FACT: The Wicked Witch of the West is also not currently under investigation by the F.B.I. and Justice Department like Killary Clinton is.
Meanwhile, ongoing depositions show Team Hillary continuing its “amnesia” stonewall.
The only item I want to see from the Hildebeast, is this.......
Julian Assange is the founder of WikiLeaks, a whistleblowing website, counted on by millions to call out the dirty birds who hold far too much power in our country. Assange says that his next leak will be so damaging for Hillary Clinton, that not only should she no longer be eligible to be President, but she should be arrested and indicted.
According to Assange, he has “enough evidence” for the Department of Justice to indict Hillary Clinton regarding her handling of classified information, which includes directing her staff to remove “classified” labels from emails as a way to casually send pertinent and delicate information via an unsecured public server.
Assange says that, while he believes that some of the rules regarding classified information are silly, he also knows that Hillary Clinton, as well as President Obama, has pushed to get people who break those rules prosecuted for such crimes.
Over 30,000 of Clinton’s emails have already been released by WikiLeaks. Those emails were sent by Clinton over the course of four years, while Clinton served as Secretary of State. While Assange didn’t go into too much detail as to what exactly he would be releasing, he did say that he had “accumulated a lot of material about Hillary Clinton, which could proceed to an indictment.”
Assange does not, however, believe that anyone in President Obama’s administration would actually indict Clinton. Assange said this in an interview with ITV:
“[ATTORNEY GENERAL LORETTA LYNCH] IS NOT GOING TO INDICT HILLARY CLINTON. IT’S NOT POSSIBLE THAT COULD HAPPEN. BUT THE FBI COULD PUSH FOR NEW CONCESSIONS FROM THE CLINTON GOVERNMENT IN EXCHANGE FOR ITS LACK OF INDICTMENT.”
This is not the first time Assange has called on President Obama to indict Hillary Clinton. In 2010, WikiLeaks released information that would have had any non-famous politician in serious trouble. That information was soon forgotten, and nothing ever came of an indictment.
Now, many years later, the American public is still talking about Hillary Clinton’s private email server and mishandling of classified information. The public wants the truth.
Assange is viewed as an enemy of the state, keeping sanctuary in the Ecuadorian embassy in London. Ecuador has refused the United State’s request for them to hand over Assange to us.
Watch the interview with Assange here.
-------------------
That explains a lot.
"Flush with cash" is a pretty loose term for someone averaging $27 per donation, zero super pac money et al. You can take a swing at Bernie if you want, but characterizing him as some money grubber is off the mark.The reason Bernie hasn't dropped out is that he is flush with cash and wants to use it to continue promoting his positions.
https://www.clintonfoundation.org/about/annual-financial-reports
All of their audited financials and annual reports are on-line, so you can have at them. They average about 88% of their funds going to
program services, which is a pretty good record for a non-profit.
If the Clintons were money hungry, you'd see them living a luxurious lifestyle. But you mainly see them working. Working floats some peoples boats.
“Charity Navigator … [has] placed the Clinton Foundation on a watch list,” Willis said. “They think there are problems with this nonprofit. They don’t like the way it runs itself. They say the money is not spent wisely.”
As for conferences, nearly 98 percent of money spent was tabbed as a programming expense. And when it comes to salaries — which includes pension plan contributions, benefits and payroll taxes — about 73 percent went to program service expenses.
If you define "actual charities not controlled by the Clintons" as "programmatic grants," then it appears the number is 15%, with 85% staying with the foundation itself:
Between 2009 and 2012, the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million dollars according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist (2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). A measly 15 percent of that, or $75 million, went towards programmatic grants. More than $25 million went to fund travel expenses. Nearly $110 million went toward employee salaries and benefits. And a whopping $290 million during that period — nearly 60 percent of all money raised — was classified merely as “other expenses.” ...The Clinton Foundation may well be saving lives, but it seems odd that the costs of so many life-saving activities would be classified by the organization itself as just random, miscellaneous expenses.
"When anyone contributes to the Clinton Foundation, it actually goes toward fat salaries, administrative bloat, and lavish travel. Between 2009 and 2012, the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million dollars according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist (2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). A measly 15 percent of that, or $75 million, went towards programmatic grants. More than $25 million went to fund travel expenses. Nearly $110 million went toward employee salaries and benefits. And a whopping $290 million during that period — nearly 60 percent of all money raised — was classified merely as ‘other expenses.’ "
The Clinton foundation, on the other hand, gets to its 88 percent going to "life-changing work" by combining the finances of the Clinton Foundation and an affiliated organization, the Clinton Health Access Initiative, that before 2010 had been part of the Clinton Foundation proper
In response to a PolitiFact request, the Clinton Foundation said the expenditures for its programs are "inclusive of salaries for staff, large-scale conferences (which is how the foundation convenes partners to take action such as the Clinton Global Initiative and the Health Matters conference), training for farmers and other beneficiaries, as well as direct program expenses like purchasing seeds and fertilizer for our agricultural programs and medical equipment for our public health work."
Reasonable people can disagree about how to categorize expenses, said Janet S. Greenlee, emeritus professor of accounting at the University of Dayton business school.
Julian Assange and wiki leaks are set to release new trove of Hillary emails. This new batch will 'surely lead to her arrest' according to Assange. Will wait and see. Btw this is one of the reasons Bernie hasn't dropped out, imo.
See post #193What are the chances that Obama's Dept. of Justice would EVER, despite the evidence, move to indict Hillary, for even a parking ticket?
What are the chances that Obama's Dept. of Justice would EVER, despite the evidence, move to indict Hillary, for even a parking ticket?