is hard to remember this but Oz was not hated. Before announcing his run. He was still well liked. Then months and months of the news media beating him down has a negative reaction on what we remember about him.
The problem with Oz is not hatred, it's that he was a wealthy celebrity who barely even lived in this state. Fetterman's campaign did a good job of exploiting that, and Oz gave them lots of ammunition.

Oz's other problem was focusing on Fetterman's medical condition instead of his extreme policy views. Huge mistake.

But ultimately, it was about the Dobbs decision and abortion. Exit polls show abortion the top issue among 37% of PA voters, who went for Fetterman by a wide margin. Women went for Fetterman by 57-41%.

I am pro-life and it pains me to say this but I don't think a pro-life candidate can win here again.
 
people continue to say that Walker was a bad candidate.
yet those same people say Fetterman was a better candidate than Oz.

Oz and Warnock were both eloquent and could speak in complete sentences without rambling.

Someone explain to me why:

Fetterman > Oz if Warnock > Walker
 
people continue to say that Walker was a bad candidate.
yet those same people say Fetterman was a better candidate than Oz.

Oz and Warnock were both eloquent and could speak in complete sentences without rambling.

Someone explain to me why:

Fetterman > Oz if Warnock > Walker
Let me help, Burgundy has this figured out, Democrats good, Republicans bad.
Glad I could help.
 
Oz's biggest problem was he really wasn't from PA, a lot of voters in most states don't like that.
 
Oz's biggest problem was he really wasn't from PA, a lot of voters in most states don't like that.
and Herschel was a college football hero

wtf is your point?
 
I agree with alot of what you say. But you have to remember how well the candidate was like before they decided to run for office.
It is hard to remember this but Oz was not hated. Before announcing his run. He was still well liked. Then months and months of the news media beating him down has a negative reaction on what we remember about him.
Like OFB said Oz was not hated, i think people didn't believe he was republican enough and not really a PA guy. Fetterman is a bad candidate as well, but i just think the repubs didn't show up for Oz. Walker had various issues and basically no political experience I am really surprised he did as well as he did in general.
 
Top