Election Day 2020

[SteelerInLebanon]

Once again, REALITY is on my side. You lose. Oh, and please seek professional help. You’re wicked pissed off!

You talk of reality now after four years of ignoring it?

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

This is a pipe dream, but the merits of his message are real.

Flynn shares petition urging Trump to suspend the Constitution and hold an election re-vote overseen by military

Former national security adviser Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn promoted a petition this week that calls for the temporary suspension of the Constitution and a re-vote for the 2020 election.

“Freedom never kneels except for God,” the recently pardoned Flynn tweeted along with the petition advertising the We The People Convention.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WeThePeople?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WeThePeople</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/SidneyPowell1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SidneyPowell1</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/LLinWood?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@LLinWood</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/DanScavino?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@DanScavino</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/LouDobbs?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@LouDobbs</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/MariaBartiromo?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@MariaBartiromo</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/marklevinshow?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@marklevinshow</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/lofly727?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@lofly727</a> <br><br>Freedom never kneels except for God &#55357;&#56911;&#55356;&#56826;&#55356;&#56824;<a href="https://t.co/Vrn3UeyDoF">https://t.co/Vrn3UeyDoF</a></p>— General Flynn (@GenFlynn) <a href="https://twitter.com/GenFlynn/status/1333916403389370369?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 1, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

A letter alongside the petition urged President Trump to declare martial law to temporarily suspend the Constitution for the sole purpose of a national re-vote overseen by the military that “reflects the true will of the people.”

The letter also discussed the actions that President Abraham Lincoln undertook during the Civil War when he ordered newspapers to be shut down, arrested an Ohio congressman, signed an arrest warrant for a Supreme Court justice who ruled against him, and arrested citizens suspected of supporting the South.

The letter states that while those decisions are still being debated today, it is undeniable that Lincoln’s actions “saved the Republic” and are part of the reason he is viewed as one of the country's greatest presidents.

“You must also act, like Lincoln did, to silence the destructive media’s one-sided propaganda designed and proven to influence the election outcome, and end the unlawful censorship of Big Tech, to restore the confidence of the American People in our electoral process or we cannot continue as a nation,” the letter reads. “Failure to do so could result in massive violence and destruction on a level not seen since the Civil War. Limited Martial Law is clearly a better option than Civil War!”

The petition was also posted by attorney Lin Wood, who is part of the legal effort to overturn election results in several key states in response to allegations of rampant voter fraud.

“@realDonaldTrump should declare martial law,” Wood tweeted, arguing that the United States is on the brink of another Civil War.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Good morning.<br><br>Our country is headed to civil war. A war created by 3rd party bad actors for their benefit - not for We The People.<br><br>Communist China is leading the nefarious efforts to take away our freedom.<a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDonaldTrump</a> should declare martial law.<a href="https://t.co/h3Ym5ytMYt">https://t.co/h3Ym5ytMYt</a></p>— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) <a href="https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1333788036815937537?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 1, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

All major news outlets have called the presidential race for Joe Biden as Trump continues to mount legal challenges. The president has said he will leave office if he is not the winner after the Electoral College voters convene later this month. However, he and other Republicans, including Republican Alabama Rep. Mo Brooks this week, have also signaled the fight could continue after that.

 

[jitter77]

Which is why they didn't even bother trying to conceal it.

Hundreds of thousands more votes than registered voters? In more than one state?

Real time views of votes switching PRECISELY from one candidate to another AS WE WATCH. It's on the ******* TV.

Statistical records of 600 thousand votes coming in the middle of the night in PA, and only 2,300 of them were for Trump?

I know you aren't denying proof of election fraud because you actually believe there was no fraud. You're only taking the position because that position is the only salve for your TDS. But don't try to shovel that **** on actual rational people.

If you get your way and the American election process remains destroyed, don't ******* try to shove it down our throats that your peeps didn't just steal the election on the largest scale the world has most likely ever seen. We actually KNOW what happened, just as well as you do. So shut the **** up, enjoy your cake, but don't try to shovel that **** our direction.

This stuff has already been debunked over and over again. So far there has been no concrete proof of anything. The courts have seen nothing, Trumps own appointees have seen nothing including Barr who has bent over backwards defending Trump.

 

[Steeltime]

Once again, REALITY is on my side. You lose. Oh, and please seek professional help. You’re wicked pissed off!

So says the Rodney King of the internet.

Idiot, moron, liar, and freeloader = Floggy

 

[Badcat]

Once again, REALITY is on my side.

Yet more evidence of Cognitive Distortion. You really should seek professional help. Seriously.

 

[Steeltime]

This stuff has already been debunked over and over again.

Really? Why don't you go through the 687 declarations and "debunk" them for us.

So far there has been no concrete proof of anything.

"Concrete" proof? You mean like hundreds upon hundreds of witnesses swearing under penalty of perjury, mathematical analyses from several sources showing the vote count is simply impossible, the statement of a USPS employee that he delivered THOUSANDS of ballots from New York to Pennsylvania?

You are simply slurping what the Pravda media is telling you and regurgitating the bullshit.

The courts have seen nothing, Trumps own appointees have seen nothing including Barr who has bent over backwards defending Trump.

False and false. The lawsuits have not addressed the particulars of the fraud allegations and instead denied procedural niceties like certifying based on present results.

Why don't you link a court ruling finding no evidence of fraud? Should be easy to do since you and the Pravda media keep claiming that happened. Go ahead. I'll wait. In the meantime, check this item:

The notion that “there’s no evidence of election fraud” that took hold among Democrats and the mainstream media the night of November 3 is precisely the sort of assertion that lends itself to clear follow-up questions that almost no one seems interested in asking:

What would evidence of election fraud look like? Suppose that some country, at some point, held a fraudulent election. How could anyone prove it? Furthermore, is the only acceptable evidence so clear on its face that it would be evident the moment the polls closed? Couldn’t at least some evidence be hidden where only after-the-fact investigations could find it?

These questions are critical. Short of perhaps widespread videos of soldiers threatening voters, what sort of evidence might the president have presented on election night? What sort of evidence must he now present in order to prevail? Surely, if material election fraud did occur, it must have left some evidence. What is it?

While the specifics of the Trump campaign’s allegations have not yet been formalized (at least to the public), their contours are clear: A handful of jurisdictions under Democratic control destroyed, altered and/or fabricated enough ballots to shift the outcomes in selected states. How would anyone go about proving such an allegation?

The answer lies in the concept of “evidence marshalling,” a methodology used to bridge the gap between legal reasoning and Bayesian statistics. Bayesian analysis quantifies the likelihood of competing hypotheses using whatever evidence is available. The certainty and precision of the answer increases as more evidence arrives to support a specific hypothesis, but in a Bayesian framework it’s always possible to assess which answer appears most likely given what is already known.

Without getting into technical details, a Bayesian analysis begins with a “prior probability,” or a judgment derived from experience prior to looking at any specific data. The law reflects this approach (if informally) with “rebuttable presumptions.” A legal presumption is a statement that something is assumed to be true. A presumption is rebuttable if a litigant is allowed to submit evidence establishing that it’s likely false.

Beginning with that prior, Bayesian analysis considers each quantum of evidence individually. Each quantum pushes the probability “posterior” to its consideration either higher or lower. When all evidence has been considered, the posterior probability indicates whether the election was more likely to have been legitimate or riven with fraud.

The general legal presumption that American ballots and tallies are valid means that prior to the consideration of any evidence, the law has placed the probability that an election’s reported results are legitimate somewhere between 0.5 (even money) and 1.0 (certain).

The party attempting to prove fraud must bring evidence indicative of fraud. Again, each new showing increases the probability of fraud until the election appears to be more likely than not to have been fraudulent. Then the law shifts the “burden of proof” to the Biden campaign to present evidence indicating that the election results are legitimate. That burden continues to alternate until neither side has anything new to present.

How could the Trump campaign meet its initial burden? The best place to start is with uncontested evidence. Because roughly 90 million of 160 million ballots were circulated by mail, more than half the ballots were placed in circumstances in which it’s impossible to know who could access them.

Does that prove fraud? No. But it does suggest that fraud is more likely than in an election whose custodians protected all ballots at all times. It thus moves the (probability) needle a bit lower.

The same is true with the observation that Democrats clamored to reduce the security of these ballots while Republicans called to protect them. Proof? Still no. But again, a slight reduction in the probability that the results are legitimate.

Then come the various sworn statements, reports and rumors. Some states introduced unusual pauses in ballot counting? Court orders were violated? Observers were blocked? Tally patterns show statistical anomalies? Votes in a particular category or batch differ wildly from those in similar categories or batches? Computer glitches? Oddities pointing overwhelmingly in the same direction?

Every such report that the president can validate reduces the posterior probability that the reported election results are legitimate. How many would he have to validate to convince a court that at least some state elections were so riven with fraud that they need to be nullified?

Sadly, no precise answer is possible; legal reasoning lacks the mathematical formalism of Bayesian analysis. For those truly interested in understanding what it means for there to be evidence of election fraud, however, Bayesian methodology provides a clear answer.

The Trump campaign has already uncovered evidence of precisely the strategic fraud it alleges. The only question remaining is whether or not it can present enough such evidence to convince the courts.

https://www.wgowam.com/news/is-there-really-no-evidence-of-election-fraud/

Finally, for the millionth time, Barr said nothing about "no fraud." That claim is a Pravda special. He instead said that from what he has seen so far, the vast amount of fraud he has examined is not enough to change the outcome.

That's it.

 

[tapeANaspirin2it]

Some video of them counting votes in GA after they kicked out the observers. This might have been for the bogus burst pipe. Look at them pulling out cases of ballots they had hidden until nobody was around.

 

[Steel Ballin]

 

[Steelin]

Some video of them counting votes in GA after they kicked out the observers. This might have been for the bogus burst pipe. Look at them pulling out cases of ballots they had hidden until nobody was around.

Wow. If that isn't ******* obvious I dont know what would be to these blinded by party deniers.

 

[Steelworth]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Joe Biden is asked about his disagreements with Kamala Harris on certain issues:<br><br>"Like I told Barack, if I reach something where there's a fundamental disagreement we have based on a moral principle, I'll develop some disease and say I have to resign." <a href="https://t.co/SLcvrwaPCA">pic.twitter.com/SLcvrwaPCA</a></p>— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) <a href="https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1334686548122591235?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 4, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Did I just hear what I thought I heard?

 

[Steelworth]

Some video of them counting votes in GA after they kicked out the observers. This might have been for the bogus burst pipe. Look at them pulling out cases of ballots they had hidden until nobody was around.

You'll have to provide more than that.

- The Blind, The Dumb, or The Rotten

 

[tapeANaspirin2it]

i'm waiting for the explanation that those mystery boxes just contained their lunches

 

[Steelworth]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">JUST IN: DOJ files lawsuit against Facebook for unfair hiring practices against US citizens</p>— Rooster&#55356;&#56826;&#55356;&#56824; (@no_silenced) <a href="https://twitter.com/no_silenced/status/1334605334023872512?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 3, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[Booted]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Joe Biden is asked about his disagreements with Kamala Harris on certain issues:<br><br>"Like I told Barack, if I reach something where there's a fundamental disagreement we have based on a moral principle, I'll develop some disease and say I have to resign." <a href="https://t.co/SLcvrwaPCA">pic.twitter.com/SLcvrwaPCA</a></p>— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) <a href="https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1334686548122591235?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 4, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Did I just hear what I thought I heard?

I've never seen any incoming president's vp have such a huge presence before . VPs usually, for the most part, disappear after the election . Kamala is probably going to be seen more than Joe in the coming months/years.

 

[Booted]

Also...dementia Joe probably just accidently gave away the plan that has been cooked up. Note to the Deep State: never discuss the evil plot in front of Joe again. Watch Kamala shake her head in disapproval as Biden says he'll develop a disease and resign . Seems like she's saying , Joe, you dumb mother ******.

 

[SteelChip]

This stuff has already been debunked over and over again. So far there has been no concrete proof of anything. The courts have seen nothing, Trumps own appointees have seen nothing including Barr who has bent over backwards defending Trump.

Yet.............

Georgia Republican Governor Brian Kemp called for a signature audit of the state’s election results on Thursday night during an interview on Fox News, saying that some of what allegedly came out today during a Georgia Senate Government Oversight Committee hearing was “concerning.”
https://www.dailywire.com/news/brea...calls-for-signature-audit-of-election-results

Yeah I seen that........old fashion *** coverin'..

 

[Steelr4evr]

This presidential election is confederate money. It's worthless.

 

[IndySteel]

See what a Biden Presidency would do to our economy? Just the thought of it is horrifying. Take it all the way to the Supreme Court and get this theft overturned. From Brietbart:

Disaster Jobs Report: U.S. Economy Added Just 245,000 Jobs in November

Less than half of what economists had forecast.

 

[IndySteel]

Biden would continue this inane Oterrorist bullshit in all aspects if he gets in.

 

[Superman]

I feel an overwhelming warmth knowing the President-elect is a robust, healthy person incapable of breaking his foot while doing something as trivial as playing with his dog.

 

[jitter77]

I feel an overwhelming warmth knowing the President-elect is a robust, healthy person incapable of breaking his foot while doing something as trivial as playing with his dog.

People can get hurt doing anything regardless of how healthy they are. I had a housekeeper at work who kick boxed, went skydiving rode horses, etc etc. She tripped over her dog at home and shredded her knee. Several pro athletes have been hurt at home doing basic things as well. Joe is certainly not the most robust person, but equating that to breaking his foot over his dog is just being salty.

 

[Superman]

People can get hurt doing anything regardless of how healthy they are. I had a housekeeper at work who kick boxed, went skydiving rode horses, etc etc. She tripped over her dog at home and shredded her knee. Several pro athletes have been hurt at home doing basic things as well. Joe is certainly not the most robust person, but equating that to breaking his foot over his dog is just being salty.

LOL - no.
the man is 78. he's got zero business - mentally, and physically at this point - being the man in the White House for the next 4 years. If he lives that long. He's already shown signs of dementia and now he breaks bones in his foot playing with his dog. If you're to follow along with the script, that is.

 

[SteelerInLebanon]

I feel an overwhelming warmth knowing the President-elect is a robust, healthy person incapable of breaking his foot while doing something as trivial as playing with his dog.

To be fair I have broken a toe walking to the bathroom at night. Also the way my dogs and cat like to walk right under my feet I will fall and hurt myself one of these days. Particularly the 16 year old cat with a death wish who has to put her whole body right where you are about to step. Maybe I should send her to be around Joe.

 

[Steelworth]

People can get hurt doing anything regardless of how healthy they are. I had a housekeeper at work who kick boxed, went skydiving rode horses, etc etc. She tripped over her dog at home and shredded her knee. Several pro athletes have been hurt at home doing basic things as well. Joe is certainly not the most robust person, but equating that to breaking his foot over his dog is just being salty.

Forget the bullshit of him twisting his ankle 'playing with his dog', have you seen what the man has said on multiple occasions recently? And you're actually comfortable with that having access to the nuclear codes (to use a famous one against Trump)? God help you, me and this country if you answer the way I think you might.

 

[jitter77]

Forget the bullshit of him twisting his ankle 'playing with his dog', have you seen what the man has said on multiple occasions recently? And you're actually comfortable with that having access to the nuclear codes (to use a famous one against Trump)? God help you, me and this country if you answer the way I think you might.

I have said multiple times that he he is not all mentally there, but there is no way can you equate breaking your foot at home to being unfit for president. I do not think Biden will make it through his first term, but this incident has 0 to do with that. I bet many on this forum have hurt themselves doing mundane stuff. Sometimes things just happen