The Epstein Problem

[Steelworth]

Just from what I have read, Trump was not a passenger on the bimbo flights to the Caribbean. The two flew together a couple of times in Epstein's plane, but not to Pedophile Isle.

I believe you are correct, counselor. This according to sworn testimony from Epstein's brother, Mark.

That makes sense. Of course, why would Trump ban Epstein if he knew of no wrongdoing? And if Trump knew of Epstein's predilections, why would he ban Epstein from Mara Lago for the same behavior he already supposedly knew about? And why would he cooperate with a lawyer investigating a lawsuit against Epstein if he cavorted in the Caribbean with minors? Wouldn't he just stay quiet to avoid potentially devastating retaliation?

Seems pretty logical to me.

 

[Steeltime]

Seems pretty logical to me.

Even an old sow sometimes finds an acorn.

 

[Steelworth]

Google biased? Nah.

 

[oneforthebus]

Just from what I have read, Trump was not a passenger on the bimbo flights to the Caribbean. The two flew together a couple of times in Epstein's plane, but not to Pedophile Isle.



That makes sense. Of course, why would Trump ban Epstein if he knew of no wrongdoing? And if Trump knew of Epstein's predilections, why would he ban Epstein from Mara Lago for the same behavior he already supposedly knew about? And why would he cooperate with a lawyer investigating a lawsuit against Epstein if he cavorted in the Caribbean with minors? Wouldn't he just stay quiet to avoid potentially devastating retaliation?

What I am pointing out is that there is not much here to tarnish Trump. Look, I am certainly not saying Trump will never be mentioned or badmouthed about Epstein; what I am saying is that right now there is "no there there."

Like I said, I'm not suggesting I believe Trump did anything wrong. I've simply said it wouldn't shock me if he did. It wouldn't shock me if any friend of Epstein (especially the known serial womanizer friends of Epstein's) did something wrong, ether knowingly or unknowingly, with young women they did not know to be underage or with adult prostitutes. It shouldn't be out of the realm of possibility in anyone's mind.

 

[Steelworth]

Like I said, I'm not suggesting I believe Trump did anything wrong. I've simply said it wouldn't shock me if he did. It wouldn't shock me if any friend of Epstein (especially the known serial womanizer friends of Epstein's) did something wrong, ether knowingly or unknowingly, with young women they did not know to be underage or with adult prostitutes. It shouldn't be out of the realm of possibility in anyone's mind.

Completely logical train of thought.

But then think about the crazy country we currently live in and the vicious animals in the MSM, the elites and Orange Man Bad. He'd have been crucified already and they may have even made it a PPV event.

 

[Ron Burgundy]

Here is what cracks me up on this board a picture of maxwell at the clintons wedding = close to Clinton's, but a picture of Trump with someone shady = "oh he/ she was just an acquaintance. " The level of bias is insane and at times all rational thought just vanishes.
Trump has gone back stage at teen pagents while girls as young as 15 were getting dressed or undressed. At best that makes him a perv. I really don't think you can rule out anything for trump. He also hired the guy who basically let Epstein off free. None of this makes trump guilty of anything, but it also does not mean he is innocent either. It definitely looks alot worse for clinton and who knows who else will get sucked in. I hope Trump is totally innocent, and i hope Acosta gets investigated. I also hope clinton and whoever else gets what they deserve if implicated.

I still think the whole thing was ginned up now just to get Acosta since he's in Trump's administration. They couldn't pin anything on anyone else. If some Democrats have to go down, so to speak, well that's just collateral damage. Like I said, people have known about Epstein and Clinton for years. None of this is new.

 

[Steeltime]

Google biased? Nah.

Went on Google and confirmed that this is 100% accurate.

Unbelievable how corrupt Google is. **** them and the horse they rode in on.

 

[Roy92040]

I still think the whole thing was ginned up now just to get Acosta since he's in Trump's administration. They couldn't pin anything on anyone else. If some Democrats have to go down, so to speak, well that's just collateral damage. Like I said, people have known about Epstein and Clinton for years. None of this is new.

You might have something there. Maybe someone is hoping this guy will roll on Trump. Hey it's worth a try. It's only the taxpayer's money. They were kind of disappointed by the Mueller report.

 

[Steeltime]

You might have something there. Maybe someone is hoping this guy will roll on Trump. Hey it's worth a try. It's only the taxpayer's money. They were kind of disappointed by the Mueller report.

Not Mad Maxine.

"Peach fortify!!"

 

[hamster]

Went on Google and confirmed that this is 100% accurate.

Unbelievable how corrupt Google is. **** them and the horse they rode in on.

duckduckgo.com

 

[Steelworth]

duckduckgo.com

Yessir.

 

[ZonaBurgh]

Went on Google and confirmed that this is 100% accurate.

Unbelievable how corrupt Google is. **** them and the horse they rode in on.

Yep, I did the same thing this morning and was surprised all the links were associated with Trump. I need a new go to search engine.

 

[Steelworth]

Yep, I did the same thing this morning and was surprised all the links were associated with Trump. I need a new go to search engine.

I know this is unrealistic and all, but how about a fuckfuckgoogle.com? I'd be all over it.

 

[Steelworth]

duckduckgo.com

Bump for Zona.

 

[Spike]

 

[tapeANaspirin2it]

Epstein's wikipedia page is being edited like crazy today.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jeffrey_Epstein&action=history

 

[SojournerSteel]

this thread is invisible to the Board Libs

They're probably all over at Wexell's Board aka safe space. Pretty entrenched over there and they'd think you guys were McCarthy. Of course, it so dead over there who knows.

 

[Confluence]

Once again you're saying things I didn't say at all. Trump is at a minimum a ferocious womanizer, that we know for a fact. He has cheated on wives. He has slept with a near *****. He has spent time with Epstein. He has said Epstein is a great guy, fun to be around, and likes them young. These are all facts. I said it's possible Trump could be implicated. I said it wouldn't shock me. That's all I said. I did not say "Trump is every bit as likely to be implicated as Clinton." or "Trump is just as bad as Clinton." Nowhere.

You seem incredibly hypersensitive to even the slightest hint that Trump isn't some perfect pure holy angel sent from God. Clearly he is not. I'm sorry you can't admit that to yourself. Like I said, blinders.

What is a "near *****" pls?
Asking for a friend.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Steeler Nation mobile app

 

[Steelworth]

They're probably all over at Wexell's Board aka safe space. Pretty entrenched over there and they'd think you guys were McCarthy. Of course, it so dead over there who knows.

Vandilay & crew are pretty ******* sensitive about that stuff. JFC, learn to understand that people have different political viewpoints.

 

[IndySteel]

duckduckgo.com

One bonus with DDG is that (with safe search off) pretty much every image search includes porn. Duckduckgo > commiegoogle.

 

[SojournerSteel]

Vandilay & crew are pretty ******* sensitive about that stuff. JFC, learn to understand that people have different political viewpoints.

To borrow from Eric Hoffer, definitely some true believers over there.

 

[Steelworth]

To borrow from Eric Hoffer, definitely some true believers over there.

I had to look him up.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_True_Believer

Sounds like a guy ahead of his time.

 

[oneforthebus]

What is a "near *****" pls?
Asking for a friend.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Steeler Nation mobile app

Well I mean I personally would consider someone like Stormy Daniels who gets paid to have sex on film a *****, but I guess technically in the legal sense she's not, hence, near *****.

 

[CharlesDavenport]

Well I mean I personally would consider someone like Stormy Daniels who gets paid to have sex on film a *****, but I guess technically in the legal sense she's not, hence, near *****.

Your entire rants are about what you "personally consider", and nobody cares about what you and your kind think. Let's fast forward to you now telling everyone that you posted that you said that you allowed that technically in the legal sense she isn't, and then base all your further bullshit on that. LOL.

 

[jitter77]

Not sure how true this is, but if it is then not a good look....
https://news.google.com/articles/CA...vc2FpKgQICjAMMJD-CQ?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en

Exclusive party with just trump epstein and 28 girls