W. I highly suspect there will be continued chaos and dysfunction in the White House.
Don't worry. The Dems have it under control.
W. I highly suspect there will be continued chaos and dysfunction in the White House.
You haven't mentioned any facts. Saying that if another R had won the election, there would be another special investigation and talk of impeachment is both rhetorical and hypothetical. That's a very weak point. Being that several of the other R candidates warned against a Trump presidency, it's also a preposterous point, IMO.
I gave these historical and present day facts to explain why this isn't a media created crisis.
Whatever you think of Romney from a policy perspective, he is as admirable a man as you will ever meet. To find a presidential candidate of better moral character, you probably have to go back to Abraham Lincoln and George Washington. Romney never said a rude word about a woman in his life.
So what happened? Did Romney and the GOP get credit in the press for the candidates’s outstanding character? No. Romney, who helped to create tens of thousands of jobs at Bain Capital, was denounced as a “vulture capitalist” and blamed, absurdly, for one woman’s developing cancer. The Washington Post made a front page story of the fact that 50 years earlier, when he was in high school, he and others had cut a classmate’s hair. Oh, and Romney was a racist, too.
McCain is a great patriot, a man of extraordinary character and courage who survived years of torture and abuse as a prisoner of war in Vietnam. Did the liberal media give Republicans credit for nominating such a hero? No. The New York Times, to its everlasting shame, peddled a false rumor that McCain had an affair with a lobbyist. (Bill Clinton would have done that before breakfast.) It also berated McCain for failing to release his medical records–which, actually, he did, unlike Bill Clinton and Barack Obama.
Chris Matthews on MSNBC: “Why would someone running for president . . . lay the blame on those young people in Oregon who were just killed by a mass murderer?” New York Daily News headline: “2016 contender Ben Carson defends remarks criticizing victims of Oregon shooting.” It was grotesque libel.
But even that libel might have even outdone by the reaction to Carson’s comments about the Holocaust and guns: “The likelihood of Hitler being able to accomplish his goals would have been greatly diminished if the people had been armed.” Those comments were actually labeled anti-Semitic.
You are seriously as easy to reason with as reasoning with a chimpanzee. I never said there would be another special investigation or talk of impeachment if it were another person in the suit, now did I?
Go back, re-read the posts and quote me in context.
I've made the blanket FACTUAL statement that any R would be attacked and the Left and the MSM would work to destroy him/her. It's a fact. Not an opinion. It's happened to every major political Conservative candidate for 20 years.
I've repeated this for you 3 times, as is. How is this simple, factual concept so difficult for your feeble mind to grasp, or why can't you contain the premise and limit it as presented without attempting to recant it incorrectly over and over? I've never given you much credit for intelligence. Less so now.
Here's some examples Troggie. A history. It doesn't matter who would be in the suit. The MSM and Democrats will work to destroy said person.
http://www.nationalreview.com/ben-carson-the-left-is-smearing-him
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/L42aXh4CvuA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
LOL! You've come unhinged!
Romney!?!? He was calling Trump a phony and a fraud long before any of this Russia scandal broke. He's part of the problem according to you.
McCain?!?! He's also part of the MSM machine set on destroying Trump.
First of all i am not liberal. Second i feel that hillary should have been prosecuted. However none of that matters or pertains to this situation. Just because the president can declassify stuff does not mean he should. The president can order a bombing run on canada if he wants. This information was not shared with our other allies. Trump has admitted he shared the Intel so that is not even debateable anymore. Like i said if this was hillary or obama most of you would have want them hanged publically. Wrong is wrong no matter which party you are for
If it was Hillary or Obama, then the media wouldn't have reported on it...
You are delusional if you believe this. Completely. One only has to look at what the media and Democrats have done to Republican candidates and politicians for the past 20 years...Herman Cain, Ben Carson, George Bush, John McCain, Mitt Romney, Sarah Palin, and dozens of others. I suppose you would say Ben Carson is an insulting provocateur. Or Allen West is. The minute there is a candidate set to run in an election with R next to his or her name, it's an onslaught. WashPo and others sick legions of reporters on them attempting to dig up or create dirt. Evidence being WashPo putting 20 reporters dedicated to attacking Trump during the election. Or CNN trying to make a story out of ice cream. Or the press going ape **** that Trump went to dinner soon after the election and didn't invite the press corps. Those last two examples show the absurdity of the bald-face tactics the media is playing - destroy at all costs. The suit is irrelevant.
It's a machine. A long standing machine. To claim otherwise is fool-hardy.
LOL! You've come unhinged!
Romney!?!? He was calling Trump a phony and a fraud long before any of this Russia scandal broke. He's part of the problem according to you.
McCain?!?! He's also part of the MSM machine set on destroying Trump.
Why are you yelling at me? Before you pop an artery, my answer is of course I'll accept the outcome of the Robert Mueller-led inquiry. A special prosecutor was badly needed in this scenario, it's time to get to the bottom of all the collusion & corruption of the Trump campaign and administration. I don't 'want' any particular outcome besides calling for an independent, fair, probing search for the facts in the case. Those will bear out, sooner or later, and it won't be pretty I'm afraid. But at the end of the day if Trump and his team of shady cronies and cohorts are able to clear their names of any wrongdoing, then yes, I will accept that and apologize here on the board.
You mean like when the media didn't report on the emails or when they didn't report about comey re opening the investigation right before the election?
The irony is that I think you Trump supporters are the ones that've lost your minds. We'll just have to agree to disagree I guess.Just wanting to be able to hold you to it if and when he is found to be clear. We have had some reasonable discussions in the past just seems like you have lost your mind over Trump like most other Liberals.
I don't think he was talking about those people in particular. He was pointing out the MSM TREATMENT OF those people when for all intents and purposes they all exhibited strong moral character.
Um, that's the point. He used examples of people who have actually sided with much of the media's take on Trump and then he insists it's not Trump, it's the media. Preposterous.
I don't think he was talking about those people in particular. He was pointing out the MSM TREATMENT OF those people when for all intents and purposes they all exhibited strong moral character.
NO, that's not the point.
In the past, the MSM has twisted the words and deeds of right leaning politicians in an effort to discredit them, and at the same time made excuses for the words and deeds of left leaning politicians. THAT is the point being made.
I had more intelligent discourse with that cute little man last night than with Trogtard here ever. A ton more substance too.
Well, OK but good luck getting him to explain all of the late night Trump jokes to you.
I call bullshit again say all you want about intelligence being black and white Everyone has an agenda. Politics does get into intelligence it can't be helped. Those who run things have great influence on how and what gets investigated and what gets buried. You are naive to believe otherwise. People do get killed over politics in intelligence operations. Benghazi is just one example.
Sent from my iPhone using Steeler Nation mobile app
Fox News 52% negative? I think you need to subtract about 50% from those figures.
Fox News 52% negative? I think you need to subtract about 50% from those figures.
Apparently you don't watch Fox. They have not given Trump a free pass by any means.