Tibs, a lot of us voted for Trump because the alternative - Hillary - was just too nauseating to consider.
Everything about her was said just for the sole sake of being the First Female President. You're quick to jump on "Trump supporters" for his actions/tweets/statements, but are oblivious to what the alternative was. Let's forget about Jill Stein, since she was never going to win anyway. The 2016 race was between Trump and Hillary. I'll go way out on a short limb and guess you voted for Hillary, despite all the ugly bumps, bruises and warts she has brought upon herself by just being Hillary.
She was for the promotion of the LGBTQ alphabet community.
She was also for the rapid, mass import of people from the part of the world who did not tolerate homosexuality in any degree - even going so far as killing gay people.
Gee, wonder what would have happened when (not if, but when) those mixed?
She labeled black youths as "super predators"
Yet Trump received the Ellis award
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-received-ellis-island-award-in-1986/
Speaking of success, she was the political benefactor of Loretta Lynch meeting Bill Clinton on a private jet to discuss yoga, grandchildren and recipes.
Yet you're upset that Trump sold some condos to Russians in the 80s.
Hillary was proven to have destroyed computers, bleached hard drives, broken PDAs, cellphones, etc when it leaked about her email situation - where she used personal email to conduct top secret government business. You're fine with her not being prosecuted for that.
Yet you don't utter a peep about Kristian Saucier.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...otos-of-classified-areas-of-nuclear-submarine
You're ok with a person who bumps her head and suffered a convenient concussion right before she's to discuss her role in Benghazi. Doctors even said her concussion was "not severe"
Yet wail, moan and cry about a person who can balance his own social media account at 2am.
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/16/us/politics/hillary-clinton-concussion.html
And, now, currently you're complaining about the treatment of illegals/invaders at the southern border. All you CHOOSE to see are women with kids in diapers. You don't see the 18-32 year old men who look well fed and refreshed after "walking" 2,000+ miles and still have the enthusiasm to try climbing the southern border security walls. You don't see that those same children in diapers are 6-7 years old. You don't question how these people made such a trek all at once, when its difficult to even assemble a small congregation to fight back against an oppressive government.
Yet to you, Trump, as much of a blowhard as he is, says some mean things, hurts some feels and is undoubtedly the worst goddamn ******* in the history of our planet, so much that even Hitler would be aghast.
I think that about covers what you've portrayed on this forum.
Everything about her was said just for the sole sake of being the First Female President. You're quick to jump on "Trump supporters" for his actions/tweets/statements, but are oblivious to what the alternative was. Let's forget about Jill Stein, since she was never going to win anyway. The 2016 race was between Trump and Hillary. I'll go way out on a short limb and guess you voted for Hillary, despite all the ugly bumps, bruises and warts she has brought upon herself by just being Hillary.
She was for the promotion of the LGBTQ alphabet community.
She was also for the rapid, mass import of people from the part of the world who did not tolerate homosexuality in any degree - even going so far as killing gay people.
Gee, wonder what would have happened when (not if, but when) those mixed?
She labeled black youths as "super predators"
Yet Trump received the Ellis award
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-received-ellis-island-award-in-1986/
Speaking of success, she was the political benefactor of Loretta Lynch meeting Bill Clinton on a private jet to discuss yoga, grandchildren and recipes.
Yet you're upset that Trump sold some condos to Russians in the 80s.
Hillary was proven to have destroyed computers, bleached hard drives, broken PDAs, cellphones, etc when it leaked about her email situation - where she used personal email to conduct top secret government business. You're fine with her not being prosecuted for that.
Yet you don't utter a peep about Kristian Saucier.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...otos-of-classified-areas-of-nuclear-submarine
You're ok with a person who bumps her head and suffered a convenient concussion right before she's to discuss her role in Benghazi. Doctors even said her concussion was "not severe"
Yet wail, moan and cry about a person who can balance his own social media account at 2am.
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/16/us/politics/hillary-clinton-concussion.html
And, now, currently you're complaining about the treatment of illegals/invaders at the southern border. All you CHOOSE to see are women with kids in diapers. You don't see the 18-32 year old men who look well fed and refreshed after "walking" 2,000+ miles and still have the enthusiasm to try climbing the southern border security walls. You don't see that those same children in diapers are 6-7 years old. You don't question how these people made such a trek all at once, when its difficult to even assemble a small congregation to fight back against an oppressive government.
Yet to you, Trump, as much of a blowhard as he is, says some mean things, hurts some feels and is undoubtedly the worst goddamn ******* in the history of our planet, so much that even Hitler would be aghast.
I think that about covers what you've portrayed on this forum.
