HUGE legal win. YUGE.
A serious review of this case, this decision, and its implications is in order.
040-Memorandum Order and Opinion
Since the COVID products were placed under EUA, the government has told us they were "safe and effective." When some doctors and members of the public began to suspect that may not be the case, they turned to VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. The VAERS data was wildly concerning, to say the least, and it picked up a safety signal almost immediately. When word of that spread, the CDC took to discrediting its own system. It is suggested that VAERS, a voluntary reporting system, captures only 1% of adverse events generally occurring.
The website
OpenVAERS.com was created to make it easier to track the adverse events being voluntarily reported, given that the government was not transparent about what was occurring. As of 11/3/23, this is a snapshot. I suggest everyone take a look at this for themselves.
It is important to note that many doctors will not even report to VAERS for fear of retribution and because they just want to cover this up. Project Veritas
did an expose on that very thing. It is also very time-consuming.
But when the signal from VAERS couldn't be ignored anymore, the CDC lied about how the system worked during a hearing in front of Congress. Then CDC director Rachel Walensky stated when asked that even car accident deaths are captured in VAERS, a BLATANTLY false projection. See for yourself.
The video above was captured 2 years ago. However, another system was implemented to make it appear that the government was monitoring for adverse effects after the COVID-19 shot. Enter V-safe.
As per the CDC, this is the "premier" system for tracking the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. It is an app people can download that allows people who got the shot to tell the CDC about any side effects they experience. But, there are some problems.
However, the app has some limitations. Users are instructed to check boxes as they relate to symptoms. But even the CDC says those "symptoms" just mean the shot is working. So, by that logic, it couldn't ever pick up a safety signal. Approximately 10 million users downloaded and used V-safe. Here is an example of the pre-determined events they could choose.
However, there was another way to track the safety of these novel shots—the free text field. There were a few places where you could write in how you felt or other information, with a character limit. The CDC called this "health impact data"
Also, note that "check box" data was only collected for the first week after vaccination... They then used a week's worth of this data, which they had already said would be typical and show the shot was working, to determine safety for the entire world. Sounds legit. So, the Freedom Coalition of Doctors for Choice, a not-for-profit, sent a FOIA request to the CDC for the data contained within the free text field. Obviously, the CDC said it wouldn't produce and that it would be too cumbersome to filter out privacy information.
Freedom Coalition of Doctors for Choice v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2:23-cv-00102 – CourtListener.com
Here is an example from the BRILLIANT attorney Aaron Siri of what is found in the free text field of this app.
So, the Freedom Coalition of Doctors for Choice SUED the CDC, arguing that the data held within these text fields is imperative to accurately gauge the true safety of these injections. The lawsuit argued that the people using this app were pro-vaccine and early adopters eager to get it. There isn't a bias in this data towards folks who didn't want the shot. We must have this data, and the CDC should be willing to give it to us— after all, the shot is completely and totally safe, right?
If we don't have "real" evidence of harm, no studies will be funded to help those harmed. If we don't have an admission, there is a problem; there will be no accountability for anyone who caused the massive (what I would argue) humanity-altering PROBLEM.
This past week the judge in the case made his ruling. I am going to show you some excerpts of it, because it is TRULY a massive win for transparency and accountability, and we FINALLY may be starting to see the tide turn. Here is the link:
"In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States government spearheaded one of the greatest medical endeavors in history. Within months, Congress allocated billions of dollars to fund, develop, manufacture, and distribute hundreds of millions of doses of COVID-19 vaccines. When the first vaccines became available in December of 2020, Defendants launched a massive safety monitoring program called “V-safe.” Because of the rapid and extensive rollout of the vaccine, Defendants used V-safe to quickly collect critical health data for symptoms, adverse events, hospitalization or treatment, and safety issues directly from those who received the vaccines."
The PREP Act declarations provided liability immunity for big pharma....and Warp Speed removed the regulatory requirements you usually need to be able to bring a novel technology to market.
The judge remarks here about the MASSIVE role the federal government had in "promoting" the shot, mentioning the rules, regulations, and policies it implemented - including forced vaccination for employment, referencing OSHA. This has been a terrible tragedy.
....to be continued
Sure, Tim. Your vagina must stink worse than Elise Stefanie’s. You think the FBI staged the January 6th violence just like they stage mass shootings, right?
