You didn't correct jack ****. He did not call the Governor of Florida.
Act of Terrorism in Orlando
- Thread starter TDX27
- Start date
You didn't correct jack ****. He did not call the Governor of Florida.
what happens to the conservatives on the right when they get put under investigation?
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,507
- Reaction score
- 6,229
- Points
- 113
Ah, I get it. There is some mystical protocol in Indy's head as to who the president needs to call in instances like this. This severe breach of Indy's protocol, whereby Obama called the Mayor to offer his condolences - and not the Governor - can only mean one thing. That Obama is clearly a Muslim terrorist sympathizer. The likes of you and your dumbfuck hero Trump really make me question the sustainability of humankind on this planet.
more gun violence. if only the old man didnt have a gun (as that would be the case under more gun control laws)
http://pix11.com/2016/06/13/retired-nypd-officer-fatally-shoots-armed-man-during-queens-bar-robbery/
http://pix11.com/2016/06/13/retired-nypd-officer-fatally-shoots-armed-man-during-queens-bar-robbery/
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,507
- Reaction score
- 6,229
- Points
- 113
Don't be mad Indy, you and Trump will get over the *** beating Obama handed him yesterday.
President Obama lays a whupping on Trump - the likes of which have not been seen before
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...-the-likes-of-which-have-not-been-seen-before
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">President Obama denounced Donald Trump for his rhetoric after the Orlando shooting <a href="https://t.co/cJuaSAr4WJ">https://t.co/cJuaSAr4WJ</a> <a href="https://t.co/cAEQLNOUOu">pic.twitter.com/cAEQLNOUOu</a></p>— The New York Times (@nytimes) <a href="https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/742772197350068225">June 14, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">President Obama speaking about Donald Trump's proposed Muslim ban:<br>"This is not the America we want." <a href="https://t.co/3FD091JTrO">https://t.co/3FD091JTrO</a></p>— BBC News (World) (@BBCWorld) <a href="https://twitter.com/BBCWorld/status/742765866668818432">June 14, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
President Obama lays a whupping on Trump - the likes of which have not been seen before
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...-the-likes-of-which-have-not-been-seen-before
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">President Obama denounced Donald Trump for his rhetoric after the Orlando shooting <a href="https://t.co/cJuaSAr4WJ">https://t.co/cJuaSAr4WJ</a> <a href="https://t.co/cAEQLNOUOu">pic.twitter.com/cAEQLNOUOu</a></p>— The New York Times (@nytimes) <a href="https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/742772197350068225">June 14, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">President Obama speaking about Donald Trump's proposed Muslim ban:<br>"This is not the America we want." <a href="https://t.co/3FD091JTrO">https://t.co/3FD091JTrO</a></p>— BBC News (World) (@BBCWorld) <a href="https://twitter.com/BBCWorld/status/742765866668818432">June 14, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,466
- Reaction score
- 5,525
- Points
- 113
Shouldn't you be asking your boy Donald about that? He (perhaps unwittingly) supports restricting their 2nd amendment rights.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,507
- Reaction score
- 6,229
- Points
- 113
I'm shocked and apalled Trump or W didn't reach out to the Mayor of Orlando. A damn shame, really.
Heh heh! Yeah, Obuttfuck really taught Trump a lesson!
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
SMACK!
Obama’s tantrum a striking display of failed leadership
He laid waste to a field of straw men, cable-TV pundits and the always-evil “partisan rhetoric,” by which he means anyone who disagrees with him. It was a striking display of personal anger and pent-up grievances — and a total failure of leadership during a national crisis.
Obama’s demeanor and tone were far from presidential — tantrums rarely are. Nor was he effective in rallying the nation to his cause. No surprise there. His cause is himself, always and only, and his greatly diminished historic presidency looks especially insignificant next to the bloodshed in Orlando. The iconic redeemer who promised hope and change never seemed so small and hopeless.
America saw Barack Obama at low tide yesterday, revealed as brimming with fury and bankrupt of ideas and even sympathy for the dead. The man who had an answer for everything and a solution to nothing is now also out of excuses.
http://nypost.com/2016/06/15/obamas-tantrum-a-striking-display-of-failed-leadership/
Obama’s tantrum a striking display of failed leadership
He laid waste to a field of straw men, cable-TV pundits and the always-evil “partisan rhetoric,” by which he means anyone who disagrees with him. It was a striking display of personal anger and pent-up grievances — and a total failure of leadership during a national crisis.
Obama’s demeanor and tone were far from presidential — tantrums rarely are. Nor was he effective in rallying the nation to his cause. No surprise there. His cause is himself, always and only, and his greatly diminished historic presidency looks especially insignificant next to the bloodshed in Orlando. The iconic redeemer who promised hope and change never seemed so small and hopeless.
America saw Barack Obama at low tide yesterday, revealed as brimming with fury and bankrupt of ideas and even sympathy for the dead. The man who had an answer for everything and a solution to nothing is now also out of excuses.
http://nypost.com/2016/06/15/obamas-tantrum-a-striking-display-of-failed-leadership/
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
After Orlando, Obama continues to be in denial about terrorism
According to the Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg, who spent hours interviewing Obama about his foreign policy doctrine, the president “has never believed that terrorism poses a threat to America commensurate with the fear it generates” and “frequently reminds his staff that terrorism takes far fewer lives in America than handguns, car accidents, and falls in bathtubs do.”
That’s right, our commander in chief sees the mass shooting of 49 people in Orlando as akin to a slip in the tub.
In his 2016 State of the Union address, Obama blithely dismissed the Islamic State as “fighters on the back of pickup trucks” who he said, in typical strawman fashion, “do not threaten our national existence.”
In a 2015 BBC interview, he said , “If you look at the number of Americans killed since 9/11 by terrorism, it’s less than 100.” In other words, no big deal.
After his anti-Islamic State strategy came under withering criticism following the Brussels terror attacks in March, Obama said “my top priority is to defeat ISIL.” But he has admitted elsewhere that is untrue.
Obama has openly declared that climate change is a much higher priority for him than terrorism because “ISIS is not an existential threat to the United States. Climate change is a potential existential threat to the entire world if we don’t do something about it.”
Indeed, Goldberg writes, Obama “gets frustrated that terrorism keeps swamping his larger agenda” and “his advisers are fighting a constant rearguard action to keep Obama from placing terrorism in what he considers its ‘proper’ perspective, out of concern that he will seem insensitive to the fears of the American people.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...45fb3e-3303-11e6-8ff7-7b6c1998b7a0_story.html
-----------------------------
Drag Hillary down with you on the way out the door.
The New York Times Can’t Figure Out The Orlando Terrorist’s Motive
"I did it for ISIS. I did it for the Islamic State."
The radical Islamist terrorist responsible for the attack in an Orlando nightclub that killed at least 49 people called a local television station during his rampage with a chilling message.
“I’m the shooter. It’s me,” the terrorist told News 13 in Orlando. “I did it for ISIS. I did it for the Islamic State,” he said, according to a Washington Post account of the call.
Which brings us to today’s lead editorial in the New York Times. The NYT editorial board, you see, is having some real trouble figuring out who’s responsible for what happened in Orlando. And they cannot figure out what the heck the motive was. When Bruce Jenner tells the New York Times that he’s a girl, by golly he’s a girl. But when a gay Muslim registered Democrat terrorist in the midst of a killing spree declares to the news media that he “did it for the Islamic State,” it is just impossible for the New York Times and its ilk to figure out the true identity of this inscrutable killer. How do you solve a puzzle like sharia?
The New York Times has no clue. This was an actual phrase that an actual human deliberately wrote and published in the NYT today: “While the precise motivation for the rampage remains unclear[.]” Linger on that for a moment. Surround yourself with it. Drink it in:
While the precise motivation for the rampage remains unclear, it is evident that Mr. Mateen was driven by hatred toward gays and lesbians. Hate crimes don’t happen in a vacuum. They occur where bigotry is allowed to fester, where minorities are vilified and where people are scapegoated for political gain. Tragically, this is the state of American politics, driven too often by Republican politicians who see prejudice as something to exploit, not extinguish.
Here’s who the New York Times blames, in order:
Republican politicians, Republican-led state legislatures, Republican governors, Republican federal lawmakers, Donald Trump, Mitch McConnell, Ted Cruz, North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant, anyone who believes in traditional marriage, anyone who’s ever voted to preserve traditional marriage, and anyone who has ever voted for anyone who believes or has voted to preserve in traditional marriage.
http://thefederalist.com/2016/06/15...ant-figure-out-the-orlando-terrorists-motive/
According to the Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg, who spent hours interviewing Obama about his foreign policy doctrine, the president “has never believed that terrorism poses a threat to America commensurate with the fear it generates” and “frequently reminds his staff that terrorism takes far fewer lives in America than handguns, car accidents, and falls in bathtubs do.”
That’s right, our commander in chief sees the mass shooting of 49 people in Orlando as akin to a slip in the tub.
In his 2016 State of the Union address, Obama blithely dismissed the Islamic State as “fighters on the back of pickup trucks” who he said, in typical strawman fashion, “do not threaten our national existence.”
In a 2015 BBC interview, he said , “If you look at the number of Americans killed since 9/11 by terrorism, it’s less than 100.” In other words, no big deal.
After his anti-Islamic State strategy came under withering criticism following the Brussels terror attacks in March, Obama said “my top priority is to defeat ISIL.” But he has admitted elsewhere that is untrue.
Obama has openly declared that climate change is a much higher priority for him than terrorism because “ISIS is not an existential threat to the United States. Climate change is a potential existential threat to the entire world if we don’t do something about it.”
Indeed, Goldberg writes, Obama “gets frustrated that terrorism keeps swamping his larger agenda” and “his advisers are fighting a constant rearguard action to keep Obama from placing terrorism in what he considers its ‘proper’ perspective, out of concern that he will seem insensitive to the fears of the American people.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...45fb3e-3303-11e6-8ff7-7b6c1998b7a0_story.html
-----------------------------
Drag Hillary down with you on the way out the door.
The New York Times Can’t Figure Out The Orlando Terrorist’s Motive
"I did it for ISIS. I did it for the Islamic State."
The radical Islamist terrorist responsible for the attack in an Orlando nightclub that killed at least 49 people called a local television station during his rampage with a chilling message.
“I’m the shooter. It’s me,” the terrorist told News 13 in Orlando. “I did it for ISIS. I did it for the Islamic State,” he said, according to a Washington Post account of the call.
Which brings us to today’s lead editorial in the New York Times. The NYT editorial board, you see, is having some real trouble figuring out who’s responsible for what happened in Orlando. And they cannot figure out what the heck the motive was. When Bruce Jenner tells the New York Times that he’s a girl, by golly he’s a girl. But when a gay Muslim registered Democrat terrorist in the midst of a killing spree declares to the news media that he “did it for the Islamic State,” it is just impossible for the New York Times and its ilk to figure out the true identity of this inscrutable killer. How do you solve a puzzle like sharia?
The New York Times has no clue. This was an actual phrase that an actual human deliberately wrote and published in the NYT today: “While the precise motivation for the rampage remains unclear[.]” Linger on that for a moment. Surround yourself with it. Drink it in:
While the precise motivation for the rampage remains unclear, it is evident that Mr. Mateen was driven by hatred toward gays and lesbians. Hate crimes don’t happen in a vacuum. They occur where bigotry is allowed to fester, where minorities are vilified and where people are scapegoated for political gain. Tragically, this is the state of American politics, driven too often by Republican politicians who see prejudice as something to exploit, not extinguish.
Here’s who the New York Times blames, in order:
Republican politicians, Republican-led state legislatures, Republican governors, Republican federal lawmakers, Donald Trump, Mitch McConnell, Ted Cruz, North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant, anyone who believes in traditional marriage, anyone who’s ever voted to preserve traditional marriage, and anyone who has ever voted for anyone who believes or has voted to preserve in traditional marriage.
http://thefederalist.com/2016/06/15...ant-figure-out-the-orlando-terrorists-motive/
Last edited:
You are right. It sucks here. Please don't move here. As a matter of fact, please don't even visit here.
In Western PA , we just call them dumbasses.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,507
- Reaction score
- 6,229
- Points
- 113
Of course he did. A boozing, gay man who's frequented this club for years and hit on gay men online was a real, card-carrying Islamic terrorist. Keep on believing brother, you're definitely on the right path here.
lol...can't buy a machine gun?
$500, or less, and a few hours in Miami and you have an AK.
a full auto AK.
$500, or less, and a few hours in Miami and you have an AK.
a full auto AK.
Or go to Mexico, where you ,might be able to find one we shipped in Fast and Furious.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATF_gunwalking_scandal
Makes perfect sense. He was a self loathing closet homosexual, having grown up in an intolerant religious family. He felt that Allah would absolve him from his sins by committing, and dying during an act of jihad.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 9,394
- Reaction score
- 6,217
- Points
- 113
but it is already illegal to own it if you don't have a special license. How does banning the scary AR change that?
Proof right there gun laws don't work. Automatic AK's are against the law.
ONCE AGAIN CRIMINALS DONT FOLLOW LAWS !!!!!!
ONCE AGAIN CRIMINALS DONT FOLLOW LAWS !!!!!!
What happened, when I lived there they was jaggoff's.
LOL, they didn't pull my name again Hammy. That makes it like...EVERY year in a row.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 1,022
- Reaction score
- 585
- Points
- 113
I'm curious about that as well. The guy targeted a gay nightclub -- why wasn't this a hate crime?
Is it because he wasn't a white male?
Bwahahahaha
Wait...this just in !
It don't get any better than that folks, sorry.
Last edited:
Here we go again. Wasn't our enemy Syria. The media painting them as evil and bereft of humanity. Then the Russians stepped in. All the sudden Syria is no longer on the radar (minus the fact that ISIS is still there holding land).
So now the media is creating a hot button word that everyone here is parroting. "Radical Islamism". Keep saying it enough time, and every time you see someone with brown skin, your heart will skip, and you'll break in a cold sweat. This is typical demonization of an enemy to make they scary, and we should all be fearful to the point of begging to go to war.
Congrats. Radical Islam is the new buzzword to gain support for another war. Excuse me if I don't get on board this time. I'm sick of bankrupting our economy for elitist special interest defense contracts.
Wash, Rinse, repeat.
So now the media is creating a hot button word that everyone here is parroting. "Radical Islamism". Keep saying it enough time, and every time you see someone with brown skin, your heart will skip, and you'll break in a cold sweat. This is typical demonization of an enemy to make they scary, and we should all be fearful to the point of begging to go to war.
Congrats. Radical Islam is the new buzzword to gain support for another war. Excuse me if I don't get on board this time. I'm sick of bankrupting our economy for elitist special interest defense contracts.
Wash, Rinse, repeat.
Similar threads
