Free agency is not an ultimate truth. If that was the case guys like Doug Flutie, Rich Gannon, Kurt Warner, Warren Moon, Mark Brunell, Jake Delhomme, etc would never have amounted to a hill of beans.
Year | Age | Tm | Pos | No. | G | GS | QBrec | Cmp | Att | Cmp% | Yds | TD | TD% | Int | Int% | 1D | Succ% | Lng | Y/A | AY/A | Y/C | Y/G | Rate | QBR | Sk | Yds | Sk% | NY/A | ANY/A | 4QC | GWD | AV | Awards |
---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1999 | 24 | NOR | QB | 9 | 2 | 2 | 1-1-0 | 42 | 76 | 55.3 | 521 | 3 | 3.9 | 5 | 6.6 | 24 | 40.2 | 51 | 6.9 | 4.7 | 12.4 | 260.5 | 62.4 | | 6 | 42 | 7.3 | 5.84 | 3.83 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
---|
2002 | 27 | NOR | QB | 12 | 4 | 0 | | 8 | 10 | 80.0 | 113 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 4 | 50.0 | 54 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 14.1 | 28.3 | 113.7 | | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 11.30 | 11.30 | | | 0 | |
---|
That guy above sucks. He went from 1999 to 2002 and got all that practice but couldn't get on the field with the likes of Billy Joe Tolliver and Billy Joe Holbert in front of him.
Year | Age | Tm | Pos | No. | G | GS | QBrec | Cmp | Att | Cmp% | Yds | TD | TD% | Int | Int% | 1D | Succ% | Lng | Y/A | AY/A | Y/C | Y/G | Rate | QBR | Sk | Yds | Sk% | NY/A | ANY/A | 4QC | GWD | AV | Awards |
---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1998 | 27 | STL | QB | 10 | 1 | 0 | | 4 | 11 | 36.4 | 39 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 27.3 | 21 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 9.8 | 39.0 | 47.2 | | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 3.55 | 3.55 | | | 0 | |
---|
This guy had Tony Banks in front of him after bouncing around the league like your mom at a truck stop. Geesh. SUCKS!
Year | Age | Tm | Pos | No. | G | GS | QBrec | Cmp | Att | Cmp% | Yds | TD | TD% | Int | Int% | 1D | Succ% | Lng | Y/A | AY/A | Y/C | Y/G | Rate | Sk | Yds | Sk% | NY/A | ANY/A | 4QC | GWD | AV | Awards |
---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1987 | 22 | MIN | QB | 16 | 4 | 0 | | 2 | 6 | 33.3 | 18 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 16.7 | | | 12 | 3.0 | -4.5 | 9.0 | 4.5 | 2.8 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 3.00 | -4.50 | | | 0 | |
---|
1988 | 23 | MIN | QB | 16 | 3 | 0 | | 7 | 15 | 46.7 | 90 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | | | 19 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 12.9 | 30.0 | 66.0 | 3 | 22 | 16.7 | 3.78 | 3.78 | | | 0 | |
---|
1989 | 24 | MIN | QB | 16 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | | | 0 | 0 | | | | | | 0 | |
---|
1990 | 25 | MIN | QB | 16 | 14 | 12 | 5-7-0 | 182 | 349 | 52.1 | 2278 | 16 | 4.6 | 16 | 4.6 | | | 78 | 6.5 | 5.4 | 12.5 | 162.7 | 68.9 | 34 | 188 | 8.9 | 5.46 | 4.41 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
---|
This guy couldn't beat out Tommy Kramer and Wade Wilson! BUM
Here are the facts. Rudolph did not get a chance. Pickett has not received a chance but has received much more of a chance so far. Those are facts. Not subjective. Those are objective facts. I don't care if Rudolph gets a shot. Unless he gets one here then I will root for him as loud as I am currently for Pickett. The obsession is with the people who ignore all the red flags of Pickett and just bash Rudolph who by all accounts has played better than Pickett. Again, statistical facts. And I really don't care who is the QB as long as they are playing good and we are winning. But I don't think Mitch or Rudolph are in the teams long term plans. Maybe I am wrong but I just don't think they are. So our best chance for long term success is for Pickett to turn his horse
play around and start putting us in positions to win. I will give him three years. That isn't a magic number. Just a number where I will either decide he can be our guy or we need to look in another direction. Just my personal opinion of how long it should take to see if a guy can play at this level.