Fauci Approves In-Person Voting: ‘There’s No Reason’ Why We Shouldn’t Be Allowed
The USPS just lost a 4 lbs. package of erythritol I ordered from Amazon. Can't find it anywhere. It got lost in transit... a 4 lbs bag. If these idiots can march and protest they can vote in person.
Any person who believes the ******* postal service will be able to competently handle 130 million ballots is an idiot, a liar, or both.
The post office handles almost 2.6 billion pieces of mail in a 2 week period. If all mail in ballots are mailed with in a 2 week period that is only a 5% total increase in mail. Physically it should not stress the system much, but who knows how much mail will get lost. I hate mail in voting, but i do not think the post office will be the main cause of issues if there are problems
P.S. Registrars are telling voters that they can mail in ballots one week before the election. I heard a rumor that some people wait to do things. I know, I know, sounds far-fetched, but possible, I guess.
So your 5% over two weeks becomes 10% in one week.
You REALLY think that a 10% increase in mail would not cause problems for the same ******* company that delivers things to your home and somehow LOST billions of dollars during a pandemic??
Huh? 1 week is the latest you can mail stuff in and "have your vote counted" All 130mil people are not going to wait till the last week to do that. Also the post office could hire temp workers like they do for holiday season is needed.
As for losing billions, if companies and businesses are closed then they are not going to be sending / receiving mail so its not surprising.
The Company: FedEx
The boost for online retailers has a ripple effect, as well. With so many people opting to order their stuff online rather than go to the store, major parcel delivery companies stand to benefit as well. And with Amazon halting its new delivery services for non-Amazon packages, FedEx is in an even better position to reap the benefits of this change. The Stats
- March 9, 2020, closing price: $115.70
- July 23, 2020, closing price: $165.99
- Change from March 9 closing to July 23 closing: 43.47%
In May, I argued that the pandemic-driven boom in online shopping might mark a turning point toward perpetually lower profitability for United Parcel Service Inc. and FedEx Corp. UPS had just reported its the lowest adjusted operating margin for its domestic business in at least 15 years, as a huge shift toward more costly residential deliveries appeared to catch it unprepared. FedEx had been mired in a seemingly never-ending cycle of disappointments. But I was wrong. It seems the pandemic was actually the best thing that could have ever happened to the package-delivery companies, at least from the perspective of their business models and their long-suffering investors.
Dawn of a New Era?
Shares of UPS and FedEx have soared in recent weeks as the carriers reclaimed some pricing power on residential deliveries
The study someone mentioned was very unscientific and if you truly want to get an idea of issues it would need to be conducted in a much better way. There was no control group or anything plus the sample size was extremely small. I would definitely be interested to see the results of a better study because there is potential there for major issues.
Interesting that a bunch of people who want an all mail in vote to avoid crowds, gathered in a large crowd to protest at the Postmaster General's house.
Interesting that a bunch of people who want an all mail in vote to avoid crowds, gathered in a large crowd to protest at the Postmaster General's house. Wear a mask. Social distance. Vote in person. You'll be alright.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/20...-boss-home-amid-concerns-over-mailed-n1236874
Interesting that a bunch of people who want an all mail in vote to avoid crowds, gathered in a large crowd to protest at the Postmaster General's house. Wear a mask. Social distance. Vote in person. You'll be alright.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/20...-boss-home-amid-concerns-over-mailed-n1236874
I do think there is an issue with dead people receiving mail or people getting mail at the wrong address, but i am not sure who's fault this is. If someone is deceased i don't think that is the USPS's responsibility. Just like if you move and do a change of address i am not 100% sure who is responsible for processing that properly.
As for the study itself i equate it to flipping a coin 5x and getting 3 heads. I would say you get heads 60% of the time based on my results. If i flipped that same coin 100x or 1 mil times i would get closer to the 50/50 split. Also like i said that report had 0 control. Was the mail lost due to incompetence, was it lost do to tampering, was it removed due to ballots being recognized as not official? This "study" can answer none of that along with having a ridiculously low sample size. To do a proper study you would have to set up multiple locations in each state. You would also have to have a group of variety mail along with the ballots. It would be a great experiment, but very costly. I'm sure someone could get funded to do it. If .5% of the basic mail was lost and .5% of ballots were lost you could say it's incompetence. If .5% of basic mail was lost and 3% of ballots were lost then you would have to dig deeper. Without a baseline though the original experiment is just designed to fire people up
Who cares whose fault it is? Seriously, you support a demonstrably flawed process on the principle you don't know who is at fault? I don't give a **** whose fault it is - I care that the proposed system is DESIGNED to fail.
Once again, you ***** about the one effort to check out the "delivery by mail" approach without a single ******* fact to show the approach will work. NOT. ONE. FACT. IN. SUPPORT.
Also, the CBS study consisted of sending out 200 ballots - not 5 - and seeing how many made it to the return address. 3% had not been returned in TWO WEEKS, and 21% had not made it back in ONE WEEK. Facts.
That study was a closed loop, where ALL ballots were sent to a valid address, and returned to a valid address. Therefore, the 3% and 21% figures by their very nature did NOT include deliveries to invalid addresses or rejection of ballots based on problems with the returned ballot.
Therefore, the 3% ballot failure is at the low end. The real number will be much, much, much, much, much higher based on deliveries to invalid addresses, to dead people, failure of the voter to complete the ballot as required, etc.
So you apparently still have zero data showing that the approach WILL work; I have data that it will reject AT LEAST 3% of ballots, and likely MUCH more, closer to 10%.
And you still stick with the approach. I know why Kameltoe Knobjob and Dementia boy support the approach (manipulation, fraud, ability to declare a Trump victory a fraud). Why do you?
I dont support mail in voting because whiny people on both sides will claim fraud no matter who wins. I am just saying that study was flawed. 200 ballots is a drop of water in the ocean compared to millions or 10s of millions or 100 million ballots. The USPS handles over 470 million pieces of mail daily and at 3% loss rate that is over 14 million pieces of lost mail daily. That is very unlikely. At 10% your looking at 47 million pieces of lost mail daily. Again extremely unlikely. There are lots of reasons the ballots could not have returned or simply the people conducting the study flat out lied. The numbers could be legit, but without more samples and a control group it is just not possible to draw conclusions from this study. Again I would like to see a proper study done there very well could be horrible issues. I am just not basing conclusions on a half baked study.
I dont support mail in voting because whiny people on both sides will claim fraud no matter who wins. I am just saying that study was flawed. 200 ballots is a drop of water in the ocean compared to millions or 10s of millions or 100 million ballots. The USPS handles over 470 million pieces of mail daily and at 3% loss rate that is over 14 million pieces of lost mail daily. That is very unlikely. At 10% your looking at 47 million pieces of lost mail daily. Again extremely unlikely. There are lots of reasons the ballots could not have returned or simply the people conducting the study flat out lied. The numbers could be legit, but without more samples and a control group it is just not possible to draw conclusions from this study. Again I would like to see a proper study done there very well could be horrible issues. I am just not basing conclusions on a half baked study.
Here are some more unhinged libtards, Antifa-loving far-left communists hiding under their beds in Hungary, explaining why they are voting for Biden in November. In their own words:
<samp class="EmbedCode-container"><code class="EmbedCode-code"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Steve is a lifelong Republican, and an ex-USAF fighter pilot. Listen to why he will be voting Joe.<br><br>"He's a draft dodger. He never served in the military, he has no clue what it means to serve in the military." <a href="https://t.co/GXuXAzm1JM">pic.twitter.com/GXuXAzm1JM</a></p>— Republican Voters Against Trump (@RVAT2020) <a href="https://twitter.com/RVAT2020/status/1292098239039188992?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> </code></samp>
<samp class="EmbedCode-container"><code class="EmbedCode-code"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Skip has been a Republican since 1978, but now he is tired of Trump's America being the laughing stock of the world.<br><br>"I don't like having to wake up every morning wondering what the hell my president said on Twitter." <a href="https://t.co/KXY3GPPZm2">pic.twitter.com/KXY3GPPZm2</a></p>— Republican Voters Against Trump (@RVAT2020) <a href="https://twitter.com/RVAT2020/status/1292188836273905665?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> </code></samp>
<samp class="EmbedCode-container"><code class="EmbedCode-code"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">MUST WATCH: In a moving plea to his fellow Republicans, Leroy describes what America means to him. He can't vote for Trump because he is dismantling the America Leroy has loved his whole life. <br><br>"We cannot let America die. ... This Republican is voting for Joe Biden this year. " <a href="https://t.co/uFRFOmo4oZ">pic.twitter.com/uFRFOmo4oZ</a></p>— Republican Voters Against Trump (@RVAT2020) <a href="https://twitter.com/RVAT2020/status/1292234134824222721?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> </code></samp>