Hungarians Declare: ‘Central Europe Stands United Against Mass Illegal Migration’

[Spike]

An alliance of Central European countries led by Hungary has pledged to work together to stem the flow of illegal migrants into Europe at a meeting in Prague.

Delegations to the Central European Defence Cooperation (CEDC) group from Austria, Croatia, Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia, and the Czech Republic were, according to a report on the Hungarian government’s official website, “united against mass illegal migration”.

Defence ministers at the summit agreed to “facilitate the quick and joint mobilization of civilian, police and military capabilities” in defence of the European Union’s external borders.

Elaborating on the reasons behind Hungary’s robust anti-mass immigration stance, Prime Minister Viktor Orbán explained: “What we want is a Hungarian Hungary and a European Europe.”

The Fidesz leader said his government “won’t participate in experiments aimed at changing Hungary or Europe, in which Europe’s cultural traditions would be swept aside...

http://www.breitbart.com/london/201...-europe-stands-united-mass-illegal-migration/

---------------------------

BORDER SECURITY!

What a concept!

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

Tibs disapproves of this message.

 

[Ron Burgundy]

Tibs disapproves of this message.

S'all right Muzzies, Tibs is on your side.

 

[Ironcitysteelers]

They need some solar panels on dat wall!

 

[Booted]

Pretty sweet deal ya got going on over there, tibs.

 

[Confluence]

Looking at them pics, I can't figure out which one is Tibs.

 

[deljzc]

Looking at them pics, I can't figure out which one is Tibs.

He's the woman in the head scarf. Not that hard to find him really.

 

[Tibs]

He's the woman in the head scarf. Not that hard to find him really.

 

[Tibs]

Those so easily bamboozled by Donald Trump are equally as easily bamboozled by Viktor Orban, Putin, Erdogan and their ilk. Not surprising one bit to see Hungary constantly on the front pages of breitbart and other far-right sites. Birds of a feather flock together.

 

[Tibs]

Hungarians Declare: ‘Central Europe Stands United Against Mass Illegal Migration’

And btw, Hungarians don't 'declare' jack ****. The corrupt regime of Orban Viktor and his FIDESZ cronies may make such declarations. Orban is on the verge of getting his *** handed to him by Brussels cutting off EU funding, which is the sole source of economic activity in the country, the majority of which is siphoned off (see: stolen) by Orban and his close circle of family and friends. Again, the model for Orban is Putin and his oligarchs and Erdogan and his anti-democratic henchmen. These are the shining stars of Europe that Trump supporters kneel down to and worship. Shameful and embarassing for the alt-right in the US, no doubt about it. Lincoln - and Reagan - are certainly rolling over in their graves.

 

[deljzc]

And btw, Hungarians don't 'declare' jack ****. The corrupt regime of Orban Viktor and his FIDESZ cronies may make such declarations. Orban is on the verge of getting his *** handed to him by Brussels cutting of EU funding, which is the sole source of economic activity in the country, the majority of which is siphoned off (see: stolen) by Orban and his close circle of family and friends. Again, the model for Orban is Putin and his oligarchs and Erdogan and his anti-democratic henchmen. These are the shining stars of Europe that Trump supporters kneel down to and worship. Shameful and embarassing for the alt-right in the US, no doubt about it. Lincoln - and Reagan - are certainly rolling over in their graves.

They are wrong on a lot of issues and I'm never in favor or oligarchs or non-democratic processes (which is how Putin stays in power).

But on the issue of Muslim immigration they are the only ones speaking the correct language. It is sad (well, I like it but) liberals have decided to attach their cart to the idea of illegal immigration is "fine" and allowing a culture to enter our country and not assimilate is "okay" (in fact they BLAME me for it).

The left (and you Tibs) have finally picked an issue they are just so far wrong on the side of history that normal, sane Americans are just never going to agree with you on. And you are losing hundreds of elections because of it.

If the Democrats still had the same immigration policy of Bill Clinton, they might be in the White House. But instead they have decided to go full-force behind the crazy ideology of Obama and his anti-American, globalist, anti-patriotism, self-loathing image that now dominates everything the liberals argue about.

You are wrong on this issue Tibs. You and all the liberal crazies that have no knowledge of history, immigration, how it works and what problems it can bring if not done correctly.

Keep pounding away on white guilt, reparations, all the things America should be ashamed about, and how we have to apologize for using gasoline. Keep reminding me. Because as long as you do, I'm never voting democrat again in my life.

 

[Ron Burgundy]

Those so easily bamboozled by Donald Trump are equally as easily bamboozled by Viktor Orban, Putin, Erdogan and their ilk. Not surprising one bit to see Hungary constantly on the front pages of breitbart and other far-right sites. Birds of a feather flock together.

How many terrorist attacks have occurred in Hungary lately?

 

[CoolieMan]

Tibs disapproves of this message.

Tibs is probably behind this message...he enjoys his life behind their wall

 

[Tibs]

How many terrorist attacks have occurred in Hungary lately?

There's never been a extremist Islamic terrorist attack - ever - in Hungary, at least in modern times. This is true for the past thirty years for sure, long before all the huffing and puffing and building of chain link fences on the southern border.

On the other hand, terrorist sleeper cells have existed here for decades, as is the case in most European capitals, none more infamous than the attackers that carried out the Bataclan Paris attacks. There are plenty of 'shady' internet cafes, barber shops and the like where terrorist sympathisers mingle freely and openly.

It amazes me how many on this board, for such a sustained amount of time, simply can't grasp the basic concept that terrorists and potential terrorist either already live here or travel freely throughout Europe on trains, planes, buses and cars. It's like you're stuck in the XVIth century when the Turks marauded on foot and horseback.

 

[Ron Burgundy]

There's never been a extremist Islamic terrorist attack - ever - in Hungary, at least in modern times. This is true for the past thirty years for sure, long before all the huffing and puffing and building of chain link fences on the southern border.

On the other hand, terrorist sleeper cells have existed here for decades, as is the case in most European capitals, none more infamous than the attackers that carried out the Bataclan Paris attacks. There are plenty of 'shady' internet cafes, barber shops and the like where terrorist sympathisers mingle freely and openly.

It amazes me how many on this board, for such a sustained amount of time, simply can't grasp the basic concept that terrorists and potential terrorist either already live here or travel freely throughout Europe on trains, planes, buses and cars. It's like you're stuck in the XVIth century when the Turks marauded on foot and horseback.

I'm thinking if you don't let that demographic in to begin with, it greatly reduces the likelihood.

 

[Tibs]

I'm thinking if you don't let that demographic in to begin with, it greatly reduces the likelihood.

Sure but it's a drop in the bucket relative to what tighter border controls (bus and rail), airport security, INTERPOL, domestic surveillance, inter agency cooperation would do to help fix the issue. I guess if all that was working on a much higher level and you still had a terrorist issue then you could start building walls and fences on the southern border to make you feel safer. Not the other way around. All it provides is a false sense of security.

 

[Confluence]

Sure but it's a drop in the bucket relative to what tighter border controls (bus and rail), airport security, INTERPOL, domestic surveillance, inter agency cooperation would do to help fix the issue. I guess if all that was working on a much higher level and you still had a terrorist issue then you could start building walls and fences on the southern border to make you feel safer. Not the other way around. All it provides is a false sense of security.

You would rather have a police state than a simple inanimate wall?


Sent from my iPhone using Steeler Nation mobile app

 

[CoolieMan]

Sure but it's a drop in the bucket relative to what tighter border controls (bus and rail), airport security, INTERPOL, domestic surveillance, inter agency cooperation would do to help fix the issue. I guess if all that was working on a much higher level and you still had a terrorist issue then you could start building walls and fences on the southern border to make you feel safer. Not the other way around. All it provides is a false sense of security.

then I expect you to go start tearing down your county's walls.......

 

[Tibs]

then I expect you to go start tearing down your county's walls.......

My country doesn't have any walls, not yet. Trump hasn't gotten around to building them. Once he does I'll take your advice and do my best to tear them down.

 

[Tibs]

You would rather have a police state than a simple inanimate wall?

What, you're against police sniffing out terrorist sleeper cells, tracking finances, communications? I hope they catch these *******, by whatever means neccessary.

 

[Ron Burgundy]

You would rather have a police state than a simple inanimate wall?

.
Well he's a Liberal, so....

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

Mind boggling, the Liberal mind is.

Let's use the percentages. 1-3% of Muslims are willing to commit acts of violence in the name of Islam against non-believers. Finance, INTERPOL, policing, intelligence agencies isn't working (see the increase in terrorism).

So let's say you live in England, and you decide to have open borders. You let in 300,000 Muslims in 2016. 3,000 to 9,000 of them are willing to commit acts of violence.

The next year, another 3K to 9K would-be jihadists enter the country. And the year after. After 3 years, you have 9,000 to 27,000 Muslims willing to drive a lorrie through a crowd of people.

Now, you can sit back and hope and pray that the intelligence agencies figure this **** out, or you can shut down your borders to stop the influx of would-be assassins.

Seems to me the latter is smarter.

Reminds me of the spinach scare in the late 2000s. 30 people or so died. They couldn't figure out where the infected spinach was coming from. It was a scant, tiny percentage of spinach. But, 30 people had died. So they shut down the sale of all spinach - ALL of it - until the bad farm was found and they could locate the rest of the contaminated spinach.

Until the bad Muslims can be rooted out, you are simply an idiot for letting Muslims into your country. You ARE allowing terrorists in by doing so.

And as for the argument - "Well Gomer, they are already here" I say ******* brilliant. ADD to the population by letting in more. ******* profound.

 

[ZonaBurgh]

It's like you're stuck in the XVIth century when the Turks marauded on foot and horseback.

Still about 800 years ahead of those bastardizing their religion in the name of Mohammad, or that's what they appear to think anyway.
If you know a way to reason with them, please enlighten the knuckle dragging among us.

 

[Confluence]

Tibs[/B];382462]Sure but it's a drop in the bucket relative to what tighter border controls (bus and rail), airport security, INTERPOL, domestic surveillance, inter agency cooperation would do to help fix the issue. I guess if all that was working on a much higher level and you still had a terrorist issue then you could start building walls and fences on the southern border to make you feel safer. Not the other way around. All it provides is a false sense of security.

You would rather have a police state than a simple inanimate wall?


Sent from my iPhone using Steeler Nation mobile app

What, you're against police sniffing out terrorist sleeper cells, tracking finances, communications? I hope they catch these *******, by whatever means neccessary.

Please don't put words in my mouth.

You suggested more governmental police action; socialists like that sense of security for giving away liberties.
Others greatly prefer much more liberty for all, but a real or metaphorical wall to get past first.
This shouldn't be difficult to understand.

 

[Tibs]

Please don't put words in my mouth. You suggested more governmental police action; socialists like that sense of security for giving away liberties. Others greatly prefer much more liberty for all, but a real or metaphorical wall to get past first. This shouldn't be difficult to understand.

Nor should it be difficult to understand a wall /fence on Hungary's southern border with Serbia does little to move the needle in the fight against terrorist cells currently wreaking havoc throughout western Europe.