Another piece of legal brilliance.
And.........here comes Steeltime.......................
And it Begins:Special Prosecutor To Investigate Trump And Russia
- Thread starter Elfiero
- Start date
- Status
Another piece of legal brilliance.
And.........here comes Steeltime.......................
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 11,477
- Reaction score
- 17,474
- Points
- 113
You guys are something else. God forbid anyone thinks Trump isn't the living embodiment of Jesus Christ. If you read my post, it is a clear indictment of the Democrat party. But I said Trump is going down. I am obviously a hater. Good gravy.
Another piece of legal brilliance.
And.........here comes Steeltime.......................
This isn't a slip and fall. The ambulance chaser can't help you gerbil.
They would look good in North Korean army uniforms wouldn't they? Praising dear leader constantly while he starves them to death and destroys the country.....yet they think they are patriots...it is so utterly laughable how gullible they are, and sad at the same time.
Meanwhile their President ignores the 517-5 vote to impose sanctions on Russia...a clear constitutional crisis. Gee.....why does he try SO HARD to never criticize Putin....and now goes 100% cuck on punishing them.....Gee I wonder why that is................................
still playing the popular vote angle, dipshit?
and why are you lefties so triggered by Russia? hint: the 80s called. they want their foreign policy back.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 18,605
- Reaction score
- 29,987
- Points
- 113
- Location
- The nearest Steelers bar.
Stupid ****. Jesus, why do I waste a millisecond arguing law with you, you stupid ****. It would be like me arguing with you about what it's like to be a miserable failure of a flatulent excuse of an infected ****, when I know you are the goddamn expert on that topic.
Take notes, you blithering imbecile. Alternatively, have your alzheimer-addled grandma explain the **** to you. The consensus of legal experts - you know, those who have actually been to law school and are not leeches admittedly stealing taxpayer money, like you - is that a sitting President cannot be indicted, i.e., that means charged with a crime by a grand jury. (More **** they teach in law school and that you don't know, you bloated, fat-assed, lying used diaper.)
But would the Constitution allow Mr. Mueller to indict Mr. Trump if he finds evidence of criminal conduct? The prevailing view among most legal experts is no. They say the president is immune from prosecution so long as he is in office.
“The framers implicitly immunized a sitting president from ordinary criminal prosecution,” said Akhil Reed Amar, a law professor at Yale. Note the word “implicitly.” Professor Amar acknowledged that the text of the Constitution did not directly answer the question. “It has to be,” he said, “a structural inference about the uniqueness of the president himself.”
The closest the Constitution comes to addressing the issue is in this passage, from Article I, Section 3: “Judgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States: but the party convicted [under a trial by impeachment ... again, law school teaches real lawyers to read and understand the law] shall nevertheless be liable and subject to indictment, trial, judgment and punishment, according to law.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/29/...nal-puzzle-can-the-president-be-indicted.html
So you diseased, cankerous, disgusting, bile-inducing wart of an excuse of a human being, why the **** would the Constitution provide that a President is subject to no criminal prosecution except impeachment, and only AFTER impeachment is the President subject to indictment or trial? Please, grace us with your legal acumen, you dimwitted, illiterate, lying thief.
Hey, you know one thing they teach us in law school, i.e., the place you are too stupid and ignorant to attend? Yeah, READ THE ******* STATUTE. Impeachment then indictment, fuckwad, NOT indictment then impeachment.
See how that works? Get it? Go ahead, give an indication you understand the basic instruction of Article I, Section 3:
Thought so.
Last edited:
I see what you said and I fully agree. if Trump goes down, it will be from something so ridiculously miniscule and distant in history that will mock the absolute hypocrisy of the left.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 9,394
- Reaction score
- 6,217
- Points
- 113
Stupid ****. Jesus, why do I waste a millisecond arguing law with you, you stupid ****. It would be like me arguing with you about what it's like to be a miserable failure of a flatulent excuse of an infected ****, when I know you are the goddamn expert on that topic.
Take notes, you blithering imbecile. Alternatively, have your alzheimer-addled grandma explain the **** to you. The consensus of legal experts - you know, those who have actually been to law school and are not leeches admittedly stealing taxpayer money, like you - is that a sitting President cannot be indicted, i.e., that means charged with a crime by a grand jury. (More **** they teach in law school and that you don't know, you bloated, fat-assed, lying used diaper.)
But would the Constitution allow Mr. Mueller to indict Mr. Trump if he finds evidence of criminal conduct? The prevailing view among most legal experts is no. They say the president is immune from prosecution so long as he is in office.
“The framers implicitly immunized a sitting president from ordinary criminal prosecution,” said Akhil Reed Amar, a law professor at Yale. Note the word “implicitly.” Professor Amar acknowledged that the text of the Constitution did not directly answer the question. “It has to be,” he said, “a structural inference about the uniqueness of the president himself.”
The closest the Constitution comes to addressing the issue is in this passage, from Article I, Section 3: “Judgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States: but the party convicted [under a trial by impeachment ... again, law school teaches real lawyers to read and understand the law] shall nevertheless be liable and subject to indictment, trial, judgment and punishment, according to law.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/29/...nal-puzzle-can-the-president-be-indicted.html
So you diseased, cankerous, disgusting, bile-inducing wart of an excuse of a human being, why the **** would the Constitution provide that a President is subject to no criminal prosecution except impeachment, and only AFTER impeachment is the President subject to indictment or trial? Please, grace us with your legal acumen, you dimwitted, illiterate, lying thief.
Hey, you know one thing they teach us in law school, i.e., the place you are too stupid and ignorant to attend? Yeah, READ THE ******* STATUTE. Impeachment then indictment, fuckwad, NOT indictment then impeachment.
See how that works? Get it? Go ahead, give an indication you understand the basic instruction of Article I, Section 3:
Thought so.
nyu uh!
Your hallucinations are becoming worse. Time to up your meds.
You gotta love Homey the Clown though.
Sent from my [device_name] using Steeler Nation mobile app
View attachment 3800
This is an interesting development to me. So if Mueller wants to postpone Gen. Flynn's sentencing and assuming his guilty plea, does it keep Flynn from being able to testify to any or all causes in these matters since he is not guilty of anything and is still "technically" sworn to secrecy due to his position in DIA? Political maneuver and a last ditch effort methinks. Barrister Steeltime?
https://theconservativetreehouse.co...of-general-mike-flynn-sentencing/#more-145262
This is an interesting development to me. So if Mueller wants to postpone Gen. Flynn's sentencing and assuming his guilty plea, does it keep Flynn from being able to testify to any or all causes in these matters since he is not guilty of anything and is still "technically" sworn to secrecy due to his position in DIA? Political maneuver and a last ditch effort methinks. Barrister Steeltime?
https://theconservativetreehouse.co...of-general-mike-flynn-sentencing/#more-145262
Homey don’t play that!
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2014
- Messages
- 3,599
- Reaction score
- 1,148
- Points
- 113
#LOCKHERUP
Nunes: There is clear evidence of collusion with Russians, but it’s with DNC and Clinton Campaign
http://www.bizpacreview.com/2018/02...ollusion-russians-dnc-clinton-campaign-597506
Nunes: There is clear evidence of collusion with Russians, but it’s with DNC and Clinton Campaign
http://www.bizpacreview.com/2018/02...ollusion-russians-dnc-clinton-campaign-597506
I mean the DNC has to be flipping out...
a.) if the collusion narrative collapses and they don't have an impeachment angle to sell they get smushed in the next few elections, and
B.) if they actually colluded with the Russians, they have to defend themselves against their own arguments...
Its just funny to me...
a.) if the collusion narrative collapses and they don't have an impeachment angle to sell they get smushed in the next few elections, and
B.) if they actually colluded with the Russians, they have to defend themselves against their own arguments...
Its just funny to me...
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
bring it on home, knock the **** out of them
Rep. Paul Gosar calls for 'criminal prosecution' of former top FBI, DOJ officials
Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., called for the criminal prosecution of multiple former FBI and Justice Department officials after the release Friday of the Republican memo about surveillance of a Trump campaign adviser.
Gosar said in a statement that he will be co-authoring a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions seeking the "criminal prosecution" of former FBI Director James Comey, former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein for their "illegal misconduct and abuse of FISA."
"I will be leading a letter to the Attorney General seeking criminal prosecution against these traitors to our nation," Gosar said in a statement.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/r...s-after-release-of-nunes-memo/article/2647991
Rep. Paul Gosar calls for 'criminal prosecution' of former top FBI, DOJ officials
Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., called for the criminal prosecution of multiple former FBI and Justice Department officials after the release Friday of the Republican memo about surveillance of a Trump campaign adviser.
Gosar said in a statement that he will be co-authoring a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions seeking the "criminal prosecution" of former FBI Director James Comey, former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein for their "illegal misconduct and abuse of FISA."
"I will be leading a letter to the Attorney General seeking criminal prosecution against these traitors to our nation," Gosar said in a statement.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/r...s-after-release-of-nunes-memo/article/2647991
Thank you Rep. Gosar of AZ!
What i don't understand about this whole thing is who cares if Russia tried to get one candidate elected? Short of hacking voting machines i don't think it matters. The US always has preference of one candidate over another on foreign elections. To me this whole thing is saying Americans are too weak to make up their own mind. If Russia learns of a secret plan by north Korea to nuke the US and we pay them for the info or ease off sanctions is that collusion?
it doesnt matter if it was Russia or Elbonia.
the fact that they created a document out of the wild blue in order to spy on a political candidate is illegal in every sense. that the FBI willingly went along with this, twice, is flat out appalling. that the FBI didn't speak up and tell the country precisely what the DNC was attempting to do discredits their authority and integrity. It's awful all around.
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2014
- Messages
- 5,307
- Reaction score
- 4,795
- Points
- 113
I've said this from the very beginning as well.
It's like the MSM says "Propaganda from inside the U.S. is fine, but oh my god! Russia tries propaganda on facebook and the end of the world is right around the corner!"
The problem is that some media outlets have gotten too big and control too many different avenues of news, so propaganda is easily organized and disseminated with a common message... both the conservative and liberal news media have so much bias every single story is a woven agenda to fit their narrative.... talking points should be punishable by death lol... just report the facts and let people form tgeir own opinion
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 9,083
- Reaction score
- 11,822
- Points
- 113
Why did Comey reopen his investigation into Hillary days before the election?
Because he understood this was a sham?
Loyalty to country or to friends/colleagues?
Sent from my iPhone using Steeler Nation mobile app
Because he understood this was a sham?
Loyalty to country or to friends/colleagues?
Sent from my iPhone using Steeler Nation mobile app
The information leaked and released by the FBI and the rest of the so-called “deep state” during the election didn’t undermine Trump — it helped get him elected.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/real-purpose-nunes-memo-204250923.html
https://www.yahoo.com/news/real-purpose-nunes-memo-204250923.html
- Status
