• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Kenny Pickett Is Our QB. Deal With It, Whiners.

I see. So, maybe if "this" happened then "that" may have happened too. Is that correct? Couldn't the same be said about any QB castoff throughout time?

And just out of curiosity, how do you define a coach "that has stability"? One that doesn't get fired regardless of how deserving he is?

Please advise.
can you present a citation on what you mean by "this" and "that' has anything to do with what I posted? as your quotes " " were not in my post.

a coach that has stability might have hung onto a QB that was taken #2 overall to develop him. almost kinda like We did with Terry Bradshaw. 1st overall but not ready 1st few years. thank god Chuck didn't give up on that guy.
 
Can you name another Bears starting QB that they parted ways with that went on to find great success elsewhere?
That's such a foolish argument. Before last year, could you name another starting quarterback with whom the Lions parted ways who went on to find great success elsewhere?

Almost as stupid as using the possibility that Trubisky might've signed with the Giants as a reason why he won't be any good in Pittsburgh. God forbid the guy would explore his options as a free agent.
 
Can you name another Bears starting QB that they parted ways with that went on to find great success elsewhere?

Someone in the past 2 decades would be ideal and a supporting citation would be appreciated. Thanks.
this is the absolute most random post I have ever heard or read. come on Balls creep which poster are you? you have to be one of us posting as another just to spark posts.
 
*crickets*
blah blah blah

Mitch was not terrible in chicago....the bears just suck

he did take them to the playoffs un 2018 and was a missed FG away from leading a game winning drive in the wildcard game

we get it, you are in love with pickett...not sure why, but whatever floats your boat

I would rather go into the season with a decent vet QB starting than any of the top guys in this draft
 
That's such a foolish argument. Before last year, could you name another starting quarterback with whom the Lions parted ways who went on to find great success elsewhere?

Almost as stupid as using the possibility that Trubisky might've signed with the Giants as a reason why he won't be any good in Pittsburgh. God forbid the guy would explore his options as a free agent.
To answer his question Cutler went to a pro bowl after he left the Bears. Got damn backdoor butternut Bob. He is something..
 
this is the absolute most random post I have ever heard or read. come on Balls creep which poster are you? you have to be one of us posting as another just to spark posts.
Is it random? You said, "this could be a good thing" and the reasons you listed for this were based on wishful thinking, if not conjecture. He wasn't good here because this happened. If only he had this then that may have happened. I still don't know what Tomlin having stability means. The best I can tell, it means he won't get fired despite deserving to be, so we should respect his endless presence. I also don't recall Tomlin being known for turning around QBs that couldn't cut it elsewhere. Hell, Madison Rudolph has the benefit of being homegrown and under T's "stability" and even he can't cut it with us.
 
Is it random? You said, "this could be a good thing" and the reasons you listed for this were based on wishful thinking, if not conjecture. He wasn't good here because this happened. If only he had this then that may have happened. I still don't know what Tomlin having stability means. The best I can tell, it means he won't get fired despite deserving to be, so we should respect his endless presence. I also don't recall Tomlin being known for turning around QBs that couldn't cut it elsewhere. Hell, Madison Rudolph has the benefit of being homegrown and under T's "stability" and even he can't cut it with us.
well your initial post was based on your absurd mental disorder....so in my opinion "wishful thinking" is a better bet
 
Can you name another Bears starting QB that they parted ways with that went on to find great success elsewhere?

Someone in the past 2 decades would be ideal and a supporting citation would be appreciated. Thanks.
I don't need to, your reasoning for him failing is because he wanted to play for the giants... But most of that was just rumored nonsense because he agreed to our deal during the legal tampering window.

Also you site no reasons as to why Pickett gives us 5 wins as a rookie over a veteran (who the numbers say, shouldn't have been given up on so early).
 
Again, I'd take Pickett if he's there at 1-20 but I'm pretty sure he'll be gone by then.
When they signed Trubisky I figured any QB was off the table but then Haskins got killed so that changed things.
 
Is it random? You said, "this could be a good thing" and the reasons you listed for this were based on wishful thinking, if not conjecture. He wasn't good here because this happened. If only he had this then that may have happened. I still don't know what Tomlin having stability means. The best I can tell, it means he won't get fired despite deserving to be, so we should respect his endless presence. I also don't recall Tomlin being known for turning around QBs that couldn't cut it elsewhere. Hell, Madison Rudolph has the benefit of being homegrown and under T's "stability" and even he can't cut it with us.
Mic drop.
 
blah blah blah

Mitch was not terrible in chicago....the bears just suck

he did take them to the playoffs un 2018 and was a missed FG away from leading a game winning drive in the wildcard game

we get it, you are in love with pickett...not sure why, but whatever floats your boat

I would rather go into the season with a decent vet QB starting than any of the top guys in this draft
Exactly! I've said this on numerous occasions. And something else to consider with Mitch. He was a one year starter at NC and they threw him in as the starter his rookie year. Chicago is and has been a mess for years so I take no stock in with that team's functionality. When Mitch was in Buffalo he knew he was never going to supplant Josh Allen when he signed there for one year but he wanted to take the year to slow things down and learn from Josh and OC Brain Daboll which was a smart and unselfish move.

Pickett, Willis, Ridder, Corral will do nothing their first year if put in as starters on any team. Pickett is the most ready out of the bunch but in no way is he ready to be a starter. I think Ballz Deep is Coach btw!
 
Would rather have T-biscuit, which we do already…**** KP as a rookie would probably yield less wins than Rudy.

Mitch took the Bears and a ****** offense and coach to the playoffs. Our weapons and coaching are both better than what he had there. I’d roll with Mitch and a legitimate 1st round addition over a fumble prone rookie as the first rounder 8 days a week.
 

Mitch took the Bears and a ****** offense and coach to the playoffs. Our weapons and coaching are both better than what he had there. I’d roll with Mitch and a legitimate 1st round addition over a fumble prone rookie as the first rounder 8 days a week.
Ah. You think Glitch will have a better time here given our "coaching and weapons". What about Mike Sullivan's resume with the Broncos leads you to believe that he will be an upgrade from what he was accustomed to with the Bears? Could you reference something specific about Matt Canada's offensive schemes that you saw last year that leads you to believe that he will be able to elevate Trubasky? How many QBs has T elevated throughout his tenure? Now that BB is gone, do you think Dionte's Johnson will be in the business of catching the ball?
 
Real talk: we know why we're stuck with bug eyes and it isn't because he brings any special skill to the table. He was lucky enough to be given Cowher's team for the first half of his career and even a broken, noodle-arm Ben is still able to keep the Cheerleader at .500 in modern day. The 2008 team dragged his incompetent a*s across the end-zone, gifting him a SB title for his resume. Truth be told, they could have brought in the guy slinging crack in the Tampa Bay parking lot that day and had him in Tomlin's place and we would have still ended with the same result.

Now, I know that a lot of you "woke" b*tches likely agree, despite being afraid to admit it publicly. I think that Senile Rooney and his family's willingness to keep Mr Pom Pom on the payroll is actually hurting other franchises from giving preference to others due to skin color. It seems like every year we hear numerous minorities (or those who want to be perceived as "woke) publicly expressing disappointment with the lack of head coaching vacancies being filled by minority candidates. But why the hell should an owner subject his team and fanbase to something as ridiculous and offensive as this (let's face it .. The Rooney Rule in itself is an act of racism .. just the socially "ok" kind). Cheerleader Tomlin was never worthy of a head coaching position. His players brought him places, not the other way around. And no sh*t he wants a veteran QB. It's not as if this guy as the gift of being able to mold anything. Hell, he can't even hire competent coordinators. Why expose himself even more than he has already been exposed?

To those that think that "better" doesn't exist, you've either been brainwashed into believing this, or you are part of the problem.

#therooneyruleisBS

which is it? We need a veteran QB or Kenny Picket?
 


Ah. You think Glitch will have a better time here given our "coaching and weapons". What about Mike Sullivan's resume with the Broncos leads you to believe that he will be an upgrade from what he was accustomed to with the Bears? Could you reference something specific about Matt Canada's offensive schemes that you saw last year that leads you to believe that he will be able to elevate Trubasky? How many QBs has T elevated throughout his tenure? Now that BB is gone, do you think Dionte's Johnson will be in the business of catching the ball?
Ahhhh, a good maneuver. Limiting the perusal of Sullivan's resume to the one year he spent with the Broncos as part of Vance Joseph's doomed staff means that we skip over the work he did with Eli Manning as his first QB Coach. It means that we can't discuss how that work lead to a Super Bowl win at the end of the 2007 season. Nor can we ponder the effect, Sullivan, as Manning's QB Coach, had on Eli's two best seasons as a professional (2010, where Manning set franchise records with 339 completions and a 62.9 completion percentage, as well as his second season with over 4,000 yards; and 2011 when Manning threw for a career-high 4,933 yards, 29 touchdowns with 16 interceptions, and had a completion percentage of over 60% for the fourth year in a row, not to mention the Giants winning a second SB with Sullivan as Manning's QB Coach). Nope, Denver it is.
 
I'm ok with Trustinky as our back-up. I consider him a significant upgrade over Maddam Rudolph, but back-up he is. When I think "veteran QB", I think Aaron Rodgers or Russell Wilson, not a guy who couldn't keep his job for more than 3 seasons with Da Bears. Those of you trying to delude yourselves into thinking we're going to get some fairy tale story here with Glitch, I predict that you are going to be highly disappointed.

If we do get lucky enough to get KP at #20, I'll be curious to see how many of the sheep here will be b*tching. My guess is, not many.
 
I'm ok with Trustinky as our back-up. I consider him a significant upgrade over Maddam Rudolph, but back-up he is. When I think "veteran QB", I think Aaron Rodgers or Russell Wilson, not a guy who couldn't keep his job for more than 3 seasons with Da Bears. Those of you trying to delude yourselves into thinking we're going to get some fairy tale story here with Glitch, I predict that you are going to be highly disappointed.

If we do get lucky enough to get KP at #20, I'll be curious to see how many of the sheep here will be b*tching. My guess is, not many.
further proof your IQ is lower than room temperature
 


Ah. You think Glitch will have a better time here given our "coaching and weapons". What about Mike Sullivan's resume with the Broncos leads you to believe that he will be an upgrade from what he was accustomed to with the Bears? Could you reference something specific about Matt Canada's offensive schemes that you saw last year that leads you to believe that he will be able to elevate Trubasky? How many QBs has T elevated throughout his tenure? Now that BB is gone, do you think Dionte's Johnson will be in the business of catching the ball?

As for Sullivan (way to cherry pick there) he had 1 season there…let’s look at where he spent the majority of his career….you know the place where he was instrumental in the early development of Eli and helped him to his best football…oh yeah and won a couple SBs too

Canada is garbage, we all know that. Mitch fits his system far better than Ben or baby hands can’t wait to fumble it again KP tho.

Who the hell is T? Doesn’t matter…stupid question anyways

And as too the off point DJ throw in at the end of your hot mess of questions his hands were much improved last year so I have no clue where that off topic garbage came from.

Guessing it was just additional spew of random bad takes
 
Top