Trump - Make America Great Again!

[Tim Steelersfan]

And in other news, while Liberals on this board continue to froth at the mouth over Donald being sued over Trump University...

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/02/t...urce=Facebook&utm_medium=Social#ixzz4AkSC38Ds

Trump U Is Nothing Compared To Laureate Education

Hillary Clinton is excoriating Donald Trump over Trump University? The Clinton scandal at Laureate Education, a for- profit education chain of schools and colleges operating world-wide, including the United States is much worse. That New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman is pursuing Trump University while ignoring CGI-University, a shady joint venture of Laureate and the Clinton Global Initiative adds insult to injury.

The Laureate Education went private in August 2007, in a multi billion dollar, risky, hugely leveraged transaction, closed in the last gasp of the bubble. The leveraged buyout was completed around August 2007 for approximately $3 billion in debt plus equity. The driving force behind the deal is of Friend of Bill (FOB) hedge fund king Steven Cohen, a poster child for bad hedge fund behavior. Henry Kravis and his KKR, Goldman Sachs and many others are in.

After the deal closed, the schools had great financial difficulties and these capital suppliers grew concerned. Bill Clinton’s pals were feeling squeezed as a profitable exit seemed less and less likely.

To dress the deal up in 2010, Bill Clinton was brought in to serve as “Chancellor,” a part-time position for which he was collecting $16 million through early 2015. This extraordinary compensation was never properly disclosed until 2015. Many of those on the hook paid Bill and Hillary big fees for speeches as well. Bill Clinton was thus collecting from both Laureate equity and debt suppliers. The Laureate CEO, Doug Becker, is involved as a Clinton backer, Clinton Global Initiative and Clinton Foundation donor and involved in the International Youth Foundation, a recipient of favors and money from the Clinton-led Department of State

Incredibly, in 2013 the International Finance Corporation announced a record setting $150 million investment in Laureate at a time when its financial condition was rocky at best. Clinton’s involvement sealed the deal. Then the Clinton Global Initiative and Clinton Foundation entered into a joint venture with Laureate to create CGI-University. Yet none of these related party disclosures are included in any of the Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative filings for relevant periods (starting in 2008 or so).

New York State law requires specific approvals for an entity to hold itself out as being a university. In this case CGI (a fraud) created CGI University (a fraud) in league with Laureate, a fraud. Laureate is a highly leveraged failing investment whose principal beneficiaries are Wall Street fat cats and billionaires, and William Jefferson Clinton.

It is a great thing that Hillary is here to stand up against those big bag Wall Streeters...

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

The person with a preference for dating white girls calling other people racist. Oh the irony. Wow, you are Mr. Social Justice too until it comes to women, about whom you seem only too eager to speak in degrading, objectifying fashion.

He'll rail on anyone who has a problem with "darkie" (his words, not mine) but defend his own actions degrading white women.

I seriously cannot get enough of this part of this thread

 

[oneforthebus]

All of these things can be done, and done effectively, without targeting people because of their race, religion, or "legal status." Without dragging prejudices into it.

I like how you dump "legal status" in with race and religion. Are lawbreakers some kind of protected class now? There are any number of reasons to want to stem the tide of illegal immigration that have nothing to do with being "prejudiced". Some of those reasons even have to do with protecting the immigrants themselves, from exploitative employment that is almost akin to slavery. Of course that doesn't fit with your "you hate brown people" narrative, I realize.

 

[Spike]

I'm with you, I was just skipping ahead. The Bertards would crush the Hilltards.

Tribal street fighting hippies in Philly in July!

I can't wait!


Bernie Sanders Fans Plan to ‘Occupy’ Democratic Convention

Fans of Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) are planning to occupy the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania this July.

https://www.facebook.com/events/1750066641891115/

 

[Steel Vanguard]

The person with a preference for dating white girls calling other people racist.

I just find them easier to deal with. White girls really dig Black masculinity. That's more cultural than racial, I think. White girls tend to treat Black men the way Asian women tend to treat white men. Which is why both those mixes are so common. At least, in California. Can't speak for the more backward parts of the country.

Oh the irony. Wow, you are Mr. Social Justice too until it comes to women, about whom you seem only too eager to speak in degrading, objectifying fashion.

I think your definition of "degrading" and "objectifying" is needlessly puritanical. You're a prude, and that's fine. But I'm not. The people who's company I prefer are not. It's just as easy for me to say you're judgemental and sanctimonious. You have always struck me as the kind of person who reads tabloids so she can feel superior to adulterous celebrities. Not everyone wants to live the soccer mom lifestyle that you do. Some of us dig freedom and adventure. That's why college aged chicks are the best. What offends you, I suspect, is how easily men can date outside their age group compared to women.

That's the thing about you Puritans. It's usually more about your own insecurities than it is any real moral outrage. Don't look now, but your jealousy is showing again.

Are lawbreakers some kind of protected class now? .

I think that largely depends on whether you think the law is just in the first place. As a free market capitalist it's clear to me that the market has spoken with regard to migrant labor. The government (and it's law) is obligated to get the **** out of the way.

 

[oneforthebus]

I think your definition of "degrading" and "objectifying" is needlessly puritanical. You're a prude, and that's fine. But I'm not. The people who's company I prefer are not. It's just as easy for me to say you're judgemental and sanctimonious. You have always struck me as the kind of person who reads tabloids so she can feel superior to adulterous celebrities. Not everyone wants to live the soccer mom lifestyle that you do. Some of us dig freedom and adventure. That's why college aged chicks are the best. What offends you, I suspect, is how easily men can date outside their age group compared to women.

That's the thing about you Puritans. It's usually more about your own insecurities than it is any real moral outrage. Don't look now, but your jealousy is showing again.

Yeah, I'm sure your little white girls would be thrilled to know you consider them fun because they're not too smart but their firmness wetness tightness smoothness quotient is higher. I'm sure they'd love hearing that you're going to "make them swallow" to show someone else who's boss. Women just adore being talked about like that.

And jealous? No, sorry. You may consider me to be puritanical but you know nothing about me. There is nothing about the kind of relationships you seek out that makes me jealous. Been there, done that, grown the **** out of it thanks. I have nothing but pity for you and the unfortunate young women who come across your path.

 

[IndySteel]

One thing about you racists, that banging pretty white girls thing really bothers you. Bring it up once, and you Klan boys will come back to it over and over again. A Brotha can set his watch by it.

I'll make sure she swallows, just for you tough guy.

Way to treat a woman, Toby.

I mean way to treat a little girl. Toby.

 

[jitter77]

Trump Changes Libya Stance Again....

This board is really biased...If people call out Clinton for her lies and whatnot the same should go for Trump. Trump has no clue what he is saying it appears. He says one thing then changes it then goes off on the press when called out on it. In the debates his stance was taking out guys like Hussein and Gaddafi would destabilize the region. Now he says he would be surgically for removing Gaddafi. However you take him out does not matter it will have the same effect. I do not get this guy. So for president we have someone who should be in jail and a guy who changes his mind as often as his clothes. Ouch...

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/05/politics/donald-trump-libya/index.html

Washington (CNN)Donald Trump reversed his stance on U.S. military intervention in Libya on Sunday, saying he would have authorized "surgical" strikes to take out strongman Moammar Gaddafi -- even though he'd previously said the world would be better with Gaddafi in power.
"I didn't mind surgical. And I said surgical. You do a surgical shot and you take him out," Trump said on CBS' "Face the Nation."

It was a notable change from the position he'd staked out at a Republican presidential debate in Texas in February.
"We would be so much better off if Gaddafi would be in charge right now," Trump said then. He has also hit Clinton over the U.S. intervention in Libya in his stump speech.
It's the second time Trump has reversed his position on Libya. In a 2011 video, Trump said that "on a humanitarian basis, immediately go into Libya, knock this guy out very quickly, very surgically, very effectively, and save the lives."
On Sunday, he still sought to blame former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Barack Obama.
"I wasn't for what happened. Look at the way -- I mean look at with Benghazi and all of the problems that we've had. It was handled horribly," he said.
He added: "I was never for strong intervention. I could have seen surgical where you take out Gaddafi and his group."
While Trump has changed positions on how the United States should have handled Gaddafi, he's now advocating a sharp escalation in the U.S. military's role in Libya.
He asked at a rally in Fresno, California, two weeks ago why the United States isn't "bombing the hell out of" ISIS in Libya.
"ISIS has the oil. And then you say if ISIS has the oil, why aren't we blockading so they can't sell it? Why aren't we bombing the hell out of ... " Trump said, stopping short as he pivoted to slamming Obama as "grossly incompetent."
He's also made blasting Clinton's foreign policy judgment a staple on the campaign trail.
"She doesn't have the temperament to be president. She's got bad judgment. She's got horribly bad judgment," Trump said two weeks ago in Anaheim. "If you look at the war in Iraq, if you look at what she did with Libya, which was a total catastrophe."
Clinton, meanwhile, unleashed on Trump as ill fit to serve as commander in chief on Thursday in a high-profile speech.
"He's not just unprepared -- he's temperamentally unfit to hold an office that requires knowledge, stability and immense responsibility," Clinton said.

 

[oneforthebus]

I sure did make a whole lot of money as a young bartender and cocktail waitress stroking the egos of insecure old men like SV though. I wasn't a big enough ***** to actually **** them so they would buy all my drinks and pay all my bills but I knew plenty of girls who were.

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

Trump Changes Libya Stance Again....

This board is really biased...If people call out Clinton for her lies and whatnot the same should go for Trump. Trump has no clue what he is saying it appears. He says one thing then changes it then goes off on the press when called out on it. In the debates his stance was taking out guys like Hussein and Gaddafi would destabilize the region. Now he says he would be surgically for removing Gaddafi. However you take him out does not matter it will have the same effect. I do not get this guy. So for president we have someone who should be in jail and a guy who changes his mind as often as his clothes. Ouch...

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/05/politics/donald-trump-libya/index.html

Washington (CNN)Donald Trump reversed his stance on U.S. military intervention in Libya on Sunday, saying he would have authorized "surgical" strikes to take out strongman Moammar Gaddafi -- even though he'd previously said the world would be better with Gaddafi in power.
"I didn't mind surgical. And I said surgical. You do a surgical shot and you take him out," Trump said on CBS' "Face the Nation."

It was a notable change from the position he'd staked out at a Republican presidential debate in Texas in February.
"We would be so much better off if Gaddafi would be in charge right now," Trump said then. He has also hit Clinton over the U.S. intervention in Libya in his stump speech.
It's the second time Trump has reversed his position on Libya. In a 2011 video, Trump said that "on a humanitarian basis, immediately go into Libya, knock this guy out very quickly, very surgically, very effectively, and save the lives."
On Sunday, he still sought to blame former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Barack Obama.
"I wasn't for what happened. Look at the way -- I mean look at with Benghazi and all of the problems that we've had. It was handled horribly," he said.
He added: "I was never for strong intervention. I could have seen surgical where you take out Gaddafi and his group."
While Trump has changed positions on how the United States should have handled Gaddafi, he's now advocating a sharp escalation in the U.S. military's role in Libya.
He asked at a rally in Fresno, California, two weeks ago why the United States isn't "bombing the hell out of" ISIS in Libya.
"ISIS has the oil. And then you say if ISIS has the oil, why aren't we blockading so they can't sell it? Why aren't we bombing the hell out of ... " Trump said, stopping short as he pivoted to slamming Obama as "grossly incompetent."
He's also made blasting Clinton's foreign policy judgment a staple on the campaign trail.
"She doesn't have the temperament to be president. She's got bad judgment. She's got horribly bad judgment," Trump said two weeks ago in Anaheim. "If you look at the war in Iraq, if you look at what she did with Libya, which was a total catastrophe."
Clinton, meanwhile, unleashed on Trump as ill fit to serve as commander in chief on Thursday in a high-profile speech.
"He's not just unprepared -- he's temperamentally unfit to hold an office that requires knowledge, stability and immense responsibility," Clinton said.

One, simple reply.

If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.

Politicians waffle. Now we must crucify Trump for waffling and changing his mind.

Got it.

And Clinton's lies? Let's see...they involve national security secrets on a server illegally maintained in a bathroom that were hacked by an international, notorious hacker (and probably China). There are lies...there's waffling...then there's breaking the law.

 

[Steel Vanguard]

Been there, done that, grown the **** out of it thanks.

Now your bullshit makes TOTAL sense. You was a ho. The town pump. The local turnstile.

Everything you've said makes total sense now. You got used up, got tired of seeing the hot chicks getting married, so now you're in slut recovery. Well, congratulations. I wish you luck staying on the wagon...

 

[Ron Burgundy]

I don't have to prove ****. You said STRAIGHT UP that you "hate Muslims". One of the few honest things you've ever said on this board.

Your forgot me. I hate Muslims too. But only because they hated me first.

 

[oneforthebus]

I just find them easier to deal with. White girls really dig Black masculinity. That's more cultural than racial, I think. White girls tend to treat Black men the way Asian women tend to treat white men. Which is why both those mixes are so common. At least, in California. Can't speak for the more backward parts of the country.

Gee, that's not racist at all. What an unbelievable hypocrite you are.

Yeah, sorry to tell you here in the "more backward parts of the country", like in Philadelphia and DC where I have lived and worked as an adult, only a backwards *** idiot would ever say something like "white girls really dig black masculinity"and "like Asian women treat white men".

 

[oneforthebus]

Now your bullshit makes TOTAL sense. You was a ho. The town pump. The local turnstile.

Everything you've said makes total sense now. You got used up, got tired of seeing the hot chicks getting married, so now you're in slut recovery. Well, congratulations. I wish you luck staying on the wagon...

LOL...dude I've been married twice and turned down another marriage proposal. Wrong again my friend.

 

[Steel Vanguard]

LOL...dude I've been married twice and turned down another marriage proposal. Wrong again my friend.

Lady, I don't know. You could be a nun for all I know.

Honestly, every one of you could be a troll. I have no idea. What I do know is that you say silly and judgemental things, like you're some kind of moral authority. Which you're not. You remind me of these bathroom idiots in (Arkansas?) who are crying in their corn flakes about trannies in the john. Who gives a ****? Like seriously, why do you people care so much about what OTHER people do with their privates?

 

[jitter77]

One, simple reply.

If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.

Politicians waffle. Now we must crucify Trump for waffling and changing his mind.

Got it.

And Clinton's lies? Let's see...they involve national security secrets on a server illegally maintained in a bathroom that were hacked by an international, notorious hacker (and probably China). There are lies...there's waffling...then there's breaking the law.

Of course he should be crucified just like Clinton. What Trump does is not waffling it's totally changing stances. What is he going to do send troops somewhere then a week later say it was a mistake and send them somewhere else then send them back again...Like I said before Trump is the lesser of two evils, but about the only thing he has been consistent with is the wall. He says about Romney blowing the election, but he is having trouble beating a lying criminal. Wonder if he will call himself a loser?

 

[IndySteel]

Now your bullshit makes TOTAL sense. You was a ho. The town pump. The local turnstile.

Everything you've said makes total sense now. You got used up, got tired of seeing the hot chicks getting married, so now you're in slut recovery. Well, congratulations. I wish you luck staying on the wagon...

Your dumb *** needs to retake reading comprehension 101. I bet you're only pulling drug addicted cum guzzling gutter *****. No one with any self esteem would give you a second glance.

 

[oneforthebus]

Lady, I don't know. You could be a nun for all I know.

Honestly, every one of you could be a troll. I have no idea. What I do know is that you say silly and judgemental things, like you're some kind of moral authority. Which you're not. You remind me of these bathroom idiots in (Arkansas?) who are crying in their corn flakes about trannies in the john. Who gives a ****? Like seriously, why do you people care so much about what OTHER people do with their privates?

I don't give a rat's *** what you do with your privates. What I am talking about is your hypocrisy. Your righteous indignation over the so-called racism of others when you are the most racist, sexist person here. Take the log out of your own eye before condemning others for the splinter in theirs.

As for me I'm neither a nun nor a *****. I'm not puritanical or judgmental. Like most people I'm not perfect. I've made plenty of mistakes in my life that I regret and that I've learned from. I'm not a perfect person now.

You seem to me to be living (at least here on the internet) in some teenage boy's fantasy world. I'm sorry, I know you'd like to think we're all so very jealous that a 40 something man gets to **** young girls. We are not jealous. We are creeped out. As much as a lot of guys might like to ogle supermodels or even look at porn, in reality the dehumanizing way you claim to approach women and relationships is not something most grown up people envy. Sorry to burst your bubble.

Your preference for white girls must make your mother proud, that she raised a son who sees white women as superior to his own mother.

 

[IndySteel]

Lady, I don't know. You could be a nun for all I know.

Honestly, every one of you could be a troll. I have no idea. What I do know is that you say silly and judgemental things, like you're some kind of moral authority. Which you're not. You remind me of these bathroom idiots in (Arkansas?) who are crying in their corn flakes about trannies in the john. Who gives a ****? Like seriously, why do you people care so much about what OTHER people do with their privates?

why do you only molest white girls? You don't like under aged black girls? Racist.

 

[Spike]

WAR!!!


Sanders hits Clinton Foundation over foreign donations

Democratic presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders criticized the Clinton Foundation for accepting donations from foreign governments in an interview aired Sunday, calling it a conflict of interest.

Do I have a problem when a sitting secretary of State and a foundation run by her husband collects many, many dollars from foreign governments — governments which are dictatorships?

"Yeah, I do have a problem with that. Yeah, I do," Sanders said on CNN's "State of the Union."

When host Jake Tapper asked if he thought it was a conflict of interest, Sanders said, "I do."

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...rs-clinton-foundation-engaged-in-conflicts-of

-----------------------

Go CrazyBernie! Keep Attacking Crooked Hillary!

hahahahahahahaha

 

[Spike]

Hillary about to be crowned and Bernie bots are preparing to slash their wrists!


Tibs is not looking good, poor guy

BAM!


Bill Clinton: Sanders Supporters 'Will Be Toast!’

#BillClinton to @BernieSanders hecklers: "If I were them I'd be screaming too bc they know they will be toast by election day."

 

[Steel Vanguard]

I don't give a rat's *** what you do with your privates. What I am talking about is your hypocrisy. Your righteous indignation over the so-called racism of others when you are the most racist, sexist person here. Take the log out of your own eye before condemning others for the splinter in theirs.

You say the word "sexist", but I don't think you understand what that word means. Nowhere in here have I called for discrimination against woman, violence against women, or curtailed opportunities for women.

I'm not puritanical or judgmental.

Here's where the rubber meets the road. That statement is directly contradicted by the following statement...

We are creeped out.

You can't have it both ways, lady. Either you accept the sexual lifestyles of others or you don't. You clearly don't, so you're clearly a prude. Now I mocked you for being a hypocrite for good reason. You had your fun, now you don't want anyone else to have theirs. That's why I called you the town pump (and please fellas, keep the neg rep coming: if that thing ever turns green again I'll be severely disappointed). Had you simply said you liked riding the D, I would have been all high fives because there's nothing more awesome than a sexually liberated woman.

Your preference for white girls must make your mother proud, that she raised a son who sees white women as superior to his own mother.

You assume. My mother's no racist, unlike Teeny Weeny Tim. She doesn't see the world in colors. She sees people, just like her son. I'm not anti-Black girl, I'm just very pro white girl. Why? Because in CA white girls are very pro-Black man. And I dig that about them...

 

[Tibs]

GOP worries rise amid hostile Trump comments on Latinos and Muslims
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...6545e8-2a1c-11e6-a3c4-0724e8e24f3f_story.html

A growing number of Republican lawmakers and strategists fear that Donald Trump’s hostile remarks about minorities and his unorthodox strategy have imperiled his campaign at the end of a five-week head start on Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton that they hoped would fortify him heading into the general election.

Their concerns increased again Sunday after Trump said he thought a Muslim judge might treat him unfairly because he wants to temporarily ban most foreign Muslims from entering the country. The remark was an expansion on repeated assertions over the past week that an American-born judge overseeing a fraud case against him should recuse himself because of his “Mexican heritage.”

“If it were a Muslim judge, would you also feel like they wouldn’t be able to treat you fairly because of that policy of yours?” host John Dickerson asked on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

“It’s possible, yes. Yeah. That would be possible, absolutely,” Trump replied.

While Republicans credit Trump for making some strides after vanquishing his final GOP opponents last month, many are concerned about repeated comments singling out people for criticism on the basis of race, ethnicity or religion. The attacks in the Trump University case also underscore the extent to which Trump, who is traveling overseas later this month to visit some of his golf courses, commingles his private business interests with his presidential campaign.

Republican strategist Brian Walsh, a former spokesman for the National Republican Senatorial Committee, quickly took to social media after Trump’s remarks on Muslims on Sunday: “I don’t care if he’s the nominee — Republicans should loudly condemn this racist, nonsensical rhetoric by Trump,” Walsh tweeted.

Trump has consistently struggled throughout his campaign with both his rhetoric and policies relating to minorities. At a rally in Redding, Calif., on Friday, Trump pointed to a black man in the crowd and exclaimed, “Oh, look at my African American over here — look at him.”

Rick Wilson, a longtime GOP operative who has been one of the most aggressive critics of Trump, penned a column to fellow Republicans this weekend warning that candidates up for election will be yoked to Trump: “You own his politics. You own his policies, even the ones that only last as long as the next contradiction. You own the racial animus that started out as a bug, became a feature and is now the defining characteristic of his campaign. You own every crazy, vile chunk of word vomit that spews from his mouth.”

Wilson said in an interview Sunday that Trump’s comments about Curiel and a hypothetical Muslim judge are “overtly racist” and contradict the freedoms outlined in the Constitution. Wilson said that it is “mortifying” that Trump would use a judge’s ethnic heritage as an excuse for why Trump University has lost court decisions.

“For everyone who cries wolf on racism — and there are a lot of them on the other side — they are now validated forever,” Wilson said.

 

[Ron Burgundy]

The same with the Right wingers who say things like "the immigration issue is about the law".

That's the best you've got? We only have to obey laws we agree with? But then Bomma is only enforcing laws He agrees with.

No. It isn't.

Yes it is.
http://watchdog.org/266740/vermont-refugees-test-positive-for-tuberculosis/
Feeling the Bern in Vermont.

In short, my problem with Supe, Tim, Farva, Ron and the rest of the haters is that they're so busy blaming that they never spend any time solving.

I've said many times over the years that we need a solid border wall with a gate every 20 miles or so staffed by an immigration agent with a laptop who signs up everyone who comes in order to get them paying taxes. Sure illegals work for less but they also cost less because they work off-the-books. Take away the cost advantage by getting them to pay their fair share of taxes.

 

[Yinzerlyn]

Now your bullshit makes TOTAL sense. You was a ho. The town pump. The local turnstile.

Everything you've said makes total sense now. You got used up, got tired of seeing the hot chicks getting married, so now you're in slut recovery. Well, congratulations. I wish you luck staying on the wagon...

**** off. You have no right to call onefor a "ho". I think you are just jealous that a woman with her moral character won't give you the time of day. So you belittle her. What a fine upstanding citizen you are. Now go find a 14 year old to **** and leave us all alone.