Why are you? We get it. You hate the church. That your problem, not ours.
******* caption time. (Or thoughts)
- Thread starter Ironcitysteelers
- Start date
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,338
- Reaction score
- 5,385
- Points
- 113
It’s ironic that that’s pretty much what the Catholic Church told the victims.
So......you were there? You heard what was said. Or are you just making **** up?
well, that is precisely what you are doing.
you could have said "yes, I do find that reprehensible. I also find..." Instead you're desperately wanting to divert this away from drag queens and children ... despite that being exactly what this thread began about.
now, if you use the search feature you'll likely not find ANYONE supporting the sexualization of children or the grooming of children or the molestation of children from any member on this board ... despite you're absolute willingness to say that that is what has happened.
So, to sum, - you're now on board with stating you disagree with allowing drag queens to twerk in front of children.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,338
- Reaction score
- 5,385
- Points
- 113
You’re seriously unaware? Watch the movie “Spotlight” - it’s a true story. Or google “Catholic Church cover up”. Multiple diocese across the country, thousands of victims.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,338
- Reaction score
- 5,385
- Points
- 113
Wrong! I’m being inclusive. Before I mentioned priests, I included Jerry Sandusky and John Wayne Gacy. Want more? You can find many cases of high school teachers and coaches ******* kids, likely locally. What should be done about that? You don’t care, because you can’t stop fixating on the supposed drag Queen problem. But it’s not a culture war, right?
That’s Johnny Knoxville’s production company. It’s code for Tibs. It shouldn’t be hard to figure out which part of the biological female anatomy is Tibs.
um, no ma'am
John Wayne Gacy was arrested in 1978. Before Al Gore invented this here interweb. Thus, we could not have had the opportunity to discuss his actions.
Jerry Sandusky was VILIFIED on this very board (or some incarnation of it) for his actions.
The cases of high school teachers and coaches ******* kids is met with the same way as it always has been - if the teacher/coach is female and hot, she gets laughed at and a pass. If the teacher/coach is a man or an ugly woman, they are crucified. THIS is not the same as drag queens. These are people in positions of authority using that as leverage against school age children.
see, instead of being reactionary to an issue, try being preventive. Hell, your very own goddamned insistence to bring John Wayne Gacy into this is thrusting mental health into the issue. But you don't or refuse to see it. Gacy - get this - dressed up as someone he was not in order to gain the interest of younger people. Odd that, no? Similarities there, but of course you can't and won't or refuse to acknowledge that.
Oh, the argument about Sandusky - see above where I said he was in a position of authority? Yeah, the sick ******* was using his Second Mile Organization as a way to leverage into a kid's life. Position. of. Authority.
Thankfully, both Gacy and Sandusky are dead and can no longer touch little kids and **** up their lives and futures.
Yet YOU are perfectly willing to allow Drag Queens to gyrate in front of little kids and potentially **** up their lives and futures.
Kudos to you. You're in the lowest class of ************* on this board. And you're PRIDEful of it.
As with Tibs, you miss the MASSIVE difference.
Sandusky's actions weren't protected, let alone promoted by a political party, the media, and corporations nationwide.
Gacy's actions weren't protected, let alone promoted by a political party, the media, and corporations nationwide.
Priests' actions weren't protected, let alone promoted by a political party, the media, and corporations nationwide.
There is a concerted movement with massive public support of trans people sexualizing young children. It is promoted, glorified, and protected.
Unlike every use case you provide. All of them (the cases you've referenced) have been universally condemned and prosecuted, or are being investigated and hopefully prosecuted.
I tried unsuccessfully to get a response to this very question, yes or no, couldn't be any simpler, and got butkis.
One can only conclude that Flog approves of drag queens twerking in front of 6 year old's, and has earned a spot right next to GotCaughtSteelin'.
As a moderator, Stupid *** Pervert may be an appropriate profile banner.
Tibs yes, Floggy I think is really that stupid.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 18,548
- Reaction score
- 29,820
- Points
- 113
- Location
- The nearest Steelers bar.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 3,621
- Reaction score
- 6,754
- Points
- 113
aaaaannnddd....I see this today. They're attacking children. plain and simple. At this point, I'm thinking it's population control
Connecticut school kids as young as 8 were shown a video about gender identity, sent home with "puberty kits" – Parents are angry
Parents were enraged upon learning that students of a Connecticut elementary school were sent home with a “puberty kit” and shown a Pride video without their consent. Students were 3rd, 4th, and 5th graders Parents in Granby, Connecticut, were left enraged after learning their kids who are in 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade were shown ...
Every teacher under 40 years old has been indoctrinated in college and views every kid they can talk into being "trans" as a win.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 10,294
- Reaction score
- 14,311
- Points
- 113
They hate the pledge, guns, capitalism, Christianity, patriotism, etc. They love gays, trans, socialism, big government, illegals, free food year round at schools, etc.
You've heard me say it many times, but here goes again - GET YOUR KIDS OUT OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,338
- Reaction score
- 5,385
- Points
- 113
Get this - no, he did not. Gacy’s victims were all teenage boys or young men. His clown side job was just another creepy aspect about him. Perhaps now would be a good time to acknowledge what you know, and what you are merely suspicious of.
You miss the point entirely. Sandusky IS (he’s still alive) not a drag Queen and parents, who probably would have been suspicious of him if he was, entrusted him with their children.
Is it WHAT they’re doing, or is it WHO is doing it? Did you lose your **** when Justin Timberlake tore open Janet Jackson’s outfit exposing her breast during the Super Bowl halftime show? Children were watching that.
I swear, you'd miss the point if it was tattooed between your eyes with a ballpeen hammer
1. Gacy - dead. During his trial, he submitted an insanity plea, saying the murders were caused by an alternate identity. That, taken at its face value, IS the definition of a mental disorder. And he was being allowed around children. The fact that he was preying on young men just marginally older than children is lost on you. All you see is a white guy doing this. Dig deeper and you'll also see that he was a ******* registered Democrat.
2. Sandusky, should be dead and is in prison for the rest of his natural life - yes, he's serving a 30 year sentence, but should die in prison. I never, not once, said Sandusky was a drag queen. I very ******* specifically stated that he used his power of authorty in his organization to weasel into his victim's lives. He sought the kids in broken homes, and had a functioning plan each time.
3. If drag queens want to twerk and gyrate their pubic area and *****, that's fine with me. What's NOT fine with me is doing it around little kids. You seem to want to find the gray area and exploit it. There's no gray area. We all know what a child is and we do not need an exact definition to agree on.
4. How in the **** are you drawing a correlation between a ******* Super Bowl halftime show and drag queens twerking in front of children with their pubic areas inches from a child's face? That's some universal olympic leaping you're doing. However, to address your ignorance, the fact that parents were able to discuss this with their kids who saw it or even tell their kids that it was a mistake is part of this discussion. Janet's breast was exposed, but her nipple was covered. ****, I'd like to have seen those nipples. She has nice ****. Or had. But, it's still a YUGE stretch to say this is the same as a drag queen shoving HIS dick and *** or a sex toy in a kid's face.
5. The fact that you STILL argue FOR drag queens to twerk and shove their ***** and pubic areas in a child's face proves without a doubt that you're a classless, ****** human. Whataboutism is all you have to go on.
Like I said, he’ll justify and defend whatever the Dems want no matter how stupid or offensive it is.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,338
- Reaction score
- 5,385
- Points
- 113
I am not arguing FOR anyone. That’s your strawman. I’m getting to the real underlying cause of what threatens you.
If the Super Bowl halftime show was to have a drag Queen Janet Jackson impersonator having her outfit ripped off exposing her surgically augmented breast, would you feel differently about it? Yes or no?
Oh, and you really think that was a wardrobe malfunction? Really?
Maybe, but when kids are involved, I don't care how loyal you are to a party, **** him, ignore the prick.
If killer whales ate oranges while sunning themselves on top of the Empire State Building, would you still be a clueless fuckup?
Are you waiting for someone to defend Janet Jackson? Keep waiting dumb ***.
if that even happens, ze will pivot towards something else asinine in comparison.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,338
- Reaction score
- 5,385
- Points
- 113
Clueless? No that would be southerners who complain about freak drag queens and sexualization of children as they attend the latest and greatest child beauty pageant. Those are big down there, ammarite?
