The state supreme court ruled they could come in up to the 6th as long as they were postmarked by the 3rd or even if they didn't have postmarks. People have said the prepaid return mail envelopes do not get postmarked though so I dunno.
As was posted in a video montage earlier in this thread, what the PA Supreme Court did in their ruling was to CHANGE the law in PA. That has to happen via the legislature, not the Supreme Court of the State. In so doing, they violated Constitutional law. This is - what I understand - the main premise of the lawsuit in PA. And thus, any votes received after election day will be voided because they were accepted via a change in law that was unconstitutional.
If that is the case could get interesting, but what constitutes a vote after election day? Is it just one postmarked after election, or can no votes period be counted after election day?
As was posted in a video montage earlier in this thread, what the PA Supreme Court did in their ruling was to CHANGE the law in PA. That has to happen via the legislature, not the Supreme Court of the State. In so doing, they violated Constitutional law. This is - what I understand - the main premise of the lawsuit in PA. And thus, any votes received after election day will be voided because they were accepted via a change in law that was unconstitutional.
Trumps endgame is obvious and highly dangerous too. He isn’t planning to get enough votes to win 270... he plans to get enough states elections thrown out by the supreme court that neither can reach 270 and throw this to the house.
The election lives on only in the minds of the delusional.
Disagree. Trump wants to get the late and illegal ballots thrown out, which would give him 270. If the election goes to the House, it's run by Democrats and they will select Kam...I mean Joe. I still think it goes to the electoral college though, and I'm told that if state elections cannot be certified then the state legislatures will select the electors and 30 states have legislatures controlled by Republicans.
What if the "late and illegal ballots" lean towards Trump? Has anyone confirmed those ballots exist, or actually seen those ballots, or tallied those ballots etc., or is it purely conjecture that throwing them out would give Trump the election?
Disagree. Trump wants to get the late and illegal ballots thrown out, which would give him 270. If the election goes to the House, it's run by Democrats and they will select Kam...I mean Joe. I still think it goes to the electoral college though, and I'm told that if state elections cannot be certified then the state legislatures will select the electors and 30 states have legislatures controlled by Republicans.
They won’t because they’re all from highly Democrat areas. The fraudsters aren’t smart enough to throw in some votes for Trump or even vote for other Dems on the ballot. This why the GOP won all the statewide races in PA (one is still pending) but the Presidential vote is close.What if the "late and illegal ballots" lean towards Trump? Has anyone confirmed those ballots exist, or actually seen those ballots, or tallied those ballots etc., or is it purely conjecture that throwing them out would give Trump the election?
The election lives on only in the minds of the delusional.
Why would they feel the need to backdate to Nov 3? The court changed the law to say they can come after the 3rd. Seems to me if they are backdating to the 3rd it means they know that the Supreme Court will overrule the state court and make ballots postmarked after the 3rd invaild.
The election lives on only in the minds of the delusional.
The court said they could arrive after the 3rd. They had to be postmarked by the 3rd.
They won’t because they’re all from highly Democrat areas. The fraudsters aren’t smart enough to throw in some votes for Trump or even vote for other Dems on the ballot. This why the GOP won all the statewide races in PA (one is still pending) but the Presidential vote is close.
If Biden ends up the winner, it just shows that charisma and eloquence wins every time.
I suspect a lot of people voted split ballot. I also wouldn't be surprised if a lot of people voted only for president, while disregarding every other race, just so they could cast a vote against Donald Trump.
The Court does not have legal standing to make that call. It will be struck down.
It may be. It's not enough votes to change the outcome.