What is the likelihood that you would be able to complete law school and pass the bar exam?
Zero. Thankfully, states have those protections in place to prevent selfish, lying scum - you - from ever representing somebody else's interests. And of course you make another basic grammatical mistake in your sentence - as I detail further, below, you're incredibly stupid.
Rule 4. Periods and commas ALWAYS go inside quotation marks.
Examples:
The sign said, "Walk." Then it said, "Don't Walk," then, "Walk," all within thirty seconds. He yelled, "Hurry up."
http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/quotes.asp
elfiePoloLiarTard error number 1. Let's continue.
elfiePoloLiarTard, you have combined a grating, nonsensical comment with a palpable exhibition of your stupidity. I dare any person to find a comment as demonstrably idiotic, psychotic and imbecilic as elftard's idiotic comment, anywhere else on the internet. Specifically, I wrote in part:
Can you read, you ignorant cow? You stupidly ignored what I wrote and instead went on some rant. This is at least the 5th time I have pulled your pants down when you play amateur lawyer and write something incredibly stupid and wrong about the law.
Jesus Christ on a cookie, you better hope I'm a lawyer, since otherwise some other amateur lawyer wanna-be is ***-raping you on legal analysis. (I know, I know this line of thinking is hard to follow for you. Have a 3rd grader explain it.)
elfiePoloLiarTard error number 2.
Oh, elftard, another basic grammatical error. Basic, as in I knew this rule in 3rd grade. I guess you were too busy learning "White Man Responsible for all Evil" to learn basic rules of grammar, so let me give you the instruction you should have had at age 9:
Semicolons (
separate independent clauses. Oh, right, you don't know what an independent clause is. An independent clause is a complete sentence, with a subject and a predicate. Yes, I forgot, you don't know what a subject and a predicate are. A subject is a noun which is the actor in the sentence, and the predicate is the verb describing the action taken by or inflicted on the subject. An example:
"Steeltime is beating elfiePoloTard like she's Rodney King." "Steeltime" is the subject in this sentence, "beating" is the predicate." See how easy that is?
elfiePoloLiarTard error number 3.
I realize your pathetic education failed to instruct you on the most basic rules of grammar, but for the love of God, learn to read. Once again, here is what I ACTUALLY WROTE, you miserable cow:
So, you fat, bloated, ignorant cow - I specifically pointed out, three times in the opening paragraphs, that the officer was wrong. But I know how to read, and was thus answering Ron's actual question:
So elfiePoloLiar, you (1) either failed to read or failed to understand what I wrote, and where such fault lies completely with you, you fat cow and (2) failed to read or understand the very basic question Ron asked, and that I answered. In law school, we learned the acronym, "RTFQ." That stands for "read the ******* question," elfiePoloLiar. You may wish to employ that advice, fat-***. Oh, and mix in a salad.
elfiePoloLiarTard error number 4.
Siiiigh ... yet another basic grammatical error, you moron. The single quotation mark - ' - is used only to denote a quotation within a quotation. An example:
Steeltime pointed out, "When elfiePoloLiarTard stated, 'I am to stupid to be a lawyer,' she committed another embarrassing grammatical gaffe. elfiePoloTard's second grade English teacher weeps ..."
elfiePoloLiarTard error number 5.
So-called "logical punctuation" is nothing more than an excuse for those too uneducated, lazy and stupid to adhere to basic rules of grammar. And the idea that some fat cow (you) know more about "logical punctuation" than I do is comedy gold, Jerry. ee cummings was a very, very early proponent of non-standardized English, i.e., the lack of capitalization and punctuation. In college, where I earned a degree in English (not as marketable as your degree in "Da White Man Evil," no doubt), we discussed and indeed debated non-standardized English.
An English teacher I liked a lot pointed out that the rules of grammar are designed to insure uniformity of style, organization, order and case. The point of such uniformity is to guarantee precision in expression, among all who communicate in English. English does not have gender or case at all (gender) or to the extent as do Latin, Italian, German, and French (case). Languages with gender and case use declensions of the nouns and verbs to insure accuracy as to the actor, the action, descriptive terms, and the object of the action. English does not have such language tools, so to insure accuracy of message, English focuses upon the order of the nouns and clear indications of case, as far as the English language recognizes case (subjective, objective primarily).
The conclusion in my English class was that non-standard English, one aspect of which has been re-named "logical punctuation," was that those trying to justify their lack of knowledge of English rules of grammar or punctuation were merely trying to excuse their laziness and lack of knowledge. Seriously, can you imagine any other area of study trying to justify failing to follow basic rules?
elfiePoloLiarTard error number 6.
I am of course not surprised that a fat, lazy cow like you would veer towards laziness and inaccuracy in grammar and punctuation. Try to remember Dean Wormer's advice, elfiePoloTard: "Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life."
Once again, you reveal your ignorance. Every legitimate publication continues to use standardized English.
Please find a New York Times article or a Washington Post article following your "logical, i.e., fat, lazy and stupid punctuation."
Go ahead. I'll wait.
elfiePoloLiarTard error number 7.
