Hell, most of us right-wingers KNEW that. Just for different reasons than yours.
The Crooked Hillary Thread
- Thread starter Coach
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 14,927
- Reaction score
- 13,233
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Lebanon, OH (Near Kings Island)
http://www.allenbwest.com/allen/heres-why-im-delighted-about-the-fbis-verdict-on-hillary
Interesting take on the situation. I had thoughts along the same line.
Interesting take on the situation. I had thoughts along the same line.
**** right wing left wing.. shes a ******* obscenely crooked *****.
This is a shot across the bow, folks. Here is what I mean.
Romney got a lot of heat when he said the 47%. The question is whether it is much more than 47%. The Democrats, with the immigration policies among many other things, are banking on the fact that it is much more than 47%. They aren't even hiding the corruption anymore, because they know that whatever the % is, those idiots will vote for them.
So it is almost a challenge to see how much **** the American people will put up with. The Dems are betting just about anything, and they may be right.
Far too many Americans view politics like their favorite football team when they were about 12. I was like that. The Steelers could do no wrong. Besides being the best, all their players were top citizens. I ignored the Ernie Holmes and Joe Gilliam stuff. And a Cowboy could have saved 100 old ladies from horrible deaths and I still would have hated him.
Romney got a lot of heat when he said the 47%. The question is whether it is much more than 47%. The Democrats, with the immigration policies among many other things, are banking on the fact that it is much more than 47%. They aren't even hiding the corruption anymore, because they know that whatever the % is, those idiots will vote for them.
So it is almost a challenge to see how much **** the American people will put up with. The Dems are betting just about anything, and they may be right.
Far too many Americans view politics like their favorite football team when they were about 12. I was like that. The Steelers could do no wrong. Besides being the best, all their players were top citizens. I ignored the Ernie Holmes and Joe Gilliam stuff. And a Cowboy could have saved 100 old ladies from horrible deaths and I still would have hated him.
Last edited:
some of Shillary's emails
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-email...e_to&nofrom¬o&count=50&sort=0#searchresult
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-email...e_to&nofrom¬o&count=50&sort=0#searchresult
None of them are fake. There is a history of the clintons being tied to both democratic and republican scandals such as iran contra... Bill laundered themoney for that through arkansas... They dont call him slick willie for nothing... Those two have a long history of murder, death and destruction to get their way...
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 4,878
- Reaction score
- 5,064
- Points
- 113
The vote counting machines are being uploaded as we speak. There is absolutely ZERO chance she does not win in November.
On the off chance, Trump wins, I'm sure Obama can pull some kind of a pardon for her crimes. That will allow her & Bill to stay out of jail as well as keep all the ill gotten gains.
On the off chance, Trump wins, I'm sure Obama can pull some kind of a pardon for her crimes. That will allow her & Bill to stay out of jail as well as keep all the ill gotten gains.
If your check comes from the government there is no way you vote for the other guy, no matter what.
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2015
- Messages
- 15,544
- Reaction score
- 3,801
- Points
- 113
Clinton is the favorite, but Trump can win. He only needs to take Ohio, and Florida, then wins one other large battleground state, like North Carolina. BAM, a 62 electoral vote swing. That means Clinton would need to win ALL the other states Obama did in 2012 as he would be 270 electoral votes if you took those three states away from him.
If Trump won Florida, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina it's a 64 electoral vote swing, and Clinton can't win the same way Obama did.
Right now all three states are very close in the polls.
Clinton needs 270 more electoral votes to win. If neither candidate hits that mark, they vote in Congress and the Republicans have the majority there.
I'd say Trump right now has a 40% chance of winning. But a lot can change in 4 months.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 4,878
- Reaction score
- 5,064
- Points
- 113
I still like the scenario where Johnson takes enough votes away from both parties, and neither gets the numbers to win.
Then it goes to the House for a vote.
- Republicans will not vote for Hillary, Dems will not vote for Trump.
- Dems vote for Johnson, because he is NOT A Rep.
- Rep. vote for Johnson, because they do not want Trump.
- Johnson wins and then both the Reps & Dems can campaign next on the platform "It isn't our fault, he is not our guy"
Then it goes to the House for a vote.
- Republicans will not vote for Hillary, Dems will not vote for Trump.
- Dems vote for Johnson, because he is NOT A Rep.
- Rep. vote for Johnson, because they do not want Trump.
- Johnson wins and then both the Reps & Dems can campaign next on the platform "It isn't our fault, he is not our guy"
I guess that's why Bill and G.H. Bush still work together on charity and international projects.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
Green Party!
Jill Stein: Prosecute Clinton for Reckless Abuses of National Security
Today FBI Director James Comey described Hillary Clinton's email communications as Secretary of State as "extremely careless." His statement undermined the defenses Clinton put forward, stating the FBI found 110 emails on Clinton's server that were classified at the time they were sent or received; eight contained information classified at the highest level, "top secret," at the time they were sent. That stands in direct contradiction to Clinton's repeated insistence she never sent or received any classified emails.
All the elements necessary to prove a felony violation were found by the FBI investigation, specifically of Title 18 Section 793(f) of the federal penal code, a law ensuring proper protection of highly classified information. Director Comey said that Clinton was "extremely careless" in handling such information. Contrary to the implications of the FBI statement, the law does not require showing that Clinton intended to harm the United States, but that she acted with gross negligence.
The recent State Department Inspector General (IG) report was clear that Clinton blithely disregarded safeguards to protect the most highly classified national security information and that she included on her unprotected email server the names of covert CIA officers. The disclosure of such information is a felony under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act.
While the FBI is giving Clinton a pass for not "intending" to betray state secrets, her staff has said Secretary Clinton stated she used her private email system because she did not want her personal emails to become accessible under FOI laws. This is damning on two counts – that she intended to disregard the protection of security information, and that she had personal business to conceal.
This is not the end of the Clinton email issues. Department of Justice officials filed a motion in federal court on June 29th requesting a 27-month delay in producing correspondence between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's four top aides and officials with the Clinton Foundation and Teneo Holdings, a public relations firm that Bill Clinton helped launch.
Hillary Clinton deleted 30,000 emails claiming they were 'personal'. This is equal to the volume of her emails designated as department business. If half of an employee's email volume is for their personal business, they are not using their time for their job.
If Secretary Clinton was conducting personal business for her family Foundation through the Secretary of State's Office, this is a matter the American public deserves to know about. As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton routinely granted lucrative special contracts, weapons deals and government partnerships to Clinton Foundation donors. The Secretary of State's office should not be a place to conduct private back room business deals.
The blurring of the lines between Clinton family private business and national security matters in the Secretary of State Office underscores evidence on many other fronts that Hillary Clinton is serving the 1%, not we the people.
Hillary Clinton's failure to protect critical security information is not the only thing in her tenure as Secretary that deserves the term reckless, including her decision to pursue catastrophic regime change in Libya, and to support the overthrow of democratically elected governments in Ukraine and Honduras.
http://www.jill2016.com/stein_prosecute_clinton_for_reckless_abuses_of_national_security
Jill Stein: Prosecute Clinton for Reckless Abuses of National Security
Today FBI Director James Comey described Hillary Clinton's email communications as Secretary of State as "extremely careless." His statement undermined the defenses Clinton put forward, stating the FBI found 110 emails on Clinton's server that were classified at the time they were sent or received; eight contained information classified at the highest level, "top secret," at the time they were sent. That stands in direct contradiction to Clinton's repeated insistence she never sent or received any classified emails.
All the elements necessary to prove a felony violation were found by the FBI investigation, specifically of Title 18 Section 793(f) of the federal penal code, a law ensuring proper protection of highly classified information. Director Comey said that Clinton was "extremely careless" in handling such information. Contrary to the implications of the FBI statement, the law does not require showing that Clinton intended to harm the United States, but that she acted with gross negligence.
The recent State Department Inspector General (IG) report was clear that Clinton blithely disregarded safeguards to protect the most highly classified national security information and that she included on her unprotected email server the names of covert CIA officers. The disclosure of such information is a felony under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act.
While the FBI is giving Clinton a pass for not "intending" to betray state secrets, her staff has said Secretary Clinton stated she used her private email system because she did not want her personal emails to become accessible under FOI laws. This is damning on two counts – that she intended to disregard the protection of security information, and that she had personal business to conceal.
This is not the end of the Clinton email issues. Department of Justice officials filed a motion in federal court on June 29th requesting a 27-month delay in producing correspondence between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's four top aides and officials with the Clinton Foundation and Teneo Holdings, a public relations firm that Bill Clinton helped launch.
Hillary Clinton deleted 30,000 emails claiming they were 'personal'. This is equal to the volume of her emails designated as department business. If half of an employee's email volume is for their personal business, they are not using their time for their job.
If Secretary Clinton was conducting personal business for her family Foundation through the Secretary of State's Office, this is a matter the American public deserves to know about. As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton routinely granted lucrative special contracts, weapons deals and government partnerships to Clinton Foundation donors. The Secretary of State's office should not be a place to conduct private back room business deals.
The blurring of the lines between Clinton family private business and national security matters in the Secretary of State Office underscores evidence on many other fronts that Hillary Clinton is serving the 1%, not we the people.
Hillary Clinton's failure to protect critical security information is not the only thing in her tenure as Secretary that deserves the term reckless, including her decision to pursue catastrophic regime change in Libya, and to support the overthrow of democratically elected governments in Ukraine and Honduras.
http://www.jill2016.com/stein_prosecute_clinton_for_reckless_abuses_of_national_security
Jocularity...more jocularity !
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
Keep hounding her every day for the next 4 months, keep her squirming
Paul Ryan / @SpeakerRyan:
"I formally asked the Director of National Intelligence to deny Sec. Clinton access to classified info."
--------------------------------
Republicans threaten PERJURY probe of Hillary Clinton over congressional testimony that 'nothing marked classified' was on her email server as committee chairman grills FBI director
The Republican chairman of a powerful congressional committee said Thursday that he will ask the FBI for a new criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton's classified email scandal, focusing on the possibility that she perjured herself in sworn testimony to Congress.
Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz, the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, asked FBI Director James Comey whether he had cause to charge her for lying in a statement she made to Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan during a 2015 hearing on the 2012 Benghazi terror attack.
'There was nothing marked classified on my emails, either sent or received,' Clinton said at the time.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ace-Congress-Clinton-email-investigation.html
Paul Ryan / @SpeakerRyan:
"I formally asked the Director of National Intelligence to deny Sec. Clinton access to classified info."
--------------------------------
Republicans threaten PERJURY probe of Hillary Clinton over congressional testimony that 'nothing marked classified' was on her email server as committee chairman grills FBI director
The Republican chairman of a powerful congressional committee said Thursday that he will ask the FBI for a new criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton's classified email scandal, focusing on the possibility that she perjured herself in sworn testimony to Congress.
Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz, the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, asked FBI Director James Comey whether he had cause to charge her for lying in a statement she made to Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan during a 2015 hearing on the 2012 Benghazi terror attack.
'There was nothing marked classified on my emails, either sent or received,' Clinton said at the time.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ace-Congress-Clinton-email-investigation.html
That might be the only good thing Ryan has done as Speaker.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
On The Hill
Comey getting grilled - ha ha - try protecting a crooked liar
“Did you plan the timing of your announcement to help the Sec. of State with her campaign?”
http://www.c-span.org/video/?412315-1/fbi-director-james-comey-testifies-hillary-clinton-email-probe
Comey getting grilled - ha ha - try protecting a crooked liar
“Did you plan the timing of your announcement to help the Sec. of State with her campaign?”
http://www.c-span.org/video/?412315-1/fbi-director-james-comey-testifies-hillary-clinton-email-probe
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
Ha Ha!
Comey: Hillary’s FBI Testimony Wasn’t Under Oath Or Recorded, 'But It Would Still Be a Crime To Lie'
During testimony before Congress on Thursday, FBI Director James Comey stated that the FBI’s interview with presumptive Democratic presidential nominee former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was not under oath or recorded, but it still would be a crime to lie to the FBI.
Comey stated that he did not personally interview Clinton, and did not talk to all of the “five or six” who did interview Clinton.
He was then asked, “did she testify or talk to them under oath?” Comey answered, “No.” But added that “it’s still a crime to lie to us.”
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016...ecorded-but-it-would-still-be-a-crime-to-lie/
Comey: Hillary’s FBI Testimony Wasn’t Under Oath Or Recorded, 'But It Would Still Be a Crime To Lie'
During testimony before Congress on Thursday, FBI Director James Comey stated that the FBI’s interview with presumptive Democratic presidential nominee former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was not under oath or recorded, but it still would be a crime to lie to the FBI.
Comey stated that he did not personally interview Clinton, and did not talk to all of the “five or six” who did interview Clinton.
He was then asked, “did she testify or talk to them under oath?” Comey answered, “No.” But added that “it’s still a crime to lie to us.”
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016...ecorded-but-it-would-still-be-a-crime-to-lie/
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2014
- Messages
- 3,320
- Reaction score
- 3,237
- Points
- 113
I had to turn it off. Comey states people who knew she was running the server should be held responsible and accountable for not reporting it....but you do nothing to the person who actually had the server set up and used it!!! Is this bizarro world?
She committed perjury by lying under oath to congress. She should be charged with a felony.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
Marco joins in!
Marco makes his mark: Leads Senate push to strip Hillary of security clearance
A high-powered group of senators officially petitioned the State Department Thursday to suspend the security clearances of former Secretary Hillary Clinton and her top aides — a move that could effectively kneecap her preparations for the White House.
Sen. Marco Rubio, a member of the intelligence committee, led the push, joined by Sen. John Cornyn, the Senate’s second-ranking Republican and a handful of others...
They took that step after the White House said it wouldn’t act on its own. The administration says both major presidential candidates have traditionally gotten such access, and President Obama won’t break that tradition despite the allegations against Mrs. Clinton.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/7/gop-petitions-state-dept-cancel-clinton-aides-secu/
Similar threads
