- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 9,394
- Reaction score
- 6,217
- Points
- 113
it depends...if they can manage not to add stupid **** on, like you can't give your grandads.45 to your kid....yeah, I think there should be a screening process for obvious military grade semi-auto long guns....it's a start....we'll get to the criminals as soon as we can....no one really has a solution to that.
define front lines....I certainly am not gonna go running out to the barricades with a .223, or a .308, or a 7.62x 39, when the militarized police force, or the Military itself, has superior firepower....someone else can go be a martyr...and I will laugh......I got a better plan.
the police will definitely turn on citizens....they already do.
I would hope the Military would refuse.
If you don't have a CC, you wait three days don't you? I did. When I bought a gun online it was over a week for shipping. Since I have a CC, once it was shipped, I don't have to wait. Takes about 30 min to an hour for the background check. If any gun dealer is selling guns and not doing the check and/or violating the 3-day wait rule, shouldn't they be punished for breaking that law? how does making it harder for everyone else fix that?
I still get hung up on the "obvious military grade" semi-autos. Just a silly depiction with no meaning if operation is the same as a normal semi-automatic. If I buy a non-military style and put a light, scope, adjustable stock and bipod on it, am I OK with that? Another thing that surprises me about your opinion on this.
There would be some in the military and police that would turn on the citizens. I believe the majority would not. I believe the majority of those would help the citizens.
the Iraqi's and Afghani's didn't do too bad versus superior firepower....