Some rebuttals:
Ask a Bear's fan what they think of Trubisky. Sure, the team (e.g. the defense) won games, but it was not because of him. He has an awful Y/A, and rarely challenges teams deep. I think almost every pundit considered him to be a bridge QB anywhere he landed.
I doubt the Steelers signed him to tier-1 QB money so pretty much by definition he is a bridge to a QB drafted and expected to be the team's leader for a long time. As to how well he performed, and him not throwing deep, and Bears winning because defense ... I guess they haven't seen the Steelers the past 3 seasons. That describes the Steelers 100%, doesn't it? If the defense had a good game, the Steelers usually won. If the defense gave up 30 points, they lost because the offense has not been good. At all.
And throwing deep?
There may not be a clear cut franchise QB, but that is not to say there wont be any Franchise QB's available. But isnt that typically the case? Most drafts may have one (or two) at most, and even then they are crap shoots.
Available how? Free agency? Which franchise has a franchise QB and does not sign him long-term or franchise him at least twice? Also, the tactic of picking a guy not seen as a top-tier QB and then hoping he becomes one is basically why the Bears selected Trubisky, no? I prefer the team pick a QB that is actually seen as a franchise guy.
That is why I keep harping on protecting draft capital, getting an extra early pick, protecting the 3rd and 4th round picks, so the team can deal their #1, another #1 the next year, and something like a #2 to move up 10-12 spots to get a guy like that.
Almost everyone has said that if Malik sits for a spell and hits his potential (a big if), he would clearly be a franchise QB.
If he sits, and if he learns, and if he gets more accurate, and if he develops, and if if grandpa had ****, he'd be grandma.
The 20th pick is hardly a "Top" pick, and certainly not that high to take a swing on a QB with a high ceiling. Obv I would love if Malik is there at 20, but I would be just as happy with the other top mobile guys (Corral, maybe Howell). Desmond also could be a nice pickup in the 2nd.
You're just rolling the dice with those guys. Okay. But getting a QB who can actually start helps the team do so next year and 2023, with better QB crops. Some years are just not good for QB drafts. Why force it?
2019 had Kyler Murray, who I thought was "ehh." He is better than that but went 1-1. After him, Daniel Jones? Dwayne Haskins? Sam Darnold and Josh Rosen in 2018? Examples of teams forcing picks in a bad QB crop.
Willis is more likely Daniel Jones than Kyler Murray, more likely Dwayne Haskins than Joe Burrow.