It's hard to believe this is an actual quote from our president and not something from the Onion.
Okay, I copied and pasted it into a search. May jobs report has exactly what to do with George Floyd? Good God, he says some ridiculously stupid ****.
It's hard to believe this is an actual quote from our president and not something from the Onion.
The charges will also contain "lesser included offenses." The DA thereby charges murder in the 2nd degree and all lesser included offenses (listed in the warrant), including 3rd degree, manslaughter, negligent endangerment, etc.
The supervising cop will get convicted. I think that the two rookies who were under that guy's supervision and who said, "Maybe you should sit him up," "Maybe roll him onto his side so he can breathe" are going to be convicted of no more than 2nd degree manslaughter, a.k.a., negligent homicide...
I'm not sure this is deserved. Sounds like they would've liked to help Floyd and wanted to let him up, but if you think two rookies are going to tell a salty 19 year vet what to do..... they were essentially as powerless as the people on the sidewalk watching, maybe had even less power because they couldn't even speak their mind.
Okay, I copied and pasted it into a search. May jobs report has exactly what to do with George Floyd? Good God, he says some ridiculously stupid ****.
I think we might see the other three turn on the main guy, whose name I don't care to commit to memory.Yeah, I definitely understand what you are saying. It's basically a private with 2 weeks experience telling the Sergeant Major what to do. But reality also checks in. The three cops are already convicted in the media.
I presume the three will have excellent lawyers who try and peel away pre-judgment by prospective jurors but the simple fact is this: The jurors are going to lean incredibly towards conviction and will know that a not-guilty verdict will lead to more riots, burning and looting.
That was absolutely ridiculous. That said, I can't wait to vote for him in November and watch more wall go up and Ginsberg get replace by a judge who rules according to the U.S. Constitution. I don't have a single f*ck to give about what he says or how he says it.
So here is the latest "police brutality" video. The guy is told numerous times to move back, which he fails to listen to. He continues to approach the officers. Then, after a brief discussion he reaches towards the right hip of the officer on the right. 90% of police and citizens carry their firearm on their right hip if they are right handed. So the officer in front of the guy shoves him backwards. Here is a screen shot of the guy reaching for the hip of the officer:
Edit: never mind on the pic, I cannot get the jpg to upload correctly from my computer for some reason. I select the file, select upload, it shows it as uploaded but gives a broken link to the file? Can anyone help a brother out?View attachment 4647
I was waiting for someone to chime in, because now that it's been established that he says some ridiculously stupid **** (probably been established a hundred times now on this board), here comes the next question; did he say anything hateful, divisive, incendiary or racist?
No.
I've seen a lot of high-ranking elected officials say some really ridiculous things lately, with a lot of hatefulness and divisiveness in their tones and words. Their actions have been deplorable. They've scrapped the don't kill Grandma and must social distance mantra, and you're not allowed to go to church services, and you're not allowed to reopen your business, to "this protest is just too important to worry about Covid-19". C'mon people, you think we're that dumb? This is a coup to overtake not only this President, but overtake the laws and values & the way we govern in this great country.
So let me think for a minute. Vote for that, or vote for Trump, who occasionally says some mind-numbingly stupid ****, but who doesn't want to rip this country apart? Yeah I'm going to have to think pretty hard on that one.
The Pentagon has told Washington D.C.'s National Guard and guardsmen from other states who have are in the nation’s capital not to use guns or ammunition.
The order came from Defense Secretary Mark Esper and made without consulting the White House, The Washington Post reported, and it's seen as a sign of de-escalation of the federal response to protests that sprung up in the wake of George Floyd's death.
So here is the latest "police brutality" video. The guy is told numerous times to move back, which he fails to listen to. He continues to approach the officers. Then, after a brief discussion he reaches towards the right hip of the officer on the right. 90% of police and citizens carry their firearm on their right hip if they are right handed. So the officer in front of the guy shoves him backwards. Here is a screen shot of the guy reaching for the hip of the officer:
Edit: never mind on the pic, I cannot get the jpg to upload correctly from my computer for some reason. I select the file, select upload, it shows it as uploaded but gives a broken link to the file? Can anyone help a brother out?View attachment 4647
What do you do when you've just lost control of your city for multiple days to rioters? Slash the police budget!
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lo...apd-budget-reinvest-into-communities-of-color
The police order as a nation (at least in those cities) needs to hold a massive strike. Your want to cut our funding, you want create “another” oversight committee, you want us to be slane by mobs and speak I’ll of us. **** you governor. **** your city.
Walk out. Then the act will be initiated because of your failure to protect those that protect us.
That was absolutely ridiculous. That said, I can't wait to vote for him in November and watch more wall go up and Ginsberg get replace by a judge who rules according to the U.S. Constitution. I don't have a single f*ck to give about what he says or how he says it.
OFTB, is it possible Trump's remarks on George Floyd were taken out of context? This video below shows him talking about equality/equal treatment under the law and that George would be happy about that.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Usual Left Wing Hacks in the Media and <a href="https://twitter.com/JoeBiden?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JoeBiden</a> tried to spread a complete lie about President Trump’s comments about George Floyd today.<br><br>Thank you <a href="https://twitter.com/IngrahamAngle?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@IngrahamAngle</a> & <a href="https://twitter.com/CharlesHurt?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@CharlesHurt</a> for calling them out. <a href="https://t.co/lNQtszPKbw">pic.twitter.com/lNQtszPKbw</a></p>— Benny (@bennyjohnson) <a href="https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1269105116130484224?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 6, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Or am I missing something?