It's to bad that when Obama does something it's ok but when trump does it it's the end of the world
That's awesome.Even better, Dems invented it
Ban Of Muslims And Others Already U.S. Law: 8 U.S. Code 1182
This law was written in 1952. It was passed by a Democrat-controlled Congress, House and Senate, and signed by a Democrat president.
“Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by president. Whenever the president finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, the president may, by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”
http://www.commonsenseevaluation.co...u-s-law-8-u-s-code-1182/#sthash.cTqAuEEs.dpbs
Nobody here cares as long as the guy doing it has an "R" next to his name
This is the problem with our identity politics right now. People ***** and complain and spew bullshit conspiracies when actions being carried out are not in line with their agenda or party. Conservatives are much much worse as far as this goes. Just huge hypocrites. Then progressives just sit around and divide their narratives into 50 ******* things and lose the message.
Even better, Dems invented it
Ban Of Muslims And Others Already U.S. Law: 8 U.S. Code 1182
This law was written in 1952. It was passed by a Democrat-controlled Congress, House and Senate, and signed by a Democrat president.
“Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by president. Whenever the president finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, the president may, by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”
http://www.commonsenseevaluation.co...u-s-law-8-u-s-code-1182/#sthash.cTqAuEEs.dpbs
And it was utilized by Jimmy Carter, no less, in 1979 to keep Iranians out of the United States, but he actually did more. He made all Iranian students already here check in, and then he deported a ton of ’em.
In November the 1979 United States attorney general had given all Iranian students one month to report to the local immigration office. Seven thousand were found in violation of their visas, 15,000 Iranians were forced to leave the United States in 1979."
[/QUOTE]"President Trump's Executive Orders remain in place - prohibited travel will remain prohibited, and the U.S. government retains its right to revoke visas at any time if required for national security or public safety," according to the DHS statement.
Stephen Miller, a senior adviser to the White House, said: "Nothing in the Brooklyn judge's order in anyway impedes or prevents the implementation of the president's executive order which remains in full, complete and total effect."
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie...ME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2017-01-28-23-02-13
Bullshit the Liberals are ten times worse just look at the ******* news. Conservatives might ***** might have a few minor rallies or spot protests at best, they don't lose their **** and spew hate at anyone and everyone who disagrees with them and burn car break windows and just be all around ********.
That's not even my point. I'm talking about the narrative from the "news" sources. The **** that a lot of people just eat from the trough without questioning it. President Obama was overstepping his power with his executive orders according to conservative news outlets and "branding the country under his totalitarian views" but have not said nearly a ******* thing close to that about Trump. There's like a thousand other examples.
I fear racists and xenophobes and psychopaths, therefore I don't think we should let them into our country.
Well then the whole lot of you should pack your bags and catch the first flight out.
Well then the whole lot of you should pack your bags and catch the first flight out.
What news outlets have you been watching all I see is snowflakes trashing trump and his policies. I hate getting Philly news channels. Lefty centralThat's not even my point. I'm talking about the narrative from the "news" sources. The **** that a lot of people just eat from the trough without questioning it. President Obama was overstepping his power with his executive orders according to conservative news outlets and "branding the country under his totalitarian views" but have not said nearly a ******* thing close to that about Trump. There's like a thousand other examples.
Tens of thousands of people took to the streets across the country to protest President Trump's immigration ban.
Thankfully, there are plenty of people on the right side of history, unlike those on this board.
[h=1]Second day of protests breaks out against Trump's immigration order[/h]
http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...across-the-country-against-trumps-immigration
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Crowd of demonstrators gathering in Boston's Copley Square <a href="https://t.co/9Yjew0QPQU">pic.twitter.com/9Yjew0QPQU</a></p>— Evan McMurry (@evanmcmurry) <a href="https://twitter.com/evanmcmurry/status/825779890079330305">January 29, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The attorneys general in 15 states and the District of Columbia are condemning President Trump’s executive order on immigration, calling it “unconstitutional, un-American and unlawful” in a statement on Sunday.
They pledged to “work together to ensure the federal government obeys the Constitution, respects our history as a nation of immigrants, and does not unlawfully target anyone because of their national origin or faith.”
“We are confident that the Executive Order will ultimately be struck down by the courts. In the meantime, we are committed to working to ensure that as few people as possible suffer from the chaotic situation that it has created.”
The statement was issued by the attorneys general of New York, California, Pennsylvania, Washington, Massachusetts, Hawaii, Virginia, Oregon, the District of Columbia, Connecticut, Vermont, Illinois, New Mexico, Iowa, Maine and Maryland.
Where,in the Constitution does it say that we have to accept ANY immigrants?
According to the Supreme Court, “the clearest command of the Establishment Clause is that one religious denomination cannot be officially preferred over another.” Larson v. Valente, 456 US. 228, 244 (1982). But that command is apparently not clear enough for President Donald Trump. On Friday he signed an Executive Order on refugees that imposes a selective ban on immigration from seven Muslim-majority countries, and at the same time establishes preferential treatment for refugees seeking asylum who are identified with “minority religions” in their country of origin. In case there was any doubt about the latter provision’s intent, Trump told Christian Broadcast News that it was intended to give priority to “Christians” seeking asylum over “Muslims.” In both respects, the Executive Order violates the “clearest command of the Establishment Clause.”
yeah....remember who stood next to you when 81 and his old man were about to get their ***** beat.There are a handful of snowflakes here who exhibit their soft leftist ignorance, when they're not rocking back and forth and sobbing in their safe spaces.
I guess when I see a crowd protesting with signs that say "Protect Immigrant Families" and "No Ban, No Wall" I lumped them all into the illegal alien apologists bucket. It's actually the refuge and illegal alien bucket.Illegal immigration? These people have valid visas and green cards. Those that are entering the country have undergone rigorous vetting over a two-year timeframe. Why is it so easy for Trump to lie to you unabated? Well, because you no longer have an ability for critical thinking. You've become a sponge for Trump's alternative facts.