• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

******* caption time. (Or thoughts)

Confluence said:
Flogtard,
You do not seem to understand that comparing priests and drag queens is not apples to apples.

You see, a small percentage of priests, like the rest of the population, are sexual deviants.
100% of drag queens are sexual deviants.

And no one here cares about the actions of adult sexual deviants EXCEPT where their deviance results in harm to kids.

Priests who are sexually deviant with kids should be punished, as should any other member of the population who is sexually deviant with kids, because a just society ought to protect kids and strongly discourage sexual deviance with or around kids.

So the notion of putting known sexual deviants with kids, especially with regard to influencing and educating kids, is so far from what a just society should do that anyone suggesting this type of thing --- like sexually deviant drag queens reading to kids as a teacher --- is ok, or normal, is just categorically and morally wrong.
Click to expand...
FFS, and who else is a sexual deviant? People who have engaged in pre-marital or extra-marital relationships? People who patronize strip clubs or watch porn? Women who wear anything other than a burka?

And you’re right, drag queens aren’t comparable to priests. There’s no John Jay report on drag queens.
 
Troglodyte said:
FFS, and who else is a sexual deviant? People who have engaged in pre-marital or extra-marital relationships? People who patronize strip clubs or watch porn? Women who wear anything other than a burka?

And you’re right, drag queens aren’t comparable to priests. There’s no John Jay report on drag queens.
Click to expand...
Still stupid........
 
Steeltime said:
Goddammit, Ron, Biden grew up in a coal mining family though his dad was a middle-class used car salesman, and was an All-American football player denied his status due to an injury inflicted by a villain named Corn Pop, but overcame that trauma to be on a full academic scholarship at Syracuse law despite the law school reporting that is not true since he had a half-scholarship based on need, and did not plagiarize a paper in law school as once again the law school is just wrong, and graduated 76th in a class of 85 or as Biden describes it, "top half of the class," and who overcame his home burning down by changing time and making it a small kitchen fire, where he was a brave civil rights activist who never attended any civil rights rally and never marched in any civil rights demonstration, who was arrested trying to visit Nelson Mandela but where he never was actually arrested and never tried to visit Mandela. Biden's life story is so amazing that Neil Kinnock stole it! Or vice-versa but goddammit, don't get mired in small details, Ron!

In short, quit being racist against the whitest white guy racist ever to walk the planet!
Click to expand...
Superman said:
oh, may god damn your pitch black soul for leaving out the absolute sheer fact that a truck driver killed Joe's first wife and his child after his first wife drove headfirst into the truck driver after crossing the double line on the street - an absolute horrible fact made even more horrible that Joe has to tell it to everyone he encounters and especially those who confuse Beau Biden with Bo Duke. Jesus Christ, Jimmy. Get your **** together.
Click to expand...
Don’t forget that Joe was raised by black Jewish Creole Puerto Ricans whose chicken soup gumbo and matzo balls gave him the strength to take on Corn Pop, who was a bad dude and ran with some bad boys.
 
Ron Burgundy said:
Don’t forget that Joe was raised by black Jewish Creole Puerto Ricans whose chicken soup gumbo and matzo balls gave him the strength to take on Corn Pop, who was a bad dude and ran with some bad boys.
Click to expand...
Joe's a busy, busy man.

 
Troglodyte said:
FFS, and who else is a sexual deviant?
Click to expand...

You really are this stupid, aren't you?
Vast majority of Americans: "Weirdo adult males should not be wagging their groins at little kids."
You: "What about other weirdos?!?"

Da fuq do other weirdos - 99% of whom are leftists - have to do with stopping a group that is insistent on going after little kids in schools?

Troglodyte said:
And you’re right, drag queens aren’t comparable to priests. There’s no John Jay report on drag queens.
Click to expand...

How many instances of these cross-dressing freaks molesting kids will it take to make you care? Tell me and I will start listing the weirdo cross-dressing freaks who are accused of sexual assault.










There are hundreds of such stories, you moron. I found the above in three minutes.

Geez, for such a small percentage of the population, the group of men who dress up in women's clothes and want to spend time with little kids seems to have a high percentage of perverts committing sex crimes. Huh. Wish we had some clue as to the fact a man dressing up as a woman and who wants to spend time with kids might be a ******* nutjob. Any clue, and we would not tolerate this **** any more.

And for the love of God, try to stay on topic for 5 minutes. Priests molesting kids? Bad. Nobody supported it. That has not one goddamn thing to do with the topic. Not one.

Weirdos dressing up in bizarre outfits targeting little kids in schools and where a whole hell of a lot of them wind up molesting kids? Bad, but you have no problem with it.
 
Iron95 said:
Now you are just being stupid.
Click to expand...
Well....stupid seems to be the flavor of the month.

FxgkzNCagAAnuDO
.
FxeRi1IWAAQkEW0
..
th
rainbow-logos.png
 
SteelChip said:
Well....stupid seems to be the flavor of the month.

...
rainbow-logos.png
Click to expand...
in fairness, Apple, United Way, NBC and Skittles have used the rainbow for a long time.

IBM, on the other hand, has a bunch of cunts and cocksuckers working there, so they have to appease the limp-wristed, slack-jawed, knock-kneed faggotry they employ.
 
SteelChip said:
Well....stupid seems to be the flavor of the month.

FxgkzNCagAAnuDO
.
FxeRi1IWAAQkEW0
..
th
rainbow-logos.png
Click to expand...

An entire MONTH to celebrate deviate sexual behavior of a small but growing minority. The part they ****** on was forcing it into elementary schools. That's clearly to desensitize children and it's just a grooming tactic by the twisted pedophiles.And anyone with half a brain knows it.Well, society has had enough of that and is pushing back.
 
Steeltime said:
You really are this stupid, aren't you?
Vast majority of Americans: "Weirdo adult males should not be wagging their groins at little kids."
You: "What about other weirdos?!?"

Da fuq do other weirdos - 99% of whom are leftists - have to do with stopping a group that is insistent on going after little kids in schools?



How many instances of these cross-dressing freaks molesting kids will it take to make you care? Tell me and I will start listing the weirdo cross-dressing freaks who are accused of sexual assault.










There are hundreds of such stories, you moron. I found the above in three minutes.

Geez, for such a small percentage of the population, the group of men who dress up in women's clothes and want to spend time with little kids seems to have a high percentage of perverts committing sex crimes. Huh. Wish we had some clue as to the fact a man dressing up as a woman and who wants to spend time with kids might be a ******* nutjob. Any clue, and we would not tolerate this **** any more.

And for the love of God, try to stay on topic for 5 minutes. Priests molesting kids? Bad. Nobody supported it. That has not one goddamn thing to do with the topic. Not one.

Weirdos dressing up in bizarre outfits targeting little kids in schools and where a whole hell of a lot of them wind up molesting kids? Bad, but you have no problem with it.
Click to expand...
Yeah, still doesn’t come close to the incomprehensible and ever increasing number of cases involving priests, now does it? And nobody supported it? Really? How ******* clueless are you?




“99%”, “Seems like”, “whole hell of a lot”, etc. Please, this thread isn’t about protecting children, it’s about propagating a culture war.
 
Troglodyte said:
Yeah, still doesn’t come close to the incomprehensible and ever increasing number of cases involving priests, now does it? And nobody supported it? Really? How ******* clueless are you?




“99%”, “Seems like”, “whole hell of a lot”, etc. Please, this thread isn’t about protecting children, it’s about propagating a culture war.
Click to expand...
so, you're against sexualizing children, correct?
 
Troglodyte said:
Yeah, still doesn’t come close to the incomprehensible and ever increasing number of cases involving priests, now does it? And nobody supported it? Really? How ******* clueless are you?




“99%”, “Seems like”, “whole hell of a lot”, etc. Please, this thread isn’t about protecting children, it’s about propagating a culture war.
Click to expand...
Culture war is a stupid term. I guess thats why you use it so much.
 
Troglodyte said:
That and all the other abuses.
Click to expand...
so you find it reprehensible and criminal for a cis-gendered male to intentionally and purposefully shake his pubic area and/or *** in front of grade school children, regardless of clothing he's wearing or how they "identify" at that time.

correct?
 
Ron Burgundy said:
That's why I rarely engage him and Mr. Tibs.
Like I've said before, "Democrats good, Republicans bad, Democrats right, Republicans wrong, bend facts to fit."
Not worth my time.
Click to expand...
Yep, sometimes I get suckered in, amazed at the sheer stupidity of a comment. I hold out hope that it's done on purpose just to get a reaction.
 
Superman said:
so you find it reprehensible and criminal for a cis-gendered male to intentionally and purposefully shake his pubic area and/or *** in front of grade school children, regardless of clothing he's wearing or how they "identify" at that time.

correct?
Click to expand...
Flogs response:


DWF6Z8iXUAIiOrR.jpg
 
Superman said:
so you find it reprehensible and criminal for a cis-gendered male to intentionally and purposefully shake his pubic area and/or *** in front of grade school children, regardless of clothing he's wearing or how they "identify" at that time.

correct?
Click to expand...
No, I find it reprehensible regardless if it’s a cis-gendered male or not. Why are you compelled to specify and target?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top