Who cares if the KKK sides with Obama. The new Black Panther Party (racists, terrorist group) and Black Lives Matter (75% hate group advocating killing cops and white people) both support Killary.
The Trump campaign denounced an apparent endorsement from the Ku Klux Klan publication “The Crusader. The paper’s front page read “Make America Great Again,” a slogan used by Trump during the election season. “You can see it on the shirts, buttons, posters and ball caps. … But can it happen? Can America really be great again? This is what we will soon find out!” it read.
The campaign denounced the support in a statement later.
“This publication is repulsive and their views do not represent the tens of millions of Americans who are uniting behind our campaign.”
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...n-goes-after-heckler-as-rhetoric-revs-up.html
Wow you got hate that Tibs he publicly denounces them. Sorry doesn't fit your narrative.
Not sure you want to get rid of the Raccoons if it requires burning your house down to be rid of them.
If Trump were actually elected, investment dollars would flee this country, our economy sent into reverse.
Not sure you want to get rid of the Raccoons if it requires burning your house down to be rid of them.
If Trump were actually elected, investment dollars would flee this country, our economy sent into reverse.
Not sure you want to get rid of the Raccoons if it requires burning your house down to be rid of them.
If Trump were actually elected, investment dollars would flee this country, our economy sent into reverse.
I was replying to your post that only referenced ISIS. You don't even remember the **** you post here.
Hillary has a similar tax reform as Obama has had on the table for 8 years. Lower Corporate rates and eliminate deductions.
First off wig, you're not a Corporation, you're an individual. I wasn't referring to personal taxes. Next your daughter and head of household are exemptions
and not deductions.
I refer you to post #8393, Oneforthebus: "...The only thing I hold out hope for is that if Trump wins he will listen to advice from seasoned conservative experts, although I don't buy that he has a truly conservative bone in his body."
To which, in post #8398 you reply to OFTB: "When has Trump, the ultimate narcissist, ever listened to advice or questioned his own judgement? He thinks he knows more about ISIS than the generals. Potential damage worse from her? Not seeing that."
You can't post before me - be the first poster and reference ONLY ISIS in your post, then later claim that I'm the one only referencing ISIS.
Keep up Sally. I'll say again, coherence.
I've tried to vote early twice so far and when I get to my polling place, it's closed. Polls are supposed to open at 7am, and I get there by 705. Suppression???
This is like taking candy from a baby...
You accuse of me not recalling what I post, then you say this??? What does it feel like when you step in your own ****?
=======================================================
I refer you to post #8393, Oneforthebus: "...The only thing I hold out hope for is that if Trump wins he will listen to advice from seasoned conservative experts, although I don't buy that he has a truly conservative bone in his body."
To which, in post #8398 you reply to OFTB: "When has Trump, the ultimate narcissist, ever listened to advice or questioned his own judgement? He thinks he knows more about ISIS than the generals. Potential damage worse from her? Not seeing that."
Note: You don't mention China. You don't mention Boko Horam. You mention ISIS, and only ISIS. So I replied to your ISIS only comment.
Post #8409: I explained "I mean, she only helped to create ISIS, has done nothing to stem their tide, and by new WikiLeaks accounts, funded their initial and sometimes ongoing growth.
What could get worse? How about more of the same? How about importing tens of thousands of Syrian refugees (we know that ISIS has used the refugee crisis to import terrorists into other countries)? How about continuing to fund ISIS?"
Your rebuttal in #8410 was actually a diversion: "ISIS? Pffft. My concerns about Trump go way beyond ISIS." - Ummm, that actually isn't what you said in #8398 was it? You pointed ONLY to ISIS, which is the only thing therefore I attacked. Now, in 8410, you try to steer the discussion away from ISIS - because you have no substantive reply.
My reply, in #8463 - "You referenced ISIS only. Coherence. It's a word." (as in, since you didn't understand it, I addressed ISIS because that's all you brought up)
And today, #8471, your retort: "I was replying to your post that only referenced ISIS. You don't even remember the **** you post here."
=======================================================
You can't post before me - be the first poster and reference ONLY ISIS in your post, then later claim that I'm the one only referencing ISIS.
Keep up Sally. I'll say again, coherence.
Comprehension. It's a word, your's really sucks.
The subject of OFTB's post was Trump's ability to listen to, and take advice from, others. My reply was also about Trump's ability to listen to and take advice from others. I referenced the asinine comment he made about his proclaimed knowledge of ISIS as one example of his narcissism and unwillingness to listen to others. That does not make ISIS the subject of the conversation.
Your’s
Though you may see your’s written even by native speakers, it is incorrect. Yours should never have an apostrophe.