• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

The Official Thread Dedicated to "Biden Destroying Us"

I feel like that Indian on the old Keep America Beautiful commercial...

The embarrassment is keeping me from crying though...
what happened to this once great nation?


"that guy was eyetalyin!"
- @Ron Burgundy
 
Another great decision by blithering dementia-ridden moron plagiarist grifter liar, Sloppy Joe: an affirmative action choice for Vice President. Brilliant!!


“We all watched. The television coverage, just yesterday. That’s on top of everything else that we know and don’t know yet based on what we’ve just been able to see and because we’ve seen it or not doesn’t mean it hasn’t happened.”
- ******* Idiot

Every time Cumallah Harris speaks, she sounds like a college student who did not read any of the assigned material, drank way too much the prior night, shows up for class hungover, and is asked by the professor to answer a difficult question on a subject she knows NOTHING about.
 
Last edited:
No. Real liberalism doesn't stand for the things we are seeing. This is authoritarian fascism disguised as liberalism quite the opposite of the real thing.
We are experiencing America Last, the polar opposite of Trump’s America First.
 
Biden's greatest accomplishment IMO is sending this country to hell much quicker than any of us even anticipated.
 
It isn't them, I assure you.

I'd bet the house on it. There's absolutely no way. This is all deliberate and well crafted. Those two could **** up a free lunch.
 
No. Real liberalism doesn't stand for the things we are seeing. This is authoritarian fascism disguised as liberalism quite the opposite of the real thing.

Read the book "Witness" by Whittaker Chambers. Back in the 1930s, when he left the communist party and exposed communists working in our Federal government (hundreds of them), he wrote a book. In it, he wrote about the dangers of Liberalism and how it was a form of Communism and would overtake our world...and wrote then...it already may be too late.

Some of his better passages on liberals and liberalism:

Now I thought that I understood much better something that in the past had vaguely nibbled at my mind, but never nibbled to a conclusion–namely, how it happened that so many concealed Communists were clustered in Government, and how it was possible for them to operate so freely with so little fear of detection. For as between revolutionists who only half know what they are doing and revolutionists who know exactly what they are doing the latter are in a superb maneuvering position. At the basic point of the revolution–the shift of power from business to government–the two kinds of revolutionists were at one; and they shared many other views and hopes. Thus men who sincerely abhorred the word Communism, in the pursuit of common ends found that they were unable to distinguish Communists from themselves, except that it was just the Communists who were likely to be most forthright and most dedicated in the common cause. This political colorblindness was all the more dogged because it was completely honest. For men who could not see that what they firmly believed was liberalism added up to socialism could scarcely be expected to see what added up to Communism. Any charge of Communism enraged them precisely because they could not grasp the differences between themselves and those against whom it was made. Conscious of their own political innocence, they suspected that it was merely mischievous, and was aimed, from motives of political malice, at themselves. But as the struggle was really for revolutionary power, which in our age is always a struggle for control of the masses, that was the point at which they always betrayed their real character, for they reacted not like liberals, but with the fierceness of revolutionists whenever that power was at issue.

Chambers’ verdict on this abusive treatment was that when he took up his sling and struck [Alger] Hiss, he also struck Goliath:

What I hit was the forces of that great socialist revolution, which, in the name of liberalism, spasmodically, incompletely, somewhat formlessly, but always in the same direction, has been inching its ice cap over the nation for two decades.

Chambers stridently argued that communists, socialists, and progressives really couldn’t grasp “the differences between themselves.” An accusation that Hiss was a communist struck many progressives as an attack upon them because he was of their circles. How could a Soviet agent share their purposes?

Chambers answered by pointing to the rationalism of the modern liberal project, which believed that man’s mind could constitute and change man’s reality. The spirit of this vision moved in tandem with the communist faith.

The progressive shared the communist position that replaced right and wrong, good and evil, with “the morally corrupting distinction between ’progress’ and ‘reaction,’” as Dan Mahoney articulates.

Chambers’ “Witness” argued that he was fighting for Western political freedom, but that freedom could not be defended by modern liberalism. Freedom, Chambers said, “is a need of the soul.” In “striving toward God,” he wrote, the “soul strives continually after a condition of freedom.”
 
Everything Tim said, but if you haven't, read the book "Witness" anyways. Eye-opening, scary **** -- and this is almost a century ago.
 
Media. So looking in my phone and I see a “topic” about how Americans are stressed (ahh boo ******* hoo and no ****) with the headliner CNN.

So how is that below said headline was every other network with the same ducking story? Like this isn’t rona or Ukraine update bs. It’s a non story but they are all in line. 🤔
 
xicZEHC.jpg
 
Boom. 20 seconds, Biden summed up on inflation.

 
Remember the Right wing protester shot dead in Denver during the Patriot Muster by the unlicensed security guard?

Charges dropped. Fully. Soros DA I'm sure. Infuriating.




I don't know man. The article says that the guy that got shot hit the "security guard" and then went to spray him with OC spray when he was shot. Now I am sure there are details missing, but based on that information alone, it sounds like self defense. He should probably be charged for not having a license to be a security guard, and the news organization should be fined for hiring him. Beyond that, and without more information, I can understand why he wasn't charged.
 
I don't know man. The article says that the guy that got shot hit the "security guard" and then went to spray him with OC spray when he was shot. Now I am sure there are details missing, but based on that information alone, it sounds like self defense. He should probably be charged for not having a license to be a security guard, and the news organization should be fined for hiring him. Beyond that, and without more information, I can understand why he wasn't charged.

This is all I can find. From what IRC, the security guard may have agitated the situation, but this sums it up nicely.

In a confrontation captured on video and by a Denver Post photographer, Keltner and a handful of others were arguing with a counter-protester near the Denver Art Museum when Keltner suddenly shifted his focus to a 9News producer who was filming the argument with a cellphone. Keltner told the producer to put the camera away and said he was going to “(expletive) him up.”

Dolloff, who was working as a security guard for Denver television station 9News, stepped between the two and physically blocked Keltner, who was holding a can of bear spray. Keltner slapped Dolloff in the face. Dolloff pulled a gun from his belt and shot Keltner as Keltner discharged the bear spray.

Under Colorado law, a person can use deadly force in self-defense only if that person reasonably thinks using less force won’t be sufficient, and the person reasonably believes he or someone else faces an immediate threat of being killed or seriously hurt.

There is no duty to retreat under state law, but the action taken in self-defense must be generally proportionate to the attack, attorneys said.

Everyone can debate, and I'm not sure what I would have done. Hindsight is always 20/20. A face slap and spray doesn't equal a bullet I fear, but I stand for the right to self defense so.
 
No. Real liberalism doesn't stand for the things we are seeing. This is authoritarian fascism disguised as liberalism quite the opposite of the real thing.
Do you remember when we actually had liberals pleading their virtuous policies here?
Where did they go?
 
Do you remember when we actually had liberals pleading their virtuous policies here?
Where did they go?
I don’t know. It is boring over here without them, even if they were all suffering from horrible cases of TDS. Particularly @Tibs who was sometimes a moderate liberal before Trump. Hopefully they are all ok as we are all Steelers fans together. Maybe they will come back a bit wiser.
 
Top