Holy ******* ****, that was lame, even for you. Let's go through these alleged "falsehoods" by Kavanaugh:
1. All four people Phony Doctor (seriously, nobody is called "Dr." unless he or she is a medical doctor) Ford says were present denied the allegation. Truth - Kavanaugh denies the allegation. As to Mark Judge, here is what he has to offer: "Judge has backed up Kavanaugh’s emphatic denial of the accusations.
“It’s just absolutely nuts. I never saw Brett act that way,” Judge said. Strike 1, Tibsy. Ford's friend says, Keyser, says, "Simply put,
Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.” According to the news outlet, Walsh confirmed that his client and Ford are “lifelong friend
." Strike 2, Tibsy. Finally, Smyth stated he has no memory of anything close to what was alleged. "Patrick Smyth, issued a written statement to that effect earlier in the week. Thus far, nobody has backed up the account advanced by Kavanaugh’s accuser, while Kavanaugh and three other named witnesses have rejected it outright. Smyth continued, “Personally speaking, I have known Brett Kavanaugh since high school and I know him to be a person of great integrity, a great friend, and I have never witnessed any improper conduct by Brett Kavanaugh towards women." Lying about lies ... Strike 3, buddy ... and you know what that means. "GET THE **** OUT." Oh, and the lying bullshit that Keyser "believes" Pretend Dr. Ford?!? Jee-zus, are you that stupid? (Rhetorical question - don't answer, you will just make yourself look dumb.) She is a longtime friend, disputes the facts, but does not throw her under the bus.
So whose story checks out, and whose does not? Yep, Dr. Kavanaugh 1 - Dr. Ford 0. Keep score, buddy.
2. Ahhhh, the calendar supports Fake Ford!! Yeah, no. The calendar entry specifies, "Tobin's house." Ford does not identify Tobin as being present. Wait, so they broke in?? Funny she forgot that. The entry further states, "Workout ... go to Timmy's for skis, with Judge, Tom, PJ, Bernie, Sq." No reference to any girls - NONE. No reference to a party - NONE. No reference to Ford - NONE. No reference to Keyser - NONE. Further, lazy-*** ************, Tobin's house is ******* MILES from the location Fake Doctor claims. Strike 4, *****.
3. He denies blacking out due to drinking. Evidence to contrary?? Kavanaugh wrote an e-mail in 2001 about a dice game he doesn't recall ... and a 2014 speech where he referred to drinking and "piecing things together." Okay, I am so sick of raping intellectually bankrupt, stupid, lazy kunts who are too dumb and lazy to look **** up. But here we go (again) - the e-mail has does not even refer to drinking. Here is that horrendous e-mail:
No mention of alcohol. No mention of blacking out.
Jesus, if failing to remember a dice game = blackout drunk, then what does that make Fake Dr. "I don't remember the date, the location, how I got there, how I left, who invited me, etc."??? Seriously, how ******* trashed must she have been? Oh, and as to the 2014 speech - Kavanaugh said the following:
I am approaching my eighth anniversary on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. I am approaching the 24th anniversary of my graduation from this school. That means I am approaching the 24th anniversary of my organizing 30 classmates in a bus to go to Boston for a Red Sox game and a night of Boston bar-hopping, only for us to return falling out of the bus onto the front steps of Yale Law School at about 4:45 a.m. One friend of mine, Steve Hartmann, actually had a Labor Law final the next morning. (I checked with him just yesterday to confirm that it was Labor Law.) True story.
On the bus, he actually had his book out and was reading his notes while people were doing group chugs from a keg. He got a P. I think the people doing the group chugs got H’s. Fortunately for all of us, we had a motto, what happens on the bus stays on the bus. Tonight, you can modify that to what happens at the Fed Soc after-party stays at the Fed Soc afterparty.
We had a good run my third year. We got our work done, but we had our share of fun. During our third year class party, it was a beautiful night then as it is tonight. We were at the Lawn Club. No one had done their SAWs. Most people didn’t even have their topics yet. But we didn’t care that night. We had a memorable evening. It is fair to say that we had a few drinks. Indeed, as a classmate of mine and I were reminiscing and piecing things together the other day, we think we had more than a few beers before the banquet. Might have been at Toads. Not a good idea.
Anyway, toward the end of the evening a friend of mine who shall remain nameless—and this is a story that is really about a friend of mine, not about me where I am disguising myself as a friend of mine—my friend broke a table in the Lawn Club reception area. Smashed it into multiple pieces. I actually still possess a photo of him sprawled on the floor on top of the table. How’d did he break it, you might ask? The old-fashioned way. He lost his balance and fell into the table, drink in hand, and the table collapsed. My friend was a big guy.
Now, you might think that we would have quickly left the Lawn Club after that, with some sense of shame. But you’d be wrong. My friend actually tried to get another drink at the bar. Proving something I have always known—that bartenders have a lot more common sense than many law school students—the bartender refused to serve my friend.
But that’s where one of our many fond memories of Yale Law School came in. Professor Steve Duke, who himself might have had a few cocktails, came to the rescue and told my friend that he would take care of the situation and argue his case to the bartender. His actual words, as we recalled the other day, were “I’ll take your case.” And sure enough, Steve Duke—or as we called him for reasons too bizarre to recall now, the Dukie-stick—won the case and got my friend some more beers. That’s probably one Professor Duke deserved to lose. The moral of this story: I suppose there are a lot of them. But here’s one I like: Don’t ever let it be said that Yale Law professors are not there when you most need them.
So strike 5 ... *****.
4. Kavanaugh referred to the legal drinking age in Maryland as being 18. Lie. He said that during PART of his high school years the drinking age in Maryland was 18, and at ALL TIMES during his high school years, the drinking age in D.C. was 18. True. So another lie about the lie.
5. Sheldon Whitehouse has never played quarters (liar), and yet is going to lecture us on the meaning of "devil's triangle"? What the ******* ****?!? "I've never seen a baseball game, but let me lecture you on the proper way to throw a curveball ... " Shut the **** up. Hey, whitemouse, or limpdick, you pansy *********** liar fuckbag, we named our drinking games in the early 1980's, when I was attending college. No internet back then, so limpdick liars (*cough*whitehead or whitemouse) were uninformed losers and preening queefs we excluded from our drinking games.
6. Finally, that wart on the *** of life, Blumenthal - a ******* lying liar who claimed to have served IN Vietnam, when he was never closer than 3,000 miles to Vietnam. Yep, a case of stolen valor - lying kunt who claims to have served in-country, and was outed. So no surprise that the lying kunt got the jury instruction wrong - "lying about one thing means lying about everything." Jesus, the lying, outed douche caught engaging in stolen valor used the wrong instruction, and figured doing so in Latin would protect him.
Nope. The actual instruction is, "Sometimes a witness may say something that is not consistent with something else he or she said. Sometimes different witnesses will give different versions of what happened. People often forget things or make mistakes in what they remember. Also, two people may see the same event but remember it differently. You may consider these differences, but do not decide that testimony is untrue just because it differs from other testimony.
However, if you decide that a witness did not tell the truth about something important, you may choose not to believe anything that witness said. On the other hand, if you think the witness did not tell the truth about some things but told the truth about others, you may accept the part you think is true and ignore the rest."
So no surprise ... lying douchebag Blumenthal lied about something VERY important ("I served in Vietnam" - ******* LIE), so we can and should disbelieve everything that comes out of his stinking, fetid, rotten pie-hole, but Kavanaugh supposedly lied about irrelevant **** having to do with a yearbook??
The jury instruction says, "Who ******* cares?"
Get your **** straight, Blumey.
And Tibsy.
