That's because your looking for a reason to nail him to the wall. If you weren't so emotionally involved, you might be able to be more objective.
Where do you get this ****? Some magical vendetta against Tomlin. LOL. I loved the hire and saw loads of potential before he revealed what he really is.
But nope, not good enough. If I criticize him, I MUST have some deep-seeded hatred of the guy. Why? I dunno. But I must have one, somewhere, some way. It can't just be that my opinion of him changed because, ya know, I have eyeballs and a brain. Nope, vendetta.
Take Vince Lombardi and put him in charge of the Jaxonvile Jaguars. Does he win the Super Bowl this year?
This year? No, of course not. But my money is on him turning it around, not treading water year after year.
Win the Super Bowl with the Jags? LOL. That's a MASSIVE strawman.
(1) Winning the Super Bowl with the awful Jaguars would be the ONLY proof that Lombardi was a good coach? If he went 9-7 or 10-6 with their ****** roster and rookie QB, it would be a failure and would prove your "point"?
(2) We're not the Jags, and no one is asking for Lombardi or any other top-3 all-time coach. What we're clamoring for is a coach who can find, develop, and maximize talent - and many of them do - then add MORE talent to the roster at an acceptable pace.
Coaches play a huge role in bringing talent to the roster. They have final say on game plans - if a team's weekly plan is ****** (like ours), they're expected to force changes or otherwise improve performance. Coaches implement things like specific drills, overall coaching philosophies, practice habits, etc. And you think none of that really matters? Building a roster.. developing game plans.. structuring team practices and meetings.. fostering habits and work ethic.. that's all just minor stuff?
Take a crap coach and put him in charge of a team loaded with All Pro's and future HOF players. Does he have a very good shot of winning the Super Bowl this year? Call up Bary Switzer and ask him.
That happens, and they do often fail. How did Switzer do after 1995? How about Jim Caldwell? Bill Callahan?
That tells you all you ned to know about who is more important players vs. coach. Simple as that.
A team's
immediate success is dependent more on players than the HC, yes. But over the course of eight years, when a team has the SAME problems every second of the way.. I mean, how do we not draw a connection there? The guy largely responsible for assembling the roster and structuring the game plans.. no connection there? Yeesh.
But to say they account for 5% is absurd. And to say that a coach CANNOT make his team one iota better than the quality of the players is silly.