- Joined
- Apr 14, 2014
- Messages
- 2,921
- Reaction score
- 831
- Points
- 113
The cap is on wages that the social security tax is applied too
Years ago, I really liked Trump. I like brutally honest people, and I also like capitalism and American success stories. So, you know. Trump.
In the past six months, I haven’t been a fan of a lot of the way he gets his rhetoric across. He can be too abrasive in a way that has nothing to do with his campaign message, so I wonder what in the heck he’s DOING sometimes on the campaign trail. Going after veterans? Going after Carly’s face? Insinuating that George W. had something to do with 9/11? There are days when I just tune the guy out, and that’s not a good thing, if you’re trying to get people like me to vote for you, frankly.
But when I see stuff like this from the Dems? When I see little kids being put up to making a video where they’re prompted to say a bunch of curse words at the expense of Donald Trump – you know, to get votes for the other side?
It makes me look at these kids and ask, “um…how is this better than a guy who wants to correct the illegal immigration problem? How is this better than the guy who at least STARTED THE CONVERSATION about the problem of illegal immigration?” Because it is a problem, y’all. It costs us a LOT of money every year. And we’re broke, in case you haven’t noticed lately.
So congratulations, Democrats. In a contest of who-is-the-most-classless? Of a display of absolute moral decay? You just won!
There may be a sliver of left-wingers out there that think it’s adorable for little kids to be running around with their middle fingers up, screaming “motherf*cker.” But in my neck of the woods, kids still get spanked for that.
So good for you on having absolutely ZERO freaking idea how to do PR or having no idea how to PARENT, lefties.
I can fix Veterans Healthcare. I'll call it Universal Healthcare. You don't need special veterans hospitals,
you just go to the medical facilities most convenient to your home.
Social Security is easy to fix, just raise the cap on wages to where it needs to be.
I figured this would fit here. Did you see this gem from our tolerant Left? From the Democratic party of "class" that cares about the little people? This is priceless.
One of the lower-class things I've seen in quite a while. Not quite up there with harvesting baby parts, but this nearly takes the cake.
If You Didn’t Want To Vote For Donald Trump Yesterday, This May Make You Want To Today…
http://www.chicksonright.com/if-you...ld-trump-yesterday-this-may-make-you-want-to/
Where does it "need" to be? Since there is a cap on benefits, you want to turn it into yet another entitlement rather than something people paid their whole lives for? Good idea, we don't have enough of that.
As others have said, the SSRA, needs to be raised to above 67. Just like the last time the SSRA was raised, you phase it in.
2nd, decide, are you going to keep benefits about where they are now or are you going to raise the payroll tax. On everyone. I vote for the following 1. No more of the fallacy that the employer pays half. Employees pay all everyone s pay is automatically increased by 7.65%(that the right number?) 2. Determine what level of benefits can be paid based upon current contribution rates. Do this exactly as you would expect an employer to do it for a private plan. This is your new level of benefits. People in pay status or, say, within 5 or so years of pay status get the old benefit. Every one else gets the new one. 3) New benefit structure is two tier. First is flat monthly benefit, regardless of what hour pay was. Second is a function of your pay. Can keep current caps.
Do this review every 10 years. Problem solved.
As others have said, the SSRA, needs to be raised to above 67. Just like the last time the SSRA was raised, you phase it in.
you propose sending seniors back into the work force? think granny and her cataracts can design a database? or grandpa and his walker are able to still perform manual labor? exactly HOW do you propose something this asinine? the seniors paid into this. It's morally wrong to **** them in their golden years.Why should future generations continue to be the ones who get screwed out of SSRA while it's preserved for current beneficiaries?
Company provided retirement benefits (401k's, pensions, etc) used to be a lot more generous than they are now. Many employers offer no or very little match, and pensions are almost extinct.
you propose sending seniors back into the work force? think granny and her cataracts can design a database? or grandpa and his walker are able to still perform manual labor? exactly HOW do you propose something this asinine? the seniors paid into this. It's morally wrong to **** them in their golden years.
then again, i'm not a cold-hearted ******.
you propose sending seniors back into the work force? think granny and her cataracts can design a database? or grandpa and his walker are able to still perform manual labor? exactly HOW do you propose something this asinine? the seniors paid into this. It's morally wrong to **** them in their golden years.
then again, i'm not a cold-hearted ******.
I turned 55 in September. If I lived in Greece or Italy I'd be retired with full govt bennies.I prefer the term fiscal conservative, you bleeding heart liberal. But who said anything about forcing seniors back to work? How about taking the grandfather out of the grandfather clauses? I think it has a lot more to do with politics than it does economics.
I prefer the term fiscal conservative, you bleeding heart liberal. But who said anything about forcing seniors back to work? How about taking the grandfather out of the grandfather clauses? I think it has a lot more to do with politics than it does economics.
Why should future generations continue to be the ones who get screwed out of SSRA while it's preserved for current beneficiaries?
Company provided retirement benefits (401k's, pensions, etc) used to be a lot more generous than they are now. Many employers offer no or very little match, and pensions are almost extinct.
The current generation would be getting screwed out of nothing. They will be getting a benefit based upon their contribution to the program. They can, generally, be expected to work later, so their benefits should be based on such.
The grandfathering may be a nod to politics, but if you want to pass a solution, you should make it one that works and is palatable. My solution should be both if our "representatives" had any balls.
I prefer the term fiscal conservative, you bleeding heart liberal. But who said anything about forcing seniors back to work? How about taking the grandfather out of the grandfather clauses? I think it has a lot more to do with politics than it does economics.
me? holy ****. are you new here?
It was (kind of) a joke. But social security is a very liberal idea at best, and a fraud (like all insurance) at worst, IMO.