From my reading of the statute, second degree unintentional murder means you cause someone's death during the act of committing a felony, even if you didn't intend to kill the person. The felony in this case according to the prosecution was assaulting George Floyd.Isn’t there also an unintentional clause? That’s what I see here.
There is intentional second degree murder and unintentional second degree murder in Minnesota. He was convicted of unintentional.Chauvin convicted of 2nd degree murder, which required a showing of intent to kill.
2020 Minnesota Statutes
Section 609.19
609.19 MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE.
Subdivision 1. Intentional murder.
Whoever does either of the following is guilty of murder in the second degree and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 40 years:
(1) causes the death of a human being with intent to effect the death of that person or another, but without premeditation.
Like I said, he was going to be dead in another half hour anyway by his own doing with no help from anyone else. Had three times the lethal level of fentanyl in his system.So glad they got this one right. We can all breathe a sigh of relief. A breath, sadly, that George Floyd is unable to take.
There is intentional second degree murder and unintentional second degree murder in Minnesota. He was convicted of unintentional.
609.19 MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE.
§
Subdivision 1.Intentional murder; drive-by shootings.
Whoever does either of the following is guilty of murder in the second degree and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 40 years:
(1) causes the death of a human being with intent to effect the death of that person or another, but without premeditation; or
(2) causes the death of a human being while committing or attempting to commit a drive-by shooting in violation of section 609.66, subdivision 1e, under circumstances other than those described in section 609.185, paragraph (a), clause (3).
Subd. 2.Unintentional murders.
Whoever does either of the following is guilty of unintentional murder in the second degree and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 40 years:
(1) causes the death of a human being, without intent to effect the death of any person, while committing or attempting to commit a felony offense other than criminal sexual conduct in the first or second degree with force or violence or a drive-by shooting; or
(2) causes the death of a human being without intent to effect the death of any person, while intentionally inflicting or attempting to inflict bodily harm upon the victim, when the perpetrator is restrained under an order for protection and the victim is a person designated to receive protection under the order. As used in this clause, "order for protection" includes an order for protection issued under chapter 518B; a harassment restraining order issued under section 609.748; a court order setting conditions of pretrial release or conditions of a criminal sentence or juvenile court disposition; a restraining order issued in a marriage dissolution action; and any order issued by a court of another state or of the United States that is similar to any of these orders.
I'm no lawyer but a cop does not fit the definition in either section. Subd 2-1 means you kills somebody while committing a felony. That doesn't fit. Chauvin was making an arrest. The only issue is whether he was allowed to use the tactic and it came out in trial that it was taught. He was not attempting to commit a felony.
Subd 2-2 defines Perpetrator (Chauvin) as somebody who is under an order of protection. A cop does not fit that definition. Basically it means if you kill somebody who has a restraining order against you.
Seems to me there is a case for the manslaughter but not the other charges.
There is intentional second degree murder and unintentional second degree murder in Minnesota. He was convicted of unintentional.
609.19 MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE.
§
Subdivision 1.Intentional murder; drive-by shootings.
Whoever does either of the following is guilty of murder in the second degree and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 40 years:
(1) causes the death of a human being with intent to effect the death of that person or another, but without premeditation; or
(2) causes the death of a human being while committing or attempting to commit a drive-by shooting in violation of section 609.66, subdivision 1e, under circumstances other than those described in section 609.185, paragraph (a), clause (3).
Subd. 2.Unintentional murders.
Whoever does either of the following is guilty of unintentional murder in the second degree and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 40 years:
(1) causes the death of a human being, without intent to effect the death of any person, while committing or attempting to commit a felony offense other than criminal sexual conduct in the first or second degree with force or violence or a drive-by shooting; or
(2) causes the death of a human being without intent to effect the death of any person, while intentionally inflicting or attempting to inflict bodily harm upon the victim, when the perpetrator is restrained under an order for protection and the victim is a person designated to receive protection under the order. As used in this clause, "order for protection" includes an order for protection issued under chapter 518B; a harassment restraining order issued under section 609.748; a court order setting conditions of pretrial release or conditions of a criminal sentence or juvenile court disposition; a restraining order issued in a marriage dissolution action; and any order issued by a court of another state or of the United States that is similar to any of these orders.
Yeah, that's what I guess I had always thought as well, but I can't claim to stay on top of criminal law. I pretty much share your sentiments regarding Chauvin, but I wouldn't claim to know him based upon his trial exposure. for all I know, he might be a hell of a guy. In this case, his actions seemed excessive and unnecessary to me, which has to say something about the kind of person he is.I always thought unintentional murder was manslaughter. I’m not a lawyer, and I certainly don’t know Minnesota law. On top of that, I don’t really care about Derek Chauvin. He did what he did, he got what he got. Scumbag of a human being. **** that guy.
Unintentional murder seems like an easy sell in this case. I didn't even realize that was the charge until after the verdict.From my reading of the statute, second degree unintentional murder means you cause someone's death during the act of committing a felony, even if you didn't intend to kill the person. The felony in this case according to the prosecution was assaulting George Floyd.
Was 2nd degree unintentional murder not one of the charges levied against Chauvin?The second subdivision does not apply, OFTB. That section covers a subset of felony murder and a very particular crime for causing harm while violating a restraining order.
That's why I did not include it.
Yeah, that's what I guess I had always thought as well, but I can't claim to stay on top of criminal law. I pretty much share your sentiments regarding Chauvin, but I wouldn't claim to know him based upon his trial exposure. for all I know, he might be a hell of a guy. In this case, his actions seemed excessive and unnecessary to me, which has to say something about the kind of person he is.
Unintentional murder seems like an easy sell in this case. I didn't even realize that was the charge until after the verdict.
Guilty on all three charges.
1. Guilty The second-degree unintentional murder charge alleged Chauvin caused Floyd's death "without intent" while committing or attempting to commit felony third-degree assault.
2. Guilty The third-degree murder charge alleged Chauvin caused Floyd's death by "perpetrating an act eminently dangerous to others and evincing a depraved mind, without regard for human life."
3. Guilty The second-degree manslaughter charge alleged Chauvin caused Floyd's death by "culpable negligence whereby the person creates an unreasonable risk, and consciously takes chances of causing death or great bodily harm."
Let us hope that George Floyd's death was not in vain and that this becomes a watershed moment in American history, whereby the justice system begins to truly work equally for all. Looking forward to further legislation on police reform on the local, state & federal level.
Also, I'm hopeful the judge will do the right thing and consider the extreme cruelty & utter lack of regard for human life on Chauvin's part and fully maximize the available jail sentence.
So glad they got this one right. We can all breathe a sigh of relief. A breath, sadly, that George Floyd is unable to take.
May George Floyd rest in peace and his family find some semblence of solace and comfort.
Exactly Sarge. I said the same thing to my friend tonight. After GF was unconscious and not moving, why continue to kneel on his neck? That's the part that got me. The officers could see he was basically out, on-lookers were telling him he was not moving and he continued to kneel on the man's neck. I don't know or really care what his intentions were, but the man died on the pavement under his knee with no medical attention. The jury had no choice, but to find him guilty. It was the right verdict.
Shapiro breaking down the charges
That's my issue, they should have taken into consideration the fact that Floyd was going to be dead from a drug overdose within a half hour anyway.Onlookers are irrelevant, they have no training in police procedures. Saying that, he was guilty of indifference for sure, no way did he get up that day wanting to kill a black man (contrary to the left wing cult media), but his arrogance and lack of care might've contributed to Floyd's death (though it's quite possible he would've died anyway from the drugs he consumed and swallowed). Chauvin should've been convicted on the lesser charge and sentenced to 5 years max.
I suggest you go **** yourself.I suggest you get a life size poster of George Floyd to hang above your bed so you can jerk off to it everyday, you two worthless fucksticks deserve each other.
Depends on who you listen to. There were medical experts that weighed in that say that isn't necessarily true. I have seen nowhere where your assertion is universally accepted as fact. Regardless, it doesn't give police the right to treat people that way.That's my issue, they should have taken into consideration the fact that Floyd was going to be dead from a drug overdose within a half hour anyway.