- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,571
- Reaction score
- 6,246
- Points
- 113
No. I am deeply concerned our sitting President is compromised and in the back pocket of Vladimir Putin.So you are pimping and preening over the 2nd quarter score, no?
No. I am deeply concerned our sitting President is compromised and in the back pocket of Vladimir Putin.So you are pimping and preening over the 2nd quarter score, no?
No. I am deeply concerned our sitting President is compromised and in the back pocket of Vladimir Putin.
No. I am deeply concerned our sitting President is compromised and in the back pocket of Vladimir Putin.
Wait, what?
For the 2nd time in the past 48 hours, Trump just went out of his way to clarify how much he trusts & loves US intelligence agencies.
So he has no reason to trust them according to you, but he does trust them, according to him? Trump supporters are bewildering, on a good day.
Since we all have to implicitly trust the intel community...I just hope all the people who were against the war in Iraq because they didn't find the weapons of mass destruction the intel community said were there...will change their tune.
Since we all have to implicitly trust the intel community...I just hope all the people who were against the war in Iraq because they didn't find the weapons of mass destruction the intel community said were there...will change their tune.
But don't they need to be worthy of trust? Putin might be more trustworthy in thus sense...you know what he is, you know what he is after, you know he is not your friend. Trump knows this, hence his much tougher stance with Russia than Obama for example. But our Intel people...you think they are on your side, only to stab you in the back. It's the old saw...rather have the devil I know than the devil I dont.It’s not that we have to trust them implicitly.... it would just be nice if the president trusted them more than he trustedVladimir Putin. Like the song says, you can’t always get what you want.
I don’t see any reason why the would... or wouldn’t... or would... or wouldn’t.
This all makes perfect ******* sense to people who want it to make sense.
There would be “another condition,” Putin added. “This kind of effort should be mutual one. Then we would expect that the Americans would reciprocate.”
That condition, Putin said, would be giving Russia the right to question Bill Browder, an American-born British financier who famously lobbied Congress to pass the Magnitsky Act, which resulted in harsh penalties and sanctions on Russia. The Kremlin retaliated by trying Browder in absentia for tax fraud—resulting in a conviction and an extradition request that was rejected by Interpol as obviously political in nature.
“We have a solid reason to believe that some intelligence officers accompanied and guided these transactions,” Putin continued. “So we have an interest of questioning them. That could be a first step. We can extend also it. Options abound. They all can be found in an appropriate legal framework.”
Russian prosecutors also demanded to interrogate former American ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul, a harsh critic of Putin’s regime, in what appeared to be another example of political intimidation.
President Trump is apparently willing to indulge the “offer.” On Wednesday, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders confirmed that “some conversation” had transpired with regard to the proposal, but that the administration had no comment. The offer was simply “an idea they threw out,” Sanders said, emphasizing that the White House had not yet committed to anything. “The president is gonna meet with his team and we’ll let you know when we have an announcement on that.”
Answer the question. Since we are now to completely trust the Intel people, are you willing to say the war in Iraq was legitimate?
I totally agree with what you're saying. No, what I mean is I don't not agree with it, rather that I agree that I don't agree. What I'm getting at is there should be no doubt at all that I don't agree with what I said I agreed with earlier, which I thought was obvious to everyone. It should have been obvious to everyone. So to clarify, I agree that I totally disagree with what I said, a double negative, if you will.I don’t see any reason why the would... or wouldn’t... or would... or wouldn’t. This all makes perfect ******* sense to people who want it to make sense.
Let's sum up the new rules
1 We can never talk with "enemies of the US"
2 We can never say anything negative or criticize an ally
3 We must never question the FBI or DOJ on anything ever. Everything they say is correct.
4 Congress can not tell FBI or DOJ what to do. When questioned by Congress, they can simply say, No, my boss says i don't have to answer
5 The President can't tell the FBI or DOJ what to do either. He has no authority to hire or fire them.
6 ICE and local cops do not count. They are all ******* racist pigs and must be micro managed by the DOJ
Oddly enough, now that you mention it...
Trump Winning (aka Shinin' the Turd) thread:
Replies: 2,846
Views: 66,176
Mueller Investigation (aka Trump/Russia Treason/Conspiracy) thread:
Replies: 3,646
Views: 72,662
I know which thread you were referring to. I'm talking about these two threads from after the election, just like I wrote in my post.Wrong, yet AGAIN. You should never go to Vegas. Check the 2015 Trump MAGA thread
That's the spirit!dumbass.
WASHINGTON — Two weeks before his inauguration, Donald J. Trump was shown highly classified intelligence indicating that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia had personally ordered complex cyberattacks to sway the 2016 American election.
The evidence included texts and emails from Russian military officers and information gleaned from a top-secret source close to Mr. Putin, who had described to the C.I.A. how the Kremlin decided to execute its campaign of hacking and disinformation.
Mr. Trump sounded grudgingly convinced, according to several people who attended the intelligence briefing. But ever since, Mr. Trump has tried to cloud the very clear findings that he received on Jan. 6, 2017, which his own intelligence leaders have unanimously endorsed.
The shifting narrative underscores the degree to which Mr. Trump regularly picks and chooses intelligence to suit his political purposes. That has never been more clear than this week.
Almost as soon as he took office, Mr. Trump began casting doubts on the intelligence on Russia’s election interference, though never taking issue with its specifics.
He dismissed it broadly as a fabrication by Democrats and part of a “witch hunt” against him. He raised unrelated issues, including the state of investigations into Mrs. Clinton’s home computer server, to distract attention from the central question of Russia’s role — and who, if anyone, in Mr. Trump’s immediate orbit may have worked with them.
Since then, Mr. Trump has routinely disparaged the intelligence about the Russian election interference. Under public pressure — as he was after his statements in Helsinki on Monday — he has periodically retreated. But even then, he has expressed confidence in his intelligence briefers, not in the content of their findings.
That is what happened again this week, twice.
That's fine by me, that you reject out of hand what any non-Trump fanatic says because we're paranoid Obama/Hillary lovers with a chapped hide, freaking out over nothing. I get that, even expect it.what is transpiring, for tibs and his leftist brethren.
He's crushing them
Ha Ha
Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump
The Democrats have a death wish, in more ways than one - they actually want to abolish ICE. This should cost them heavily in the Midterms. Yesterday, the Republicans overwhelmingly passed a bill supporting ICE!
Well you are wrong on several counts.
The political right is still for personal liberty, self rule and small government. There is nothing dangerous about freedom. We are not a democracy and never have been, we are a Republic where individual rights are protected from the state. The way to fix what is wrong is to stop demanding the government "Do something" and stop spreading the myth that the government should "Take care of the people" and stop telling the lie that "Government makes us great".
That's fine by me, that you reject out of hand what any non-Trump fanatic says because we're paranoid Obama/Hillary lovers with a chapped hide, freaking out over nothing. I get that, even expect it.
What I don't understand is when you routinely dismiss criticism of Trump coming from quarters who have nothing to do with liberals, Democrats or the MSM. Vested, career intelligence and military officers and the like. When conservative Republicans raise the alarm over Trump/Russia - which is happening much more frequently - that too is dismissed out of hand and thrown aside.
So who's left, that you trust and believe? The narrower than narrow, hardcore Trump base and pro-Trump media like FoxNews and breitbart? That's it? Everyone else is lying and full of ****, besides the precious few who have unearthed this massive conspiracy against the President. A conspiracy so huge and so wide, that it entangles the entire federal government.
That's pretty much where you and other Trump supporters stand, mired in ever-changing conspiracy theories trying to explain away Trump's troubling behavior.