Is it really so hard for you to believe that there was significantly more interest in this election than usual due to the pandemic?
Nowhere will you find I've said or typed that anywhere. I fully recognize this was the most popular election to vote in ever.
Or that the mail in balloting (which I think is bullshit by the way, but not necessarily fraudulent) produced higher turnout than usual?Do you know how many people don't vote because they have to work, have family commitments, don't have a car, are too ******* lazy, whatever...but if they had a ballot mailed to their home and could just plop it in a mailbox they would?
Totally aware and know that it did. And fully aware mail in voting increased the number of votes.
The number of counties is fairly insignificant. What is the population of those counties? What is the population of the counties where Biden won by a lot?
I believe it is very significant. It's like down-ballot voting. How does one explain a national decrease in down ballot voting for Dems as well as a decrease in counties won, while seeing such an "overwhelming" upsurge in voting in those areas? Yes, they are urban, yes they are Democratic. But do you really believe that in 5 major metro areas, they got out the vote so incredibly as to overcome losing 212 more counties AND increase the total vote count by 15.4Million more?
Yeah, but no.
In my opinion they got people to vote who normally don't, in big urban population centers where there are a lot of Dem votes to be had.
And my opinion is the math and logic doesn't add up. They didn't get out the vote so overwhelmingly in order to overcome losing so many more counties to the tune they did, astronomical, unheard of numbers with 105% voter turnout, etc.
And once again, saying they are easy to manipulate is one thing. Proving that they WERE...
The study released yesterday by the defense contractor showing the 68% error rate in the Dominion systems, the fact that the Michigan state Dems asked all machines be wiped, the fact that Venezuela uses these machines and is proven to have used these machines to manipulate those elections, the fact that 97% of votes counted overnight in those areas with these machines all went to Biden, the fact that there were "acknowledged" instances where 6500 votes were mysteriously flipped by these machines due to "Software Error" in Michigan, and countless other data points lead any logical person to say this should be investigated much further. Is it evidence? No.
I'll use the analogy I used previously in this thread. If I run a bank and leave work and shut down at 5PM and there is documented $2million in the safe and return in the morning and only $500,000 remains, I know there is a discrepancy. No video camera footage shows the money being stolen. No fingerprints. No evidence. Does that mean a crime was committed? Or should I as the owner of the bank have to simply say "oh well", lose the $1.5Million and everyone just goes home because....no evidence?
The data is so suspicious investigations are warranted. It's all being dismissed. That is a crime.
"There are people who know how to look for these things. They haven't found them.
What kind of people look for these things, I'm curious, because you speak as if you know the space? They are forensic investigators, and in the tech space, it is possible to hack without leaving a digital footprint.
To say they haven't found this is quite misleading. The guy who ran this report is a Harvard MBA cybersecurity analyst. Knows his space.
"A forensic audit of Dominion Voting Systems machines and software in Michigan showed that
they were designed to create fraud and influence election results, a data firm said Monday. “
We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results,”
https://americanmilitarynews.com/20...or-rates-in-countys-dominion-voting-software/
"Antrim County’s server showed 15,676 individual events, with 68 percent reporting errors.
The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity,” the report stated.
According to Ramsland, the voting system “is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.”
The report said the error rates that resulted in tabulation errors or ballots being sent to adjudication proved the Dominion Voting System in Michigan was “flawed and does not meet state or federal election laws.”
That's just one county. Dominion was used in how many counties across the country?
