What could possibly have been your point if you were acknowledging that many Appalachian areas are… wait for it… FOOD DESERTS. That was the point of the article, fool!
I neither approved or disapproved of your post. I attacked YOUR assertion.
And you talking about "points" like an expert is like Joe Biden advising someone on proper gymnastic techniques. You couldn't get a point if someone used a nail gun to drive it into your head.
The POINT of the article was summarized...in...the...article, which was:
Though dollar stores still represent a small share of national household food purchases (2.1% in 2020), they play an increasingly prominent role in food-at-home purchases for certain disadvantaged and rural communities. Understanding the quality of the foods they offer and how this may affect diet-related health outcomes is warranted.
What you attempted to do was politicize said article as a damnation on Appalachia while wholly ignoring that the impact on rural, black, Democratic communities is substantially worse and affects more people.
It's comical to me when you try to make a point and you just stick a bayonet through your own eye while also ignoring that your "scientific research" article omitted grocery stores from its list of grocery stores in order to make a point lmao.
Do food deserts exist or not, Dim?
When you can point to one, we can debate it. Like...say...point to me on a Google Map by dropping a PIN where one can drive for an hour in Blow Duck NC and only see a Dollar Store.
Now you’re trying to compare cities to rural areas. I’m quite certain cities have many more options within a relatively small radius. They’re cities, after all.
You should read the article I linked to. It doesn't omit grocery stores from the list of available food sources, btw, in it's analysis.
The impact is more on the urban areas. It affects more people.