That is tragic and sad that people have to resort to violence when threatened by racist groups.
This was the same reaction to the Repugnican candidates leading up to 2008/2012 wasnt.it coolie?
no one is threatened this ********. I don't think Louis Farakhan would support a racist...you can drop all this rhetoric because it is bullshit. It wasn't racist for Carter to ban muslims when he was in office, but if Trump was to stem the tide of "refugees" until they can be vetted, he is racist. The medias claims of racism just don't ******* hold up to the facts.
That's not why Trump is racist. He's racist because he characterized a group of people as mostly "drug dealers and rapists"
He is a racist and one who panders to racists. Those are facts.
That is tragic and sad that people have to resort to violence when threatened by racist groups.
This was the same reaction to the Repugnican candidates leading up to 2008/2012 wasnt.it coolie?
That's not why Trump is racist. He's racist because he characterized a group of people as mostly "drug dealers and rapists"
He is a racist and one who panders to racists. Those are facts.
were talking about racial harrasment of children, jackass.
no one is threatened this ********. I don't think Louis Farakhan would support a racist...you can drop all this rhetoric because it is bullshit. It wasn't racist for Carter to ban muslims when he was in office, but if Trump was to stem the tide of "refugees" until they can be vetted, he is racist. The medias claims of racism just don't ******* hold up to the facts.
.....................Louis Farrakahn told his followers NOT to vote for Hillary. I'll post the link if ya'll doubt me.
No he didn't....he said the the Mexican government sent their criminals over here...He NEVER said ALL or even MOST Mexicans were criminals.....only those who blindly follow what the media talking heads say believe he is racist.
no one is threatened this ********. I don't think Louis Farakhan would support a racist...you can drop all this rhetoric because it is bullshit. It wasn't racist for Carter to ban muslims when he was in office, but if Trump was to stem the tide of "refugees" until they can be vetted, he is racist. The medias claims of racism just don't ******* hold up to the facts.
I hate when I have to defend someone I don't even like and didn't support, but you are just wrong. The facts are that there is a lot of terrible stuff coming through our borders from Mexico and South and Central America. Yes there are some nice hard working people who just want to support their families coming through...AS TRUMP SAID...there is also a whole lot of drugs and a whole lot of rape and a whole lot of human trafficking and a whole lot of gang activity associated with illegal entry through our southern border. That is not racism, that is fact. Open your eyes. I can post 50 more links if you would like but this should get your education started....
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...ht-rape-trees-found-along-us-southern-border/
http://www.mensjournal.com/magazine/the-u-s-mexico-borders-150-miles-of-hell-20130103
http://hispolitica.com/2015/06/30/donald-trumps-controversial-mexican-comments-are-accurate/#
http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/04/25/rape-trees-dead-mi
http://www.businessinsider.com/hero...nistan-2016-3grants-consequences-open-border/
http://www.insightcrime.org/news-an...-compete-with-colombians-for-us-heroin-market
You actually think Farrakhan who himself is a racist would support Donald Trump?
Wow.....just wow
http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/National_News_2/article_102946.shtml
That is tragic and sad that people have to resort to violence when threatened by racist groups.
I said of Mr. Trump that I give him credit as the only one who stood in front of “some” members of the Jewish community and told them he did not need or want their money. This was very big because any man who is able to stand on his own is free enough to do what is in the best interest of the country. That is what I said and that is what I meant.
On another occasion, I said I liked what I am looking at because I felt he had a strength required of anyone who wished to save America, or move away the Wrath of Allah (God) plaguing not only America but the world with the forces of nature.
and from your article....
I said of Mr. Trump that I give him credit as the only one who stood in front of “some” members of the Jewish community and told them he did not need or want their money. This was very big because any man who is able to stand on his own is free enough to do what is in the best interest of the country. That is what I said and that is what I meant.
On another occasion, I said I liked what I am looking at because I felt he had a strength required of anyone who wished to save America, or move away the Wrath of Allah (God) plaguing not only America but the world with the forces of nature.
Wow, sounds like more "support"
Gateway pundit......breitbart.....
no thanks I think i'll stay ignorant in your eyes.
So which of the stated facts do you refute? Attacking the source without refuting the facts is cowardly. Sorry Huffpo doesn't report this stuff.
A video montage of "racist groups" getting assaulted by those peaceful, tolerant liberals:
You are a vile, contemptible, lying, ******, douchebag, contemptible lowlife in vilifying people being attacked - hundreds of times, ****** - by the worst form of dogshit ever to be covered by skin - i.e., liberal Democrats.
Eat a Glock, ******.
I’m a Muslim, a woman and an immigrant. I voted for Trump.
By Asra Q. Nomani November 10 at 1:13 PM
The author poses after casting her ballot. (Photo provided by Asra Nomani)
Asra Q. Nomani is a former Wall Street Journal reporter and a co-founder of the Muslim Reform Movement. She can be found on Twitter at @AsraNomani.
A lot is being said now about the “silent secret Trump supporters.”
This is my confession — and explanation: I — a 51-year-old, a Muslim, an immigrant woman “of color” — am one of those silent voters for Donald Trump. And I’m not a “bigot,” “racist,” “chauvinist” or “white supremacist,” as Trump voters are being called, nor part of some “whitelash.”
In the winter of 2008, as a lifelong liberal and proud daughter of West Virginia, a state born on the correct side of history on slavery, I moved to historically conservative Virginia only because the state had helped elect Barack Obama as the first African American president of the United States.
But, then, for much of this past year, I have kept my electoral preference secret: I was leaning toward Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.
Tuesday evening, just minutes before the polls closed at Forestville Elementary School in mostly Democratic Fairfax County, I slipped between the cardboard partitions in the polling booth, a pen balanced carefully between my fingers, to mark my ballot for president, coloring in the circle beside the names of Trump and his running mate, Mike Pence.
After Hillary Clinton called Trump to concede, making him America’s president-elect, a friend on Twitter wrote a message of apology to the world, saying there are millions of Americans who don’t share Trump’s “hatred/division/ignorance.” She ended: “Ashamed of millions that do.”
That would presumably include me — but it doesn’t, and that is where the dismissal of voter concerns about Clinton led to her defeat. I most certainly reject the trifecta of “hatred/division/ignorance.” I support the Democratic Party’s position on abortion, same-sex marriage and climate change.
But I am a single mother who can’t afford health insurance under Obamacare. The president’s mortgage-loan modification program, “HOPE NOW,” didn’t help me. Tuesday, I drove into Virginia from my hometown of Morgantown, W.Va., where I see rural America and ordinary Americans, like me, still struggling to make ends meet, after eight years of the Obama administration.
Finally, as a liberal Muslim who has experienced, first-hand, Islamic extremism in this world, I have been opposed to the decision by President Obama and the Democratic Party to tap dance around the “Islam” in Islamic State. Of course, Trump’s rhetoric has been far more than indelicate and folks can have policy differences with his recommendations, but, to me, it has been exaggerated and demonized by the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, their media channels, such as Al Jazeera, and their proxies in the West, in a convenient distraction from the issue that most worries me as a human being on this earth: extremist Islam of the kind that has spilled blood from the hallways of the Taj Mahal hotel in Mumbai to the dance floor of the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Fla.
In mid-June, after the tragic shooting at Pulse, Trump tweeted out a message, delivered in his typical subtle style: “Is President Obama going to finally mention the words radical Islamic terrorism? If he doesn’t he should immediately resign in disgrace!”
Around then, on CNN’s “New Day,” Democratic candidate Clinton seemed to do the Obama dance, saying, “From my perspective, it matters what we do more than what we say. And it mattered we got bin Laden, not what name we called him. I have clearly said we — whether you call it radical jihadism or radical Islamism, I’m happy to say either. I think they mean the same thing.”
By mid-October, it was one Aug. 17, 2014, email from the WikiLeaks treasure trove of Clinton emails that poisoned the well for me. In it, Clinton told aide John Podesta: “We need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL,” the politically correct name for the Islamic State, “and other radical Sunni groups in the region.”
The revelations of multimillion-dollar donations to the Clinton Foundation from Qatar and Saudi Arabia killed my support for Clinton. Yes, I want equal pay. No, I reject Trump’s “locker room” banter, the idea of a “wall” between the United States and Mexico and a plan to “ban” Muslims. But I trust the United States and don’t buy the political hyperbole — agenda-driven identity politics of its own — that demonized Trump and his supporters.
I gently tried to express my thoughts on Twitter but the “Pantsuit revolution” was like a steamroller to any nuanced discourse. If you supported Trump, you had to be a redneck.
If one of my kids was out there doing that **** I would beat their *** no matter how old they were, oh wait I raised my kids properly so they would actually act like they were human beings, and not pieces of ****, besides that they would either be at work, school or at home studying so they could be better.
Elfiero;303925. said:Of course, Trump’s Islamophobic, xenophobic, and racist rhetoric throughout the campaign already had a corrosive effect on students’ speech prior to his election win, according to a Southern Poverty Law Center and Teaching Tolerance report.
Bullshit. You're enjoying every minute of this.
You paint half the country as "The same white privilege" group that voted Trump in and wants to destroy all you hold dear but then take offense to being lumped in with the liberals tearing cities apart. Please take a look at my double-standard post.
You point out that Trump supporters would be worse in a loss, you have no evidence for that, merely your suspicion. Sadly we DO have clear evidence of what the Clinton supporters will do when faced with a loss. Who are the deplorables now?
You cannot defend the indefensible. A massive segment of Clinton's support base is behaving like petulant children. More proof of what I said before. The people in this country are not qualified to govern themselves. Your liberal friends are children. They simply can't comprehend the importance of voting. They are incapable of understanding that they could actually LOSE a ******* election. Many of them have had "their candidate" win for their entire adult lives and can't grasp the idea that the "other side" could possibly lose.
And this is how a significant portion of them responds.
It's indefensible and you know it. And yet you revel. You know that too.