Right there, I question your credentials as a Steelers fan.
Spike likes to stir the pot, I am sure he shares a love for a top Steelers defense.
Right there, I question your credentials as a Steelers fan.
Spike likes to stir the pot, I am sure he shares a love for a top Steelers defense.
There is no question in my mind that we got better as a football team with this draft.
Would I like more depth at RB? Yes. I would. Bell has been injury prone.
Would I like more depth at WR? Yes. I called it in January that we should trade Martavious while his value was high. But Wheaton is underrated as number 2.
We have enough offense to win a SB right now. We need enough defense to win a SB, and I think we took major strides in that direction.
There is no question in my mind that we got better as a football team with this draft.
Would I like more depth at RB? Yes. I would. Bell has been injury prone.
Would I like more depth at WR? Yes. I called it in January that we should trade Martavious while his value was high. But Wheaton is underrated as number 2.
We have enough offense to win a SB right now. We need enough defense to win a SB, and I think we took major strides in that direction.
And get what exactly for him? We might as well keep him for the length of his first contract which is peanuts.
After the season and before he was suspended, he had value as an up and coming big play threat. We've got all kinds of defensive holes. It would have been worth it for a solid veteran DB or a another 2nd Round draft pick that would have allowed us to get both Davis and Calhoun.
After the season and before he was suspended, he had value as an up and coming big play threat. We've got all kinds of defensive holes. It would have been worth it for a solid veteran DB or a another 2nd Round draft pick that would have allowed us to get both Davis and Calhoun.
Ive been thinking about this pick. Burns supposedly is very good at man-press coverage but has no experience in the type zone we use. Tombert is fond of their "barn" analogy. "If you have red paint, you paint the barn red". Could this mean we might start using more man or press schemes in our secondary?
off topic, what happened to your karma?
Ive been thinking about this pick. Burns supposedly is very good at man-press coverage but has no experience in the type zone we use. Tombert is fond of their "barn" analogy. "If you have red paint, you paint the barn red". Could this mean we might start using more man or press schemes in our secondary?
Really doesn't mean a damn thing...
They were fixated on Jarvis Jones too come hell or high water. I remember all the same articles.
Really doesn't mean a damn thing until we see production.
Only time will tell who will end up being the better CB and having the biggest impact on their perspective team. Jackson has three 1st rounders ahead of him on the depth chart. Burns has a bunch of mid-low free agents.
It was like Timmons' year during Coach T's first draft. Everyone knew they were taking Timmons. It would have been interesting, if the Jets didn't leapfrog us for Revis, would the Steelers have taken him? It would have been the right move at the time, since our ILBs were set. I wonder if all the news surrounding Timmons was a smoke screen to pick up Revis.
Now that you mention it, I wonder if the smokescreen is the strategy for the Steelers draft every year. Just last year we had 14 CB & safety predraft visits (including 2 dinners) compared to 3 OLB visits, and every single mock draft had us taking either a CB or safety with the loss of Ike and Troy, only to have us run up to the podium to select Bud Dupree with the 1st pick. So wouldn't surprise me at all if there was a smokescreen for Burns or Timmons.Tomlin couldn't hide his love for Revis. After he went all in praising him, Colbert had to step in when Tomlin was asked about another player. Either the Steelers wanted Revis bad, or they put on a huge smokescreen for Timmons.
The label 'raw talent' was used on recent picks like Dupree and Martavis Bryant. So the Burns pick isn't as scary or out of the ordinary. Even though Dupree rookie year wasn't stellar, he did show a motor week 1 when he sacked Brady. Bryant's accomplishments and off the field issues are well documented. The thing is Burns has intangibles like height and speed that combined with Coach Lake & Tomlin's direction can turn the raw talent to fundamentally sound technique.
Sorry but Burns might be raw but he also isn't a great athlete. Looks like he has good hands and plays aggressive but I do worry about what happens when he matches up with an elite athlete. He had a lot of picks last year but they were against Bethune Cookman, Florida Atlantic, Nebraska(Tommy Armstrong and his 16 picks) Virginia Tech 2 and again a bad QB situation. Then Pitt. Tyler Boyd was probably the best receiver he faced and his pick came off of the TE.