• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Things Mike Tomlin can do to fix the Steelers next season ( besides resign šŸ¤£ )

Well if he was better at a better position then don't knock Tomlin for trying him at NT and then say Tomlin doesn't like NTs. I'm not saying you did that but two other people here have. Also Hargrave shouldn't be a part of this conversation anyway because everybody knows the Steelers couldnt afford him so it's a moot point.
Then Tomlin was playing him out of position. Tomlin seems to not like the traditional nose. It's just a fact, by the players he brings in. Look at what he does.
 
Henry was running to the left side more then any other side during that game. This was by design obviously. A nose tackle can't stop that.
If you have a good nose, like a Casey Hampton, you are committing more than one guy to him. Maybe going to the left isn't as easy then.
 
Then Tomlin was playing him out of position. Tomlin seems to not like the traditional nose. It's just a fact, by the players he brings in. Look at what he does.
What is the traditional nose exactly? Are you basing this off of weight, or what? He put him there because he could see the field more in that position rather then the defensive end position which if I'm not mistaken was already solidified. Who would you take out and put him in??
 
Last edited:
If you have a good nose, like a Casey Hampton, you are committing more than one guy to him. Maybe going to the left isn't as easy then.
Yeah, that's assuming Casey is that much better then a player like Cam? How much better do you think Casey is then Cam??, because I'm assuming the same effort it took to avoid Cam in the run game is the same effort it would take to get around Casey
 
Last edited:
Yeah, that's assuming Casey is that much better then a player like Cam? How much better do you think Casey is then Cam, because I'm assuming the same effort it took to avoid Cam in the run game is the same effort it would take to get around Casey
Have to disagree on this point, they are two entirely different types of players. Cam is strong but he is a technician as well. He doesn't play the run the same way as Casey did. Casey just ate up space and people he didn't have great moves he just plain physically beat you straight ahead if tried to block him with one man. HE couldn't run down a back or QB laterally like Cam or chase down a QB. He would just take the center and or guard and shove them into the QB. He didn't shoot gaps or beat anyone with speed, he did one thing, and he did that one thing very well, but it did limit what you could while he was in. Every positive has a negative. It would be nice to have someone who could do what he did as effectively as he did it but I think it can be a liability if teams are creative and have two players on the field who can run the ball. That is hard to stop in the best of situations for the best of teams. Getting a lead and eating clock is the best way to stop it. Something we failed at utterly the last 5 games.
 
Yeah, that's assuming Casey is that much better then a player like Cam? How much better do you think Casey is then Cam??, because I'm assuming the same effort it took to avoid Cam in the run game is the same effort it would take to get around Casey
It's not about which player is better, it's about having more size on your Dline when you're going against a great running team. Like I said before a group of grade school kids can tell you that if you have 5 300lbs guys pushing against 2 300lb guys, they know the 5 guys are going to win. Yeah sounds basic, but when you're using 2 DL, then 4 245lb LB's behind that, you're going to get blown off the LOS
 
Then Tomlin was playing him out of position. Tomlin seems to not like the traditional nose. It's just a fact, by the players he brings in. Look at what he does.
Shades has always had something against traditional noses, no idea why. But facts are facts.
 
What is the traditional nose exactly? Are you basing this off of weight, or what? He put him there because he could see the field more in that position rather then the defensive end position which if I'm not mistaken was already solidified. Who would you take out and put him in??
Fair point. I would have secured a more traditional nose and used him in rotation with Heyward and Tuitt.
 
It's not about which player is better, it's about having more size on your Dline when you're going against a great running team. Like I said before a group of grade school kids can tell you that if you have 5 300lbs guys pushing against 2 300lb guys, they know the 5 guys are going to win. Yeah sounds basic, but when you're using 2 DL, then 4 245lb LB's behind that, you're going to get blown off the LOS
Nothing you said changes whether they have a player like Casey on the line or not. What you're referring to is scheme whether it's 3-4, 4-3 etc. If you think the scheme needs to change that's one thing. I personally just thought it was more about who was the more physical team the other night. Nobody really wanted to tackle. That's not going to get fixed whether you have a Casey Hampton in the middle or not.
 
Yeah, that's assuming Casey is that much better then a player like Cam? How much better do you think Casey is then Cam??, because I'm assuming the same effort it took to avoid Cam in the run game is the same effort it would take to get around Casey
Different players, different roles. Part of this discussion, let's not forget, is Tomlin's insistence on playing this 2 DL thing. Maybe a traditional nose would not be such a big deal if he got a way from that.
 
Have to disagree on this point, they are two entirely different types of players. Cam is strong but he is a technician as well. He doesn't play the run the same way as Casey did. Casey just ate up space and people he didn't have great moves he just plain physically beat you straight ahead if tried to block him with one man. HE couldn't run down a back or QB laterally like Cam or chase down a QB. He would just take the center and or guard and shove them into the QB. He didn't shoot gaps or beat anyone with speed, he did one thing, and he did that one thing very well, but it did limit what you could while he was in. Every positive has a negative. It would be nice to have someone who could do what he did as effectively as he did it but I think it can be a liability if teams are creative and have two players on the field who can run the ball. That is hard to stop in the best of situations for the best of teams. Getting a lead and eating clock is the best way to stop it. Something we failed at utterly the last 5 games.
Well I agree with everything you just said which basically should put this "Tomlin dislikes NT" business to rest, because I just feel you're not going to have much different results you had the other day with Casey in there.
 
Nothing you said changes whether they have a player like Casey on the line or not. What you're referring to is scheme whether it's 3-4, 4-3 etc. If you think the scheme needs to change that's one thing. I personally just thought it was more about who was the more physical team the other night. Nobody really wanted to tackle. That's not going to get fixed whether you have a Casey Hampton in the middle or not.
When people say have a Casey Hampton they're referring to a scheme change, Hampton took up the C and an OG every play allowing LB's to flow to the ball more easily, not we're seeing Tomlin lame excuse for a Tampa 2 using primarily only 2 DL, well now there is no occupying two Olinemen, now the OL are getting to the second level with ease.
How are you going to be more physical when you're trying to stop a 250lb running back with only 2 DL? The running back is bigger than our LB's, you need more size in the trenches, that's Tomlin's idiotic stubborness again, we can stop them with just 2 DL, " WE DO WHAT WE DO", same damn thing he tried vs Cleveland in the playoffs, they averaged almost 5ypc in that game.
 
Nothing you said changes whether they have a player like Casey on the line or not. What you're referring to is scheme whether it's 3-4, 4-3 etc. If you think the scheme needs to change that's one thing. I personally just thought it was more about who was the more physical team the other night. Nobody really wanted to tackle. That's not going to get fixed whether you have a Casey Hampton in the middle or not.

 
A job he had no business having? He's been to two SBs and has never had a losing season. Don't be ridiculous. I can't waste time going back and forth with people like you. I can understand being upset and angry with the results the last few years, but don't get irrational and stupid. Consider the rosters and the talent and realistically how far you think these teams could have gone. He's not this horrible terrible coach you make him out to be as biased and disrespectful as your spiel is. He's not a great coach either admittedly, but Stop with the foolishness.
carried to two Super Bowls.
tell me two magnificent coaching moves he made to lead those teams to both.

I'll help with one:
1. Stayed TF outta the way.

Your turn
 
When people say have a Casey Hampton they're referring to a scheme change, Hampton took up the C and an OG every play allowing LB's to flow to the ball more easily, not we're seeing Tomlin lame excuse for a Tampa 2 using primarily only 2 DL, well now there is no occupying two Olinemen, now the OL are getting to the second level with ease.
How are you going to be more physical when you're trying to stop a 250lb running back with only 2 DL? The running back is bigger than our LB's, you need more size in the trenches, that's Tomlin's idiotic stubborness again, we can stop them with just 2 DL, " WE DO WHAT WE DO", same damn thing he tried vs Cleveland in the playoffs, they averaged almost 5ypc in that game.
hes a troll tom. Either that or just not very smart.
 
When people say have a Casey Hampton they're referring to a scheme change, Hampton took up the C and an OG every play allowing LB's to flow to the ball more easily, not we're seeing Tomlin lame excuse for a Tampa 2 using primarily only 2 DL, well now there is no occupying two Olinemen, now the OL are getting to the second level with ease.
How are you going to be more physical when you're trying to stop a 250lb running back with only 2 DL? The running back is bigger than our LB's, you need more size in the trenches, that's Tomlin's idiotic stubborness again, we can stop them with just 2 DL, " WE DO WHAT WE DO", same damn thing he tried vs Cleveland in the playoffs, they averaged almost 5ypc in that game.
Well then I think we're all agreeing on the same thing. This narrative that Tomlin doesn't like NT is false. It's the scheme that's the issue, not that he doesn't like NTs.
 
Well then I think we're all agreeing on the same thing. This narrative that Tomlin doesn't like NT is false. It's the scheme that's the issue, not that he doesn't like NTs.
If he did like a traditional nose, wouldn't he change the scheme to accommodate one?
 
carried to two Super Bowls.
tell me two magnificent coaching moves he made to lead those teams to both.

I'll help with one:
1. Stayed TF outta the way.

Your turn
If that was a legit reason I would feel the need to go on further with the conversation. I guess you'll just be scoffing at his brown jacket when he gets one because it's a tell tale sign of someone who just stayed out of the way his whole career.
 
If he did like a traditional nose, wouldn't he change the scheme to accommodate one?
We have already discussed why he went away from that scheme. Why are we circling back around? He went away from it because of what the league was transitioning to....passing league with more mobile QBs. He may have to switch back, but apparently you guys don't understand you typically have to be all in on one pattern or another. I don't know of any coaches that run a hybrid of multiple defenses. Basically its pick your poison. I would be curious to know now if there are any, but I've never heard of that and they be overly successful.
 
We have already discussed why he went away from that scheme. Why are we circling back around? He went away from it because of what the league was transitioning to....passing league with more mobile QBs. He may have to switch back, but apparently you guys don't understand you typically have to be all in on one pattern or another. I don't of any coaches that run a hybrid of multiple defenses. I would be curious to know now if there are any, but I've never heard of that and they be overly successful.
Bill Belechick? The guy would adapt and adjust his defenses depending on the offense he was facing. At least that is what all the "experts" would say as they were kissing his a@@,
 
Bill Belechick? The guy would adapt and adjust his defenses depending on the offense he was facing. At least that is what all the "experts" would say as they were kissing his a@@,
Ha. Right. I guess if you got a bunch of high IQ guys you could pull it off. Scouting teams practices unknowingly helps that a lot too. It's supposed to be a copycat league though and it looks like three coaches do it and are pretty good. Not sure why then it's not being done by way more teams. The only reason I can think of is the influence of coaching trees. This is how I learned and it's hard to go away from using what I've been taught.
 
Last edited:
If that was a legit reason I would feel the need to go on further with the conversation. I guess you'll just be scoffing at his brown jacket when he gets one because it's a tell tale sign of someone who just stayed out of the way his whole career.
WTF gets a brown jacket? is he going to be a janitor or some ****?

I'll assume you mean gold jacket for a HOF induction, but ... not even you are that naively ignorant.
 
Top