Data are almost identical to the 2016 data I cited, if not slightly worse in terms of blacks committing the vast majority of interracial crimes.
As Hispanic is an ethnicity and not a race it was included in both black and white perpetrators, not just the white ones. There are black hispanics.
False. Hispanics are grouped as whites in terms of race. When the FBI tracks the race of the victim or the perpetrator, "Hispanic" is not a choice as a race, just as it is not a choice for race on the census.
You are just wrong.
The point I was making is that in total numbers whites kill more whites and blacks kill more blacks. Vaders original comment made it seem like there was some sort of melee on whites from blacks. Now, this is my assumption, but I'm going to say quite a bit of those are probably drug/gang involved on BOTH sides and not just a racial driven thing.
Yeah, sure. Blacks kill whites more than twice as often as whites kill blacks, though whites are more than 5 times the population, meaning that black-on-white killings are really ten times more frequent than white-on-black.
Facts don't care about your feelings.
Yes, I get the background information matters in cases as it can show patterns of behavior. That should ring true for the cop putting his knee on the neck of Floyd and the over zealous idiots with the Arbery case, and yet, the comments I saw focused on Arbery's past in the other thread, but not the yokels that chased him and ultimately murdered him. Why?
Why are you making up something that is untrue you mean? As in, "the comments I saw focused on Arbery's past in the other thread but not the yokels that chased him and ultimately murdered him."
Uhhh, false. You need to re-read that thread and this time remove your "ow, my race hurts" goggles. Also, I know the laborious process of a hearing, witnesses, getting to present a defense bothers you but defendants are entitled to their day in court.
The knee-jerk, spasm-like demands for justice are odd. So a trial is too laborious? Almost as if African-Americans are rooting for immediate justice, right-the-****-now punishment. You know, by citizens, not waiting for the namby-pamby judicial process to take place.
In fact, however, that is something African-Americans know is not a good idea since it usually involves an angry mob, a tree and a rope.
As you don't know me and what I absolutely believe you are wrong about the video being the end all be all. Michael Brown? Did I bring him up as an example? That video was in no way definitive. Hell, even the snippet they had from the Raleigh cops last year that seemed to show a group of cops beating a black guy down was incorrect. I didn't "jump" to conclusions on that one as again it was a snippet of what happened and later the whole video showed a disturbed individual attacking the cops and showed the whole pic justifying the ends. Seems to me as more video is coming out on both of these cases it's not looking good for the perps as the guy video taping the Arbery incident was found to be involved and arrested because the rest of the video showed they chased him for at least 4 minutes blocking his escape whenever he tried to get away. There is a video from a business in the area of the Floyd arrest that shows the beginning of him being led out of his car and being detained. No resisting was shown in that video, but he did look pretty annoyed and looked like he was letting it be known. What's missing is what happened after that part and up to officer ******** holding him down with his knee on his neck.
You actually did not say anything substantive here. Well, maybe, "You don't know me," but I think the law requires you sob when you say that. And despite what you seem to claim, you are indeed reaching decisions based solely on a video, and with no other facts. As in, "murderers" in the civilian thing.
Also, the fact that I point out things that have to happen, or need exploring, or play a role, or might explain motive (which is all I've done, and the stuff I post is still available for review), I don't render an unchallengeable verdict - GUILTY!! Instead, I have talked about why motive is important in the civilian case, that the problems those guys face is what they did after pursuing the guy, the cop had no reason to keep his knee on a guy's neck when he was cuffed, should have him sit up so he can breathe, etc.
That's what I actually wrote, not some make-believe strawman you seem intent on debating.
So now the police have to witness the offense to make an arrest and wait for a warrant in all cases?
Uhhh, yes. Something called the Constitution. The police can arrest for crimes they witness, but are not "required" to arrest, cite or imprison. Fact.
The cops witnessed the event but apparently did not believe a crime had been committed. Unlike some (*cough* you), I think the rules should be followed and therefore the officers' decisions are not the be-all and end-all. The police can later investigate, take statements, take it to the DA, and get a warrant issued upon a showing of probable cause.
I know it's not as fast as your Judge Dredd, never-erroneous, instant-justice approach but seems to have worked pretty well in our nation for 229 years and counting.
