• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Covid Vaccine

Interesting stuff. @Confluence may find this interesting. Not sure what to make of it. Hope Steve's right. Doubt the FDA would be required to remove them, but perhaps they have found the loophole necessary to sue the pants off those orgs.


Breaking: You can now sue the mRNA COVID vaccine manufacturers for damages and the FDA is required to take the COVID vaccines off the market. Why? Adulteration. The plasmid bioactive contaminant sequences were NOT pointed out to the regulatory authorities. It's considered adulteration. I just got off the phone with Professor Byram Bridle and Dr. Robert Malone on this.

Michigan remdesivir case is very important precedent here proving liability shield falls when there is undisclosed contamination of active ingredients.
I’m doing a video interview with Byram and with Kevin tomorrow on this topic.

The FDA is now at a crossroads. Either they admit that they knew about the plasma contamination, and failed to disclose that to the public and to the outside committees, or they can claim that they didn’t know about it in which case Pfizer is liable. But we have the Pfizer documents that were given to the FDA so we know what the FDA got. And I seriously doubt there’s any disclosure of SV40 contamination. That means we have an adulterated vaccine and the FDA has to remove it from the market until the adulteration is fixed. If the FDA doesn’t do that, they should face criminal prosecution for endangering the public, and not following the law.

Here's the Michigan story for those who asked showing when there is contamination, there is no immunity. It makes sense. Otherwise, they can add arsenic into the vaccines and not be liable.


All the COVID production vials are contaminated AFAIK. From both Moderna and Pfizer.

I just message Dr. Naomi Wolf re: Pfizer docs. She wasn't aware of any mention of SV40 in the Pfizer docs they gave the FDA (but she will check further).

So Pfizer has a VERY BIG problem.
I just got off the phone with attorney Warner Mendenhall. He confirmed I wrote is accurate and the litigation floodgates are now open.

Here is a list of 90 lawyers that you can contact if you want to sue the vaccine manufacturers: airtable.com/appGIUGnttjzsc…

The SV40 promoter is found in all the vials and it was in the gene sequence that was provided to the regulators. There is no mistake. The problem was that neither drug company ever pointed it out to the regulators. It's an unapproved contaminant that doesn't meet the standards set. So the regulators are off the hook. But if the regulators don't take action, then they dig themselves into a very deep hole. The law requires the FDA to stop the vaccine.

Robert Malone @RWMaloneMD just messaged me: “Yes I think that this DNA adulteration issue could be the wedge we have been looking for. Use of a plasmid with SV40 sequences as the template for manufacturing the pseudo-mRNA is, at a minimum, reckless and I can see no logical justification”

It does appear that Biden and most all of the US lawmakers are supporting the drug companies. That’s what they’re paid to do.

Why do I say that? The adulteration has been known since April 2023 and nobody has called for an investigation. Not even after Health Canada confirmed it. They didn’t even ask for an investigation!!

Also, not a single mainstream doctor, who was promoting the vaccine has called for the proper testing to be done as far as I know. The brainwashing and intimidation here is stunning. Everyone should be calling for this to be taken extremely seriously.

I can tell you that all of MY scientific friends want to see this work done ASAP.

If it is discovered that this integrates into your DNA, no one will want to take it willingly.

Our government will then need to mandate it to get people to comply, just like they did before.

If people in government were interested in science and your health, they would have been hammering the CDC and the FDA asking why this was never investigated when it was first discovered.

It will be interesting to see what they do now, won’t it?

@RWMaloneMD Learn more here. It includes a link to the original April 10 paper:

"OK, you were right. We admit vaccine is contaminated with SV40, but we found some experts who think it's not a problem."How is it that Kevin McKernan, and not any world health authority, found the contamination in April 2023? And why are the FDA, CDC, and the mainstream media still silent about this?https://kirschsubstack.com/p/ok-you...cine?r=o7iqo&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

@RWMaloneMD Dr. Naomi Wolf reports that SV40 does not appear in any of the regulatory documents that Pfizer gave the FDA. So it’s an active ingredient that was not disclosed. That makes it adulteration. This means that the FDA is required to take it off the market. NOW.
 
Tim Steelersfan said:
His doctor didn't say that. You simply can't help but twist people's messages out of context.

By all means, continue 🤡. We are entertained.
Click to expand...
Oh, excuse me, she said “detrimental” you call them “very dangerous”. But why split hairs all of a sudden? What did your doctor not say? Man up, grow a sack.
 
Tim Steelersfan said:
Interesting stuff. @Confluence may find this interesting. Not sure what to make of it. Hope Steve's right. Doubt the FDA would be required to remove them, but perhaps they have found the loophole necessary to sue the pants off those orgs.


Breaking: You can now sue the mRNA COVID vaccine manufacturers for damages and the FDA is required to take the COVID vaccines off the market. Why? Adulteration. The plasmid bioactive contaminant sequences were NOT pointed out to the regulatory authorities. It's considered adulteration. I just got off the phone with Professor Byram Bridle and Dr. Robert Malone on this.

Michigan remdesivir case is very important precedent here proving liability shield falls when there is undisclosed contamination of active ingredients.
I’m doing a video interview with Byram and with Kevin tomorrow on this topic.

The FDA is now at a crossroads. Either they admit that they knew about the plasma contamination, and failed to disclose that to the public and to the outside committees, or they can claim that they didn’t know about it in which case Pfizer is liable. But we have the Pfizer documents that were given to the FDA so we know what the FDA got. And I seriously doubt there’s any disclosure of SV40 contamination. That means we have an adulterated vaccine and the FDA has to remove it from the market until the adulteration is fixed. If the FDA doesn’t do that, they should face criminal prosecution for endangering the public, and not following the law.

Here's the Michigan story for those who asked showing when there is contamination, there is no immunity. It makes sense. Otherwise, they can add arsenic into the vaccines and not be liable.


All the COVID production vials are contaminated AFAIK. From both Moderna and Pfizer.

I just message Dr. Naomi Wolf re: Pfizer docs. She wasn't aware of any mention of SV40 in the Pfizer docs they gave the FDA (but she will check further).

So Pfizer has a VERY BIG problem.
I just got off the phone with attorney Warner Mendenhall. He confirmed I wrote is accurate and the litigation floodgates are now open.

Here is a list of 90 lawyers that you can contact if you want to sue the vaccine manufacturers: airtable.com/appGIUGnttjzsc…

The SV40 promoter is found in all the vials and it was in the gene sequence that was provided to the regulators. There is no mistake. The problem was that neither drug company ever pointed it out to the regulators. It's an unapproved contaminant that doesn't meet the standards set. So the regulators are off the hook. But if the regulators don't take action, then they dig themselves into a very deep hole. The law requires the FDA to stop the vaccine.

Robert Malone @RWMaloneMD just messaged me: “Yes I think that this DNA adulteration issue could be the wedge we have been looking for. Use of a plasmid with SV40 sequences as the template for manufacturing the pseudo-mRNA is, at a minimum, reckless and I can see no logical justification”

It does appear that Biden and most all of the US lawmakers are supporting the drug companies. That’s what they’re paid to do.

Why do I say that? The adulteration has been known since April 2023 and nobody has called for an investigation. Not even after Health Canada confirmed it. They didn’t even ask for an investigation!!

Also, not a single mainstream doctor, who was promoting the vaccine has called for the proper testing to be done as far as I know. The brainwashing and intimidation here is stunning. Everyone should be calling for this to be taken extremely seriously.

I can tell you that all of MY scientific friends want to see this work done ASAP.

If it is discovered that this integrates into your DNA, no one will want to take it willingly.

Our government will then need to mandate it to get people to comply, just like they did before.

If people in government were interested in science and your health, they would have been hammering the CDC and the FDA asking why this was never investigated when it was first discovered.

It will be interesting to see what they do now, won’t it?

@RWMaloneMD Learn more here. It includes a link to the original April 10 paper:

"OK, you were right. We admit vaccine is contaminated with SV40, but we found some experts who think it's not a problem."How is it that Kevin McKernan, and not any world health authority, found the contamination in April 2023? And why are the FDA, CDC, and the mainstream media still silent about this?https://kirschsubstack.com/p/ok-you...cine?r=o7iqo&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

@RWMaloneMD Dr. Naomi Wolf reports that SV40 does not appear in any of the regulatory documents that Pfizer gave the FDA. So it’s an active ingredient that was not disclosed. That makes it adulteration. This means that the FDA is required to take it off the market. NOW.
Click to expand...
pFizer and Moderna won't exist in 5 years. Wait until most folks come to understand that pFizer actually stole most of this mRNA ****, with FDA clearly aware the whole time.
 
Troglodyte said:
Oh, excuse me, she said “detrimental” you call them “very dangerous”. But why split hairs all of a sudden? What did your doctor not say? Man up, grow a sack.
Click to expand...
Still leaving out context you jackass. Also what do you have to say about all the **** hitting the fan that is being buried? Still a ******* worshipper of a false god? I took the vaccine, I wanted it to work. It hasn't and the boosters are more dangerous for many groups(young male and healthy) than Covid itself. Why don't you believe in science and natural immunity?
 
Tim Steelersfan said:
Do you want my doctor's name and number?
Click to expand...
To verify what? That he doesn’t agree with your baseless claim? You know you’re full of ****. I know you’re full of ****. If not, make a ******* statement and post his identity and I’ll contact him.
 
Troglodyte said:
To verify what? That he doesn’t agree with your baseless claim? You know you’re full of ****. I know you’re full of ****. If not, make a ******* statement and post his identity and I’ll contact him.
Click to expand...
You are insufferable and wrong on every ******* level both as person and scientifically, politically, morally and every other way.
 
Troglodyte said:
No, I’m being told that I’m wrong about what is reality. You loons claim that doctors are largely split over the vaccine. I’ve provided you multiple ways to prove it and you cannot.

Click to expand...
Dipshit,

You are providing examples of corporate marketing policies, because, well, pFucinkg pFizer is a very large client. But numbers show that not only are people not getting the dangerous/useless Covid shot, but that they are also now more leery of the almost as useless, random flu shot.

You seem to miss that the corporate messaging has been ignored, either by patients or their doctors, or both. It seems like you may be about the only person thusly befuddled, which is not surprising given your Shortbus, low-wattage, self-mendacious output.
 
Confluence said:
Dipshit,

You are providing examples of corporate marketing policies, because, well, pFucinkg pFizer is a very large client. But numbers show that not only are people not getting the dangerous/useless Covid shot, but that they are also now more leery of the almost as useless, random flu shot.

You seem to miss that the corporate messaging has been ignored, either by patients or their doctors, or both. It seems like you may be about the only person thusly befuddled, which is not surprising given your Shortbus, low-wattage, self-mendacious output.
Click to expand...
Dipshit, health providers are clients of Pfizer, not the other way around. Talk about being befuddled!
 
Here is another research paper.

Note that all of these effects would have precluded pFizer or Moderna from gaining approval, had they been disclosed. While both companies cite "rushed" timing 2 factors remain:
1) approved drug usage requires phase 4 reporting; that is barely happening
2) the phase 1 and phase 2 clinical studies were never completed AND the control groups were demolished because companies reported compassionate need. If this timeline gets reconstructed with internal docs, the fraud will become evident as the companies KNEW there were significant side effects and simply lied about them.


Key Results​

In the first 24 h after application, both mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 caused neither functional disturbances nor morphological abnormalities. After 48 h, expression of the encoded spike protein was detected in ventricular cardiomyocytes for both mRNAs. At this point in time, mRNA-1273 induced arrhythmic as well as completely irregular contractions associated with irregular as well as localized calcium transients, which provide indications of significant dysfunction of the cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2). In contrast, BNT162b2 increased cardiomyocyte contraction via significantly increased protein kinase A (PKA) activity at the cellular level.

Conclusions and Implications​

Here we demonstrated for the first time, that in isolated cardiomyocytes, both mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 induce specific dysfunctions that correlate pathophysiologically to cardiomyopathy. Both RyR2 impairment and sustained PKA activation may significantly increase the risk of acute cardiac events.
 
Note how pFloggy now ignores all new research and pFlails around like the only thing that matters is his chosen deities' (health care providers) "opinion".

pFathetic
 
Confluence said:
Here is another research paper.

Note that all of these effects would have precluded pFizer or Moderna from gaining approval, had they been disclosed. While both companies cite "rushed" timing 2 factors remain:
1) approved drug usage requires phase 4 reporting; that is barely happening
2) the phase 1 and phase 2 clinical studies were never completed AND the control groups were demolished because companies reported compassionate need. If this timeline gets reconstructed with internal docs, the fraud will become evident as the companies KNEW there were significant side effects and simply lied about them.


Key Results​

In the first 24 h after application, both mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 caused neither functional disturbances nor morphological abnormalities. After 48 h, expression of the encoded spike protein was detected in ventricular cardiomyocytes for both mRNAs. At this point in time, mRNA-1273 induced arrhythmic as well as completely irregular contractions associated with irregular as well as localized calcium transients, which provide indications of significant dysfunction of the cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2). In contrast, BNT162b2 increased cardiomyocyte contraction via significantly increased protein kinase A (PKA) activity at the cellular level.

Conclusions and Implications​

Here we demonstrated for the first time, that in isolated cardiomyocytes, both mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 induce specific dysfunctions that correlate pathophysiologically to cardiomyopathy. Both RyR2 impairment and sustained PKA activation may significantly increase the risk of acute cardiac events.
Click to expand...
I don't think anyone can deny that corners were cut bringing this vaccine to market. Initially, the majority jumped on board, thinking this was a world ending event.
Turns out that it wasn't then and is even less so today. It will be interesting to see how this plays out, but I suspect Covid and will simply fade away to the back pages of the newspaper without any repercussion to the bureaucracy involved in this mess.
The players are just too big.
 
Troglodyte said:
Take it up with Tim.
Click to expand...
nah. you're the one twisting your labia majora over "detrimental" and "very dangerous". I presented the webster definition of "detrimental" with an example of "smoking may be detrimental to one's health"

in that, you would not say that "smoking may be a positive effect on one's health", but instead would say "smoking may be dangerous to one's health". The adjective "very" can be discarded, as smoking in and of itself is not going to contribute positively to a person's health, thus "very" would just underline the detrimental/dangerous insinuation.

even a dumbfuck such as yourself should be able to understand that.
 
Superman said:
nah. you're the one twisting your labia majora over "detrimental" and "very dangerous". I presented the webster definition of "detrimental" with an example of "smoking may be detrimental to one's health"

in that, you would not say that "smoking may be a positive effect on one's health", but instead would say "smoking may be dangerous to one's health". The adjective "very" can be discarded, as smoking in and of itself is not going to contribute positively to a person's health, thus "very" would just underline the detrimental/dangerous insinuation.

even a dumbfuck such as yourself should be able to understand that.
Click to expand...
Dumbfuck, take it up with Tim. He’s the one that had a problem with me using “very dangerous” instead of “detrimental”. Follow along.
 
Troglodyte said:
To verify what?
Click to expand...

You keep demanding doctor's phone numbers. You answer that.

Troglodyte said:
That he doesn’t agree with your baseless claim?
Click to expand...

That he won't agree that he has never asked about my Covid vaccine status and never recommended I get one? That's what I have said repeatedly has happened in my personal case. Your reading comprehension is abhorent.

Troglodyte said:
You know you’re full of ****.
Click to expand...

So now you're down to just calling people liars? Ironic, given you're the biggest liar on the board.

What I claim my PCP has not done is truth

Troglodyte said:
If not, make a ******* statement and post his identity and I’ll contact him.
Click to expand...

I did make a statement. 39 times. It's repeated above. Read it. Comprehend it.
 
Troglodyte said:
No, I’m being told that I’m wrong about what is reality. You loons claim that doctors are largely split over the vaccine. I’ve provided you multiple ways to prove it and you cannot.

Click to expand...

200w.webp


LMAO :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :LOL: :LOL: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

Your "reality" is to drink up every ounce of propaganda you are fed. This is a prop piece. Just days ago we provided you evidence that
a) 2% of Americans have gotten the new booster <<<<------Next to no one
b) Pfizer is losing billions because there is no demand for the shot

And right on cue you just turn a blind eye to the reality and like Gomer ******* Pyle read this puff piece and go "Golllllyyy, people's be out dare getting dem shots like they candy!!"

You are so pathetic.

Shot.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Game Balls, Game Goats & FU's...........Week 1 @ Atlanta
2 3 4
Replies
84
Views
2K
SteveA
SteveA
Tim Steelersfan
(D) Gov. Katie Hobbs Under Investigation
Replies
8
Views
497
Steelr4evr
S
Superman
what's that? you want MORE government? say less.
Replies
10
Views
120
Steelr4evr
S
Drink IRON City
OFFICIAL Prediction Thread....STEELERS at Broncos
2 3
Replies
57
Views
896
Drink IRON City
Drink IRON City
C
Game Balls, Game Goats & FU's.............week @ Broncos
2 3
Replies
56
Views
1K
jitter77
J
Top