Neither one is a DOCTOR, that’s who I take medical advice from.
Like Dr. Marty Makary?
I'll wait.
Last edited:
Neither one is a DOCTOR, that’s who I take medical advice from.
FFS TIM! FFS TIM! FFS TIM! FFS TIM! FFS TIM! FFS TIM! FFS TIM! FFS TIM! FFS TIM! FFS TIM! FFS TIM! FFS TIM. FFS TIM! FFS TIM! FFS TIM! - Flog
but, just since you raised this ...UN ******* BELIEVABLE!!!… someone would offer Ice-T $9 million to do a movie?
If there's one thing you can put money on, it's that Ice-T is making plenty of money from "Law and Order: SVU." How much we hear you ask? Well, according to Celebrity Net Worth, the rapper earns a whopping $250,000 an episode. That's a quarter of a million dollars. Not bad! Of course, all that adds up, and the outlet estimates he takes home about $6 million for every single season of the show he appears on
Read More: https://www.nickiswift.com/889824/how-much-does-ice-t-make-per-episode-of-law-and-order-svu/
Why they put women in these roles whereby key decisions should be made befuddles me. I mean, have you ever asked your wife where she wants to eat?!?! good Lord!Winning
Canadian Court Invalidates Covid Lockdowns Due To Illegal Implementation
An Albertan court ruled on Tuesday that lockdown orders enacted in response to Covid were invalid.
The ruling in Ingram v. Alberta will likely force prosecutors to withdraw charges against individuals, churches, and other organizations in several other standing cases.
Justice Barbara Romaine ruled in favor of the applicants because the Chief Medical Officer of Health (CMOH) delegated her decisions to the cabinet, which she was not authorized to do under Canadian law. The CMOH herself testified at trial that she provided only advice and recommendations to politicians but did not make the decisions herself.
Where did this spike in leprosy suddenly and unexpectedly come from? The answer is the stories were based on a single “Research Letter” published this week in Emerging Infectious Diseases, titled “Case Report of Leprosy in Central Florida, USA, 2022.” One case. And the diagnosis was already a year old.
“News.”
The Research Letter described a single case of a 54-year-old Central Florida man who had minor clinical signs of leprosy for five years before he finally went into his dermatologist for a rash, and wound up leaving with a leprosy diagnosis....
The doctors at Shands — a major Central Florida research hospital affiliated with the University of Florida — aren’t that concerned about leprosy. Florida’s Department of Health isn’t that concerned about leprosy. Apart from its ridiculous travel advisory, CDC doesn’t seem that concerned about leprosy.
So why is corporate media so concerned about leprosy?
The media’s hook, which is difficult to identify, is that there appears to be a new etiology of the disease, meaning a few people recently seem to be catching (or showing) leprosy without the usual causes, like cuddling with armadillos. For some baffling reason.
The very first footnote cited in the Research Letter linked a 2017 scientific article on leprosy that mentions this important fact:
Lepromatous leprosy occurs in infected individuals with impaired T-cell immunity resulting in anergy.
IDK, hiding and using the excuse that their opponent is a meanie as to why they refuse to debate them seems to be a winning strategy, and we will likely see again.Whatever it takes to create fake votes, like in ‘20. The libtards know Trump will mop the floor with whatever commie they nominate, so they have to rig the election. Again:
Seriously? If it was impractical to merely release the data in a period of less than 23.5 years, how the hell did they manage to review and evaluate the data and approve the "vaccines" in a much shorter time period?The FDA had argued it would be “impractical” to release the estimated 4.8 million pages at more than between 1,000 and 16,000 pages per month, which would have taken at least 23.5 years.
Pfizer and Moderna Reps Put on the Hot Seat in Fiery Senate Hearing in Australia
(excerpts below)
Sparks flew during a contentious public hearing in the Australian Parliament earlier this week as Representatives from Pfizer and Moderna gave unsatisfactory answers to multiple lawmakers’ questions.
The Australian Senate’s ‘Education and Employment Legislation Committee’ held a hearing Wednesday regarding the status of the COVID-19 vaccines, which included witnesses from Pfizer Australia, Moderna, and the Australia’s Theraputic Goods Administration (TGA).
Conservative lawmakers were outraged that at least half of all Australians got COVID after the country imposed some of the most draconian lockdowns and vaccine mandates in the world.
During the hearing, a Pfizer representative insisted that no one was forced to get the risky COVID-19 jabs in Australia, despite the county’s strict mandates.
Senator Pauline Hanson confronted Dr. Brian Hewitt, Pfizer Australia’s Head of Regulatory Sciences, about a comment he had made earlier in the hearing regarding the country’s vaccine mandates.
“You actually made a comment that no one was forced to have the vaccination,” Hanson said, after initially attributing the comment to his colleague Dr. Krishan Thiru, Pfizer Australia’s Country Medical Director.
“You were in Australia during COVID-19 … you must have been fully aware that people—nurses, doctors, people—to keep their jobs, were forced to have the vaccination,” she said. “Now, do you retract your statement that they were not forced?”
“Senator, no, I believe firmly that no one was forced to have a vaccine,” Hewitt responded. “Mandates and vaccine requirements are determined by governments and health authorities. I believe everyone was offered an opportunity to get a vaccine or not get a vaccine and I don’t believe that anybody was forced to take the vaccine.”
“A lot of Australians will disagree with you on that one,” Hanson shot back.
Senator Alex Antic had cited statistics showing that cases of Myocarditis spiked precipitously in South Australia following introduction of the COVID injections.
“Now, we know that myocarditis and pericarditis are two heart inflammation conditions well associated with the COVID mRNA injections—even the Theraputic Goods Administration admits to that, Antic began. “Yet despite this well-established fact, the injections were mandated to thousands of Australians and speaking out about these incursions on freedom got one labeled an anti-vaxxer or a peddler of dangerous disinformation,” the senator continued.
Antic cited data he obtained through a Freedom of Information request from the South Australia Health Department that tracked cardiac related presentations in 15-year-olds to 44-year-olds going back to 2018.
The senator showed a chart indicating that the numbers remained steady at 1,100 a month from January 2018 until July of 2021 when it “drastically spiked.” By November of 2021, he said, the number of cases peaked at 2,172 per month, almost double the norm. The rise in cases, he noted, took place “just as these injections were rolled out.”
Antic noted that there was another spike in cardiac related presentations in February of 2023, “just when the boosters were being mandated.”
“These injections are harming, and in many cases, killing our young people,” Antic declared. “So what does SA Health have to say about this? Nothing. They continue to roll out the injections. They continue to push the injection narrative. This injection campaign is going to go down as the greatest scandal in medical history and none of you said a single thing.”
During the hearing, one of the Pfizer representatives admitted that during the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines, Pfizer employees received a different shot than the general public.
“Your vaccine mandate was using your own batch of vaccine especially imported for Pfizer and not tested by the TGA?” conservative Senator Malcolm Roberts asked Dr. Hewitt.
“Pfizer undertook to import Pfizer vaccines specifically for the employee vaccination program and that was so that no vaccine would be taken from government stocks that were being delivered to clinics as needed,” Dr. Hewitt replied, in answer to a senator’s question.
“What we’ve seen during the COVID mismanagement and malfeasance was the largest transfer of wealth in our nation’s history from We the People to Big Pharma via Big Government that lied repeatedly during the COVID mismanagement,” Roberts said.
Queensland Senator Gerard Rennick, a member of the Liberal National Party, on Wednesday as asked the doctors whether they could explain how Pfizer’s mRNA COVID injections were causing heart disease.
As Antic had noted, even Australia’s Theraputic Goods Administration had confirmed the link between COVID vaccines and heart diseases such as myocarditis and pericarditis.
“Can you explain the process, why the vaccine causes myocarditis and pericarditis?” Sen. Rennick asked.
Dr. Thiru began by expressing his “confidence in the safety profile” of the vaccine, but was cut off by Sen. Rennick when it became apparent that the doctor was filibustering.
Calling for a point of order, he again asked the Pfizer doctors, “Do you understand why [Pfizer’s vaccine] causes myocarditis? I want you to explain to me why it causes myocarditis.”
Dr. Thiru said that Pfizer is “aware of very rare reports of myocarditis and pericarditis that have been temporarily associated with the vaccine,” before being interrupted again by Rennick to answer the question.
In response, Thiru again referred t to the “small” number of reports around the world linking myocarditis to the Pfizer jab, before being interrupted for a third time by Rennick.
“I’m not referring to the number of reports,” the Queensland senator pressed. “I want you to explain to me the mechanism of how the vaccine causes myocarditis. Do you or do you not understand the mechanism of why the vaccine causes myocarditis?”
“It looks to me like you don’t. And if you don’t understand it, why are you saying the vaccine is safe without qualifying the risks?” he asked.
The committee chair directed Dr. Thiru to “get to” Sen. Rennick’s question, but the Pfizer doctor insisted on talking about the mRNA product’s benefit-risk ratio, which he indicated was excellent.
Rennick tried one last time to get a straight answer from the Pfizer doc.
“The question that I asked was can you explain why the vaccine causes myocarditis. Yes or no?” he asked.
After Thiru tried to deflect one more time by citing the jabs’ allegedly justifiable benefit-risk ratio, Rennick gave up.
“You clearly don’t understand the pathway, do you? Because you can’t explain it,” the senator said
Thiru said he would have to “come back” to the committee with “whatever information we can provide” on the mechanism of how the vaccine causes myocarditis.
Sen. Antic was similarly frustrated when he asked the doctors from Moderna to provide data on the rates of serious adverse events, which a recent medical journal report showed was occurring in one of 800 vax recipients.
He asked the Moderna representatives how their own internal adverse reaction numbers compared with that study.
Dr. Chris Clarke, Moderna’s Director, Scientific Leadership, told Antic that he had not seen the report.
“Do you think you should be aware of that?” Antic pressed. “This has been widely reported. You are a manufacturer of vaccines. I find it difficult to think that you wouldn’t be aware of this report.”
“You can’t tell me the rates of serious adverse events. You realize you’ve come to a Senate hearing today for the purposes of exactly that question. And you can’t tell me the rates of serious adverse reactions to your product, which I find extraordinary,” he said.
When Antic asked Clarke what Moderna’s overall rate of serious vaccine injury was for its COVID product, the doctor admitted that he doesn’t know “the actual rates of adverse events.”
“You don’t have the rates of adverse events in front of you?” Antic asked incredulously.
Don't get me started...Was any government more evil to its people during Covid than Australia's?
Was any government more evil to its people during Covid than Australia's?
I just hope, for the sake of all, that the women on the View got their shots and boosters!
OMG, JFC, Doktors! - TrogAnyone liking this new normal?
16-YEAR-OLD TEXAS CHEERLEADER SUFFERS FATAL CARDIAC ARREST
A sudden cardiac arrest took the life of a high school girl, remembered for her exuberance and hard work.
Callie Mitchell, the 16-year-old high schooler entering her junior year, suffered a fatal cardiac arrest at her cheerleading camp, which she attended as of July 24.
The popular Morton Ranch High School (Katy, TX.) cheerleader was at Texas A&M when the medical emergency occurred. Mitchell had to be airlifted to Texas Children’s Hospital.
Tragic Medical Emergency Kills Texas Cheerleader
Despite the coach’s CPR, Mitchell died from the sudden attack.
Mitchell’s bereaved parents, Michelle and Scott Donahue, suggested that the cardiac arrest stemmed from Callie’s Long QT. The coach contacted Callie’s parents days before the fatal cardiac arrest.
“If it wasn’t for [the coach], we would have never had the chance to say goodbye,” Michelle Donahue said.
Mitchell’s parents also encourage fellow Morton Ranch High School parents to buy EKGs, which monitor signs of a potentially fatal heart disorder.
“For any other parents out there, you know they do physicals every year. … EKGs are not part of a physical. … Get an EKG,” Scott Donohue said.
OMG, JFC, Doktors! - Trog