I'm on record after the Tampa Bay game that it's over for me and Tomlin.
It really just comes down to the simple conclusion this team the last three seasons just isn't as good as the first three seasons he took over. Every conceivable neutral criteria to judge "expectations" points to a clear FACT that this team has less expectations now than in did in 2007.
For those that still argue Tomlin "took over" an 8-8 team how do you reconcile the fact we were FAVORITES in 15 of 16 games in 2007? That included some incredibly lopsided ones as well (9+ points favorites five times). Truly average teams are not treated that way by the betting public (or by Vegas).
The truth is Tomlin took over a team bordering on a potential dynasty. It had the youngest quarterback ever to win a Super Bowl at age 25. There was a wealth of experience on his coaching staff. There was still PLENTY of young talent on the team. Heath Miller was 25, Polamalu was 26, Holmes was 23, Parker was 27.
There are no comparisons to his situation because NO COACH in history was given the talent he was given at the age he was given it in Roethlisberger. Never. Comparing Tomlin to Cowher, Seifert, Madden, Gruden, Switzer or whoever is pointless and jibberish. It means nothing.
The fact remains over the past three years, this team has degraded into mediocrity. What was once a team that was looked at as heavy favorites vs. the dregs of the league is now treated as average. Remember those FIVE games favored by 9+ points in his first year? Since 2012 we've only been 9+ point favorites THREE TIMES. And two of those were meaningless games the final week of the season vs. Cleveland (both in 2012 and 2013).
There are excusable reasons for teams dropping from good to mediocre, those being either the loss of a franchise quarterback, the rape of talent via the salary cap (or the institution of the salary cap) or the plundering of assistant coaches that end up being better than what they were thought. None of those situations or excuses apply to Tomlin. None.
The truth is there is only one reasonable explanation for our fall from Super Bowl contender year-in-year-out to mediocre and that is poor management and head coaching. That is the only reason logical and based on the facts presented. All the apologists can't change these facts. The idea the decline "had to happen" or "is cyclical and unavoidable" still then can't debate what Tomlin has ADDED to the franchise. If the cycle was unavoidable than why bother interviewing a head coach at all? Why bother to have standards? Why NOT change head coaches just for the sake of it?
The truth is no one EXPECTED this fall to happen. Only AFTER it happened did the excuses start to appear. The fall WAS avoidable with better management and coaching. That is a fact and if you don't believe that, than firing Tomlin shouldn't really matter anyhow.