Because I don't give out personal information to fuckwads like you. The fact after all the times I actually came to your defense in 2020 that you would question my integrity tells me everything I need to know about you, you miserable little worm.
AND that right there is why I am not giving a ******* single piece of information to a commie informant.
It doesn't matter, because the only answer he will get is yes, our facility does administer the latest Covid booster injection. And everyone on this board will acknowledge that. That's it, no personal medical information will ever be released.
Mel Brooks would have a field day with that Karen/totalitarian mindset which is unfortunately well entrenched in our once free country.
I want the name age address social security number, medical license and DNA sample from every person who told you that or it isn't true.
I must be confusing you with the Tim Steelerfan thats convinced his doctor knows the vaccine is worthless, useless, dangerous and isn’t paid off by big Pharma.
I find this dubious as well for a few reasons. Please have fun verifying which one of these individuals is your BIL:
For the tenth time, if you’re being truthful, what is there to hide?
Personal medical information?
I only informed them of the dubious claims being made about IU Health via social media. They agreed with me, thanked me and forwarded the information.
So you’re on board that it was a false equivalency to what SILs doctor supposedly told him?
Ho-lee ****, people, I leave this thread for four days and it turns into Dr. Flogstain supposedly calling a medical provider to "report" on information he got from a football message board?!?
Meanwhile, two different research facilities examined the Pfizer vax/shot and determined that the product contains DNA far in excess of what is permitted under the mRNA guidelines.
Sorry, We May Have Mixed Some DNA Into Your mRNA Vax/Shot
The process in making mRNA vax/shots involves using DNA templates that are "triggered" to produce the desired mRNA. The process almost always produces "residual" DNA material that is removed as best as possible since researchers have warned that "residual" DNA should be limited in these vax/shots. Why? Because the residual DNA can include oncogenes (a gene that has the potential to produce cancer) or infectious agents:
National Library of Medicine - Limit on DNA
Tests on the vax/shots, particularly the Pfizer brand, showed vastly excessive DNA, far in excess of the amounts permitted under FDA rules and even under the much more generous limits of the European Medicines Agency.
Ooh, Sorry About That Unwanted DNA
So Dr. Flogstain, the Pfizer vax/shot is pfucked up with amounts of DNA that greatly exceed the limits placed on such genetic materials allowed in the vax/shot. Tell us all, oh wise fake doctor, the following:
I look forward to your considered reply to my questions. And by "considered reply," I do not mean the usual, "Wait, [fill in name of entity]? That's a group of nutjobs! Hah!" The information I cited is based on research that nobody actually disputes. The argument on behalf of the Pfizer pfonies is more along the lines of, "Pffft, that excess DNA is harmless" - triggering my question, "Why then do the governing health agencies limit the amount of this supposedly harmless product??"
- Why does the FDA limit the amount of DNA that can be found in these vax/shots?
- What are the concerns about excessive DNA in vax/shots using mRNA as a delivery method?
- What concerns do you have that the Pfizer pfucked around with the vax/shots and have far too much residual DNA in their vax/shots?
- Please don't say, "Because the excess DNA is harmless" - the FDA and EMA both limit the amount of DNA that should be present. Or are you suggesting those agencies issue meaningless edicts and in fact don't know what the hell they are doing?
OK one, no one believes you actually called. But let's pretend "you did"
If I'm the IU person, I'm going to say where on social media? X? Facebook? Did you direct them to Steeler Nation? Did they say they were going to create a user ID and join? I'd really like that. I'd welcome it in fact. Did you send the link to join to them? If you won't, I can. I have unlimited InMails if you need me to send them the link.
View attachment 11806 View attachment 11807
Did you send them screen shots? Exactly 'how' did you inform them of the dubious claims?
Agreed with you about what? Dubious claims? Do be more specific. See above. Exactly what did you say to these non-M.D. PUBLIC RELATIONS people that they 'directly agreed with.'
To who? Exactly to who? Their PR Relations boss??
Did they say they would reach out to SteelerPride's named doctor to tell him that as PR people they frown upon a medical doctor telling a patient not to get the RonaShotz?
Were they going to tell the board of directors and try to get them to slap the hand of this wild, renegade Dr.??
Please, your generic "I called them, told them dubious claims were being made, they agreed with me, and forwarded the information" is utter bullshit.
It's free to join SN. Get those girls on board so we can talk.
Your imagination is running wild.
**** off jackass.
So you can attempt to have them “brought in line” with your anti-science group think? However comical the call may be I believe in not feeding brown shirts like you.
It was a brief communication of what was being shared on this site about the supposed advise of IU Health’s Dr O’Brien not to get vaccinated based on natural immunity and how it was at odds with current guidance.
They may very well shrug it off based on the obscurity of the platform but they deserve to be aware of it.
What’s wrong with contacting IU Health and informing them EXACTLY what was being said about one of their doctors and his advice to his patients? If it’s true, then there’s nothing to fear. If it’s not true then people shouldn’t be making **** up implicating others on social media.
