What bathroom do these trans-species things use?
from - http://louderwithcrowder.com/trans-species-meet-the-grown-men-who-identify-as-dogs/#.V0gt0VeWVJE
They **** outside with the rest of the dogs. Want to be treated like one? Go **** outside.
What bathroom do these trans-species things use?
from - http://louderwithcrowder.com/trans-species-meet-the-grown-men-who-identify-as-dogs/#.V0gt0VeWVJE
I don't think I've ever denied that communal showers exist, however I can promise you that no one will ever force you to avail yourself of one.
You really do believe now that Obama has mandated they can be there, that men won't accept these invitations?
I have said repeatedly I oppose Obama getting involved in this. Again you just ignore anything that doesn't fit your argument. We don't need him mandating anything, we don't need states banning anything. Leave people alone, deal with problems as they arise.
You are WAY overestimating Obama's influence, the law, and how much the dregs of humanity follow current events.
You are WAY underestimating the power of what is socially acceptable and how difficult it is to go against that, EVEN WHEN IT IS LEGAL. Watch the show "Impractical Jokers" and you'll know what I mean.
Not one man has said they will start using the women's bathroom, not one. Has anyone had a woman they know say they recently encountered a man in the the woman's bathroom?
It simply isn't happening as you imagine.
There is a long list of colleges with religious exemptions to Title IX.
But somehow the possibility of having a transgendered roommate is so horrific, so awful, so unimaginably unendurable that we need laws to protect us from it.
And that's not because you are skeeved out by transgendered people? Even a little?
You're ok with your daughter possibly being assigned a drug addict ***** of a roommate, just as long as she doesn't secretly have a penis?
I believe in leaving people alone who are not doing any harm. What is so difficult for you to understand about that?
And you have posted absolutely nothing that is "occurring due to his mandates". That is pure speculation with not a shred of evidence.
It said "community", not "communal". My community center's locker rooms are still gender specific, I suspect these are as well. Hysteria, Tim, hysteria.
You are WAY overestimating Obama's influence, the law, and how much the dregs of humanity follow current events.
You are WAY underestimating the power of what is socially acceptable and how difficult it is to go against that, EVEN WHEN IT IS LEGAL. Watch the show "Impractical Jokers" and you'll know what I mean.
Not one man has said they will start using the women's bathroom, not one. Has anyone had a woman they know say they recently encountered a man in the the woman's bathroom?
It simply isn't happening as you imagine.
Your community's locker rooms may say they are gender specific. I can go to your community center today, say I identify as a female, and I can walk right in. Doubt me?
Are social norms hard to get around or they don't matter, cuz now you've argued both.
And again, to refute your last two sentences, we don't just have men saying they are going to use the restrooms, we have men doing it. We have men in the showers. We have men in the shelters. We have men in the dressing rooms. Countless stories.
Doubt you? Hey, go right ahead and use the women's room, I'm sure they'll appreciate whatever point you're trying to make.
I've always contended social norms are hard to get around. Men (not predators) aren't going to start using the women's room to the point where women aren't alarmed by their presence. When a predator does, they are likely going to sneak in when it's vacant. They aren't going to boldly walk in as you are imagining.
I could easily count the stories you've posted. Again, what is countless is the BILLIONS of times public restrooms have been used in the same time period without incident.
I could find "countless" stories of people being sexually assaulted on playgrounds, public parks, public transportation, etc. no one is demanding we make those gender specific.
Very "Brave New World" ish....
All we need is soma and we'll all feel better.
At least you read it. And yes it is Orwelian/Huxleyesque..................and equally prescient,imo.
It goes pretty far. She makes premises that aren't that hard to believe. I don't see it happening, but I also don't see it being utterly impossible. Regardless, this movement and the others are attempts to de-humanize us. We've been told by that genius over at MSNBC - Melissa Harris Scary - your children aren't your children. The Left would love to have more of us being even more dependent on Government.
Makes for great stories and discussion.
So....the knock out game is NOT a hate crime when someone gets ktfo for no reason other than their race but you daresn't politely escort a tranny out of a bathroom because.....hateful.
We can't feed all of our people. We can't fund all of our schools. We allow toxic chemicals to get into our environment. By my goodness, we can worry about where people go to the bathroom. Good to see where our priorities are in this country.
We are funding all our schools. That they still suck is a different issue.We can't feed all of our people. We can't fund all of our schools. We allow toxic chemicals to get into our environment. By my goodness, we can worry about where people go to the bathroom. Good to see where our priorities are in this country.
We are funding all our schools. That they still suck is a different issue.
Correction, we are funding our schools in affluent areas. The ones in low income areas don't get jack ****. Trust me, I work in one. And I'm not just talking about the inner city ghetto schools, I'm talking about rural America.
The Baltimore school system ranked second among the nation's 100 largest school districts in how much it spent per pupil in fiscal year 2011, according to data released Tuesday by the U.S. Census Bureau.
The city's $15,483 per-pupil expenditure was second to New York City's $19,770. Rounding out the top five were Montgomery County, which spent $15,421; Milwaukee public schools at $14,244; and Prince George's County public schools, which spent $13,775.
The Census Bureau also noted the first decrease in per-pupil spending nationally since 1977, the year the figures were first tracked.
Not quite true. Maybe rural areas. I wouldn't call Baltimore affluent. And it has one of the worst school systems in the country, despite spending more per pupil than every other district in the country save for one.
http://articles.baltimoresun.com/20..._1_school-system-per-pupil-spending-districts
Baltimore second in per-pupil spending, Census Bureau says
PG County is absolutely not affluent.
You may argue both are urban and not rural.
Baltimore is a huge city. I'm sure things are probably different in places like that but I wouldn't know personally. I probably should have prefaced my comments with that. I have no experience with huge schools in huge cities. I just know from my own experiences in both rural Ohio and rural Pennsylvania. I can tell you for my district and the 5 or 6 other low income districts in the immediate vicinity it is an absolute, iron clad truth. None of them have a pot to piss in.
I won't argue more money goes to the big, urban districts. But, if it makes you feel better, in many of those places, it's not working and would probably be better spent in districts like yours.