• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

And it Begins:Special Prosecutor To Investigate Trump And Russia

Status
Not open for further replies.
Great news, make it happen Mueller! Finally, this smoke & mirrors circus act can come to a screeching halt. Please, make this happen, without further ado.


donald-trump-the-gop-mad-as-hell-moment-over.jpg


Could the Russia Investigation Reveal Trump’s Tax Returns?
http://www.politico.com/magazine/st...ion-reveal-trumps-tax-returns-215212?cmpid=sf

If special prosecutor Robert Mueller suspects they contain evidence of a crime, the most sought-after documents in Washington might just be unearthed.

President Donald Trump has already described the multiple investigations into possible collusion between Russia and his presidential campaign as a “witch hunt”—the word he has used in several angry tweetstorms since entering the White House. But he might be even more disturbed when he realizes that the latest of those investigations—by the newly named special prosecutor, former FBI Director Robert Mueller—could amount to a double-punch to the president and resolve one of the greatest mysteries of the 2016 campaign:

What, exactly, is in Trump’s tax returns?

The president and his beleaguered White House staff have given no outward sign that they have thought about the prospect yet. But in interviews, veteran federal prosecutors and legal scholars said that Mueller, who began his investigation only last week, has clear-cut authority to obtain the president’s tax returns—perhaps the most sensitive and sought-after government documents since the Pentagon Papers—from the IRS if Mueller suspects they might contain evidence of a crime.

And short of firing Mueller and shutting down his investigation, Trump—who is the first president in 40 years to refuse to make his tax returns public, despite once promising to do so— would have almost no way of stopping him. In fact, the prosecutors said, the president and his lawyers would not necessarily even know that Mueller had obtained them.

“It shows the chaos around Washington that nobody has really started to talk about this yet,” said a Justice Department lawyer who deals with tax fraud prosecutions, speaking on condition of anonymity since he is not authorized to speak to reporters. “But finally, I think, someone is going to get their hands on Donald Trump’s tax returns. And that man is Robert Mueller.”
 
Great news, make it happen Mueller! Finally, this smoke & mirrors circus act can come to a screeching halt. Please, make this happen, without further ado.


donald-trump-the-gop-mad-as-hell-moment-over.jpg


Could the Russia Investigation Reveal Trump’s Tax Returns?
http://www.politico.com/magazine/st...ion-reveal-trumps-tax-returns-215212?cmpid=sf

If special prosecutor Robert Mueller suspects they contain evidence of a crime, the most sought-after documents in Washington might just be unearthed.

I'll save you the trouble and end this year long controversy. I'm going to make a startling announcement of what top secret information Trump's mysterious tax returns will show when they are unveiled to the world. Brace yourself for this.,.,.,...he's absurdly, filthy, stinking rich. Holy ******* ****, what a revelation!!! Worlds will be rocked and the planets will shudder when the truth finally comes out! I'm telling you.....nobody will be prepared for this revelation. Nobody.

And I always thought he was lower middle class. What a shocker! IMPEACH!!!!!!!!!
 
Best you get all the gloating done while you can Tibs.

Your fellow first among equals, Elfiepolo will remember the 14 or 49 or 483 time she claimed victory in the great climax hoax. Hell, she probably still doesn't know she isn't functionally able to discern reality from BS talking points.

You are smarter than her, but seem unable to self diagnose your clear manic/depressive behaviour since Hitlery **** the bed(after ******* over Bernie).

So gloat now, while you think it is a good idea.

When you run and hide, again, cuz you know you will, just remember that Steeler scores come from all over the interwebz, so that you can feel safe in venturing to those places, because you may not be able to handle, again, the shame and and disappointment that you will feel at being wrong yet again.


Sent from my iPhone using Steeler Nation mobile app
 
Last edited:
Food for thought, from Robert Reich:

Putin-and-Trump-AP-640x480-1-640x480.jpg



Say you’re Vladimir Putin, and you did a deal with Trump last year. What's Trump's side of the deal?

1. Trump repudiates NATO. Trump almost did last week in Europe by not reaffirming Article 5, which states that an attack on one NATO ally is an attack on all.

2. Trump antagonizes Europe, especially Angela Merkel, the strongest leader in the West other than Trump. Trump has almost delivered on this, too. She now says Europe can no longer depend on America.

3. Trump rejects the Paris accord on the environment, thereby angering other American allies around the world and causing a wave of anti-Americanism. Seems like Trump is about to deliver on this one, too.

4. Trump embarks on a new era of protectionism – or at least anti-trade rhetoric – thereby threatening the West's economic interdependence. He's on the way to delivering on this one.

5. Trump ends the economic sanctions on Russia imposed after the annexation of Crimea and for backing separatists in eastern Ukraine.No delivery as yet, but you understand why. He's got to deal with all this suspicion over the deal he made with you to win him the presidency. Once that dies down, he'll end the sanctions.

And what was your side of the deal? Not only would you help win him the presidency, but you'd shut up about it so he wouldn't be impeached and convicted of treason.

In other words, he's still in the process of delivering on his side of the deal, as are you. That's the art of the deal.

Did I get the terms correct, Vladimir?
 
...because you may not be able to handle, again, the shame and and disappointment that you will feel at being wrong yet again.

For the record, remind me what it is that I'm wrong yet again about? You can't be referring to the election, as I was one of the first on the board to predict Trump was going to win, about two weeks or so before Election Day.
 
For the record, remind me what it is that I'm wrong yet again about? You can't be referring to the election, as I was one of the first on the board to predict Trump was going to win, about two weeks or so before Election Day.

ROFLMAO!! You are wrong about Everything! One little hissy fit wussy tirade right before the election doesn't erase all of your other posts. You're a ******* idiot who really is wrong about everything.
 
Coming from you, I'll take that as a massive compliment, thank you.

I'll admit, as wrong and as ****** up as you are you just keep on swinging and missing, with your only pause coming from the safe space visits. The massive failure on a regular basis is fun to watch. Keep on keepin' on, Tibs! You're like a machine. A mentally handicapped machine.
 
I'll admit...

Everytime I read your posts, this is literally what I'm seeing:

giphy8.gif



You are perpetually trapped in the mind of a five year old. Can't be easy being you.
 
Last edited:
I'll save you the trouble and end this year long controversy. I'm going to make a startling announcement of what top secret information Trump's mysterious tax returns will show when they are unveiled to the world. Brace yourself for this.,.,.,...he's absurdly, filthy, stinking rich. Holy ******* ****, what a revelation!!!

So he doesn't want to reveal that which he has repeatedly bragged about in the past?

And BTW, he's not. He's way down the list of wealthiest Americans.
 
So he doesn't want to reveal that which he has repeatedly bragged about in the past?

And BTW, he's not. He's way down the list of wealthiest Americans.

But he's closer to the top than any of us are.
 
So much jealousy and hatred from the libtard left. Fun times, lmao! It's great watching them suffer.
 
Accusing Trump of treason based on absolutely nothing, those dems sure love to project their own actions on to others. Its no surprise that they're coming unhinged. They know that their rhetoric is hollow.
 
And **** that treasonous ***** Merkel. She is dessimating Germany.
 
For the record, remind me what it is that I'm wrong yet again about? You can't be referring to the election, as I was one of the first on the board to predict Trump was going to win, about two weeks or so before Election Day.

Pretty sure most here tried for months to set you straight about Trump becoming POTUS, but you arrogantly and haughtily laughed and made fun of him, and those who supported him.

Then reality set in, you realized you had been 180 degrees wrong, and tried to save face by becoming the lead libtard to fear that Trump would win.

Then he did, and you went to your safe space for an extended period, until you could no longer contain your utter disdain for POTUS and his supporters and so began to stain SN threads with your ****y posts again.


Sent from my iPhone using Steeler Nation mobile app
 
Food for thought, from Robert Reich:
Say you’re Vladimir Putin, and you did a deal with Trump last year. What's Trump's side of the deal?

1. Trump repudiates NATO. Trump almost did last week in Europe by not reaffirming Article 5, which states that an attack on one NATO ally is an attack on all.

2. Trump antagonizes Europe, especially Angela Merkel, the strongest leader in the West other than Trump. Trump has almost delivered on this, too. She now says Europe can no longer depend on America.

3. Trump rejects the Paris accord on the environment, thereby angering other American allies around the world and causing a wave of anti-Americanism. Seems like Trump is about to deliver on this one, too.

4. Trump embarks on a new era of protectionism – or at least anti-trade rhetoric – thereby threatening the West's economic interdependence. He's on the way to delivering on this one.

5. Trump ends the economic sanctions on Russia imposed after the annexation of Crimea and for backing separatists in eastern Ukraine.No delivery as yet, but you understand why. He's got to deal with all this suspicion over the deal he made with you to win him the presidency. Once that dies down, he'll end the sanctions.

And what was your side of the deal? Not only would you help win him the presidency, but you'd shut up about it so he wouldn't be impeached and convicted of treason.

In other words, he's still in the process of delivering on his side of the deal, as are you. That's the art of the deal.

Did I get the terms correct, Vladimir?


A list of things that haven't actually happened. Yep, some more damning evidence of nothing.
 
Everytime I read your posts, this is literally what I'm seeing:

giphy8.gif



You are perpetually trapped in the mind of a five year old. Can't be easy being you.

Lol... I pictured the snowflake in chief golfing in Mar a Lago being informed that his tax returns would be made public; "Bad! and very unfair...it's not fair!"
 
Pretty sure most here tried for months to set you straight about Trump becoming POTUS, but you arrogantly and haughtily laughed and made fun of him, and those who supported him. Then reality set in, you realized you had been 180 degrees wrong, and tried to save face by becoming the lead libtard to fear that Trump would win. Then he did, and you went to your safe space for an extended period, until you could no longer contain your utter disdain for POTUS and his supporters and so began to stain SN threads with your ****y posts again.

Funny-Crying-Man-Gif.gif


Golly, that's so melodramatic and sad. I had no idea the type of impact I have on your day-to-day lives. You guys have me all figured out. I hope you can comfort each other and keep each other warm if I ever decide to take a break from the board again. I have become an inverse, negative beacon to you all, a singular lightning rod you can focus your hatred and anger on. I will keep that in mind with all future postings, I wouldn't want anyone going over a cliff due to something written on a messageboard.

I know it's not easy being in the cult of Trump these days, try to find a way to stay strong and carry on.
 
Last edited:
Funny-Crying-Man-Gif.gif


Golly, that's so melodramatic and sad. I had no idea the type of impact I have on your day-to-day lives. You guys have me all figured out. I hope you can comfort each other and keep each other warm if I ever decide to take a break from the board again. I have become an inverse, negative beacon to you all, a singular lightning rod you can focus your hatred and anger on. I will keep that in mind with all future postings, I wouldn't want anyone going over a cliff due to something written on a messageboard.

I know it's not easy being in the cult of Trump these days, try to find a way to stay strong and carry on.

That you have so badly mischaracterized yourself and others here is hardly surprising. Nice attempt at deflection.


Sent from my iPhone using Steeler Nation mobile app
 
Posted by Tibs
I know it's not easy being in the cult of Trump these days, try to find a way to stay strong and carry on

That you have so badly mischaracterized yourself and others here is hardly surprising. Nice attempt at deflection.
.

It's not so bad Con, all the winning eases the little bit of pain the left causes.

f4PvcGo.jpg


Even the little wins are worth it.

TN7e3Ge.png
 
Lol... I pictured the snowflake in chief golfing in Mar a Lago being informed that his tax returns would be made public; "Bad! and very unfair...it's not fair!"


Trump's response....................



giphy.gif
 
Pretty much sums up the whole witch hunt.

-------------------------------------------------

Conservatives torch Comey’s credibility ahead of Senate hearing

Washington will be riveted this week by the drama surrounding former FBI Director James Comey’s expected congressional testimony.

But Republicans elsewhere in the country say they couldn’t care less.

Interviews with GOP activists across the country, including around a dozen attendees at this weekend’s North Carolina Republican convention, reveal deep mistrust of Comey, who was investigating possible connections between Russia and the Trump campaign before the president fired him.

Comey, slated to appear before the Senate intelligence committee on Thursday, is also expected to respond to reports that Trump pressured him to give former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn a pass. Yet there is little Comey could say this week that would change how grassroots Republicans view the president.

“There’s nothing about Jim Comey that I trust,” said state Sen. Ron Rabin. “There’s nothing consistent about what he says.”

Asked whether Comey has any credibility, he offered a view shared by many Republican activists gathered at this airy waterfront convention center: “None. Zero.”

Nationally, both Republican and Democratic lawmakers, operatives and donors have expressed alarm about the complicated, multifaceted issue of Russian involvement in an American election, some of which Comey is expected to speak to this week. Some, like Rep. Mike Simpson, a Republican of Idaho, have vouched for his credibility, especially given reports that he has contemporaneous notes from conversations with Trump.

But at this convention, which offered a snapshot of the Republican grassroots, many considered the broader Russia issue as, at best, a distraction from issues like health care and the economy. And others saw the swirling questions around Russia—including the Comey investigation and coming testimony—as pure partisanship driven by Democrats and the media to undermine the legitimacy of Donald Trump’s victory last November.

“The whole thing with Russia is nonsense,” says Jim Gannon, a GOP activist in North Carolina.

“They’re desperately trying to justify why Hillary Clinton lost other than saying Democratic policies aren’t acceptable to people,” said Gannon. “This whole thing is a pretty desperate attempt at partisan politics. ‘Wow, the Russians swung the election.’ What did they do, come and vote? No.”

U.S. intelligence experts, including former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, have been adamant that Moscow did in fact interfere with the 2016 campaign, and intelligence officials have said Russia pushed for hacking of Democratic officials’ emails. Russian President Vladimir Putin has denied this, saying in a recent interview with NBC’s Megyn Kelly that such an order could have come from anyone, including from Americans.

Allison Powers, an attendee who said she is the secretary of the Charlotte-area Union County GOP, was inclined to believe him.

“Putin suggested Russia’s being made a scapegoat for hacking,” she said. “That’s what I think too.”

Long-time U.S. government officials—the “deep state,” she calls them—“don’t want Trump. They’re trying to mess him up.”

Others didn’t go that far, but a number of people questioned whether Russia had really sought to interfere with the U.S. election.

Back in North Carolina, some convention attendees, such as Tom Fyle—a city councilman from Wilson, N.C., near Raleigh—said they would also be listening to the Comey testimony. But they didn’t expect to learn much.

“The facts,” Fyle said, when asked what he’d be watching for.

But he made clear that he doesn’t believe Comey is a trustworthy source of such information: “I don’t know that he’s credible with facts. He hasn’t been credible so far.”
 
Yep.

-----------------------------------

‘Kushnergate’ is a big fat nothing-burger

Trump senior adviser Jared Kushner privately met with dozens of officials from a wide range of nations as part of his role during the campaign and transition as conduit to foreign governments. But the liberal media, led by The Washington Post, have zeroed in on only one of those countries: Russia.

Why? Because the “Russia stole the election” narrative helps them explain how a political novice like President Trump could beat the seasoned Democratic candidate they’d anointed to carry President Barack Obama’s torch, Hillary Clinton.

In fact, the WaPo knew Kushner served as the official “primary point of contact” with the Russians and other foreign ambassadors as early as Feb. 10, when it published a fairly flattering story about him serving as “a shadow diplomat” in talks with “more than two dozen countries.”

The February story noted that Kushner had secretly met with foreign officials in New York and even established “back-channel communications” with other nations. But back then it portrayed the off-the-grid talks as healthy, because Kushner was “a moderating influence” among what it viewed as foreign-policy “extremists” in the new White House.

“Some of the leaders who have dealt with Kushner said they were initially skeptical but found him to be a good listener and courteous intermediary who quickly intuits the core of their issues,” the paper reported.

But then, as the manufactured “Russiagate” conspiracy was fizzling, the WaPo published its sensational May 26 story that made it seem as if there was something nefarious about what the paper three months earlier had known Kushner was doing. This time, his private, back-channel meetings with Russia were cast in a dark and sinister light.

The new story, “Russian ambassador told Moscow that Kushner wanted secret communications channel with Kremlin,” got wall-to-wall coverage on CNN and NBC, but in fact there was no there there.

Indeed, the White House had already explained publicly in March that Kushner’s supposedly “secret” meeting the previous December with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak was meant “to explore whether a channel could be set up between the Russian government and the incoming administration to improve relations” and “cooperate on issues in the Middle East, an area Mr. Kushner has been deputized to take the lead on.”

Fox News, moreover, revealed it was the Russian ambassador who suggested establishing a secret back channel, not Kushner. And the idea of a permanent back channel was never discussed, only a one-off for a call about Syria and ISIS. No secret line was ever established.

The Washington Post also based its story last week on an anonymous letter. That’s right: It has no idea who wrote it.

The mystery author claimed access to intercepts of an “open line” call from Kislyak to Moscow, in which the ambassador talked about the alleged arrangement with Kushner. Even if true, it means Russia may have been trying to feed disinformation — which the paper greedily bit on.

In other words, the WaPo relied on a walk-in letter from a person it can’t identify, who relied on an alleged account by Russia’s top diplomat about what was discussed with Kushner. No wonder the paper hedged its “scoop” by repeatedly using the term “apparent” throughout the story.
 
Time to get down to work.

From Watergate to Enron, Mueller’s team brings storied prosecution pedigrees

http://www.steelernation.com/showth...estigate-Trump-And-Russia&p=378668#post378668

Mueller, who brings a wealth of national security experience, is expected to take an expansive view of his role.

Special counsel Robert Mueller is assembling a prosecution team with decades of experience going after everything from Watergate to the Mafia to Enron as he digs in for a lengthy probe into possible collusion between Russia and President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign.

His first appointments — tapping longtime law firm partner James Quarles and Andrew Weissmann, the head of the Justice Department’s criminal fraud unit — were the opening moves in a politically red-hot criminal case that has already upended the opening months of the Trump White House.

Mueller is expected to take an expansive view of his role. He inherited a spate of existing federal probes covering everyone from the president’s son-in-law and senior White House adviser, Jared Kushner, to former campaign hands Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn and Carter Page.

Mueller brings a wealth of national security experience from his time leading the FBI in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Veteran prosecutors say he has assembled a potent team with backgrounds handling everyone from politicians to mobsters and who know how to work potential witnesses if it helps them land bigger fish.

“The more familiar you are with the important, hard cases that have come before you, the better you are at assessing the one in front of you,” said Samuel Buell, a former federal prosecutor who worked with Weissmann on the Enron case in the early 2000s.

“In a matter of this importance— it’s going to have an almost unprecedented level of outside scrutiny for anything they do — it’s critical that Mueller would be prizing that kind of gray-beard energy,” Buell said.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top