If a vaccine doesn't do what we historically attribute as a vaccine doing, is it really a vaccine?
Covid Vaccine
- Thread starter jitter77
- Start date
Nah, let's use your newest fave tired line: Lose the argument, change the argument?
Stay on point son. For once, follow one discussion/argument without a deflection. Just once?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 8,977
- Reaction score
- 11,580
- Points
- 113
Absolutely not! FDA has altered the legal definition of vaccine twice in the past few years to include these mRNA fuuucking shots and a whole incoming class of un-necessary, doubtfully efficacious new shots.....with zero product liability, just to enable pharma to survive their collective lack of ability to find new drugs ( because they have already altered most common botanicals).
Good watch. Excess mortality, some autopsy results. Fascinating information. Be warned, they reference the 17Million deaths claim. Someone gonna implode.
Of course. Too long to publish all of it (SN limit)
The mRNA used in the COVID-19 vaccines differs from naturally occurring mRNA, which has been modified to prevent immune degradation when injected. In a review published on April 5, researchers argue that modification—specifically, N1-methyl-pseudouridine modification—to mRNA causes immune suppression that may contribute to cancer development.
Uridine is a key component of mRNA. However, when mRNA is injected into the body, it is broken down by cells and also triggers a broad immune response, leading to its rapid degradation.
This immune response can be bypassed: researchers Katalinko Kariko, Ph.D., and Dr. Drew Weissman found that when uridine is modified to N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1-psi), the mRNA is not degraded and proteins can be produced. The two were awarded a 2023 Nobel award for their findings.
Pfizer and Moderna therefore used this patented technology to ensure that the mRNA vaccines would be able to produce spike protein inside cells.
However, research suggests this modification may reduce immune responses. “Within the framework of COVID-19 vaccination, this inhibition ensures an appropriate spike protein synthesis and a reduced immune activation,” the authors wrote in the study’s abstract.
The authors are concerned the modification may promote cancer in susceptible individuals.
“We suggest that future clinical trials for cancers or infectious diseases should not use mRNA vaccines with a 100% m1Ψ (m1-psi) modification, but rather ones with the lower percentage of m1Ψ modification to avoid immune suppression,” they wrote.
...They also cited Ms. Kariko and Dr. Weismann’s paper which found mRNA modification suppressed immune recognition and activation of immune cells. The authors argue that this was a double-edged sword, due to wide-reaching immune consequences.
...The review authors were careful to highlight that they are not suggesting that modified RNA causes cancer but that its effects may lead to an environment that aids in the development of cancers. “Those who do not read in depth will be quick to say that we are AFFIRMING that mRNA vaccines cause cancer. It is important to clarify here that mRNA vaccines do not cause cancer; but they could stimulate its development ... We are more concerned with experimental and clinical data with regard to the latter.”
The Study: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141813024022323?via=ihub
Modified RNA in COVID Vaccines May Contribute to Cancer Development: Review
In a review published on April 5, researchers argue that modification to mRNA causes immune suppression that may contribute to cancer development.The mRNA used in the COVID-19 vaccines differs from naturally occurring mRNA, which has been modified to prevent immune degradation when injected. In a review published on April 5, researchers argue that modification—specifically, N1-methyl-pseudouridine modification—to mRNA causes immune suppression that may contribute to cancer development.
Uridine is a key component of mRNA. However, when mRNA is injected into the body, it is broken down by cells and also triggers a broad immune response, leading to its rapid degradation.
This immune response can be bypassed: researchers Katalinko Kariko, Ph.D., and Dr. Drew Weissman found that when uridine is modified to N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1-psi), the mRNA is not degraded and proteins can be produced. The two were awarded a 2023 Nobel award for their findings.
Pfizer and Moderna therefore used this patented technology to ensure that the mRNA vaccines would be able to produce spike protein inside cells.
However, research suggests this modification may reduce immune responses. “Within the framework of COVID-19 vaccination, this inhibition ensures an appropriate spike protein synthesis and a reduced immune activation,” the authors wrote in the study’s abstract.
The authors are concerned the modification may promote cancer in susceptible individuals.
“We suggest that future clinical trials for cancers or infectious diseases should not use mRNA vaccines with a 100% m1Ψ (m1-psi) modification, but rather ones with the lower percentage of m1Ψ modification to avoid immune suppression,” they wrote.
...They also cited Ms. Kariko and Dr. Weismann’s paper which found mRNA modification suppressed immune recognition and activation of immune cells. The authors argue that this was a double-edged sword, due to wide-reaching immune consequences.
...The review authors were careful to highlight that they are not suggesting that modified RNA causes cancer but that its effects may lead to an environment that aids in the development of cancers. “Those who do not read in depth will be quick to say that we are AFFIRMING that mRNA vaccines cause cancer. It is important to clarify here that mRNA vaccines do not cause cancer; but they could stimulate its development ... We are more concerned with experimental and clinical data with regard to the latter.”
The Study: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141813024022323?via=ihub
I never knew Tim was black.TSF and Floggy discussing the shotz/vax and Covid:
No. Its profit margins.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 8,977
- Reaction score
- 11,580
- Points
- 113
Those mutherfuuckers
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 18,561
- Reaction score
- 29,871
- Points
- 113
- Location
- The nearest Steelers bar.
I am going to point out that you may not be aware of how bad this could turn out if indeed the mRNA vax ingredient reduces immune response and thereby fosters cancer growth. In particular:
Susceptible individuals include Type 1 diabetics (since higher blood sugar promotes cancer growth), and the elderly (since every human has a cancer trigger in them that will go off if the person lives long enough).
Hey, who were two of the groups told to get the shot/vax??
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2014
- Messages
- 11,739
- Reaction score
- 15,403
- Points
- 113
it is if it identifies as one
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2014
- Messages
- 11,739
- Reaction score
- 15,403
- Points
- 113
The 2 groups that are a drain on a national health system?
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2014
- Messages
- 14,576
- Reaction score
- 16,934
- Points
- 113
His grandmother was Dutch.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 18,561
- Reaction score
- 29,871
- Points
- 113
- Location
- The nearest Steelers bar.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 8,977
- Reaction score
- 11,580
- Points
- 113
He was from CA thru Hollywod and his wife was known to speak with spirits
Democrats and illegals or are we tryna find an alternate reality?
Top WHO Official Testifies: Vaccine Passports Were a Scam to Push Fake Covid Shots
A top official with the World Health Organization (WHO) has admitted during an explosive testimony that the vaccine passports pushed by the agency were just a scam to advance the global vaccination agenda.
Additionally, Dr. Hanna Nohynek testified that the WHO knew that Covid mRNA shots were ineffective but still pushed for the general public to be pressured into taking the experimental injections.
Dr. Nohynek says the WHO used the vaccine passports to force the public into complying with the vaccination agenda despite knowing the injections were ineffective against Covid.
Nohynek is the WHO’s chair of the Strategic Group of Experts on Immunization and serves as the chief physician at the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare and serves as.
The WHO dropped the bombshell revelations in a Helsinki courtroom while testifying in a lawsuit brought by Finnish citizen Mika Vauhkala.
Vauhkala is suing after he was denied entry to a café for not having a vaccine passport.
Nohynek testified in court that she advised the WHO and her government that vaccine passports were not needed.
However, Nohynek says she was ignored, despite explaining that the Covid vaccines were essentially “fake” because they did not stop virus transmission.
She also warned that the passports and vaccines gave a false sense of security.
During her testimony, Nohynek revealed that the WHO and the Finnish Institute for Health knew by the summer of 2021 that the Covid mRNA shots were completely ineffective against virus transmission.
She says the United Nations health agency knew the injections wouldn’t stop the spread of Covid shortly after rolling out the vaccines in early 2021 but continued to push them, despite the risks to public safety.
During that same 2021 time period, the WHO said it was working to “create an international trusted framework” for safe travel.
Meanwhile, European Union member states began rolling out Covid passports.
The EU Digital COVID Certificate Regulation was passed in July 2021 and more than 2.3 billion certificates were later issued.
Visitors to France were banned if they did not have a valid vaccine passport which citizens had to carry to buy food at stores or to use public transport.
The EU’s vaccine passport system has not been made redundant, however.
As Slay News has previously reported, the EU has collaborated with the World Economic Forum (WEF) to modify the system to run as a “digital ID” instead.
This same system has been expanded to incorporate digital payments alongside ID while still supporting proof of “vaccination status.”
However, during her court appearance on Thursday, Dr. Nohynek testified yesterday that her team advised the WHO and the Finnish government in late 2021 that Covid passports should be stopped.
She argued that forcing the public to take dangerous mRNA shots that were ineffective against Covid, and then making them prove their vaccination, made no sense.
Nevertheless, the vaccine passports continued to be required.
Dr. Nohynek’s comments were reported by Finnish journalist Ike Novikoff.
Novikoff was in the Helsinki courtroom when Dr. Nohynek testified.
Dr. Nohynek’s admission about Covid shots and vaccine passports proved especially shocking as she is widely renowned in global medical circles and a top immunization official in the WHO.
Besides chairing the WHO’s strategic advisory group on immunizations, Nohynek is one of Finland’s top vaccine advisors.
She also serves on the boards of Vaccines Together and the International Vaccine Institute.
The EU’s digital COVID-19 certification helped establish the WHO Global Digital Health Certification Network in July 2023.
“By using European best practices we contribute to digital health standards and interoperability globally—to the benefit of those most in need,” stated one EU official.
Finnish citizen Mika Vauhkala created a website discussing his case against Finland’s government.
Vauhkala writes that he launched his lawsuit “to defend basic rights” after he was denied breakfast in December 2021 at a Helsinki café.
He was refused entry because he did not have a Covid passport even though he was healthy.
“The constitution of Finland guarantees that any citizen should not be discriminated against based on health conditions among other things,” Vauhkala states on his website.
British cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra also appeared in the Helsinki district court on Friday to testify in the case.
Malhotra testified that, during the pandemic, global government health officials and medical professionals supported unethical, coercive, and misinformed policies such as vaccine mandates and vaccine passports.
These policies sought only to vaccinate as many members of the general public as possible, regardless of the risks.
Malhotra notes that this mass vaccination agenda undermined informed patient consent and evidence-based medical practice.
goddammit, @Tim Steelersfan and @Steeltime and @Confluence - the WHO knew the clot shot was ineffective.
"FFS. Why didn't Daltry advise the medical organizations?!"
/Flog
"FFS. Why didn't Daltry advise the medical organizations?!"
/Flog
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 20,367
- Reaction score
- 22,048
- Points
- 113
It can't be true. Our world renowned SN board Doctor of All Things, would have been surely notified of this..
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,358
- Reaction score
- 5,426
- Points
- 113
Top WHO Official Testifies: Vaccine Passports Were a Scam to Push Fake Covid Shots
Frank BergmanApril 12, 2024 - 12:54 pm
A top official with the World Health Organization (WHO) has admitted during an explosive testimony that the vaccine passports pushed by the agency were just a scam to advance the global vaccination agenda.
Additionally, Dr. Hanna Nohynek testified that the WHO knew that Covid mRNA shots were ineffective but still pushed for the general public to be pressured into taking the experimental injections.
Dr. Nohynek says the WHO used the vaccine passports to force the public into complying with the vaccination agenda despite knowing the injections were ineffective against Covid.
Nohynek is the WHO’s chair of the Strategic Group of Experts on Immunization and serves as the chief physician at the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare and serves as.
The WHO dropped the bombshell revelations in a Helsinki courtroom while testifying in a lawsuit brought by Finnish citizen Mika Vauhkala.
Vauhkala is suing after he was denied entry to a café for not having a vaccine passport.
Nohynek testified in court that she advised the WHO and her government that vaccine passports were not needed.
However, Nohynek says she was ignored, despite explaining that the Covid vaccines were essentially “fake” because they did not stop virus transmission.
She also warned that the passports and vaccines gave a false sense of security.
During her testimony, Nohynek revealed that the WHO and the Finnish Institute for Health knew by the summer of 2021 that the Covid mRNA shots were completely ineffective against virus transmission.
She says the United Nations health agency knew the injections wouldn’t stop the spread of Covid shortly after rolling out the vaccines in early 2021 but continued to push them, despite the risks to public safety.
During that same 2021 time period, the WHO said it was working to “create an international trusted framework” for safe travel.
Meanwhile, European Union member states began rolling out Covid passports.
The EU Digital COVID Certificate Regulation was passed in July 2021 and more than 2.3 billion certificates were later issued.
Visitors to France were banned if they did not have a valid vaccine passport which citizens had to carry to buy food at stores or to use public transport.
The EU’s vaccine passport system has not been made redundant, however.
As Slay News has previously reported, the EU has collaborated with the World Economic Forum (WEF) to modify the system to run as a “digital ID” instead.
This same system has been expanded to incorporate digital payments alongside ID while still supporting proof of “vaccination status.”
However, during her court appearance on Thursday, Dr. Nohynek testified yesterday that her team advised the WHO and the Finnish government in late 2021 that Covid passports should be stopped.
She argued that forcing the public to take dangerous mRNA shots that were ineffective against Covid, and then making them prove their vaccination, made no sense.
Nevertheless, the vaccine passports continued to be required.
Dr. Nohynek’s comments were reported by Finnish journalist Ike Novikoff.
Novikoff was in the Helsinki courtroom when Dr. Nohynek testified.
Dr. Nohynek’s admission about Covid shots and vaccine passports proved especially shocking as she is widely renowned in global medical circles and a top immunization official in the WHO.
Besides chairing the WHO’s strategic advisory group on immunizations, Nohynek is one of Finland’s top vaccine advisors.
She also serves on the boards of Vaccines Together and the International Vaccine Institute.
The EU’s digital COVID-19 certification helped establish the WHO Global Digital Health Certification Network in July 2023.
“By using European best practices we contribute to digital health standards and interoperability globally—to the benefit of those most in need,” stated one EU official.
Finnish citizen Mika Vauhkala created a website discussing his case against Finland’s government.
Vauhkala writes that he launched his lawsuit “to defend basic rights” after he was denied breakfast in December 2021 at a Helsinki café.
He was refused entry because he did not have a Covid passport even though he was healthy.
“The constitution of Finland guarantees that any citizen should not be discriminated against based on health conditions among other things,” Vauhkala states on his website.
British cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra also appeared in the Helsinki district court on Friday to testify in the case.
Malhotra testified that, during the pandemic, global government health officials and medical professionals supported unethical, coercive, and misinformed policies such as vaccine mandates and vaccine passports.
These policies sought only to vaccinate as many members of the general public as possible, regardless of the risks.
Malhotra notes that this mass vaccination agenda undermined informed patient consent and evidence-based medical practice.
Published: November 26, 2022
Scientific data is not now, never has been and never will be a static number.
To push the narrative that mRNA products are flawless, or those that feel that they are absolutely without merit, is dishonest in nature.
It is however, the very tenet of medicine to question data, as it always evolves.
"First, fear inhibits our ability to think critically. Second, willful blindness protects prestige and fragile egos." From the Lancet article, albeit taken out of context, but true none the less.
Scientific data is not now, never has been and never will be a static number.
To push the narrative that mRNA products are flawless, or those that feel that they are absolutely without merit, is dishonest in nature.
It is however, the very tenet of medicine to question data, as it always evolves.
"First, fear inhibits our ability to think critically. Second, willful blindness protects prestige and fragile egos." From the Lancet article, albeit taken out of context, but true none the less.
Bird flu is coming.
The only thing that will prevent is sucking cocks. So unmarried women, gay men, some trans, and flog are safe.
The only thing that will prevent is sucking cocks. So unmarried women, gay men, some trans, and flog are safe.
How in the ever living hell do our two posts connect and how do they have an iota to do with the article you posted?
Similar threads
