Trump needs to nominate someone tomorrow
not that Congress will let them be approved before the election
not that Congress will let them be approved before the election
RIP Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Thread starter CoolieMan
- Start date
Ahh ****. RIP RBG, I didn't agree with your politics, but you're still a person so I hope you rest in peace.
Now, this means that the Dems are gonna be doing a full court press to an extreme measure from here on out. It could get even more nasty now. Hang on to your hats folks, its gonna get bumpy.
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2014
- Messages
- 3,320
- Reaction score
- 3,237
- Points
- 113
RIP Justice Ginsberg.
Rip rbg
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 20,541
- Reaction score
- 22,350
- Points
- 113
RIP Ruth. Hopefully president Trump can fill your shoes with opposite of your stature on the court.
I think I remember the Reps asking Obummer to not nominate someone in an election year, and I think he agreed. If I remember that correctly, then the Reps need to extend the same courtesy.
RIP.
But yes to coolie.
But yes to coolie.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 14,833
- Reaction score
- 13,145
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Lebanon, OH (Near Kings Island)
Mitch has already said he will push it through his own precedence be damned.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 10,463
- Reaction score
- 14,626
- Points
- 113
My sentiments exactly
RIP Justice Ginsburg. All politics aside, I thought it was wild & pretty cool how she & Scalia were such great personal friends.
The days when people could disagree on political philosophy & still have discourse and even friendship.
The days when people could disagree on political philosophy & still have discourse and even friendship.
Ted Cruz come on down- downfall would be giving up his senate seat. I know he has a short list of candidates
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 14,833
- Reaction score
- 13,145
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Lebanon, OH (Near Kings Island)
Trump needs to nominate a female minority if he has one who is strong conservative and see the left squirm and have to truly expose their partisanship.
I definitely disagreed with her decisions but don't deny her right to have had them. RIP.
It's the times we live in definitely, but I both agree and vehemently disagree with this premise (talk about a flip-flopper). It should be the most qualified, adhering to the Constitution of the United States candidate; but it would be extra special to see a conservative female minority be nominated just to see the left's continued repugnant behavior out in the open.
And that, right there, is one of many reasons we are at the crossroads we are today.
Last edited:
Thats a really good point. Hopefully the most qualified is a strong conservative woman.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 7,497
- Reaction score
- 5,032
- Points
- 113
He should find someone that is not a judge. I'm sick of the Reps always getting stabbed in the back by these fake conservative judges. Roberts, Gorsuch and even Kavanaugh have all failed at being consistent with the constitution. I'd be fine with Cruz, Cotton, or Cameron. Anybody but a sitting judge who can cloak their real agendas.
I hear she's the favorite. Amy Coney Barrett.
This time pick one with no skeletons in the closet
Sent from my iPhone using Steeler Nation mobile app
Sent from my iPhone using Steeler Nation mobile app
I also heard, when she was talk of the pick when Kavanaugh was ultimately nominated, that she's an originalist similar to Anton Scalia. Don't know anything about her but I like the sound of that.
Kavanaugh really had no skeletons in his closet, they (scum) manufactured them. He drank beer in high school and into college, oh my ******* god. Christine Blasey Ford was just a pawn in their sick game. You look at the man's career over decades working with women and hiring women as his assistants, and not a single instance of impropriety? For a supposed gang rapist?
Again, scum. They'll find something with this one too.
Similar threads
